https://github.com/lyledean1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/lyledean1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/lyledean1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -284,6 +284,8 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
- Improve the ``-Wundefined-func-template`` warning when a function template
is not instantiated due to being unreachable in modules.
+- Clang now emits a ``-Wignored-cv-qualifiers`` diagnostic when a base class
includ
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ def GNUImaginaryConstant :
DiagGroup<"gnu-imaginary-constant">;
def IgnoredGCH : DiagGroup<"ignored-gch">;
def IgnoredReferenceQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-reference-qualifiers">;
def IgnoredQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-qualifiers",
[IgnoredReference
https://github.com/lyledean1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lyledean1 wrote:
Thanks for the review @AaronBallman , I've updated the PR from your comments
and the CI has passed - is this good to merge now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ def GNUImaginaryConstant :
DiagGroup<"gnu-imaginary-constant">;
def IgnoredGCH : DiagGroup<"ignored-gch">;
def IgnoredReferenceQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-reference-qualifiers">;
def IgnoredQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-qualifiers",
[IgnoredReference
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++11 -Wignored-qualifiers -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++11 -Wignored-base-class-qualifiers -verify
lyledean1 wrote:
I've updated those tests - so will let the CI run now and confirm everything
passes
https:
lyledean1 wrote:
CI seems to be failing with the message `no such option:
--break-system-packages` from `pip` for
`[buildkite/github-pull-requests/linux-linux-x64](https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/164119#0195f387-c1b7-4bc5-8fb8-cc8049f19033)`
and
[buildkite/githu
lyledean1 wrote:
> It isn't clear what the merge conflicts are (github won't tell me for some
> reason?) but those need fixing before we can merge this.
It was on the release notes, that's fixed now
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
_
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
- Improve the ``-Wundefined-func-template`` warning when a function template
is not instantiated due to being unreachable in modules.
+- Clang now emits a ``-Wignored-base-class-qualifiers`` diagnostic when a base
clas
https://github.com/lyledean1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lyledean1 wrote:
Happy to adjust this @MagentaTreehouse for LLVM 20 - what would that require?
@erichkeane is this ok to merge (assuming I make the changes for the above -
the CI has passed)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-co
14 matches
Mail list logo