@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ set(ALL_ASAN_SUPPORTED_ARCH ${X86} ${X86_64} ${ARM32}
${ARM64} ${RISCV64}
${LOONGARCH64})
set(ALL_ASAN_ABI_SUPPORTED_ARCH ${X86_64} ${ARM64} ${ARM64_32})
set(ALL_DFSAN_SUPPORTED_ARCH ${X86_64} ${MIPS64} ${ARM64} ${LOONGARCH64})
+set(ALL_RADSAN_SUPPORTED_A
cjappl wrote:
Pinging possibly interested parties for review.
@yln @vitalybuka @Sirraide @AaronBallman @dougsonos @davidtrevelyan
Please feel free to add more, we don't know who all may be interested. Thanks
in advance
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
https://github.com/cjappl closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+# -*- Python -*-
+
+import os
+
+# Setup config name.
+config.name = "RADSAN" + config.name_suffix
+
+# Setup source root.
+config.test_source_root = os.path.dirname(__file__)
cjappl wrote:
Yes, the lit tests may be placed directly in `compiler-
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+//===--- radsan_context.cpp - Realtime Sanitizer --*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+//===--- radsan_context.cpp - Realtime Sanitizer --*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+//===--- radsan_context.cpp - Realtime Sanitizer --*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -1382,6 +1382,10 @@ collectSanitizerRuntimes(const ToolChain &TC, const
ArgList &Args,
StaticRuntimes.push_back("asan_cxx");
}
+ if (!SanArgs.needsSharedRt() && SanArgs.needsRadsanRt()) {
+StaticRuntimes.push_back("radsan");
+ }
cjappl wrote:
cjappl wrote:
Weekly ping of reviewers
@yln @vitalybuka @Sirraide @AaronBallman @zygoloid @compnerd @petrhosek
@isanbard
Looking for weighing in on any of the code as it stands now, or the naming
question posed by MaskRay
[here](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-nolock-and-noalloc-attributes/
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=realtime %s -S
-emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
cjappl wrote:
The basis of this test file were very similar ones for asan and tsan:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/te
@@ -995,6 +996,13 @@ void EmitAssemblyHelper::RunOptimizationPipeline(
FPM.addPass(BoundsCheckingPass());
});
+if (LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Realtime))
+ PB.registerScalarOptimizerLateEPCallback(
cjappl wrote:
Thanks
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
>From 9d3d49fa755c28b21c3b4771faae65cf418dec5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:25:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][rtsan] Introduce realtime sanitizer codegen and
driver
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
Weekly ping of outstanding reviewers @Sirraide @cor3ntin @AaronBallman and
@dougsonos.
Thanks in advance for any feedback/approvals before this goes in!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
>From 9d3d49fa755c28b21c3b4771faae65cf418dec5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:25:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang][rtsan] Introduce realtime sanitizer codegen and
driver
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -fsanitize=realtime
-emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
cjappl wrote:
Fixed all of your latest round in the latest commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
_
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=realtime %s -S
-emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
cjappl wrote:
Got rid of this test completely, thanks for the help understanding all this.
I'll mark this as resolved
https://github.com/
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
(investigating this issue right now, I'm unfamiliar with the fuzzer, so I'm
trying to figure out if this is my failure or not. Will keep people posted)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
cjappl wrote:
So it's happening in a pass away from the Realtime sanitizer pass, the top of
the stack says:
```
3. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module
'/home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-fuzzer/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/ubsan_minimal/ubsan_minimal_handlers.cpp'.
4. R
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105744
…r (#102622)"
This reverts commit d010ec6af8162a8ae4e42d2cac5282f83db0ce07.
Build failure: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/4466
>From b663988416adf8be4188c10521db585c234763a0 Mon Sep 17 00:0
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105744
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
Out of an abundance of caution I have reverted this. I am still unsure of what
in my code could have caused this failure.
If anyone out there has a bright idea please let me know. I will monitor the
builds for a bit and ensure they are back to green
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
cjappl wrote:
Tests continue to fail after reverting this:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/4474
I am trying to bisect locally, I will likely reland this with no modifications
tomorrow if it continues to look like this did not contribute to the build
failures.
https://git
cjappl wrote:
Thanks for taking a look @Sirraide , greatly appreciated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
At least 3 more failures in this way since this reversion:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/4477
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/4478
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/4479
I am going to re-land this tomorrow when I wake up
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105841
This reverts commit a1e9b7e646b76bf844e8a9a101ebd27de11992ff
This relands commit d010ec6af8162a8ae4e42d2cac5282f83db0ce07
No modifications from the original patch. It was determined that the ubsan
build failure
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
Relanded as f77e8f765e42
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
Bumped the branch to resolve the conflict in config-ix.cmake
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107707
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
> @dougsonos Maybe you should ask for commit access since you’ll likely be
> contributing more patches to this in the future as I understand it?
>
>
>
> CC @AaronBallman Does that still work like it used to or did your maintainers
> rfc change something about that too?
