asudarsa wrote:
Thanks @AlexVlx for this change. This should work fine for
SPIRV-LLVM-Translator (and SPIR-V backend). Adding @michalpaszkowski for input
from SPIR-V backend side. Recently, this restriction on LLVM IR input to our
translator was docuemnted:
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIR
asudarsa wrote:
> I'm okay with the patch in general, but I'd like either @michalpaszkowski or
> @VyacheslavLevytskyy to take a look. Just one question about doubling the
> test scope for LLVM tests with spir64 target triple.
+1 on this. I will take a look before end of week on this. Thanks
h
https://github.com/asudarsa approved this pull request.
Thanks for this change. LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88455
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
+//=-- clang-sycl-link-wrapper/ClangSYCLLinkWrapper.cpp - SYCL linker util --=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
@@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
+//=-- clang-sycl-link-wrapper/ClangSYCLLinkWrapper.cpp - SYCL linker util --=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to link
asudarsa wrote:
Good point. I will create them inside the test case. I was trying to 'mimic'
device library file usage. I suppose it's overkill. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commit
@@ -95,7 +95,19 @@ void SPIRV::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
CmdArgs.push_back("-o");
CmdArgs.push_back(Output.getFilename());
+ // Use of --sycl-link will call the clang-sycl-link-wrapper instead of
+ // the default linker (spirv-link).
+ i
asudarsa wrote:
Hi @jhuber6
Thanks much for providing your feedback. I will address all your comments in an
upcoming commit.
Sincerely
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
@@ -6728,7 +6728,10 @@ def fsycl : Flag<["-"], "fsycl">,
def fno_sycl : Flag<["-"], "fno-sycl">,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CLOption]>,
Group, HelpText<"Disables SYCL kernels compilation for device">;
-
+def sycl_link : Flag<["--"], "sycl-link">, Flags<[HelpHidden]>,
https://github.com/asudarsa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -95,7 +95,19 @@ void SPIRV::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
CmdArgs.push_back("-o");
CmdArgs.push_back(Output.getFilename());
+ // Use of --sycl-link will call the clang-sycl-link-wrapper instead of
+ // the default linker (spirv-link).
+ i
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to link
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to link
asudarsa wrote:
Earlier test fail due to lack of new tool in clang/test/lit.cfg.py.
Added it now.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
@@ -95,7 +95,19 @@ void SPIRV::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
CmdArgs.push_back("-o");
CmdArgs.push_back(Output.getFilename());
+ // Use of --sycl-link will call the clang-sycl-link-wrapper instead of
+ // the default linker (spirv-link).
+ i
asudarsa wrote:
Modified the test to just use empty files. Change can be found in
307c74ea4f910a7698a6084db710ff7b699c5c93
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
@@ -0,0 +1,528 @@
+//=-- clang-sycl-link-wrapper/ClangSYCLLinkWrapper.cpp - SYCL linker util --=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
@@ -0,0 +1,528 @@
+//=-- clang-sycl-link-wrapper/ClangSYCLLinkWrapper.cpp - SYCL linker util --=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
asudarsa wrote:
Hi @jhuber6
I have addressed all the concerns to my best ability. Thanks very much for your
guidance and feedback thus far.
Thanks
Sincerely
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to link
https://github.com/asudarsa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to li
asudarsa wrote:
clang/test/Driver is not the correct place to be testing for tool availability.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/asudarsa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
…ng device code
This PR is one of the many PRs in the SYCL upstreaming effort focusing on
device code linking during the SYCL offload compilation process. RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-offloading-desi
https://github.com/asudarsa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asudarsa wrote:
This PR is the first in the list of multiple PRs that will be submitted to add
SYCL offloading support using the new offloading model. Upcoming PRs include:
1. SYCL finalization steps that will run after llvm-link will be added to the
linking clow inside clang-sycl-link-wrapper.
asudarsa wrote:
@jhuber6
Can you please take a look at this PR when convenient? Thanks for all your
inputs in getting this PR ready.
Sincerely
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
asudarsa wrote:
Hi @llvm-beanz
Thanks so much for providing your valuable time and feedback thus far. I have
addressed the concerns raised to the best of my ability. I have added more
testing inside 'clang/test/Driver/clang-sycl-linker-test.cpp'. It will be great
if you can take another look
asudarsa wrote:
@bader, thanks for adding the SYCL label. Can you please provide your feedback
for this PR when convenient? For some reason, I am not able to add reviewers.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits maili
asudarsa wrote:
@jhuber6
Can you please take a look and comment if this change looks ok.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113613
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/asudarsa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113613
In clang-linker-wrapper, we do not explicitly check if --linker-path is
provided.
