> The phrase “clang api” is a bit vague (libclang?)
If it's possible, then of course LibClang as it's backward compatible, but
I know that it's restricted in functionality, so if LibClang don't give
such freedom, then LibTooling.
> $ echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' | clang -x c -
Thanks for
> On Jan 17, 2022, at 14:35, 0dminnimda via cfe-users
> wrote:
>
> I wanna use regular functionality of clang but instead of passing path to the
> source I want to pass string as source code. Yes, it's preferably a code that
> uses clang api and not just call to clang with source that was put
I wanna use regular functionality of clang but instead of passing path to
the source I want to pass string as source code. Yes, it's preferably a
code that uses clang api and not just call to clang with source that was
put into input, as source files are usually big.
Googled that, but not really su
