This may be same/similar to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38811
Basically, there's no owner for CUDA support on windows. Someone needs to
figure out why/how CUDA includes behave differently under mingw and figure
out how to work around that in the CUDA wrapper headers in clang.
On Fri, N
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:44, Jan Korous wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG via cfe-users <
> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration
> >> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class
> >>
> On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG via cfe-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration
>> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class
>> function declaration does not take the template parameter list into
>> account: http:/
> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration
> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class
> function declaration does not take the template parameter list into
> account: http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1
Our main lilypond developer disa
The rule for determining when a base class function declaration introduced
by a using-declaartion is hidden by a derived class function declaration
does not take the template parameter list into account:
http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1
So clang's behaviour is conforming and gc
> Sure, that'd be great - http://bugs.llvm.org
Done:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39581
Werner
___
cfe-users mailing list
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