A few d
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111055
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -58,31 +58,71 @@ code.
return 0;
}
# Compile and link
- % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime -g example_realtime_violation.cpp
+ % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime example_realtime_violation.cpp
If a real-time safety violation is detected in a ``[[clang::nonblocking]]`
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Will let a little time pass to let Sirraide chime in, because this section of
the code isn't my forte. If you want this merged ASAP @dougsonos and you feel
confident in it, ping me and I can merge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM - would love some eyes from more established folks to make sure we are not
breaking any bw-compatability foo, and seeing as this spans the tree a bit.
Definitely I am for this change, I think the attr is more clear this way, and
we cau
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From c8b2090824d19618e876051cfcc18a4fad49649d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
Will wait to merge for a bit to let others chime in, but LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111055
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113979
None
>From d2a311863881486fbed6097d6358b096f305377a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:17:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan][NFC] Add documentation link to Function Effects
---
cjappl wrote:
CC for review @dougsonos
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113979
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -11,11 +11,16 @@ RealtimeSanitizer (a.k.a. RTSan) is a real-time safety
testing tool for C and C+
projects. RTSan can be used to detect real-time violations, i.e. calls to
methods
that are not safe for use in functions with deterministic run time
requirements.
RTSan consi
cjappl wrote:
Just a heads up, I think this broke documentation builds. After bisecting it
points to this commit.
```
ninja -C build docs-clang-html
FAILED: tools/clang/docs/CMakeFiles/docs-clang-html
~/code/radsan_cjappl/llvm-project/build/tools/clang/docs/CMakeFiles/docs-clang-html
cd ~/code
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
cjappl wrote:
Closing
This should be split into multiple reviews that do one small atomic thing.
The reviews should have good descriptions and tests.
You should try to minimize white space and formatting changes.
Feel free to resubmit if you think these changes still need to be made.
https://g
cjappl wrote:
(test failure seems unrelated, but I will ensure it's green before I submit
after I get approval, going to rebase now)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
cjappl wrote:
(doc build failure is unrelated, I will rebase after approval and make sure
that passes):
> Warning, treated as error:
> /home/runner/work/llvm-project/llvm-project/clang-build/tools/clang/docs/index.rst:89:toctree
> contains reference to nonexisting document 'ClangFormattedStatu
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114281
As suggested by @fmayer in #113979
>From 8d3e3d29b317a35a06780f8ad2a90f437b6f3bcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:50:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan][NFC] Add 'known to hav
cjappl wrote:
FYI @jurahul - having a build failure when I try to build docs after this
change. I think a few little bits were missed.
```
Warning, treated as error:
./llvm-project/build/tools/clang/docs/ClangFormattedStatus.rst:document isn't
included in any toctree
```
https://github.com/ll
https://github.com/cjappl commented:
for whatever it's worth - LGTM. Leaving to more experienced heads in this area
to actually approve.
Good sleuthing!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1259,6 +1263,12 @@ class Analyzer {
return true;
}
+bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Statement) {
+ if (Statement != TrailingRequiresClause)
cjappl wrote:
Could consider leaving a comment here saying why you skip trailing requires
clauses (some
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
cjappl wrote:
@dougsonos let me know if you want to merge this, happy to push the button when
you are OK with it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
cjappl wrote:
Happy to help. I'll merge this afternoon after the checks are green.
Excited to have these docs up, had many conversations where I've wanted to
refer people to them!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mail
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113931
The links right now show up like:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e6b3e1f-e78f-46cb-a9f7-8164b6233340";>
([rtsan](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/RealtimeSanitizer.html),
[asan](https://clang.llvm.org/d
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113931
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From c8b2090824d19618e876051cfcc18a4fad49649d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
cjappl wrote:
Thanks for the quick fix, working for me after I pulled latest main.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From 37a1728dde2cad21b9f851268c1625b7ef2dc338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
https://github.com/cjappl closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79899
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
cjappl wrote:
#114331 has been merged, so the test failure is fixed. Going to save the build
machine a workout and submit without a rebase, as this change is very unlikely
to cause any problems
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114281
___
cfe
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
Overall, very thorough. I would wait for more eyes but this LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
>From eb8712a4eb82495a84e593c375f787017380de40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/docs/Real
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
None
>From 128f414de9f19596e81db6afe5e1d0b166888775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/doc
@@ -84,6 +84,75 @@ non-zero exit code.
#14 0x0001958960dc ()
#15 0x2f557ffc ()
+Run-time flags
+--
+
+RealtimeSanitizer supports a number of run-time flags, which can be specified
in the ``RTSAN_OPTIONS`` environment variable:
+
+.. code-block::
cjappl wrote:
CC for review @davidtrevelyan
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
>From eb8712a4eb82495a84e593c375f787017380de40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/docs/
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
>From eb8712a4eb82495a84e593c375f787017380de40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:40:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [rtsan] Update docs to include run-time flags
---
clang/docs/
cjappl wrote:
And if he is interested to review/stay up to date on our docs @dougsonos for
review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
cjappl wrote:
May be worth documenting how t
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
+constructs. The feature is currently tailored for the Perform
@@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
+
+Function Effect Analysis
+
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Clang Function Effect Analysis is a C++ language extension which can warn
about "unsafe"
cjappl wrote:
It is not only C++, but also w
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl commented:
(partial review, will do another pass later today -- overall looks great so far)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From 1bdbc3baf8399c4571429cff727bfa9bb260e400 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
101 - 200 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
