Re: [PATCH] D18489: [PGO, clang] Comment how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped to function names

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
anemet added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18489#384851, @davidxl wrote: > What I meant is that putting the comments in InstrProfData.inc file, and > update the one in CodeGenPGO.cpp to reference that. Sounds good. You mean CGCall.cpp instead of CodeGenPGO.cpp though, correct? So to

Re: [PATCH] D18489: [PGO, clang] Comment how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped to function names

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
anemet accepted this revision. anemet added a reviewer: anemet. anemet added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Was accepted by davidxl. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18489 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

Re: [PATCH] D18489: [PGO, clang] Comment how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped to function names

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL264678: [PGO] More comments how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped (authored by anemet). Changed prior to commit: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18489?vs=51713&id=51845#toc Repository: rL LLVM

r264681 - [PGO] More comments how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
Author: anemet Date: Mon Mar 28 17:18:53 2016 New Revision: 264681 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=264681&view=rev Log: [PGO] More comments how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped to function names Summary: Hopefully this will make it easier for the next person to figure

Re: [PATCH] D18489: [PGO, clang] Comment how function pointers for indirect calls are mapped to function names

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
anemet added a comment. The summary of commits: llvm: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL264678 compiler-rt: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL264680 clang: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL264681 Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D18489 ___ cfe-commits maili

Re: r226298 - [AVX512] Add intrinsics for masked aligned FP loads and stores

2016-01-18 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > - Original Message - >> From: "Adam Nemet" >> To: cfe-comm...@cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 12:51:50 PM >> Subject: r226298 - [AVX512] Add intrinsics for masked aligned FP loads and >> stores >> >> Author: anemet >

r258108 - [AVX512] Fix typo in r226298

2016-01-18 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
Author: anemet Date: Mon Jan 18 20:02:25 2016 New Revision: 258108 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=258108&view=rev Log: [AVX512] Fix typo in r226298 Hal noticed that the double/float got mixed up on the parameters for these. Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Headers/avx512fintrin.h Modif

Re: r226298 - [AVX512] Add intrinsics for masked aligned FP loads and stores

2016-01-18 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > > >> On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Adam Nemet" >>> To: cfe-comm...@cs.uiuc.edu >>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 12:51:50 PM >>> Subject: r226298 - [AVX512] Add intrinsics for m

[clang] [clang] [ARM] Explicitly enable NEON for Windows/Darwin targets (PR #122095)

2025-04-03 Thread Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
@@ -659,13 +659,21 @@ llvm::ARM::FPUKind arm::getARMTargetFeatures(const Driver &D, CPUArgFPUKind != llvm::ARM::FK_INVALID ? CPUArgFPUKind : ArchArgFPUKind; (void)llvm::ARM::getFPUFeatures(FPUKind, Features); } else { +bool Generic = true; if (!ForAS) {

<    1   2