@@ -32,8 +33,9 @@ namespace llvm {
///
class BitCodeAbbrevOp {
uint64_t Val; // A literal value or data for an encoding.
- bool IsLiteral : 1; // Indicate whether this is a literal value or not.
- unsigned Enc : 3; // The encoding to use.
+ LLVM_PREFERR
@@ -74,18 +74,18 @@ enum DiagnosticClass {
struct StaticDiagInfoRec {
uint16_t DiagID;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(diag::Severity)
- uint8_t DefaultSeverity : 3;
+ uint16_t DefaultSeverity : 3;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(DiagnosticClass)
- uint8_t Class : 3;
+ uint16_t Class : 3;
@@ -410,7 +412,7 @@ class AnalyzerOptions {
// an alias to the new verbose filename option because this
// closely mimics the behavior under the old option.
ShouldWriteStableReportFilename ||
ShouldWriteVerboseReportFilename,
-An
@@ -32,8 +33,9 @@ namespace llvm {
///
class BitCodeAbbrevOp {
uint64_t Val; // A literal value or data for an encoding.
- bool IsLiteral : 1; // Indicate whether this is a literal value or not.
- unsigned Enc : 3; // The encoding to use.
+ LLVM_PREFERR
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139825
>From a28452d50023ca12435e2d60933852e1b6728fe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:17:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [NFC] Address bit-field storage sizes to ensure ideal
packing
@@ -74,20 +75,23 @@ enum DiagnosticClass {
struct StaticDiagInfoRec {
uint16_t DiagID;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(diag::Severity)
- uint8_t DefaultSeverity : 3;
+ uint16_t DefaultSeverity : 3;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(DiagnosticClass)
- uint8_t Class : 3;
+ uint16_t Class : 3;
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139825
Rate limit · GitHub
body {
background-color: #f6f8fa;
color: #24292e;
font-family: -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,Segoe
UI,Helvetica,Arial,sans-se
ojhunt wrote:
The format problems are existing style that I don't want to reformat in this PR:
```diff
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticCategories.h
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticCategories.h
index 52bb7a268b41..f7b2af8d194a 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/Diagnos
https://github.com/ojhunt closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139825
>From a28452d50023ca12435e2d60933852e1b6728fe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:17:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [NFC] Address bit-field storage sizes to ensure ideal
packing
@@ -996,7 +997,8 @@ class Sema;
/// FailureKind - The reason why this candidate is not viable.
/// Actually an OverloadFailureKind.
ojhunt wrote:
should I remove this comment now that there's a preferred type annotation?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
ojhunt wrote:
Sigh, my stage2 config didn't include -Wc++11-narrowing :-O
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139825
Rate limit · GitHub
body {
background-color: #f6f8fa;
color: #24292e;
font-family: -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,Segoe
UI,Helvetica,Arial,sans-se
ojhunt wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
> `llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast` running on `as-builder-3` while building
> `clang,llvm` at step 6 "build-unified-tree".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/2/builds/24094
>
> Here is
@@ -3595,9 +3595,9 @@ def ObjCRequiresPropertyDefs : InheritableAttr {
def PointerAuth : TypeAttr {
let Spellings = [CustomKeyword<"__ptrauth">];
- let Args = [IntArgument<"Key">,
- BoolArgument<"AddressDiscriminated", 1>,
- IntArgument<"ExtraDiscr
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136828
>From 927380bdf377581e6e40507a12c374023352c613 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][PAC] add support for options parameter to
__ptrauth
T
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136828
>From 927380bdf377581e6e40507a12c374023352c613 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][PAC] add support for options parameter to
__ptrauth
T
@@ -327,6 +330,27 @@ a discriminator determined as follows:
is ``ptrauth_blend_discriminator(&x, discriminator)``; see
`ptrauth_blend_discriminator`_.
+``ptrauth_qualifier_options``
+~
+
+The options parameter to the ``__ptrauth`` qualifier is a
@@ -65,6 +65,17 @@ enum class PointerAuthenticationMode : unsigned {
SignAndAuth
};
+static constexpr llvm::StringLiteral PointerAuthenticationOptionStrip =
"strip";
ojhunt wrote:
Oh, I hadn't included the updated to stringifying the qualifier so these wer
@@ -3595,9 +3595,9 @@ def ObjCRequiresPropertyDefs : InheritableAttr {
def PointerAuth : TypeAttr {
let Spellings = [CustomKeyword<"__ptrauth">];
- let Args = [IntArgument<"Key">,
- BoolArgument<"AddressDiscriminated", 1>,
- IntArgument<"ExtraDiscr
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ def note_replace_abs_function : Note<"use function '%0'
instead">;
def warn_pointer_abs : Warning<
"taking the absolute value of %select{pointer|function|array}0 type %1 is
suspicious">,
InGroup;
+
+// Lambda capture diagnostics
+
+def err_invalid_l
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136828
>From 927380bdf377581e6e40507a12c374023352c613 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][PAC] add support for options parameter to
__ptrauth
T
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136828
>From 927380bdf377581e6e40507a12c374023352c613 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][PAC] add support for options parameter to __ptrauth
This P
@@ -1633,8 +1633,8 @@ static void repeatForLambdaConversionFunctionCallingConvs(
CC_C,CC_X86StdCall, CC_X86FastCall, CC_X86VectorCall,
DefaultFree, DefaultMember, CallOpCC};
llvm::sort(Convs);
-llvm::iterator_range Range(
-std::begin(Conv
@@ -1633,8 +1633,8 @@ static void repeatForLambdaConversionFunctionCallingConvs(
CC_C,CC_X86StdCall, CC_X86FastCall, CC_X86VectorCall,
DefaultFree, DefaultMember, CallOpCC};
llvm::sort(Convs);
-llvm::iterator_range Range(
-std::begin(Conv
https://github.com/ojhunt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141148
Fixes #106445 by using the lexer to find the correct range for the removal
FixIts. Previously the ranges that were generated assuming no unsurprising
formatting, which for the most part works. Being correct in a
ojhunt wrote:
The fix for the core issue was more complex than the easy fix/new contributor
tag implied: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141148
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists
@@ -1633,8 +1633,8 @@ static void repeatForLambdaConversionFunctionCallingConvs(
CC_C,CC_X86StdCall, CC_X86FastCall, CC_X86VectorCall,
DefaultFree, DefaultMember, CallOpCC};
llvm::sort(Convs);
-llvm::iterator_range Range(
-std::begin(Conv
@@ -84,6 +84,21 @@ SourceLocation Sema::getLocForEndOfToken(SourceLocation Loc,
unsigned Offset) {
return Lexer::getLocForEndOfToken(Loc, Offset, SourceMgr, LangOpts);
}
+SourceRange Sema::getRangeForNextToken(SourceLocation Loc,
+ bool
@@ -2164,15 +2164,29 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildLambdaExpr(SourceLocation
StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc,
bool IsLast = (I + 1) == LSI->NumExplicitCaptures;
SourceRange FixItRange;
if (CaptureRange.isValid()) {
+auto GetTrailingEndLocat
@@ -84,6 +84,21 @@ SourceLocation Sema::getLocForEndOfToken(SourceLocation Loc,
unsigned Offset) {
return Lexer::getLocForEndOfToken(Loc, Offset, SourceMgr, LangOpts);
}
+SourceRange Sema::getRangeForNextToken(SourceLocation Loc,
+ bool
401 - 431 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
