Re: [CIL users] New feature: CIL plugins

2013-09-16 Thread Jonathan Kotker
Thanks, Gabriel. I ended up having to rewrite the batch script to call the Cilly driver from within the Python script. I'm still not sure why I have to do this -- I suspect that it is because the `subprocess` module -- which allows Python to make system calls -- employs the Windows shell to make i

Re: [CIL users] New feature: CIL plugins

2013-09-16 Thread Jonathan Kotker
Thanks for the quick reply, Gabriel. I think the main issue seems to be that for some reason, I am not able to issue a command to run the Cilly executable from within the Python script. In prior versions, I was able to run the cilly.bat script. It could just be a problem with the Python script its

Re: [CIL users] New feature: CIL plugins

2013-09-16 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:59:40PM -0700, Jonathan Kotker wrote: > Chances are that I may just have to write a replacement batch script for my > own purposes. For what it's worth, I got rid of cilly.bat and .exe extensions because they seemed unnecessary on modern Windows versions. But if anyone h

Re: [CIL users] New feature: CIL plugins

2013-09-16 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:12:34PM -0700, Jonathan Kotker wrote: > Do you have any suggestions on why this might be the case, or how I might be > able to get the installation to generate a batch script or an executable? cilly.bat has indeed disappeared, but I have tested on cygwin the new pattern

Re: [CIL users] New feature: CIL plugins

2013-09-16 Thread Jonathan Kotker
Hi Gabriel. Thank you very much for pushing this new change to CIL through. I am currently trying to work with the new version of CIL and to re-integrate it into my research tool, but I find myself running into a few problems. In particular, the older version of CIL yielded a batch script (cilly.