@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+//===--- AddPureVirtualOverride.cpp --*-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/zyn0217 commented:
Just a drive-by comment. Thanks for working on it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139348
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139374
>From 1e359714374418bf51e93d54169557c29bddf7c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 18:59:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Don't ditch typo-corrected lookup result
For a membe
@@ -12166,6 +12174,15 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
diag::note_ovl_candidate_explicit_arg_mismatch_unnamed)
<< (index + 1);
}
+
+if (PartialDiagnosticAt *PDiag = DeductionFailure.getSFINAEDiagnost
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139276
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1476,8 +1478,8 @@ namespace {
}
}
-TemplateArgument
-getTemplateArgumentPackPatternForRewrite(const TemplateArgument &TA) {
+TemplateArgument getTemplateArgumentorUnsubstitutedExpansionPattern(
zyn0217 wrote:
```suggestion
Templa
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
one nit, else LG!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139057
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Thanks for the iteration!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139276
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4549,6 +4549,10 @@ class PackIndexingExpr final
bool isFullySubstituted() const { return FullySubstituted; }
+ bool isPartiallySubstituted() const {
+return isValueDependent() && TransformedExpressions;
+ };
zyn0217 wrote:
Trailing semicolon
htt
@@ -4549,6 +4549,10 @@ class PackIndexingExpr final
bool isFullySubstituted() const { return FullySubstituted; }
+ bool isPartiallySubstituted() const {
zyn0217 wrote:
Please document the difference with FullySubstituted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ T f1(T t1, U u1, int i1, T** tpp)
i1 = t1[u1];
i1 *= t1;
- i1(u1, t1); // expected-error {{called object type 'int' is not a function
or function pointer}}
+ i1(u1, t1);
zyn0217 wrote:
This is unfortunate
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
LGTM assuming clang-formatted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139246
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139246
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -779,3 +781,59 @@ template
consteval void S::mfn() requires (bool(&fn)) {}
}
+
+
+namespace GH138255 {
+
+ template
+ concept C = true;
+
+ struct Func {
+ template
+ requires C
+ static auto buggy() -> void;
+
+ template
+ requires C
+ fr
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139436
Since 346077aa, we began using the primary template's lexical DeclContext for
template arguments in order to properly instantiate a friend definition.
There is a missed peculiar case, as in a friend template is
@@ -6027,8 +6027,15 @@ void Sema::BuildVariableInstantiation(
Context.setManglingNumber(NewVar, Context.getManglingNumber(OldVar));
Context.setStaticLocalNumber(NewVar, Context.getStaticLocalNumber(OldVar));
+ bool VarTemplateWithAutoType = false;
+ QualType VarSourceTyp
zyn0217 wrote:
@mizvekov It's not a big deal to turn them into explicit specializations after
all... I pushed a commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139436
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
zyn0217 wrote:
@cor3ntin @erichkeane I question if a hack is really necessary here. We had run
into a similar situation when we broke libstdc++ 14.1 (#92439), and the
consensus then was to wait for the next dot release. I'd expect they'll fix
this issue in the next dot release too?
@jwakely W
https://github.com/zyn0217 requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106730
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1666,6 +1685,21 @@ namespace {
return inherited::TransformTemplateArgument(Input, Output, Uneval);
}
+using TreeTransform::TransformTemplateSpecializationType;
+QualType
+TransformTemplateSpecializationType(TypeLocBuilder &TLB,
+
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139436
>From 1756fbcd874097fdea256c2c5986810a011eafed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 12:54:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Stop looking for DC from dependent friend
specializa
@@ -5054,95 +5089,128 @@ bool
TreeTransform::TransformTemplateArguments(
}
if (In.getArgument().isPackExpansion()) {
- // We have a pack expansion, for which we will be substituting into
- // the pattern.
- SourceLocation Ellipsis;
- UnsignedOrNone
https://github.com/zyn0217 deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106730
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
>From 56bacf47c53aca276ae4fa6aa2972b7eda152ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:46:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] Reapply "[Clang] Implement CWG2369 "Ordering between
const
@@ -6484,6 +6499,57 @@ class SubstTemplateTypeParmType final
}
};
+/// Represents the result of substituting a set of types as a template argument
+/// that needs to be expanded later.
+///
+/// These types are always dependent and produced depending on the situations:
+///
@@ -6484,6 +6499,57 @@ class SubstTemplateTypeParmType final
}
};
+/// Represents the result of substituting a set of types as a template argument
+/// that needs to be expanded later.
+///
+/// These types are always dependent and produced depending on the situations:
+///
@@ -5054,95 +5089,128 @@ bool
TreeTransform::TransformTemplateArguments(
}
if (In.getArgument().isPackExpansion()) {
- // We have a pack expansion, for which we will be substituting into
- // the pattern.
