@@ -1669,6 +1669,94 @@ def GetGlobalOp : CIR_Op<"get_global",
}];
}
+//===--===//
+// SetBitfieldOp
+//===--===//
+
+def SetBitfieldOp : CI
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@AaronBallman could you review these changes? thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1054,10 +1054,26 @@ const VarRegion *MemRegionManager::getVarRegion(const
VarDecl *D,
assert(!Ty.isNull());
if (Ty.isConstQualified()) {
sReg = getGlobalsRegion(MemRegion::GlobalImmutableSpaceRegionKind);
-} else if (Ctx.getSourceManager().isInSystemHeade
@@ -0,0 +1,504 @@
+//===- LifetimeSafety.cpp - C++ Lifetime Safety Analysis -*-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@fee1-dead Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a buil
Author: beef
Date: 2025-07-10T08:28:06-07:00
New Revision: 9bd4ab7f517a6c1feb57209b9df8d66e3c3ddf32
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9bd4ab7f517a6c1feb57209b9df8d66e3c3ddf32
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9bd4ab7f517a6c1feb57209b9df8d66e3c3ddf32.diff
LOG: [cl
https://github.com/nathanchance closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143497
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 commented:
It seems like this is not actually returning the set of (what Clang calls)
visible modules. Can you clarify what the desired semantics actually is?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147969
___
cfe-com
@@ -519,6 +528,8 @@ class FullDeps {
});
JOS.attributeArray("clang-module-deps",
toJSONSorted(JOS, I.ClangModuleDeps));
+JOS.attributeArray("visible-clang-modules",
@@ -993,6 +1000,28 @@ bool ModuleDepCollector::isPrebuiltModule(const Module
*M) {
return true;
}
+void ModuleDepCollector::addVisibleModules() {
+ llvm::DenseSet ImportedModules;
+ auto InsertVisibleModules = [&](const Module *M) {
+if (ImportedModules.contains(M))
+
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+// This test verifies that the modules visible to the translation unit are
computed in dependency scanning.
+// "client" represents the translation unit that imports an explicit
submodule, that only exports one other module.
+// Thus, the dependencies of the t
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147969
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote:
> @ilovepi
>
> > There's a large number of tests. Many of these look like they're close to
> > an existing test ... in these cases is it possible to just use the existing
> > test file and add checks under a prefix?
>
> I originally recommended that @anthonyhatran write new tes
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147766
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature +sve -verify
-verify-ignore-unexpected=error,note -emit-llvm -o - %s
-
-#include
-
-void test_bfloat(svbool_t pg, uint64_t u64, int64_t i64, const bfloat
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fclang-abi-compat=latest -triple aarch64 -target-feature
+sve -target-feature +bf16 -disable-O0-optnone -Werror -Wall -emi
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ constexpr bool test() {
{
// bidi
-int buffer[2] = {1, 2};
+int buffer[3] = {1, 2, 3};
cor3ntin wrote:
Well, the test is called `increment.pass.cpp`, and used to be valid, so I
assume it should remain valid!
https://github.c
AaronBallman wrote:
> If a function has a deferred diagnostic, it should prevent codegen of that
> function, yes.
Deferred errors only, though, right? Do we know if there are any cases where we
defer the diagnostic because we may later decide it's *not* an error and thus
codegen would be fine
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yronglin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147945
Refine basic.link.p3 tests with split-file and added more test for P2788R0
which was marked as implemented.
>From f65b4423eda72ec8533359ba5fdc8f587eba0867 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Wang, Yihan"
Date: Th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (yronglin)
Changes
Refine basic.link.p3 tests with split-file and added more test for P2788R0
which was marked as implemented.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147945.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) cla
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ constexpr bool test() {
{
// bidi
-int buffer[2] = {1, 2};
+int buffer[3] = {1, 2, 3};
AaronBallman wrote:
Thanks! I kind of figured that was the case, but it wasn't clear whether the
test should change like this or not.
@ld
https://github.com/nikic commented:
Looks reasonable
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ class LLVM_ABI Pass {
/// Registration templates, but can be overloaded directly.
virtual StringRef getPassName() const;
+ /// getPassArgument - Return a nice clean name for a pass
nikic wrote:
```suggestion
/// Return a nice clean
@@ -62,8 +62,13 @@ static std::string getDescription(const Module &M) {
bool ModulePass::skipModule(const Module &M) const {
const OptPassGate &Gate = M.getContext().getOptPassGate();
+
+ StringRef PassName = this->getPassArgument();
nikic wrote:
```sugges
@@ -86,6 +91,16 @@ StringRef Pass::getPassName() const {
return "Unnamed pass: implement Pass::getPassName()";
}
+/// getPassArgument - Return a nice clean name for a pass
+/// corresponding to that used to enable the pass in opt
+StringRef Pass::getPassArgument() const {
+
@@ -55,4 +72,29 @@ bool OptBisect::shouldRunPass(StringRef PassName,
return ShouldRun;
}
-OptPassGate &llvm::getGlobalPassGate() { return getOptBisector(); }
+static void printDisablePassMessage(const StringRef &Name, StringRef
TargetDesc,
+
@@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ class LLVM_ABI Pass {
/// Registration templates, but can be overloaded directly.
