rofirrim wrote:
LGTM. Thanks @topperc !
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126188
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rofirrim wrote:
> I'm guessing that is a yes, could you @alexey-bataev please approve the
> workflows and we proceed to merge? Then we can go straight into the
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 PR :)
I did that already.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532
___
rofirrim wrote:
Hi all, @eZWALT is changing jobs and kindly asked me if I could finish on his
behalf. I plan to go through all the items of feedback and then rebase against
main.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293
___
cfe-commits mailin
rofirrim wrote:
I'm a bit uncertain with what we want to do with `NumGeneratedLoopNests` and
`NumGeneratedLoops`.
I understand that, outside of dependent contexts, this is some sort of
synthesised attribute (in the base case from analysing the loop nests /
canonical loop sequences) that can b
@@ -1143,6 +1143,83 @@ class OMPFullClause final : public
OMPNoChildClause {
static OMPFullClause *CreateEmpty(const ASTContext &C);
};
+/// This class represents the 'looprange' clause in the
+/// '#pragma omp fuse' directive
+///
+/// \code {c}
+/// #pragma omp fuse loopr