- SourceLocation Ellipsis;
- UnsignedOrNone
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106730
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
Not yet, I haven't check GCC's recent changes yet so there might still be some
differences with them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
@@ -6484,6 +6499,57 @@ class SubstTemplateTypeParmType final
}
};
+/// Represents the result of substituting a set of types as a template argument
+/// that needs to be expanded later.
+///
+/// These types are always dependent and produced depending on the situations:
+///
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106730
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5054,95 +5089,128 @@ bool
TreeTransform::TransformTemplateArguments(
}
if (In.getArgument().isPackExpansion()) {
- // We have a pack expansion, for which we will be substituting into
- // the pattern.
- SourceLocation Ellipsis;
- UnsignedOrNone
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138122
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -27,3 +27,15 @@ template constexpr int A::n = sizeof(A) +
sizeof(T);
template inline constexpr int A::m = sizeof(A) + sizeof(T);
static_assert(A().f() == 5);
static_assert(A().g() == 5);
+
+template struct InlineAuto {
+ template inline static auto var = 5;
+};
+
+temp
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
LGTM plus nits
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138122
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z %s -emit-llvm -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu |
FileCheck %s
+template struct InlineAuto {
+ template inline static auto var = 5;
+};
+int inlineauot = InlineAuto::var;
+// CHECK: @_ZN10InlineAutoIiE3varIiEE = {{.*}}i32 5{{.*}}co
@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z %s -emit-llvm -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu |
FileCheck %s
+template struct InlineAuto {
+ template inline static auto var = 5;
+};
+int inlineauot = InlineAuto::var;
zyn0217 wrote:
inlineauto?
https://github
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138122
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140714
When using InitChecker with VerifyOnly, we create a new designated initializer
to handle anonymous fields. However in the last call to
CheckDesignatedInitializer, the subinitializer isn't properly preserved but
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1321,4 +1321,39 @@ namespace GH139160{
// expected-note@-2
{{non-constexpr function 'make_struct' cannot be used in a constant expression}}
};
+// taken from: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/139818
+namespace GH
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140680
For a dependent variable template specialization, we don't build a dependent
Decl node or a DeclRefExpr to represent it. Instead, we preserve the
UnresolvedLookupExpr until instantiation.
However, this approac
@@ -2189,8 +2189,14 @@ StmtProfiler::VisitCXXPseudoDestructorExpr(const
CXXPseudoDestructorExpr *S) {
void StmtProfiler::VisitOverloadExpr(const OverloadExpr *S) {
VisitExpr(S);
- VisitNestedNameSpecifier(S->getQualifier());
- VisitName(S->getName(), /*TreatAsDecl*/ true)
zyn0217 wrote:
Does it fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/115289?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140576
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
@rupprecht That doesn't seem right... Will look into it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140029
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140655
This introduced a bug where noexcept specifiers are involved, as reported in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140029#issuecomment-2892259764
Addressing that doesn't seem trivial at the moment, so I'll
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
I reverted it :(
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140029
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138122
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
>From 56bacf47c53aca276ae4fa6aa2972b7eda152ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:46:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] Reapply "[Clang] Implement CWG2369 "Ordering between
const
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
>From 56bacf47c53aca276ae4fa6aa2972b7eda152ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:46:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] Reapply "[Clang] Implement CWG2369 "Ordering between
const
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141547
I think the intent of df18ee96206 was to substitute only those non-packs into a
pack expansion type (e.g. `T` in `T::pack`...), so let's hold off pack
expansions explicitly, in case there are calls coming from
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141547
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141547
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
>From 56bacf47c53aca276ae4fa6aa2972b7eda152ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:46:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] Reapply "[Clang] Implement CWG2369 "Ordering between
const
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
>From 56bacf47c53aca276ae4fa6aa2972b7eda152ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:46:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] Reapply "[Clang] Implement CWG2369 "Ordering between
const
zyn0217 wrote:
@cor3ntin it's ready :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
Sure, let's just wait until CWG opines.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141340
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141340
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/200f3bd39562f4d605f13567398025d30fa27d61
introduced a parsing scope to avoid deferring access checking
for friend declarations. That turned out to be insufficient beca
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141741
032ad59 taught the instantiator to expand template argument packs for rewrite.
However we might already be in a pack expansion when we synthesizing the CTAD
guide, so we reset the ArgPackSubstIndex to ensure it
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141741
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
@cor3ntin can we merge it? building clang with ToT clang results in a lot of
warnings now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141091
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
@@ -522,6 +522,12 @@ enum class TemplateSubstitutionKind : char {
llvm::PointerUnion *
findInstantiationOf(const Decl *D);
+/// Similar to \p findInstantiationOf(), but it wouldn't assert if the
+/// instantiation was not found within the current instantiation
@@ -13458,6 +13473,10 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
// FIXME: Should we have a similar limit for other forms of synthesis?
unsigned NonInstantiationEntries;
+ /// The number of \p CodeSynthesisContexts that are not constraint
+ /// substitution.