This PR adds a check to capture this.
Thanks
>From 5b890e60ad8c349254d687e96452a8f575e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arv
@@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ Error runLinker(ArrayRef Files, const ArgList
&Args) {
// Render the linker arguments and add the newly created image. We add it
// after the output file to ensure it is linked with the correct libraries.
StringRef LinkerPath = Args.getLastArgValue(OP
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+include "llvm/Option/OptParser.td"
+
+def WrapperOnlyOption : OptionFlag;
+
+def help : Flag<["-", "--"], "help">,
+ HelpText<"Display available options (--help-hidden for more)">;
+
+def help_hidden : Flag<["-", "--"], "help-hidden">,
+ HelpText<"Display all a
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// Tests the driver when linking LLVM IR bitcode files and targeting SPIR-V
+// architecture.
+//
+// RUN: touch %t.bc
+// RUN: %clangxx --target=spirv64 --sycl-link -### %t.bc 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LINK
+// LINK: "{{.*}}clang-sycl-linker
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// Tests the clang-sycl-linker tool.
+//
+// Test a simple case without arguments.
+// RUN: %clangxx -fsycl -emit-llvm -c %s -o %t.bc
+// RUN: clang-sycl-linker --dry-run -triple spirv64 %t.bc -o a.spv 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SIMPLE
+// SI
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// Tests the driver when linking LLVM IR bitcode files and targeting SPIR-V
+// architecture.
+//
+// RUN: touch %t.bc
+// RUN: %clangxx --target=spirv64 --sycl-link -### %t.bc 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LINK
+// LINK: "{{.*}}clang-sycl-linker
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+include "llvm/Option/OptParser.td"
+
+def WrapperOnlyOption : OptionFlag;
+
+def help : Flag<["-", "--"], "help">,
+ HelpText<"Display available options (--help-hidden for more)">;
+
+def help_hidden : Flag<["-", "--"], "help-hidden">,
+ HelpText<"Display all a
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to li
asudarsa wrote:
Hi @bader
Thanks very much for your feedback. I have addressed the concerns in the latest
commit.
Thanks to @jhuber6 for some responses as well.
Sincerely
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to li
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// Tests the clang-sycl-linker tool.
+//
+// Test a simple case without arguments.
+// RUN: %clangxx -fsycl -emit-llvm -c %s -o %t.bc
+// RUN: clang-sycl-linker --dry-run -triple spirv64 %t.bc -o a.spv 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SIMPLE
+// SI
@@ -0,0 +1,500 @@
+//= clang-sycl-linker/ClangSYCLLinker.cpp - SYCL Linker util ---=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// Tests the clang-sycl-linker tool.
+//
+// Test a simple case without arguments.
+// RUN: %clangxx -emit-llvm -c %s -o %t_1.bc
+// RUN: %clangxx -emit-llvm -c %s -o %t_2.bc
+// RUN: clang-sycl-linker --dry-run -triple spirv64 %t_1.bc %t_2.bc -o a.spv
2>&1 \
+/
https://github.com/asudarsa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114434
None
>From 9cfc10768adf19e41b22cd6a9fb2c781fdf4498e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:34:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Initialize SmallVector variable
Signed-off-by: Arvin
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113613
>From 5b890e60ad8c349254d687e96452a8f575e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:46:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-linker-wrapper] Add error handling for missing
asudarsa wrote:
All the failures seem to be related to missing dependencies. I am working on a
fix. Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
asudarsa wrote:
Sanitizer test failures should be resolved by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114488 (under review).
Thanks to @sarnex for the timely fix.
Sincerely
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
___
cfe-commits mailing li
asudarsa wrote:
This is not the correct fix. Closing it.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114434
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114434
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -188,6 +190,28 @@ void
SPIRVTargetCodeGenInfo::setCUDAKernelCallingConvention(
}
}
+LangAS
+SPIRVTargetCodeGenInfo::getGlobalVarAddressSpace(CodeGenModule &CGM,
+ const VarDecl *D) const {
+ assert(!CGM.getLangOpts().OpenC
asudarsa wrote:
> > Are there any tests available to check this behavior?
