cor3ntin wrote:
> Does it fix #115289?
No.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140576
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
topperc wrote:
Ping. Any further comments?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
Having the whole clause emission be in a header file ended up being pragmatic,
but ended up being a sizable negative for a variety of reasons. This patch
moves it to its own .cpp file and makes CIRGenFuncti
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
Having the whole clause emission be in a header file ended up being pragmatic,
but ended up being a sizable negative for a variety of reasons. This patch
moves it to its own .cpp file and makes CIRGenFu
https://github.com/rohitaggarwal007 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140544
>From 4769d05876f3d7f4a335c10e51fb20e3c923e270 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rohit Aggarwal
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 19:25:52 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Flang][Driver] Fix target parsing for
-fv
chandraghale wrote:
ping @alexey-bataev
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134709
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/justincady updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139777
>From be83c3207bf195aa7c6df1ce155402fde5911821 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Cady
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:08:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [Coverage] Fix mapping for do-while loops with terminating
sta
https://github.com/choikwa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: choikwa
Date: 2025-05-19T14:11:31-04:00
New Revision: 77de8a0c0abc9d245a7c6278670554b47ae183ea
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/77de8a0c0abc9d245a7c6278670554b47ae183ea
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/77de8a0c0abc9d245a7c6278670554b47ae183ea.diff
LOG:
@@ -70,18 +70,116 @@ class MustacheTemplateFile : public Template {
MustacheTemplateFile(StringRef TemplateStr) : Template(TemplateStr) {}
};
+static std::unique_ptr NamespaceTemplate = nullptr;
+
+static std::unique_ptr RecordTemplate = nullptr;
+
+static Error setupTemplat
https://github.com/DaanDeMeyer closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DaanDeMeyer wrote:
I just found misc-include-cleaner in clang-tidy which is a way better fit for
this so let me close this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
AaronBallma
Author: Eli Friedman
Date: 2025-05-19T11:27:51-07:00
New Revision: 021443cd2a8127ab0432c5e48f9dbba30d9bc6ce
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/021443cd2a8127ab0432c5e48f9dbba30d9bc6ce
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/021443cd2a8127ab0432c5e48f9dbba30d9bc6ce.diff
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> I feel like this issue is a little too niche to be adding such complexity,
> maybe just covering those specific uses cases before codegen might be the way
> to go?
I think disabling the keywords entirely is a large ask (requires an RFC at a
minimum) and so we don't need
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
erichkeane
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140591
This patch implements the macros described in the ACLE[1]
[1]
https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/blob/main/main/acle.md#modal-8-bit-floating-point-extensions
>From 22e44648ce4ec1c747406f7d98ae7c736d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (CarolineConcatto)
Changes
This patch implements the macros described in the ACLE[1]
[1]
https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/blob/main/main/acle.md#modal-8-bit-floating-point-extensions
---
Full diff: https://github.com/l
https://github.com/sarnex updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138205
>From c66ec11d8170a0e4c0b2fc50bdae039fd9c208fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Sarnie, Nick"
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 14:47:45 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][Sema] Don't warn for implicit uses of builtins in
sy
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
> > I feel like this issue is a little too niche to be adding such complexity,
> > maybe just covering those specific uses cases before codegen might be the
> > way to go?
>
> I think disabling the keywords entirely is a large ask (requires an RFC at a
> minimum) and so we d
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1825,6 +1825,11 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// Set of no-builtin functions listed by \#pragma function.
llvm::SmallSetVector MSFunctionNoBuiltins;
+ /// Map of BuiltinIDs to source locations that have #pragma intrinsic calls
+ /// that refer to them.
+
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sarnex edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138205
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
AaronBallma
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
erichkeane
https://github.com/Harald-R created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140594
The missing include diagnostic has the capability to introduce the necessary
headers into the source file. However, it does not currently follow the
inclusion style found in the `.clangd` file. For example, if
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: None (Harald-R)
Changes
The missing include diagnostic has the capability to introduce the necessary
headers into the source file. However, it does not currently follow the
inclusion style found in the `.clangd` file. For example, if the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: None (Harald-R)
Changes
The missing include diagnostic has the capability to introduce the necessary
headers into the source file. However, it does not currently follow the
inclusion style found in the `.clangd` file. For exam
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename `ListInit::getValues()` to `getElements()` to better match with other
`ListInit` members like `getElement`. Keep `getValues()` for existing
downstream code but mark it deprecated.
---
Patch is 22.45
AaronBallman wrote:
> I would be against said RFC. If you asked me in 1996/whatever, I could be
> talked into it. But we're 30+ years of this behavior.
Doesn't stop WG21 from changing the behavior 30 years later. ;-) My biggest
concern is actually that C++ is changing exception handling such t
https://github.com/andykaylor approved this pull request.
This seems reasonable to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
AaronBallma
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
DaanDeMeyer
Harald-R wrote:
@kleinesfilmroellchen @HighCommander4 would it be possible to take a look when
you have some time? Many thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
> > I would be against said RFC. If you asked me in 1996/whatever, I could be
> > talked into it. But we're 30+ years of this behavior.