+ unsigned Non
https://github.com/zyn0217 deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140029
For a dependent variable template specialization, we don't build a dependent
Decl node or a DeclRefExpr to represent it. Instead, we preserve the
UnresolvedLookupExpr until instantiation.
However, this approac
@@ -692,6 +692,70 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseLambdaExpression() {
return ParseLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer(Intro);
}
+bool Parser::IsLambdaAfterTypeCast() {
+ assert(getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && Tok.is(tok::l_square) &&
+ "Not at the start of a possible lambda expr
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140029
>From 143a35ef0af10add4a0705ea4ca11856f00dcb83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:51:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Profile singly-resolved UnresolvedLookupExpr with the
de
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
I'll approve it, because I have a similar experience that swapping the deferred
instantiation and immediate instantiation order caused a very subtle failure of
return type deduction.
However, just as what @AaronBallman suggested, please ho
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
I'll go ahead and merge this: the eager instantiation of member templates -
even it is still dependent - doesnt look right to me
In the meantime, I'll look into the case and see if I can figure out a solution
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140930
_
@@ -563,17 +563,21 @@ class alignas(void *) Stmt {
unsigned HasFPFeatures : 1;
/// True if the call expression is a must-elide call to a coroutine.
+LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(bool)
unsigned IsCoroElideSafe : 1;
-/// Padding used to align OffsetToTrailingObject
@@ -1638,43 +1647,6 @@ CallExpr::getUnusedResultAttr(const ASTContext &Ctx)
const {
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-SourceLocation CallExpr::getBeginLoc() const {
- if (const auto *OCE = dyn_cast(this))
-return OCE->getBeginLoc();
-
- // A non-dependent call to a member
@@ -296,14 +298,18 @@ class NestedNameSpecifierLoc {
/// Retrieve the location of the beginning of this
/// nested-name-specifier.
SourceLocation getBeginLoc() const {
-return getSourceRange().getBegin();
+if (!Qualifier)
+ return SourceLocation();
+
+Nes
@@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ bool SemaOpenCL::checkBuiltinToAddr(unsigned BuiltinID,
CallExpr *Call) {
auto RT = Call->getArg(0)->getType();
if (!RT->isPointerType() ||
RT->getPointeeType().getAddressSpace() == LangAS::opencl_constant) {
-Diag(Call->getBeginLoc(), diag::e
@@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ bool SemaOpenCL::checkBuiltinToAddr(unsigned BuiltinID,
CallExpr *Call) {
auto RT = Call->getArg(0)->getType();
if (!RT->isPointerType() ||
RT->getPointeeType().getAddressSpace() == LangAS::opencl_constant) {
-Diag(Call->getBeginLoc(), diag::e
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141009
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
I feel an invalid Decl shouldn't make its way down so deeper into
instantiation. Could you check?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141207
We check the accessibility of constructors when initializing a default argument
whose type is not an aggregate.
Make sure the check is performed within the correct DeclContext. Otherwise, it
will be delayed un
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -282,4 +283,25 @@ static_assert(S().SizeOfT() == sizeof(short
*), "");
} // namespace GH68490
+namespace GH83608 {
+
+class single;
+
+class check_constructible {
+ // This makes it a non-aggregate in C++20+.
+ check_constructible() = default;
zyn0217 w
zyn0217 wrote:
> Does this fixes #62444 ?
Yes 😎
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141207
>From c63f3f82d6e4c576051532b2272abf4ac0055d7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 15:29:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Fix the access checking for non-aggregates in
defaul
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141940
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
@QiYueFeiXue I don't think @shafik means to directly copy his words to the PR
body/title. Please at least flesh out these dotted parts and make the sentences
complete, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141485
___
cfe-co
zyn0217 wrote:
/cherry-pick 61314076f
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -669,6 +669,7 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
base classes. (GH139452)
- Fixed an assertion failure in serialization of constexpr structs containing
unions. (#GH140130)
- Fixed duplicate entries in TableGen that caused the wrong attribute to be
selected. (GH#140701)
+- Fixe
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142585
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
I hope it helps!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142162
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142945
(TODO: Add explanation)
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/28181
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94052
>From cdd6868879abf4b6c991c7f2b3e9cf9673b0570a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fr
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
@maryammo I managed to reduce it to
https://godbolt.org/z/vjcoq1qaG
.. will look into it tomorrow
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145260
This removes the workaround introduced in 3e1a9cf3b8 and 1ba7dc38d.
The issues should have been already resolved elsewhere, at least removing these
lines doesn't break any existing tests.
The workaround overwr
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145260
>From 96f1c3bbbf7c07bf9d11bb907e3a35e196d181aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:31:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Back out the source location workaround for
CXXConstruct
1901 - 2000 of 2066 matches
Mail list logo