virtual StringRef getPassName() const;
+ /// getPassArgument - Return a nice clean name for a pass
+ /// corresponding to that used to enable the pass in opt
+ virtual
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/woruyu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147959
Summary
This PR resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/147187
>From e18ed1ac787a0571318b8cfe1d4eee023ba11fc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: woruyu <1214539...@qq.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 21:08:24
yronglin wrote:
In this PR, I use split-file to refine some tests related to modules. These
refinements will increase the difficulty of review. I plan to complete these
refinements in a separate PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107168
__
woruyu wrote:
@hstk30-hw This patch is now ready for review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: woruyu (woruyu)
Changes
Summary
This PR resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/147187
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147959.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/SanitizerS
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Is there ANYTHING we can do to split this up? This is so huge that github is
refusing to lead half the changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147835
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
https://github.com/carlosgalvezp approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147793
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vbvictor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Andres-Salamanca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147609
>From 38b98a54b718973ec2ce1375e31996ee190e0d75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salamanca
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:33:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [CIR] Upstream new SetBitfieldOp for handling C a
@@ -2521,6 +2521,32 @@ def ComplexImagOp : CIR_Op<"complex.imag", [Pure]> {
let hasFolder = 1;
}
+//===--===//
+// ComplexAddOp
+//===--===
@@ -84,7 +95,8 @@ void NamedParameterCheck::check(const
MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
for (auto P : UnnamedParams) {
// Fallback to an unused marker.
- StringRef NewName = "unused";
+ constexpr StringRef FallbackName = "unused";
vbvi
AaronBallman wrote:
> > > > avior due to the silent stripping. Given that an atomic type is not the
> > > > same as its underlying type (in terms of ABI or semantics) I think we
> > > > should diagnose the behavior with at least a warning. I could even be
> > > > convinced it should be a warni
https://github.com/vbvictor approved this pull request.
LGTM with nit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature +sve -verify
-verify-ignore-unexpected=error,note -emit-llvm -o - %s
-
-#include
-
-void test_bfloat(svbool_t pg, uint64_t u64, int64_t i64, const bfloat
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1054,10 +1054,26 @@ const VarRegion *MemRegionManager::getVarRegion(const
VarDecl *D,
assert(!Ty.isNull());
if (Ty.isConstQualified()) {
sReg = getGlobalsRegion(MemRegion::GlobalImmutableSpaceRegionKind);
-
@@ -9364,6 +9364,14 @@ def warn_atomic_implicit_seq_cst : Warning<
InGroup>, DefaultIgnore;
def err_atomic_unsupported : Error<
"atomic types are not supported in '%0'">;
+def warn_cv_stripped_in_enum : Warning<
+ "%select{'const' and 'volatile' qualifiers|'const' qualifie
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147802
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -105,12 +117,26 @@ void NamedParameterCheck::check(const
MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
NewName = Name;
}
- // Now insert the comment. Note that getLocation() points to the place
+ // Now insert the fix. Note that getLocation() points to the
@@ -0,0 +1,504 @@
+//===- LifetimeSafety.cpp - C++ Lifetime Safety Analysis -*-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -1,29 +1,46 @@
// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-named-parameter %t
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -check-suffix=PLAIN-NAMES %s
readability-named-parameter %t -- -config="{CheckOptions: [{key:
readability-named-parameter.InsertPlainNamesInForwardDecls, value: true}]}"
---
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+
+# REQUIRES: shell
+# UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
+
+# This test demonstrates the new "IncludePath" field.
+# This field allows specifying include paths through
+# multilib.yaml configuration using relative paths.
+# Absolute paths should be rejected by the driv
@@ -235,6 +288,30 @@ bool SemaSPIRV::CheckSPIRVBuiltinFunctionCall(const
TargetInfo &TI,
TheCall->setType(RetTy);
break;
}
+ case SPIRV::BI__builtin_spirv_refract: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 3))
+ return true;
+
+llvm::function_ref
+C
@@ -0,0 +1,504 @@
+//===- LifetimeSafety.cpp - C++ Lifetime Safety Analysis -*-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -9364,6 +9364,14 @@ def warn_atomic_implicit_seq_cst : Warning<
InGroup>, DefaultIgnore;
def err_atomic_unsupported : Error<
"atomic types are not supported in '%0'">;
+def warn_cv_stripped_in_enum : Warning<
+ "%select{'const' and 'volatile' qualifiers|'const' qualifie
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt)
Changes
Make sure to mark a concept decl as being invalid if the constraint is invalid.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147938.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Maetveis created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147939
The file is listing build artifacts to ignore, but LLVM has long had the policy
that in-tree builds are not supported, so the ignore rules shouldn't serve
their original purpose anymore.
