https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134647
>From 5c7ac16d5099b192f25f17ec58dbe89cb43a7bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:46:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [KeyInstr][Clang] For range stmt atoms
This patch is
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134647
>From 5c7ac16d5099b192f25f17ec58dbe89cb43a7bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:46:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [KeyInstr][Clang] For range stmt atoms
This patch is
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -gkey-instructions
-gno-column-info -x c++ %s -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not
atomRank
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_
@@ -1118,6 +1118,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitBranchThroughCleanup(JumpDest
Dest) {
// Create the branch.
llvm::BranchInst *BI = Builder.CreateBr(Dest.getBlock());
+ // This is the primary instruction for this atom, acting in place of a ret.
OCHyams wr
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams commented:
> If I understand correctly, most of the test changes are to ensure that return
> instructions get /an/ atom group, without being specific about which? IMO
> it'd be better to make that number explicit to avoid a return accidentally
> being part of the wro
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -gkey-instructions
-gno-column-info -x c++ %s -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-CXX
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -gkey-instructi
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134652
>From a8837383c3289ab1c1e93b5fa00371241fa55fb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:28:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [KeyInstr][Clang] Ret atom
This patch is part of a
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142630
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142630
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#134647
Bot failure:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/26730/steps/6/logs/FAIL__Clang__terminate-statements_cpp
>From 36efd649134e82ec7083c1fd02ff6f11b128604f Mon Sep
Author: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: 2025-06-04T10:53:29+01:00
New Revision: ac42923c2defe51fcc9220f68d50b33b5e872933
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac42923c2defe51fcc9220f68d50b33b5e872933
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac42923c2defe51fcc9220f68d50b33b5e8729
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
* Changed base to main (sorry to everyone automatically added as reviewer - I
forgot to change to Draft PR before changing base).
* Removed Ret-atom checks (that PR hasn't been approved yet, want to land this
one now it's approved).
* Fixed broken run lines (broken in bad rebase
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134646
>From 0c7a83007e218dd7338b92f1d50319b0f35cf55f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:12:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [KeyInstr][Clang] For stmt atom
This patch is part o
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134646
>From 0c7a83007e218dd7338b92f1d50319b0f35cf55f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:12:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [KeyInstr][Clang] For stmt atom
This patch is part o
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134651
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
Reverted due to downstream failure, will fix tomorrow!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134651
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
So, to be clear:
* Verifier check was checking very few instructions per function
* Fixing the check causes coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp to fail
* Fixing the problem stops coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp failing
I suppose I could add a check for the verifier condition independently of
co
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
The verifier check was in the wrong place, meaning it wasn't actually checking
many instructions.
Fixing that causes a test failure (coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp) because coros
turn off the feature but still anno
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
>From ff6ee73af63976c34d1628692d6bf07d4d7eef34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 10:13:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fix for coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp
---
clang/lib/Co
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
>From ff6ee73af63976c34d1628692d6bf07d4d7eef34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 10:13:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fix for coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp
---
clang/lib/Co
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
>From ff6ee73af63976c34d1628692d6bf07d4d7eef34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 10:13:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fix for coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp
---
clang/lib/Co
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
>From ff6ee73af63976c34d1628692d6bf07d4d7eef34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 10:13:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] fix for coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp
---
clang/lib/Co
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
/cherry-pick 653872f782e1faaabc1da23769e6b35b10e74bde
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149101
None
>From eb49bd853b9d3c099a2d3e8dd8656095a4c1a424 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:57:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [KeyInstr] goto stmt atoms
---
clang/lib/CodeGen
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149076
Copied an aarch64 test as it was the only one I could find that exercised both
results-store codepaths.
>From 720ce66a01e37088202ef3a5117c27be8e865d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date:
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149076
>From 720ce66a01e37088202ef3a5117c27be8e865d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:16:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [KeyInstr] Inline asm atoms
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Key Instructions in Clang
+
+Key Instructions is an LLVM feature that reduces the jumpiness of optimized
code debug stepping. This document explains how Clang applies the necessary
metadata.
OCHyams wrote:
Couldn't find better wording than y
https://github.com/OCHyams commented:
Thanks for for the comments, I think I've addressed everything. I've merged
both files into the LLVM docs as I couldn't get a link to the Clang docs
working properly. How does this look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137991
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Key Instructions in Clang
+
+Key Instructions is an LLVM feature that reduces the jumpiness of optimized
code debug stepping. This document explains how Clang applies the necessary
metadata.
+
+## Implementation
+
+See the [LLVM docs](../../llvm/docs/KeyInstr
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Key Instructions in Clang
+
+Key Instructions is an LLVM feature that reduces the jumpiness of optimized
code debug stepping. This document explains how Clang applies the necessary
metadata.
+
+## Implementation
+
+See the [LLVM docs](../../llvm/docs/KeyInstr
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Key Instructions in Clang
+
+Key Instructions is an LLVM feature that reduces the jumpiness of optimized
code debug stepping. This document explains how Clang applies the necessary
metadata.
+
+## Implementation
+
+See the [LLVM docs](../../llvm/docs/KeyInstr
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Key Instructions in Clang
+
+Key Instructions is an LLVM feature that reduces the jumpiness of optimized
code debug stepping. This document explains how Clang applies the necessary
metadata.
