@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -std=c++23
-verify=expected,new
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -std=c++23
-fno-relaxed-template-template-args -verify=expected,old
Endilll wrote:
Given that you're
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -std=c++23
-verify=expected,new
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -std=c++23
-fno-relaxed-template-template-args -verify=expected,old
Endilll wrote:
> Since the core i
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12702,7 +12702,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2149.html";>2149
drafting
Brace elision and array length deduction
-Not resolved
+Not
Resolved*
Endilll wrote:
As I mentioned in
https
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
-verify=expected,cxx98 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -ast-dump
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes CXX98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
-verify=expec
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90079
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
Fixes #89544
>From b9b17fa34dab666e4c77dad9cd4109f7a88d1c2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:03:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix crash when destructor definition i
Endilll wrote:
I have a vague feeling I might be fixing the symptom instead of the cause.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
>From b9b17fa34dab666e4c77dad9cd4109f7a88d1c2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:03:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Fix crash when destructor definition is preceded
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -400,24 +389,27 @@ And the compilation process for module units are like:
mod1.cppm -> clang++ mod1.cppm ... -> mod1.pcm --,--> clang++
mod1.pcm ... -> mod1.o -+
src2.cpp +> clang++
src2.cpp ---> sr
@@ -8,79 +8,60 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The imp
@@ -8,79 +8,60 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The imp
@@ -444,53 +435,57 @@ For example, the following example is allowed:
# Inconsistent debugging level.
$ clang++ -std=c++20 -g Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
-Although the two examples have inconsistent optimization and debugging level,
both of them are accepted.
+Althoug
@@ -312,75 +300,76 @@ So all of the following name is not valid by default:
__test
// and so on ...
-If you still want to use the reserved module names for any reason, use
-``-Wno-reserved-module-identifier`` to suppress the warning.
+Using a reserved module name is st
@@ -444,53 +435,57 @@ For example, the following example is allowed:
# Inconsistent debugging level.
$ clang++ -std=c++20 -g Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
-Although the two examples have inconsistent optimization and debugging level,
both of them are accepted.
+Althoug
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I have to admit that is rather shallow due to sheer amount of text, but it
still took me more like 90 minutes. Hope you find it useful.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -95,22 +76,23 @@ In this document, we use the following umbrella terms:
* A ``module interface unit`` refers to either a ``primary module interface
unit``
or a ``module interface partition unit``.
-* An ``importable module unit`` refers to either a ``module interface uni
@@ -279,8 +266,9 @@ we could put ``-x c++-module`` in front of the file. For
example,
return 0;
}
-Now the filename of the ``module interface`` ends with ``.cpp`` instead of
``.cppm``,
-we can't compile them by the original command lines. But we are still able to
do i
@@ -8,79 +8,60 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The imp
@@ -444,53 +435,57 @@ For example, the following example is allowed:
# Inconsistent debugging level.
$ clang++ -std=c++20 -g Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
-Although the two examples have inconsistent optimization and debugging level,
both of them are accepted.
+Althoug
@@ -8,79 +8,60 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The imp
@@ -444,53 +435,57 @@ For example, the following example is allowed:
# Inconsistent debugging level.
$ clang++ -std=c++20 -g Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
-Although the two examples have inconsistent optimization and debugging level,
both of them are accepted.
+Althoug
@@ -633,36 +631,36 @@ example:
// module M's interface, so is discarded
int c = use_h(); // OK
-In the above example, the function definition of ``N::g`` is elided from the
Reduced
-BMI of ``M.cppm``. Then the use of ``use_g`` in
@@ -633,36 +631,36 @@ example:
// module M's interface, so is discarded
int c = use_h(); // OK
-In the above example, the function definition of ``N::g`` is elided from the
Reduced
-BMI of ``M.cppm``. Then the use of ``use_g`` in
@@ -925,45 +923,41 @@ In that case, you need to convert your source files (.cpp
files) to module imple
// Following off should be unchanged.
...
-The module implementation unit will import the primary module implicitly.
-We don't include any headers in the module implemen
@@ -432,9 +424,8 @@ The following example is not allowed:
$ clang++ -std=c++20 M.cppm --precompile -o M.pcm
$ clang++ -std=c++23 Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
-The compiler would reject the example due to the inconsistent language options.
-Not all options are language
@@ -776,9 +773,9 @@ export-using style
using decl_n;
}
-As the example shows, you need to include all the headers containing
declarations needs
-to be exported and `using` such declarations in an `export` block. Then,
basically,
-we're done.
+This example shows how to
@@ -1817,27 +1804,29 @@ But with optimizations, things are different:
│ │
└---┘
-It would be very unfortunate if we end up with worse performance after using
modules.
-Th
@@ -738,22 +736,21 @@ the following style significantly:
import M;
... // use declarations from module M.
-The key part of the tip is to reduce the duplications from the text includes.
+Reducing the duplication from textual includes is what improves compile-time
+performan
@@ -738,22 +736,21 @@ the following style significantly:
import M;
... // use declarations from module M.
-The key part of the tip is to reduce the duplications from the text includes.
+Reducing the duplication from textual includes is what improves compile-time
+performan
@@ -444,53 +435,57 @@ For example, the following example is allowed:
# Inconsistent debugging level.
$ clang++ -std=c++20 -g Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
-Although the two examples have inconsistent optimization and debugging level,
both of them are accepted.
+Althoug
@@ -738,22 +736,21 @@ the following style significantly:
import M;
... // use declarations from module M.
-The key part of the tip is to reduce the duplications from the text includes.
+Reducing the duplication from textual includes is what improves compile-time
+performan
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Changes to `Sema.h` and DR tests look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352
Currently we're using official publication of CWG issue list available at
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_index.html. Unfortunately,
it's not updated as frequently as we sometimes need. For inst
@@ -3893,9 +3893,12 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXBindTemporaryExpr(const CXXBindTemporaryExpr *E) {
- if (E->getTemporary()->getDestructor()->isTrivial()) {
-Inherited::VisitStmt(E);
-return;
+ if (const CXXDestructorDecl *DtorDecl =
+
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90376
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I'm fine with the way DR test is written, but I'm not qualified to review the
contents on the test, unfortunately.
I'd like to point to related Core issues
[CWG2836](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2836.html) and
[CWG2864](https://cplusplus.github.
Endilll wrote:
CI has been failing because of unrelated `Clang :: Driver/amdgpu-toolchain.c`
test. I'm merging this as is.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352 has been merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89484
>From 5985dbe47e052505278d60628bbb5ca751cc3b6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: offsetof <131769984+offse...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:35:09 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Allow constex
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89484
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
>From b9b17fa34dab666e4c77dad9cd4109f7a88d1c2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:03:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Fix crash when destructor definition is preceded
@@ -3893,9 +3893,12 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXBindTemporaryExpr(const CXXBindTemporaryExpr *E) {
- if (E->getTemporary()->getDestructor()->isTrivial()) {
-Inherited::VisitStmt(E);
-return;
+ if (const CXXDestructorDecl *DtorDecl =
+
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
This patch covers CWG issues regarding declaration matching when `friend`
declarations are involved:
[CWG138](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/138.html),
[CWG386](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
>From 65307bd2f5f8ca5c6aaa24335c77a63280d668e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:45:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues about friend declarati
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
>From 65307bd2f5f8ca5c6aaa24335c77a63280d668e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:45:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues about friend declarati
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106299
[CWG2917](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2917.html) got a new proposed
resolution that is different from the one the test has been written against.
[CWG2922](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2922.
