[PATCH] D72222: [Driver][CodeGen] Add -fpatchable-function-entry=N[,0]

mrutland added a comment. In D7#1837536 , @MaskRay wrote: > > For `BTI c` issue, GCC has several releases that do not work with > -mbranch-protection=bti. The Linux kernel has to develop some mechanism to > detect the undesirable placement of `bt

[PATCH] D72222: [Driver][CodeGen] Add -fpatchable-function-entry=N[,0]

mrutland added a comment. In D7#1839207 , @MaskRay wrote: > When -mbranch-protection=bti is used, due to > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92424 (existing GCC releases > have the issue), Linux/arch/arm64 has to make more checks to detect

[PATCH] D72222: [Driver][CodeGen] Add -fpatchable-function-entry=N[,0]

mrutland added a comment. In D7#1846796 , @mrutland wrote: > In D7#1839207 , @MaskRay wrote: > > > I shall also mention that we are essentially making decisions for x86 > > people's endbr32/endbr64. I hope