robot updated this revision to Diff 132990.
robot added a comment.
- Reformatted using clang-format
- Fixed copy&waste error CHECK(REAL(__cxa_throw))
- moved test from asan unit test to lit tests
Repository:
rCRT Compiler Runtime
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42644
Files:
lib/asan/asan_interce
robot marked an inline comment as done.
robot added a comment.
Have you had the time to review the second revision?
Repository:
rCRT Compiler Runtime
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42644
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://l
robot added inline comments.
Comment at: test/asan/TestCases/intercept-rethrow-exception.cc:48
+ // memcpy is intercepted by asan which performs checks on src and dst
+ using T = int[1000];
+ T x {};
vitalybuka wrote:
> You can include #include
> and use __as
robot planned changes to this revision.
robot marked 3 inline comments as done.
robot added a comment.
I'm working on the comments, but it will take a while.
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/DeclarePureVirtuals.cpp:58
+
+ const llvm::ArrayRef Tokens =
+
robot marked an inline comment as done.
robot added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/DeclarePureVirtuals.cpp:58
+
+ const llvm::ArrayRef Tokens =
+ TokBuf.expandedTokens(MethodDeclRange);
sammccall wrote:
> robot wrote:
robot updated this revision to Diff 556283.
robot marked 3 inline comments as done.
robot added a comment.
Herald added a project: clang.
WIP - several improvements
I thought it might be a good idea to give an update even though this is
still work in progress.
- Don't print `virtual` for added d
robot added a comment.
I've pushed some WIP change to inform that I'm still working on this topic :)
Not sure if I also need to submit a comment to publish what I've marked as
"done" via checkboxes.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D15
robot added a comment.
> so you could replace the logic that prints the return type + arg list with
> `printType(functype, class, methodname)` (from AST.h). That should pick up
> noexcept etc.
I've tried it and it's not obvious to me how to do it properly: Since
`printType` wants to print the
robot updated this revision to Diff 532575.
robot added a comment.
Remove left-over test file of other ptch from CMakeLists.txt
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153152/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153152
Files:
clang-tools-extra/c
robot created this revision.
robot added a reviewer: sammccall.
Herald added subscribers: ChuanqiXu, kadircet, arphaman.
Herald added a project: All.
robot requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang-tools-extra.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This tweak searches the
robot added a comment.
This change is not done, I need some advice:
- I don't understand why there are two levels of data structures in an entry of
the final overriders map, hence I can't properly name the variables nor do I
fully understand what I'm doing there.
- It's not clear if the tweak s
robot updated this revision to Diff 532199.
robot added a comment.
Remove left-over file of other patch from CMakeLists.txt
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153152/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153152
Files:
clang-tools-extra/clang
robot created this revision.
robot added a reviewer: cryptoad.
robot added a project: Sanitizers.
Herald added subscribers: Sanitizers, llvm-commits, hintonda, mgorny,
kubamracek.
Fixes Bug 32434
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32434
Short summary:
std::rethrow_exception does not use _
robot added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42644#993506, @kubamracek wrote:
> Cool. Can we get a lit test as well?
This is our first patch so we're unfamiliar with the LLVM testing
infrastructure. Could you please tell us what kind of test you'd like? An
example would also be great.
14 matches
Mail list logo