Re: [CIL users] Compiling CIL on Debian, -lstr

2011-01-15 Thread Guillaume Yziquel
Le Saturday 15 Jan 2011 à 14:19:11 (+0100), Guillaume Yziquel a écrit : > Le Saturday 15 Jan 2011 à 09:04:10 (+0100), Gabriel Kerneis a écrit : > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:32:09AM +0100, Guillaume Yziquel wrote: > > > > Please try either of the following: > > > > # Official CIL svn (ignore p

Re: [CIL users] Unable to Install CIL on Windows 7 Cygwin

2011-01-15 Thread Jonathan Kotker
It works brilliantly! Merci beaucoup, Gabriel! :) On 14 January 2011 10:03, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > > - upgrade cil AND ocamlutil to latest SVN (r12118 at least) > > Ahem, r12120 actually, I forgot some configure magic. > -- >

Re: [CIL users] Compiling CIL on Debian, -lstr

2011-01-15 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:19:11PM +0100, Guillaume Yziquel wrote: > What is ocamlutil by the way? Util stuff specifically for CIL, or does > it have a wider scope than just CIL? (Just to know how and what I should > package on my system). Only used by CIL and other projects by the same research

Re: [CIL users] Compiling CIL on Debian, -lstr

2011-01-15 Thread Guillaume Yziquel
Le Friday 14 Jan 2011 à 19:24:29 (+0100), Gabriel Kerneis a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:36:49PM +0100, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > > Hmmm, looking at your prompt, it looks like you are trying to compile > > CPC rather than CIL. Is this the case? Did you fetch latest git > > version? Which

Re: [CIL users] Compiling CIL on Debian, -lstr

2011-01-15 Thread Guillaume Yziquel
Le Saturday 15 Jan 2011 à 09:04:10 (+0100), Gabriel Kerneis a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:32:09AM +0100, Guillaume Yziquel wrote: > > If there's one thing I specifically loathe, it's the way sourceforge > > repos are always buried deep into the maze of their webpages. The only > > thing I

Re: [CIL users] Compiling CIL on Debian, -lstr

2011-01-15 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:32:09AM +0100, Guillaume Yziquel wrote: > If there's one thing I specifically loathe, it's the way sourceforge > repos are always buried deep into the maze of their webpages. The only > thing I could find (and tried with the -lstr issue) is this link: You are definitely