The rules however are
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147046
>From a54b4f8120460c4374422c9847c22aed0ef8665f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 12:16:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Correctly handle taking the address of an
explicit
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ constexpr bool test() {
{
// bidi
-int buffer[2] = {1, 2};
+int buffer[3] = {1, 2, 3};
AaronBallman wrote:
I'd think that as well, but the fact that it passed when it should fail means
we should double-check. :-D I don't have
Author: Corentin Jabot
Date: 2025-07-10T14:05:23+02:00
New Revision: 39ea9b71d90f95a5d91d72004b37779d1ed6d72e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/39ea9b71d90f95a5d91d72004b37779d1ed6d72e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/39ea9b71d90f95a5d91d72004b37779d1ed6d72e.diff
Author: Corentin Jabot
Date: 2025-07-10T14:06:02+02:00
New Revision: 78e84e5779f4ed1de9bc29b6aae8609de2b9f8c4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/78e84e5779f4ed1de9bc29b6aae8609de2b9f8c4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/78e84e5779f4ed1de9bc29b6aae8609de2b9f8c4.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147046
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147306
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -48,62 +48,64 @@ class Triple {
enum ArchType {
UnknownArch,
-arm,// ARM (little endian): arm, armv.*, xscale
-armeb, // ARM (big endian): armeb
-aarch64,// AArch64 (little endian): aarch64
-aarch64_be, // AArch64 (big
Author: Mészáros Gergely
Date: 2025-07-10T14:07:59+02:00
New Revision: 7a089bc4c00fe35c8f07b7c420be6535ad331161
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a089bc4c00fe35c8f07b7c420be6535ad331161
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a089bc4c00fe35c8f07b7c420be6535ad331161.di
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+//===--- ConstexprNonStaticInScopeCheck.h - clang-tidy --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Juan Manuel Martinez Caamaño (jmmartinez)
Changes
The patch [CUDA][HIP] Add a __device__ version of std::__glibcxx_assert_fail()
(#144886) missed a changelog line.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147978.diff
1 F
https://github.com/jmmartinez created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147978
The patch [CUDA][HIP] Add a __device__ version of std::__glibcxx_assert_fail()
(#144886) missed a changelog line.
From 9793fe7b0b97dfba031ed2a0967eb5698cb4d36a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Juan=2
NagyDonat wrote:
> BTW wouldn't this patch break the semantics of `freopen`? That one should
> invalidate the file ptr, right? Could you demonstrate this?
No, `freopen` should _not_ invalidate the file _ptr_, because it modifies the
stream object (associating it with a different file) _without
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
steakhal wrote:
> > BTW wouldn't this patch break the semantics of `freopen`? That one should
> > invalidate the file ptr, right? Could you demonstrate this?
>
> No, `freopen` should _not_ invalidate the file _ptr_, because it modifies the
>
vbvictor wrote:
> I suppose this patch does not impede further refactoring if we want to go in
> that direction in the future.
Yes, also with these tests we will be sure that future `llvm-` alias works
properly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142839
@@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ constexpr vector reflect_vec_impl(vector I,
vector N) {
#endif
}
+template constexpr T refract_impl(T I, T N, U Eta) {
+#if (__has_builtin(__builtin_spirv_refract))
+ if (is_vector::value)
farzonl wrote:
It looks like SPIRV refract does
hokein wrote:
We seem to have lost track of this. This patch has been around for a while, and
it needs a rebase before it can be merged.
>From what I can tell, part 1 splitting out deduction guide source tracking has
>already landed, and the missing piece for alias templates (#103016) is done
https://github.com/chestnykh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
>From 86dc26e3947d2d53e9b86d700946e7f381f71a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Chestnykh
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:19:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Don't pass sanitizers' rtlibs to linker with `-r`
https://github.com/chestnykh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
>From 83069f67af285bf5df6b2181e1c1763f5d2169ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Chestnykh
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:19:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Don't pass sanitizers' rtlibs to linker with `-r`
https://github.com/chestnykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/simpal01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146651
>From 30c353052c35f0117818aca3241e3dea6be2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simi Pallipurath
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 21:25:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Multilib] Extend the Multilib system to support an
Incl
luporl wrote:
Thanks for the fix.
