llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alan Zhao (alanzhao1)
Changes
This bug is caused by parenthesized list initialization not being implemented
in `CodeGenFunction::EmitNewArrayInitializer(...)`.
Parenthesized list initialization of `struct`s with `operator new` already
w
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76003
>From 860a2f794bdf12ff1f08d4802570757e805264b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:53:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [mlir][Linalg] Support dynamic sizes in `lower_pack`
transform
---
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff a7a78fd427569a7ad8a27e682a66fe414f004a35
ee4e3c8634bb876166ee753a4ebcbf3c1699a175 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: Mark de Wever (mordante)
Changes
…te initialization" (#76272)""
With updates the libc++ tests.
This reverts commit 2205d23 and relands
86dc6e1 and
7ab16fb.
Original commit was reverted because of failing libc++ tests, see #76232 for the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
Some stream functions were recently added to `StreamChecker` that were not
modeled by `StdCLibraryFunctionsChecker`. To ensure consistency these functions
are add
https://github.com/lntue closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76931
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76938
>From 1dcd4703002acdde370a285089008e409043717b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:08:28 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Changes uploaded to the phabricator on Dec 16th a
Author: 刘雨培
Date: 2024-01-05T01:32:10+08:00
New Revision: e78a1f491cbc0a57de7bf86058359dd0bd282540
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e78a1f491cbc0a57de7bf86058359dd0bd282540
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e78a1f491cbc0a57de7bf86058359dd0bd282540.diff
LOG: [Cla
https://github.com/LYP951018 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rsandifo-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76971
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rsandifo-arm commented:
Thanks for doing this, looks good! I've got some initial comments below, but I
think they probably repeat for other parts of the patch. The two main ones are:
* We should consume arguments to attribute keywords iff the attribute is
defined to take a
@@ -3696,6 +3696,12 @@ def err_sme_definition_using_sm_in_non_sme_target :
Error<
"function executed in streaming-SVE mode requires 'sme'">;
def err_sme_definition_using_za_in_non_sme_target : Error<
"function using ZA state requires 'sme'">;
+def err_conflicting_attribute
@@ -6852,30 +6852,73 @@ without changing modes.
}];
}
-def ArmSmeSharedZADocs : Documentation {
+def ArmInDocs : Documentation {
let Category = DocCatArmSmeAttributes;
let Content = [{
-The ``__arm_shared_za`` keyword applies to prototyped function types and
specifies
@@ -6787,6 +6787,9 @@ void Parser::ParseDirectDeclarator(Declarator &D) {
// For consistency with attribute parsing.
Diag(Tok, diag::err_keyword_not_allowed) << Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
ConsumeToken();
+ BalancedDelimiterTracker T(*this, tok::l_paren);
--
@@ -4033,12 +4033,27 @@ class FunctionType : public Type {
SME_NormalFunction = 0,
SME_PStateSMEnabledMask = 1 << 0,
SME_PStateSMCompatibleMask = 1 << 1,
-SME_PStateZASharedMask = 1 << 2,
-SME_PStateZAPreservedMask = 1 << 3,
-SME_AttributeMask = 0b111'11
@@ -3175,11 +3175,16 @@ static void checkArmStreamingBuiltin(Sema &S, CallExpr
*TheCall,
}
static bool hasSMEZAState(const FunctionDecl *FD) {
- if (FD->hasAttr())
-return true;
- if (const auto *T = FD->getType()->getAs())
-if (T->getAArch64SMEAttributes() & Functi
@@ -1767,14 +1767,22 @@ static void
AddAttributesFromFunctionProtoType(ASTContext &Ctx,
FPT->isNothrow())
FuncAttrs.addAttribute(llvm::Attribute::NoUnwind);
- if (FPT->getAArch64SMEAttributes() & FunctionType::SME_PStateSMEnabledMask)
+ unsigned SMEBits = FPT->get
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+//===--- MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
koute wrote:
> But I think this patch can work just fine [...] Apart from vendors' need, the
> request is mainly from Rust language community I think.
To put our 3 cents here, [we](https://github.com/paritytech) also need it. We
are (well, it's mostly me right now since it's still a prototype)
@@ -163,6 +170,40 @@ void attribute_const() {
std::as_const(n); // expected-warning {{ignoring return value}}
}
+struct D {
+ void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, D&&(*)(D&));
+ void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, D*(*)(D&));
+ void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, const D&(*)(D&)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
!