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void *operator new(std::size_t, void *p) { return p; }
void* operator new[] (std::size_t, void* p) {return p;}
-namespace cwg2922 { // cwg2922: 20 open 2024-07-10
+namespace cwg2922 { // cwg2922: 20 tentatively ready 2024-07-10
Endilll wrote
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
-namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 open 2024-07-30
+namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 review 2024-07-30
Endi
@@ -17292,43 +17292,43 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2913.html";>2913
-open
+tentatively ready
Grammar for deduction-guide has requires-clause in the
wrong position
Not resolved
https
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
-namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 open 2024-07-30
+namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 review 2024-07-30
Endi
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2099,6 +2099,70 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E, bool CountInBytes,
bool OrNull);
+ // AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+ // to repr
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106360
This patch updates `make_cxx_dr_status` script to use the same spoiler-like way
to hide additional details that `cxx_status.html` uses. This gives implemented
yet unresolved DRs new but very familiar look:
>
> I'm not a huge fan of this as I think this will be extremely annoying for
> downstream forks with very little up
@@ -204,6 +204,24 @@ class SemaPPCallbacks;
class TemplateDeductionInfo;
} // namespace sema
+// AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+// to represent what is actually causing the operation
+enum class AssignmentAction : unsigned {
+ Assi
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
Thank you for resolving your issue the hard way, and paying some of the
technical debt we accumulated over the years.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
>From 65307bd2f5f8ca5c6aaa24335c77a63280d668e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:45:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues about friend declarati
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
@cor3ntin Can you take another look? I added CWG1900 section to the PR
description. Nothing has changes for other Core issues.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
The failure is unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107019
This patch covers Core issues about language linkage during declaration
matching resolved in
[P1787R6](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p1787r6.html),
namely [CWG563](https://cplusplus.
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107131
[CWG2486](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2486.html) "Call to `noexcept`
function via `noexcept(false)` pointer/lvalue" allows `noexcept` functions to
be called via `noexcept(false)` pointers or values.
@@ -654,6 +654,9 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
- Clang now shows implicit deduction guides when diagnosing overload
resolution failure. #GH92393.
+- Clong no longer emits a no previous prototype warning for Win32 entry points
under ``-Wmissing-prototypes``.
---
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll you are able to reduce that further?
I don't see the original reproducer anywhere. Snippet in the description is
already reduced (and got quite damaged in the process). I can reduce it myself
if someone point me out to the original reproducer
https://github.com/llvm/
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -611,51 +612,25 @@ def register(value, name):
### Cursor Kinds ###
-class BaseEnumeration:
+class BaseEnumeration(Enum):
"""
Common base class for named enumerations held in sync with Index.h values.
-
-Subclasses must define their own _kinds and _name_map me
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll do you think this can be merged now?
After CI passes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
@DeinAlptraum This is also worth a release note, I think.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
The refactoring itself is worth mentioning in potentially breaking changes,
because this covers a significant surface of our Python API.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ Clang Python Bindings Potentially Breaking Changes
of variant 271.
- Renamed ``TypeKind`` variant 162 from ``OBJCCLASS`` to ``OBJCTYPEPARAM``.
The previous name was incorrect, it was a duplicate of variant 28.
+- Refactored enum usage, switching to the s
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I think this should be rebased on top of #95608 once it lands (soon).
CC @DeinAlptraum
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Changes to DR tests look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
Worth noting I've been investigating in the background whether we can do the
opposite transformation, i.e. move members of `*Bits` back to their respective
classes without increasing size of AST nodes. If anything, for the sake of
debugging experience. The prototype is here: htt
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
#95608 has been merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Python part seems fine to me, but I'd like @DeinAlptraum to confirm that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98622
Apparently we can't assume that `AutoTypeLoc` from `AutoType` is always valid.
Fixes #98164
>From 5310764fb4044bcd4229434e80b64870c4b4ee8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 202
Endilll wrote:
> Do you have an idea as to why the type location is invalid in the first place?
Looking at the new test, my guess is that `auto` remains undeduced, so it has
nowhere to point out to.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98622
___
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll Should I go ahead with this change anyways?
I would prefer if you can reduce the scope of the PR by avoiding the
introduction of `NamespaceDeclBits` (it looks like you do more than just that).
But if you feel strongly about it, I don't want to hold you off because of
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98736
This patch implements consensus on the corresponding RFC documented here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-deprecate-ofast/78687/72
Specifically, I added a deprecation warning for `-Ofast`, that suggests to use
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7416,10 +7416,11 @@ NamedDecl *Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator(
tryToFixVariablyModifiedVarType(TInfo, R, D.getIdentifierLoc(),
/*DiagID=*/0);
- if (const AutoType *AutoT = R->getAs())
-CheckConstrainedAuto(
-AutoT,
-
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Changes to DR tests look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1401 - 1500 of 2323 matches
Mail list logo
