MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
Could you just rebase, I'm not getting a clean merge of
ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108765/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108765
___
MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/docs/tools/dump_format_style.py:17
+PLURALS_FILE = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'plurals.txt')
+print(f'generated plurals (for yaml type) are stored in {PLURALS_FILE}')
+print('you can use `git checkout -- plurals
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
I still think the printing is unnecessary, tell me when the plurals will be
different otherwise keep quiet? otherwise, it confuses people making them think
they have to do something
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://revie
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
Please resubmit the patch with full context
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109557/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109557
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
I think the relevance of Left/Right East/West as a setting is less important,
as its more about an ordering, allowing some tokens to go to the Left and some
to the Right of the "type"
QualifierAlignment: Custom
QualifierOrder: [ inline, static, type, const,
MyDeveloperDay updated this revision to Diff 372292.
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
QualifierAlignmentFixer need to process all the Left/Right passes internally
before return the fixes on the original code. So now QualifierAlignmentFixer
has its own inner set of passes which will be processed,
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
This isn't really `AlignCloseBracket` but `BreakBeforeClosingParen` isn't it?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109557/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109557
__
MyDeveloperDay updated this revision to Diff 372430.
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
Allow more QualifierFixer functions to be directly tested, remove some older
commented code.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764
Files:
clang/doc
MyDeveloperDay marked 3 inline comments as done.
MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:2101
+**CVQualifierAlignment** (``CVQualifierAlignmentStyle``)
+ Different ways to arrange const/volatile qualifiers.
curd
MyDeveloperDay updated this revision to Diff 372460.
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
Herald added subscribers: dexonsmith, jdoerfert, sstefan1, mgrang, martong,
aheejin, dschuff.
Herald added a reviewer: shafik.
Herald added a reviewer: jdoerfert.
Further Demonstration of D69764: [clang-format] A
MyDeveloperDay accepted this revision.
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I guess this will prevent member functions in classes being treated as K&R
functions right? if thats the case them this LGTM
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SIN
2401 - 2411 of 2411 matches
Mail list logo