rkirsling wrote:
Seems like I don't have the ability to add reviewers yet; pinging @cor3ntin and
@AaronBallman for visibility.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
vitor1001 wrote:
Create PR #144851 to re-apply it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143664
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/philnik777 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NewSigma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144319
>From 584d47295f7719f96ee77d32a6b4329f82be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NewSigma
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:36:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Add LifetimeMovePass
---
clang/test/CodeGenCoroutines/pr56919.
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Lifetimes are very important and crucial. I suggest you to abstract your
algorithm and send it to https://discourse.llvm.org/ for wider visibility.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144319
___
cfe-commi
@@ -1787,6 +1788,12 @@ def note_unsatisfied_trait_reason
"%NonReplaceableField{has a non-replaceable member %1 of type %2}|"
"%NTCBase{has a non-trivially-copyable base %1}|"
"%NTCField{has a non-trivially-copyable member %1 of type %2}|"
+
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum requested changes to this pull request.
I think I found the reason why the CI doesn't run. Unfortunately it made me
realize that the changes here might require some deeper adaptions...
So far the CI was a single-step workflow, that just calls the
`llvm-project-t
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ jobs:
python-version: ["3.8", "3.13"]
uses: ./.github/workflows/llvm-project-tests.yml
with:
- build_target: check-clang-python
+ build_target: libclang
+ run: |
+llvm-lit -v tools/clang/test --filter=bindings.sh
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142948
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142948
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142948
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144873
None
>From e57e53c7e5abdb4c390a04b4ce9084dec9e71dd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:40:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][python][test] Move python binding tests to l
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jannick Kremer (DeinAlptraum)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144873.diff
39 Files Affected:
- (modified) .github/workflows/libclang-python-tests.yml (+15-10)
- (mo
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Aditi Medhane (AditiRM)
Changes
Support the following BCD format conversion builtins for PowerPC.
- `__builtin_bcdcopysign` – Conversion that returns the decimal value of the
first parameter combined with the sign code of the second par
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aditi Medhane (AditiRM)
Changes
Support the following BCD format conversion builtins for PowerPC.
- `__builtin_bcdcopysign` – Conversion that returns the decimal value of the
first parameter combined with the sign code of the second param
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-powerpc
Author: Aditi Medhane (AditiRM)
Changes
Support the following BCD format conversion builtins for PowerPC.
- `__builtin_bcdcopysign` – Conversion that returns the decimal value of the
first parameter combined with the sign code of the se
https://github.com/AditiRM created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144874
Support the following BCD format conversion builtins for PowerPC.
- `__builtin_bcdcopysign` – Conversion that returns the decimal value of the
first parameter combined with the sign code of the second parameter
@@ -520,6 +520,9 @@ def warn_drv_math_errno_enabled_after_veclib: Warning<
"math errno enabled by '%0' after it was implicitly disabled by '%1',"
" this may limit the utilization of the vector library">,
InGroup;
+def warn_drv_gcc_incompatible_complex_range_override: Warn
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
>From 3841ecf80c13101959a97316dda7a1b891e70502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Implement diagnostics for why `std::is_standard_layout`
@@ -488,3 +488,83 @@ static_assert(__is_trivially_copyable(S12));
// expected-note@-1 {{'S12' is not trivially copyable}} \
// expected-note@#tc-S12 {{'S12' defined here}}
}
+
+namespace standard_layout_tests {
+struct WithVirtual { // #sl-Virtual
+virtual void foo();
+};
+
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2025-06-19T17:54:07+08:00
New Revision: 0fe78c4a290517925acc03d59f235926f440f155
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0fe78c4a290517925acc03d59f235926f440f155
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0fe78c4a290517925acc03d59f235926f440f155.diff
LO
https://github.com/vbvictor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126434
>From 81a21a90e03e4b9cea58d6bcffddf3bde0f82710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Baranov
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 09:25:03 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [clang-tidy] add scoped-lock-check
---
.../clang-tidy/m
https://github.com/vitor1001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144851
LLVM prevents the sm_32_intrinsics.hpp header from being included with a
#define SM_32_INTRINSICS_HPP. It also provides drop-in replacements of the
functions defined in the CUDA header.
One issue is that som
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
>From 3841ecf80c13101959a97316dda7a1b891e70502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Implement diagnostics for why `std::is_standard_layout`
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vitor Sessak (vitor1001)
Changes
LLVM prevents the sm_32_intrinsics.hpp header from being included with a
#define SM_32_INTRINSICS_HPP. It also provides drop-in replacements of the
functions defined in the CUDA header.
One issue is that
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
>From 3841ecf80c13101959a97316dda7a1b891e70502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Implement diagnostics for why `std::is_standard_layout`
@@ -388,9 +387,7 @@ template class OMPDirectiveListClause : public
OMPClause {
assert(
DK.size() == NumKinds &&
"Number of directive kinds is not the same as the preallocated
buffer");
-std::copy(DK.begin(), DK.end(),
- static_cast(this)
macurtis-amd wrote:
> To make the question more precise, would it make sense to change AMDGPUs
> unaligned access hook such that https://godbolt.org/z/Gv1j4vjqE will look the
> same as on X86?
>
> That should also fix the motivating problem here.
I'll investigate this as an alternative. Thank
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144868
This change adds support for the BinAssign op and LValueToRValue for ComplexType
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/141365
>From 8fd8deef461d0a818be9b0d4de66b686dc88a9ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper)
Changes
This change adds support for the BinAssign op and LValueToRValue for ComplexType
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/141365
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144868.diff
5
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-06-19T14:59:32+08:00
New Revision: 2c2ad9a096e78e9129f8cb2d4ee260eb7e67473f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c2ad9a096e78e9129f8cb2d4ee260eb7e67473f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c2ad9a096e78e9129f8cb2d4ee260eb7e67473f.diff
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-06-19T09:01:51+02:00
New Revision: 9ee55e717308757b580dff182fc23b40d1c18a56
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ee55e717308757b580dff182fc23b40d1c18a56
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ee55e717308757b580dff182fc23b40d1c18a56.diff
LO
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143771
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
philnik777 wrote:
> @philnik777 Is it my fault that tests fail with `Error: Process completed
> with exit code 255`?
No, it's the CI being problematic. I've restarted the failed CI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144220
___
cfe-commits mai
https://github.com/jmmartinez created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144850
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#136133
From 366be49837a1fa669d836cc167b1b6dbf2725110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Juan=20Manuel=20Martinez=20Caama=C3=B1o?=
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:11:36 +0200
Subjec
jmmartinez wrote:
> @jmmartinez It appears that CUDA tests are broken by this change, because it
> uses `noexcept` which is a C++11 feature not available with c++98:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/69/builds/22562/steps/8/logs/stdio
>
> ```
> FAILED:
> External/CUDA/CMakeFiles/algo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Juan Manuel Martinez Caamaño (jmmartinez)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#136133
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144850.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Headers/CMakeLists.txt (-1)
- (removed) cl
nikic wrote:
@rjmccall From a Clang perspective, largely no -- but not entirely. There are
cases when LLVM materializes allocations based on the data layout in ways that
are observable and not controllable by Clang. One of these is certain inline
asm constraints (which can end up passing const
Author: Juan Manuel Martinez Caamaño
Date: 2025-06-19T10:06:50+02:00
New Revision: 52ff58c3300338876ae63126ce0d1000f1ba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/52ff58c3300338876ae63126ce0d1000f1ba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/52ff58c3300338876ae63126ce0d333
https://github.com/jmmartinez closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144850
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
201 - 245 of 245 matches
Mail list logo