>
> The reworked tests do verify / rely on this behaviour, but I can add an
> individual test for both vanilla and AMDGCN flavoured SPIR-V, if that is
> preferred (might be better anyway).
Thanks @AlexVlx
I will approv
https://github.com/asudarsa approved this pull request.
LGTM. Addition of new tests can be done in this PR or a follow-up PR.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109415
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to link
asudarsa wrote:
> At a minimum I think this change needs more tests. There's a lot of code
> added with very minimal test coverage.
>
> I'm uncomfortable with adding a design that is effectively a workaround with
> an unwritten "TODO" to fix it up later, but I also don't want to needlessly
>
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
>From eff4a0300336c4c106e1d293b19e795f5ccbabc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang][SYCL] Introduce clang-sycl-link-wrapper to link
asudarsa wrote:
Hi @llvm-beanz and @jhuber6
Thanks so much for all the feedback and discussion here. I am very much
grateful for both your time and insights here. I will try to give my answers in
this comment.
An overview of the SYCL compilation flow (with a bit more emphasis on the
device c
https://github.com/asudarsa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129973
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY SPIRVToolChain : public
ToolChain {
bool useIntegratedAs() const override { return true; }
- bool IsIntegratedBackendDefault() const override { return false; }
+ bool IsIntegratedBackendDefault() const override { return tru
https://github.com/asudarsa approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129545
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133967
>From 0ab40315cd5ca320d84f87c99b8f23d9b6e8ed36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:31:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [SYCL][SPIR-V Backend][clang-sycl-linker] Add SPIR-V
b
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133967
>From 0ab40315cd5ca320d84f87c99b8f23d9b6e8ed36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:31:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [SYCL][SPIR-V Backend][clang-sycl-linker] Add SPIR-V
b
asudarsa wrote:
@sarnex, @jhuber6
Thanks much for your kind feedbacks. This is ready to be merged. Can one of you
please help?
Sincerely
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133967
>From 0ab40315cd5ca320d84f87c99b8f23d9b6e8ed36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:31:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [SYCL][SPIR-V Backend][clang-sycl-linker] Add SPIR-V
b
asudarsa wrote:
For the test failures, please resync with the tip of the repo and the test
failure should disappear.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133194
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
@@ -163,6 +220,15 @@ static inline bool IsAMDOffloadArch(OffloadArch A) {
return A >= OffloadArch::GFX600 && A < OffloadArch::Generic;
}
+static inline bool IsIntelCPUArch(OffloadArch Arch) {
asudarsa wrote:
For sake of completion, can you please add IsInte
@@ -7117,6 +7117,13 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
}
}
+ // The offloading devices do not support RTTI.
asudarsa wrote:
I see that IsHIPDevice has been added to the check here (compared to what was
deleted inside Cod
asudarsa wrote:
Hi @jhuber6
Just a quick ping to check if this PR is still alive. I can take a look if it
is.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
https://github.com/asudarsa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133776
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asudarsa wrote:
> > > @farzonl can you please revert the original commit? It seems to break
> > > just any LLVM build, so I guess the CI testing of all new PRs should be
> > > affected.
> >
> >
> > I don't see it breaking any build in LLVM, just the amd offload ones. Al
> > the Premerge test
https://github.com/asudarsa approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133776
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133797
>From 675595e453b2452e49847ba3b949909367c7942a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Sudarsanam
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:04:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-sycl-linker] Replace llvm-link with API calls
T
https://github.com/asudarsa commented:
I tried to build it locally and I got a series of 'undefined reference' errors.
Sorry, I will need to revert my approval.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133776
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
asudarsa wrote:
Please remove redundant 'support' from PR topic
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133194
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asudarsa wrote:
> Shouldn't we be able to just use LTO after the SPIR-V backend left
> experimental?
Hi @jhuber6
Thanks for the ping back. That is the eventual path for us. However, we would
like to do it in stages. Replacing llvm-link tool with linkInModule call helps
us to achieve one of
asudarsa wrote:
@jhuber6
Can you please take a look? This is one of the many changes we are making to
upstream SYCL.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133797
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
https://github.com/asudarsa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133797
This PR has the following changes:
Replace llvm-link with calls to linkInModule to link device files Add
-print-linked-module option to dump linked module for testing Added a test to
verify that linking is wo
79 matches
Mail list logo
