[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping (PR #126026)

https://github.com/ergawy updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026 >From f946ee6c8c34819d36818dbc3a5430c8b9e8a059 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ergawy Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping This PR

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping (PR #126026)

https://github.com/ergawy updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026 >From 477b5b8d22ddd7b0a873519c8cc16b0e4a3c81ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ergawy Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping This PR

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream `do concurrent` loop-nest detection. (PR #127478)

https://github.com/ergawy created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127478 Upstreams the next part of `do concurrent` to OpenMP mapping pass (from AMD's ROCm implementation). See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026 for more context. This PR add loop nest detection logic. T

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping (PR #126026)

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +//===- DoConcurrentConversion.cpp -- map `DO CONCURRENT` to OpenMP loops --===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream `do concurrent` loop-nest detection. (PR #127595)

ergawy wrote: Thanks @skatrak and @bhandarkar-pranav for the approval. @kiranchandramohan @clementval I think there is a pretty simple solution that enables us to mark multi-range loop nests. I think we can add an optional attribute to the `fir::DoLoopOp` to store the loop nest depth: `nest_de

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream `do concurrent` loop-nest detection. (PR #127595)

ergawy wrote: @clementval @jeanPerier can you please take a look at the PR and @kiranchandramohan's comment above? 🙏 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127595 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream `do concurrent` loop-nest detection. (PR #127595)

ergawy wrote: @kiranchandramohan @clementval thanks for your comments (and sorry for the late response, I was off yesterday). Sure, we can works on a multi-range loop op in FIR, our team did not write the current loop op definition so I was working with what I have. Just to be on the same pag

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream `do concurrent` loop-nest detection. (PR #127595)

https://github.com/ergawy updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127595 >From 2e89efa197e7a5d3c27e33795781b1c25a123a8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ergawy Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping This

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream `do concurrent` loop-nest detection. (PR #127595)

ergawy wrote: > Extending the current fir.do_loop operation to model multi-block loop bodies > is not recommended, I think. It is there to model structured fortran loops. > If you want to handle multi-block loop bodies you will need a new operation. If it is ok, let's postpone this issue until

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Extend `do concurrent` mapping to multi-range loops (PR #127634)

https://github.com/ergawy edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127634 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent` mapping (PR #126026)

ergawy wrote: > LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64-flang-aix` running > on `ppc64-flang-aix-test` while building `clang,flang` at step 6 > "test-build-unified-tree-check-flang". > > Full details are available at: > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/201/builds/39

[clang] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Handle "loop-local values" in `do concurrent` nests (PR #127635)

https://github.com/ergawy edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127635 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

<    1   2