[clang] [clang][coverage] fixing "if constexpr" and "if consteval" coverage report (PR #77214)

chfast wrote: > But in future it would be useful to mark whole gap there as skipped instead. > If there is interest I would do it in another PR. This would be very useful not to treat compile-time unreachable code as uncovered. Can the skipped code be marked separately in the reports? https:/

[clang] 0c82fa6 - [python][tests] Fix string comparison with "is"

Author: Paweł Bylica Date: 2020-09-28T21:11:50+02:00 New Revision: 0c82fa677f24d8a9656af41ac9cc64ea4f818bc0 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0c82fa677f24d8a9656af41ac9cc64ea4f818bc0 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0c82fa677f24d8a9656af41ac9cc64ea4f818bc0.diff

[clang] 7324535 - [clang][NFC] Fix typos in sema builtins test

Author: Paweł Bylica Date: 2023-07-18T15:40:28+02:00 New Revision: 73245359847da385182dd3b3b2168e246a69a276 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73245359847da385182dd3b3b2168e246a69a276 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73245359847da385182dd3b3b2168e246a69a276.diff

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy][use-internal-linkage] fix false positive for consteval function (PR #122141)

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++20 %s misc-use-internal-linkage %t -- -- -I%S/Inputs/use-internal-linkage + +consteval void gh122096() {} chfast wrote: Can you also check `constexpr void func_constexpr()`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy][use-internal-linkage] fix false positive for consteval function (PR #122141)

https://github.com/chfast approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122141 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits