On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:16:46AM -0800, Jonathan Kotker wrote:
> To reiterate, I am constructing a tool that uses CIL in its workflow: my
> (Python) code currently runs the "cilly" driver through a system call. I
> tried the first response that was provided, but I have since realized that
> "conf
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:16:46AM -0800, Jonathan Kotker wrote:
> I am basically looking for a way to provide the executable without having
> to include all of the CIL source code, when distributing the tool. If it's
> not possible, I wouldn't mind having the user configure and make the source
>
Hello World.
My apologies for reviving a dead thread, but I wanted to see if anyone else
had to do something similar, and how they approached the problem.
To reiterate, I am constructing a tool that uses CIL in its workflow: my
(Python) code currently runs the "cilly" driver through a system call