! This test is for x86_64, where exponent-letter 'q' is for
! 10-byte extended precision
-! UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
+! UNSUPPORTED: system-windows, system-aix
madanial0 wrote:
The underflow failure only occurs on AIX for powerpc not on li
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
>From f51b382fd33d4cf3f75bdaa172bb8697a6cadc9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 02:48:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Support MSPropertyRefExpr as placement arg to
new-expres
@@ -163,6 +170,40 @@ void attribute_const() {
std::as_const(n); // expected-warning {{ignoring return value}}
}
+struct D {
+ void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, D&&(*)(D&));
+ void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, D*(*)(D&));
+ void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, const D&(*)(D&)
srcarroll wrote:
It was suggested to me by @chelini to only have the `reshape` op to handle all
cases and get rid of the `expand_shape` op. We can then implement a
canonicalizer to convert when valid. I'm all for this, however want to make
sure this is the direction we want to go before I st
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76887
>From 9b90c41bd209a49de85987529bd7286401b01ef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:27:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Move nondiscard tests of ranges::contains() to the right
place.
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75373
>From 74f256d8a77ee2ba8e0d5bbb6519aa2729cf94d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:07:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Make clang report garbage target versions.
Clang always s
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
>From f51b382fd33d4cf3f75bdaa172bb8697a6cadc9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 02:48:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Support MSPropertyRefExpr as placement arg to
new-expres
@@ -130,27 +137,24 @@ C &&(&rMove)(C&) = std::move; // #8 expected-note
{{instantiation of}}
C &&(&rForward)(C&) = std::forward; // #9 expected-note {{instantiation of}}
int (&rUnrelatedMove)(B, B) = std::move;
-#if __cplusplus <= 201703L
-// expected-warning@#1 {{non-address
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
>From c46f8efd68bf5c32164a64de36081e65a7171763 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 02:48:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Support MSPropertyRefExpr as placement arg to
new-expres
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
>From c46f8efd68bf5c32164a64de36081e65a7171763 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 02:48:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] Support MSPropertyRefExpr as placement arg to
new-expres
Sirraide wrote:
Just did a rebase and also updated the release notes to mention these changes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76976
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
Sema changes look okay.
I'd like @erichkeane to look at the codegen tests
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76976
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
@@ -1073,7 +1075,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitNewArrayInitializer(
return;
}
-InitListElements = ILE->getNumInits();
+InitListElements = ILE ? ILE->getNumInits() : CPLIE->getInitExprs().size();
cor3ntin wrote:
This is not great, but I thin
@@ -1101,7 +1103,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitNewArrayInitializer(
}
CharUnits StartAlign = CurPtr.getAlignment();
-for (unsigned i = 0, e = ILE->getNumInits(); i != e; ++i) {
+ArrayRef InitExprs = ILE ? ILE->inits() : CPLIE->getInitExprs();
+for (unsigne
https://github.com/madanial0 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73903
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76887
>From 9b90c41bd209a49de85987529bd7286401b01ef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:27:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Move nondiscard tests of ranges::contains() to the right
pl
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76887
>From 9b90c41bd209a49de85987529bd7286401b01ef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:27:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Move nondiscard tests of ranges::contains() to the right
pl
ZijunZhaoCCK wrote:
> Maybe you need to update the status page, papers and release notes too:
> https://libcxx.llvm.org/Status/Ranges.html
> https://libcxx.llvm.org/ReleaseNotes/18.html
Thank you for reminding! I will update those files after I finish
`ranges::contains_subrange`.
https://git
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74926
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
Thanks for working on that!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74926
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: ChipsSpectre
Date: 2024-01-04T21:04:54+01:00
New Revision: b5a3e9639291359d5c9e16f0610393d92bc7d4c2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b5a3e9639291359d5c9e16f0610393d92bc7d4c2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b5a3e9639291359d5c9e16f0610393d92bc7d4c2.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74926
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 approved this pull request.
> Looks mostly good to me, but I wonder if we should change testTriple as well.
I thought so too based on the comment, but reviewing the code it seems
`testTriple` is trying to find evidence that a given triple (and more
specifically a
Author: Chris Cotter
Date: 2024-01-04T21:47:14+01:00
New Revision: 03ef103235752830da7b9ce5e825c0e3ddf7f45a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03ef103235752830da7b9ce5e825c0e3ddf7f45a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03ef103235752830da7b9ce5e825c0e3ddf7f45a.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
A simple clause that is permitted on a few different constructs,
'default' takes a required parameter of either 'none' or 'present'.
This patch implements parsing for it.
---
Full diff: https://github.c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
We use the OffloadBinary to contain bundled offloading objects used to
support many images / targets at the same time. The `__tgt_device_info`
struct used to contain a pointer to this underlying binar
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75373
>From 74f256d8a77ee2ba8e0d5bbb6519aa2729cf94d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:07:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Make clang report garbage target versions.
