Re: [cfe-users] [llvm-dev] LLVM docs links broken

2017-06-30 Thread Tanya Lattner via cfe-users
Added redirect and also removed doxygen from robots.txt -Tanya > On Jun 30, 2017, at 10:20 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > > Hi, > > I think we need a fix to this as soon as possible. I know people say > that out of date documentation is worse than none, but I think that's > horribly false in this

Re: [cfe-users] [llvm-dev] LLVM docs links broken

2017-06-30 Thread Dipanjan Das via cfe-users
On 30 June 2017 at 22:20, Tim Northover wrote: > I'm happy to help out wherever I can, but we need a solution. > > I agree that we need a solution ASAP. I am working on a time critical project and every time I get a hit, I need to manually fix the URL to land at the page. This is super annoying

Re: [cfe-users] [llvm-dev] LLVM docs links broken

2017-06-30 Thread Tim Northover via cfe-users
Hi, I think we need a fix to this as soon as possible. I know people say that out of date documentation is worse than none, but I think that's horribly false in this case. The LLVM API changes, but I've found even the outdated doxygen far more useful for quick questions than grepping the source.

Re: [cfe-users] [llvm-dev] LLVM docs links broken

2017-06-30 Thread Tim Northover via cfe-users
On 27 June 2017 at 19:11, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev wrote: > There was some kind of server move that happened recently; I'm > assuming this is a side-effect of that. I'd vaguely understood the old links had been deprecated for a while. Unfortunately they're still the top Google results when

Re: [cfe-users] [llvm-dev] LLVM docs links broken

2017-06-27 Thread Dipanjan Das via cfe-users
Will a permanent redirection (mod_rewrite) from old links to new links for a few days help Google learn faster? On 27 June 2017 at 20:33, Tim Northover wrote: > On 27 June 2017 at 19:11, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev > wrote: > > There was some kind of server move that happened recently; I'm >