+
+## Implementation
+
+See the [LLVM docs](../../llvm/docs/KeyInstr
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137991
>From cb89d1f1bb60db07743f1973f9b263424fab9f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:19:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [KeyInstr] Add docs
---
clang/docs/KeyInstructions
OCHyams wrote:
I don't really feel comfortable reviewing Clang patches, living mostly on the
LLVM side of things. @dwblaikie do you know who could take a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146729
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
OCHyams wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146517
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-optzns -std=c++20 \
+// RUN:-triple=x86_64 -dwarf-version=4 -debug-info-kind=limited \
+// RUN:-emit-llvm -o - %s -gkey-instructions | \
+// RUN:FileCheck %s
+
+// Check that for the coroutine b
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148244
Make the option visible, improve the help text, and add a release note.
>From e31f415c4a1ba18f771a6119bee2bc11f4f705bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:35:12 +0100
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137991
>From cb89d1f1bb60db07743f1973f9b263424fab9f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:19:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [KeyInstr] Add docs
---
clang/docs/KeyInstructions
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+# Key Instructions in Clang
+
+Key Instructions is an LLVM feature that reduces the jumpiness of optimized
code debug stepping. This document explains how Clang applies the necessary
metadata.
+
+## Implementation
+
+See the [LLVM docs](../../llvm/docs/KeyInst
OCHyams wrote:
Sorry for the wait... I've addressed the feedback - how does this look now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148244
>From e31f415c4a1ba18f771a6119bee2bc11f4f705bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:35:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] notes and helptext
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
OCHyams wrote:
So it is. Fixed!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148244
>From 8c3d449f4398c9dbc40c4be3f19f51bb2eadfc6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:35:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] notes and helptext
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
OCHyams wrote:
ty
(rebased & fixed conflict)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -gkey-instructions %s
-gno-column-info -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s
+
+// g::h and i can be memcpy'd, check the assignment gets Key Instructions
metadata.
+
+struct e {
+
OCHyams wrote:
> Keeping on the HELP checklines though: if you symlink clang to /bin/true then
> with no checklines looking for a positive match, the test will still pass,
> which sucks
Oh I see, I'll add a note to my TODOs to follow up
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144115
___
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144115
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams commented:
Addressed feedback / replied inline
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144115
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8,8 +8,14 @@
// HELP-NOT: key-instructions
// KEY-INSTRUCTIONS: "-gkey-instructions"
-// KEY-INSTRUCTIONS: "-mllvm" "-dwarf-use-key-instructions"
// NO-KEY-INSTRUCTIONS-NOT: key-instructions
- TODO: Add smoke test once some functionality has been added.
+// RUN %c
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144115
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8,8 +8,14 @@
// HELP-NOT: key-instructions
OCHyams wrote:
I'm not sure that's right - if I change `key-instructions` to `clang` I get:
```
/home/och/dev/llvm-project/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/flag.cpp:8:14:
error: HELP-NOT: excluded string foun
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144107
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Key Instructions debug info in LLVM
+
+Key Instructions reduces the jumpiness of optimized code debug stepping. This
document explains the feature and how it is implemented in LLVM. For Clang
support please see the [Clang docs](../../clang/docs/KeyInstructio
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137991
>From cb89d1f1bb60db07743f1973f9b263424fab9f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:19:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [KeyInstr] Add docs
---
clang/docs/KeyInstructions
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146517
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144107
>From 035414edf0fc80f5d69249f94f0dc39d9e1dda8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:01:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [KeyInstr] Add DISubprogram::keyInstructions bit
St
@@ -1904,7 +1904,8 @@ CGDebugInfo::createInlinedSubprogram(StringRef FuncName,
/*ScopeLine=*/0,
/*Flags=*/llvm::DINode::FlagArtificial,
/*SPFlags=*/llvm::DISubprogram::SPFlagDefinition,
-/*TParams=*/nullptr, /*ThrownTypes=*/nullptr, /*Annotations
https://github.com/OCHyams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144115
>From 5ed1dedf639090e0706d25c874ebbb4335cc26f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:39:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [KeyInstr][Clang][NFC] Don't set
-dwarf-use-key-ins
https://github.com/OCHyams approved this pull request.
Oh right, I see, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146517
It doesn't need to be a Key Instruction.
(I noticed I had this test lying around on one of my branches - the extra
coverage can't hurt?)
>From c2e0b5b06c7a22d0c52abfa6570959ded9e9fb1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
https://github.com/OCHyams commented:
Can you explain how the include helps in a bit more detail? I don't see what it
adds (I'm not very familiar with llvm-config!)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-comm
https://github.com/OCHyams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149509
That's enabling Clang's -gkey-instructions, cc1's -gkey-instructions remains
off by default.
Key Instructions improves the optimized-code debug-stepping experience in
debuggers that use DWARF's `is_stmt` line
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
/cherry-pick 5c7c8558c856712a5ef11ff5f4e7ea7d3567f625
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
/cherry-pick bbe912f1e74252f1f57b5d6c6d97a418947f4aa0
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
OCHyams wrote:
> LGTM -- is there a possibility that there'll be multiple stores coming from
> (output arguments of?) inline asm blocks? One wonders what the desired
> stepping behaviour is then: arguably you want to step through all the
> side-effects, or some might want to just consider the
201 - 288 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