Clang always s
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff b047c9116432375586ddf7f01bf272f99d9a005c
8040f300b57fe0706ee0d5b81678ee9b7927c796 --
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66963
>From 647f5fe641b30c874bab770fced9fcec9b601161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:26:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [libc++] Implement ranges::contains_subrange
---
libcxx/i
https://github.com/XDeme created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77013
… return type.
The behavior now is consistent with the non template version.
Enabled and updated old test.
>From 45d01cbc7ec958518b1739daa9e9b0dc35c2d194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: XDeme
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: None (XDeme)
Changes
… return type.
The behavior now is consistent with the non template version.
Enabled and updated old test.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77013.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) c
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76887
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66963
>From 647f5fe641b30c874bab770fced9fcec9b601161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:26:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [libc++] Implement ranges::contains_subrange
---
libcxx/i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Joel E. Denny (jdenny-ornl)
Changes
Since D154036 landed (2a65d0388ca0 on July 7, 2023), I've been seeing many
(40-50) libomptarget test failures with errors like the following on some of
our test systems:
```
/auto/software/gcc/x8
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Rahman Lavaee (rlavaee)
Changes
Today `-split-machine-functions` and `-fbasic-block-sections={all,list}` cannot
be combined with `-basic-block-sections=labels` (the labels option will be
ignored).
The inconsistency comes from
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-binary-utilities
Author: Rahman Lavaee (rlavaee)
Changes
Today `-split-machine-functions` and `-fbasic-block-sections={all,list}` cannot
be combined with `-basic-block-sections=labels` (the labels option will be
ignored).
The inconsistency co
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahman Lavaee (rlavaee)
Changes
Today `-split-machine-functions` and `-fbasic-block-sections={all,list}` cannot
be combined with `-basic-block-sections=labels` (the labels
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Steve Cornett (stevecor)
Changes
When printing preprocessed tokens, handle newlines in string literals because
raw string literals may contain newlines.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77021.diff
2 Files Affecte
@@ -586,6 +586,16 @@ void swap(int&, int&) {
throw 1;
}
+void iter_swap(int&, int&) {
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:6: warning: an exception may be thrown in
function 'iter_swap' which should not throw exceptions
+ throw 1;
+}
+
+void iter_move(int&, int&) {
-
@@ -3914,7 +3914,15 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRecord(bool ParseAsExpr) {
// (this would still leave us with an ambiguity between template function
// and class declarations).
if (FormatTok->isOneOf(tok::colon, tok::less)) {
XDeme wrote:
Yes, that
WenleiHe wrote:
> Agreed with this concern. To do this, we probably also need a flag in the
> binary, because otherwise if we use the new toolchain for prof-gen but the
> binary built on the old toolchain, we then would generate a profile with this
> flag on but the order is the old one. My un
srcarroll wrote:
> I'm -1 on using `tensor.reshape` op. IMO, we should only use
> tensor.expand/collapse_shape; they work much better with existing
> transformations.
>
> Out of curiosity, what use case do you have in mind? Why do we lower fully
> dynamic pack op? If it is at high level graph
srcarroll wrote:
It would be easy enough for me to change what I have to only do expand and only
match fail on completely impossible cases
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76003
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
https://github.com/XDeme updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77013
>From 45d01cbc7ec958518b1739daa9e9b0dc35c2d194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: XDeme
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:04:21 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Handle templated elaborated type specifier
in function re
https://github.com/XDeme updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77013
>From 45d01cbc7ec958518b1739daa9e9b0dc35c2d194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: XDeme
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:04:21 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Handle templated elaborated type specifier
in function re
@@ -3914,7 +3914,15 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRecord(bool ParseAsExpr) {
// (this would still leave us with an ambiguity between template function
// and class declarations).
if (FormatTok->isOneOf(tok::colon, tok::less)) {
XDeme wrote:
I've upda
https://github.com/hw-1 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77031
fix bug with PCH check failed, detail with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76923
>From 50e69eac786a646491e278478bb096e361d6c4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hw-1 <8053554+h...@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: hw-1 (hw-1)
Changes
fix bug with PCH check failed, detail with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76923
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77031.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolCh
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff c1eef483b2c1ab2564e0ee1e4d1a30db11f8049f
50e69eac786a646491e278478bb096e361d6c4c1 --
https://github.com/sethp edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
srcarroll wrote:
> To be clear, I am not saying that this is not useful. I just don't know why
> this is needed.
Fair enough. Me neither. :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76003
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
@@ -404,29 +691,126 @@ constexpr unsigned char identity3b =
__builtin_bit_cast(unsigned char, identity3
namespace test_bool {
-constexpr bool test_bad_bool = bit_cast('A'); // expected-error {{must
be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note{{in call}}
+// expec
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -triple
x86_64-apple-macosx10.14.0 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -triple
x86_64-apple-macosx10.14.0 %s -fno-signed-char
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -triple
a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Stellard (tstellar)
Changes
This option is LLVM_RELEASE_ENABLE_LTO and it's turned on by default.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77035.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Release.cmake (+
@@ -404,29 +691,126 @@ constexpr unsigned char identity3b =
__builtin_bit_cast(unsigned char, identity3
namespace test_bool {
-constexpr bool test_bad_bool = bit_cast('A'); // expected-error {{must
be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note{{in call}}
+// expec
@@ -485,16 +869,16 @@ typedef bool bool17 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(17)));
typedef bool bool32 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(32)));
typedef bool bool128 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(128)));
-static_assert(bit_cast(bool8{1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0}) == (LITTLE_END ?
0x55 : 0xAA),
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -6901,51 +6916,260 @@ bool HandleOperatorDeleteCall(EvalInfo &Info, const
CallExpr *E) {
//===--===//
namespace {
-class BitCastBuffer {
- // FIXME: We're going to need bit-level granularity when we supp
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66963
>From 647f5fe641b30c874bab770fced9fcec9b601161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:26:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [libc++] Implement ranges::contains_subrange
---
libcxx/i
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66963
>From 647f5fe641b30c874bab770fced9fcec9b601161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:26:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [libc++] Implement ranges::contains_subrange
---
libcxx/i
https://github.com/HaohaiWen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76278
>From 87f3d68e82dcc752aa727f62b8b1b56b1257b343 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haohai Wen
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 13:16:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [CostModel][X86] Track fpext conversion for 16 elements
---
@@ -6901,51 +6916,260 @@ bool HandleOperatorDeleteCall(EvalInfo &Info, const
CallExpr *E) {
//===--===//
namespace {
-class BitCastBuffer {
- // FIXME: We're going to need bit-level granularity when we supp
HaohaiWen wrote:
There's cross iteration true dependency in previous experiment.
```
vcvtps2pd zmm2, ymm0
vextractf64x4 ymm0, zmm0, 1
vcvtps2pd zmm1, ymm0
```
The second cvt and first cvt of the next iteration need to wait for finish of
vextract64x4. Therefore its cost is 5.
In real scenario, va
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
1. Improve the 'errno' modeling.
2. Improve the buffer size argument's constraint.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77040.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/C
https://github.com/HaohaiWen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76933
>From 8305e5e15eaaedba58a57b179e32c6d4b2a11a44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haohai Wen
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:35:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [SEH] Add test to track EHa register liveness
verification
Th
@@ -416,6 +416,12 @@ added in the future:
This calling convention, like the `PreserveMost` calling convention, will
be
used by a future version of the ObjectiveC runtime and should be considered
experimental at this time.
+"``preserve_nonecc``" - The `PreserveNone`
https://github.com/XDeme created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77045
Fixes llvm/llvm-project#76716
Added a check to prevent null deferencing
>From d9cbbe48b96d27bff3fc926b60d039ed05f00489 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: XDeme
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:23:16 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [cla
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: None (XDeme)
Changes
Fixes llvm/llvm-project#76716
Added a check to prevent null deferencing
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77045.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/WhitespaceManager.cp
WenleiHe wrote:
> ongoing effort to extends PGO instrumentation to GPU device code
Is there a high level description for this effort and its goal? Traditional
compiler PGO is mostly for profiling control-flow, but we don't usually have a
lot of control flow for GPU kernels.
https://github.co
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 054b5fc0fd41bcbadcc6967c39a5f6bb151bdcd1
eb42407a523f9a79afca4fbf221b344330888cc6 --
HaohaiWen wrote:
Refer https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76921 for failure output
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76933
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/daltairwalter updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70621
>From f44d7746a990a3bd8e53de047a30baee4da2c790 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Walter
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:08:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Initial commit of add new check before changes
---
..
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+; RUN: llc --verify-machineinstrs < %s
+source_filename = "test.cpp"
+target datalayout =
"e-m:w-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc19.12.0"
+
+$"?test@Test@@Plugin@@Host@@@Z" = comd
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From e3863873ab817dacf8680763bb42d91f005fe5ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This patch adds a pe
@@ -3369,6 +3369,36 @@ static void handleSectionAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
}
}
+static void handleCodeModelAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ StringRef CM;
+ StringRef Str;
+ SourceLocation LiteralLoc;
+ bool Ok = false;
+ // Check tha
koute wrote:
Side note: shouldn't we also update `compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/{save,
restore}.S`? E.g. with something like this:
```patch
diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/restore.S
b/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/restore.S
index 73f64a920d66..2e185ecae3f7 100644
--- a/compiler-r
4801 - 4900 of 429361 matches
Mail list logo