But Clang::frame-pointer-elim.c test also started failing on Windows on ARM
with this PR:
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/6951
Can you please take a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147354
__
@@ -960,6 +960,8 @@ def OMP_Parallel : Directive<[Spelling<"parallel">]> {
VersionedClause,
VersionedClause,
VersionedClause,
+VersionedClause,
+VersionedClause,
alexey-bataev wrote:
Version not provided
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
alexfh wrote:
> @alexfh what makes you think this was introduced by this commit?
I found this commit using a mechanical bisection over a range of LLVM revisions
building Clang without assertions. So the assertion may actually be caused by a
different commit. @bgra8 posted a more focused test c
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-07-10T15:05:28+02:00
New Revision: 130e6121f5bb1a54c591133d050aa1311ce16d7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/130e6121f5bb1a54c591133d050aa1311ce16d7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/130e6121f5bb1a54c591133d050aa1311ce16d7f.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147942
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -174,10 +174,11 @@ def note_constexpr_heap_alloc_limit_exceeded : Note<
def note_constexpr_this : Note<
"%select{|implicit }0use of 'this' pointer is only allowed within the "
"evaluation of a call to a 'constexpr' member function">;
-def access_kind : TextSubstitution<
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature +sve -verify
-verify-ignore-unexpected=error,note -emit-llvm -o - %s
-
-#include
-
-void test_bfloat(svbool_t pg, uint64_t u64, int64_t i64, const bfloat
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147945
>From f65b4423eda72ec8533359ba5fdc8f587eba0867 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Wang, Yihan"
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 19:54:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC][C++][Modules] Refine basic.link.p3 and add test for
https://github.com/yronglin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yronglin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -51,4 +39,71 @@ template module module_var_template;
// This is a variable named 'import' that shadows the type 'import' above.
struct X {} import;
-#endif
+
+//--- ImportError1.cppm
+module;
+
+struct import { struct inner {}; };
+struct module { struct inner {}; };
+
+con
@@ -51,4 +39,71 @@ template module module_var_template;
// This is a variable named 'import' that shadows the type 'import' above.
struct X {} import;
-#endif
+
+//--- ImportError1.cppm
+module;
+
+struct import { struct inner {}; };
+struct module { struct inner {}; };
+
+con
@@ -51,4 +39,71 @@ template module module_var_template;
// This is a variable named 'import' that shadows the type 'import' above.
struct X {} import;
-#endif
+
+//--- ImportError1.cppm
+module;
+
+struct import { struct inner {}; };
+struct module { struct inner {}; };
+
+con
https://github.com/yronglin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aiden Grossman
Date: 2025-07-10T06:14:06-07:00
New Revision: 896575eb74bb59466b50fb51934596d72947ebd5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/896575eb74bb59466b50fb51934596d72947ebd5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/896575eb74bb59466b50fb51934596d72947ebd5.diff
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147969
Clients of the dependency scanning service may need to add dependencies based
on the visibility of top-level modules, for example, when determining whether a
Swift overlay dependency should be brought in ba
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
Clients of the dependency scanning service may need to add dependencies based
on the visibility of top-level modules, for example, when determining whether a
Swift overlay dependency should be brought in
@@ -2661,6 +2661,45 @@ def BitPopcountOp : CIR_BitOpBase<"bit.popcnt",
}];
}
+def BitReverseOp : CIR_BitOpBase<"bit.reverse",
+ CIR_UIntOfWidths<[8, 16, 32, 64]>> {
+ let summary = "Reverse the bit pattern of the operand integer";
+ let desc
https://github.com/Lancern updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147200
>From cf2bf0bf66f22e8fdc35baf8d4176aa5af6588d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirui Mu
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 00:45:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CIR] Add bit reverse and byte reverse operations
---
clang/incl
cyndyishida wrote:
> In my local performance testing, there was no observable performance impact.
To expand on what I tested, `clang-scan-dep` wall time for:
* scanning a TU that includes every clang module under `/S/L/F` in the macOS 26
sdk.
* scanning a real Objective-C-based project, that
maksimsab wrote:
Hi @jdoerfert @jhuber6 !
We are adding offload wrapping for SYCL in this PR. Do you have any suggestions
for whom I should request for a code review?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147508
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
jhuber6 wrote:
This broke the NVPTX build which makes the `Offload.cmake` cache file that we
recommend people use no longer work. I'm not sure why but we're no longer
passing `-nostdlibinc` and other flags.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134893
__
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148011
These decl types don't require any code generation, though when debug info is
implemented, we will need to add handling for that. Until then, we just need to
have a handler so they don't generate an NYI err
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ struct TranslationUnitDeps {
/// determined that the differences are benign for this compilation.
std::vector ClangModuleDeps;
+ /// A list of module names that are visible to this translation unit. This
+ /// includes both direct and transitive module
201 - 300 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
