https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
>From 72aafcc255bbcfccb3fa5317e260faf97a3dfed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:45:11 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Removed warnings for unnamed bitfields
---
...
https://github.com/kr-2003 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kr-2003 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
Fixes #132001
Edit ```isNonUnionUninit``` (caller of ```isPrimitiveUninit```): Add a check
before calling ```isPrimitiveUninit```
```cpp
if (isPrimitiveType(T)) {
if (I->isUnnamedBitField()) {
continue;
https://github.com/kr-2003 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kr-2003 wrote:
> Could you add a test case that fails before your patch?
Sure, here it is
## Testcase
```cpp
struct S
{
S(bool b)
: b(b)
{}
bool b{false};
long long : 7; // padding
};
void f()
{
S s(true);
}
```
### Before Patch
https://github.com/user-attachments/asset
https://github.com/kr-2003 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kr-2003 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
>From 72aafcc255bbcfccb3fa5317e260faf97a3dfed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:45:11 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][analyzer] Removed warnings for unnamed bitfields
---
...
kr-2003 wrote:
> > My proposal is to judge the current `FieldDecl` at the beginning of the
> > loop, and if it's a UnamedBitField, just skip it, because at that point the
> > UnamedBitField's static check should be passing. If it's a NamedBitField
> > then it needs to be initialized to pass th
kr-2003 wrote:
Hey, @vgvassilev
Curious to know the status of this. Thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kr-2003 wrote:
> Hmmm confused !
>
> So does it really come down to the flag responsible for enabling assertions.
> `LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON`
Seems like it. This is the only flag that explains this behaviour.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127087
__
kr-2003 wrote:
> My theory with limited testing: The crash is caused by assertion failure at
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/eb7c947272952d40d3235d89652a10da52cb2b4d/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp#L1757C1-L1758C54.
> So if we disable assertions it does not crash, and crashes otherwise.
kr-2003 wrote:
> There are quite some observations made by @kr-2003 and me here.
>
> 1. We realize even without this fix, stuff worked perfectly on our Macos ARM
> devices. So looks like a Ubuntu issue anyways
>
>  JIT execution.
2. Fetching PID of the launched out-of-process(OOP) JIT executor.
>From fbe434483153
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
>From fbe4344831538480be33accd35ef618c6d0e50b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:55:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] pipes for redirection in oop jit
---
.../clang/Interpreter/Remote
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
>From fbe4344831538480be33accd35ef618c6d0e50b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:55:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] pipes for redirection in oop jit
---
.../clang/Interpreter/Remote
https://github.com/kr-2003 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kr-2003 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
>From fbe4344831538480be33accd35ef618c6d0e50b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:55:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] pipes for redirection in oop jit
---
.../clang/Interpreter/Remote
@@ -23,10 +23,19 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#ifdef LLVM_ON_UNIX
+#include
+#else
+// Windows/MSVC fallback
+#define STDIN_FILENO 0
+#define STDOUT_FILENO 1
+#define STDERR_FILENO 2
+#endif
kr-2003 wrote:
yes, i don't think we need these now
https://gi
kr-2003 wrote:
> We will probably need a test in clang/unittest/Interpreter
Ok. So, replicating clang-repl's way of creating interpreter when
out-of-process should work, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
___
cfe-commits mailing
23 matches
Mail list logo
