On 1/8/18 5:45 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 05/01/2018 20:05, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Charlemagne Lasse
wrote:
First thing is the odd way how 8 bit loads to an uint8_t are handled
(see bug1_sec):
I could reproduce both issues on other targets on latest LLVm t
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Charlemagne Lasse
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just tested the clang eBPF backend. Very cool thing :)
>
> But I've noticed that the codegen creates really odd things which I
> cannot explain from my understanding of the ISA. My test is attached
> and was compiled via:
>
> clan
On 05/01/2018 20:05, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Charlemagne Lasse
wrote:
First thing is the odd way how 8 bit loads to an uint8_t are handled
(see bug1_sec):
I could reproduce both issues on other targets on latest LLVm trunk@321940,
for example AArch64 (need t