>
> Doesn't stop WG21 from changing the behavior 30 years later. ;-) My biggest
> concern is actually that C++ is changing exception handlin
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs -O0 -mtriple spirv-unknown-unknown
-run-pass=spirv-prelegalizer-combiner %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+# REQUIRES: asserts
+---
+name:faceforward_instcombine_float
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+legalized: true
+body:
@@ -98,21 +110,98 @@ void applySPIRVDistance(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineRegisterInfo &MRI,
SPIRVGlobalRegistry *GR =
MI.getMF()->getSubtarget().getSPIRVGlobalRegistry();
- auto RemoveAllUses = [&](Register Reg) {
-SmallVector UsesToErase(
-llvm::make_pointe
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
erichkeane
@@ -44,6 +44,13 @@ bool NoSanitizeList::containsFunction(SanitizerMask Mask,
bool NoSanitizeList::containsFile(SanitizerMask Mask, StringRef FileName,
StringRef Category) const {
+ unsigned NoSanLine = SSCL->inSectionBlame(Mask, "src", FileNa
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
thurstond wrote:
Consider pre-committing this test (with the "bad" output) as a separate patch,
so that the current patch will show how the test output is fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
__
https://github.com/kmpeng edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
AaronBallma
Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2025-05-19T12:11:11-07:00
New Revision: 175f8a444b296ba956505a5760805f05a175111b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/175f8a444b296ba956505a5760805f05a175111b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/175f8a444b296ba956505a5760805f05a175111b.diff
L
alexfh wrote:
Just to confirm: is it intended that `char *s = NULL;` now generates this
warning? I mean, the C library may define `NULL` as `((void*)0)`, and `char *s
= ((void*)0);` is clearly not C++-compatible. However, when compiling this code
in C++, `NULL` may expand to something that IS
https://github.com/jurahul closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2025-05-19T12:16:33-07:00
New Revision: 3932360b14c390188977a53ecba6c13fff685aae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3932360b14c390188977a53ecba6c13fff685aae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3932360b14c390188977a53ecba6c13fff685aae.diff
L
@@ -135,4 +135,38 @@ cir.func @vector_insert_element_test() {
// CHECK:cir.return
// CHECK: }
+cir.func @vector_splat_test() {
+%0 = cir.alloca !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>, !cir.ptr>,
["a", init]
+%1 = cir.alloca !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>, !cir.ptr>,
["shl", init]
+
tarunprabhu wrote:
Is this doing a lot that is similar to #140533?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140544
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/gedare updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139750
>From 5974807cae2cf08b26cadb2fce3bd0236519f3c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gedare Bloom
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 08:42:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-format] Add IndentPPDirectives Leave option
Allow an o
erichkeane wrote:
So @Rajveer100 : I think I bottomed out with Aaron. I think the solution of
'create a function to diagnose these, but only if not in a dependent
`DeclContext`', then call this both from where we do the current checking, plus
during `TreeTransform` of these things is the 'rig
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140597
This change adds support for Cmp ops for VectorType
Issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/136487
>From e43d04b1eb1660dcf1a99d405858efd3a9647657 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date
AaronBallman wrote:
> So @Rajveer100 : I think I bottomed out with Aaron. I think the solution of
> 'create a function to diagnose these, but only if not in a dependent
> `DeclContext`', then call this both from where we do the current checking,
> plus during `TreeTransform` of these things is
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper)
Changes
This change adds support for Cmp ops for VectorType
Issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/136487
---
Patch is 25.04 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper)
Changes
This change adds support for Cmp ops for VectorType
Issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/136487
---
Patch is 25.04 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/l
AaronBallman wrote:
> Just to confirm: is it intended that `char *s = NULL;` now generates this
> warning? I mean, the C library may define `NULL` as `((void*)0)`, and `char
> *s = ((void*)0);` is clearly not C++-compatible. However, when compiling this
> code in C++, `NULL` may expand to some
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
DaanDeMeyer
https://github.com/carlosgalvezp closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Carlos Galvez
Date: 2025-05-19T21:27:37+02:00
New Revision: 322d0197f5c5d4cf3a6bb2d86a0112788fd6c529
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/322d0197f5c5d4cf3a6bb2d86a0112788fd6c529
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/322d0197f5c5d4cf3a6bb2d86a0112788fd6c529.diff
hiraditya wrote:
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138429
>From 1139101e277f8f4d327fd7b422959dc4a3a43dbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:04:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] update error messaging
---
.../clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds
@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
AaronBallma
kazutakahirata wrote:
I've landed 195e640846765402d1a622006e6a9f9fa3192955 to fix the build failure
from this PR. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/DaanDeMeyer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140600
These mimick the same options from clangd and allow using the check to only
check for unused includes or missing includes.
>From 16d452394b0b7f92321b224de3daca99e929afad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Daan De Meyer (DaanDeMeyer)
Changes
These mimick the same options from clangd and allow using the check to only
check for unused includes or missing includes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140600.dif
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Daan De Meyer (DaanDeMeyer)
Changes
These mimick the same options from clangd and allow using the check to only
check for unused includes or missing includes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140600.diff
4 F
https://github.com/qinkunbao updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
>From b83755d2aa0c5417ab8f359aa842449213437a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:01 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UT
@@ -5200,6 +5428,26 @@ void CGOpenMPRuntime::emitReduction(CodeGenFunction
&CGF, SourceLocation Loc,
CGF.EmitBranch(DefaultBB);
CGF.EmitBlock(DefaultBB, /*IsFinished=*/true);
+ if (Options.IsPrivateVarReduction) {
+if (LHSExprs.empty() || Privates.empty() || Reductio
Author: Justin Cady
Date: 2025-05-19T15:49:26-04:00
New Revision: 025639bc396f1e0d2ead279c5f345cb381733f16
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/025639bc396f1e0d2ead279c5f345cb381733f16
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/025639bc396f1e0d2ead279c5f345cb381733f16.diff
L
https://github.com/justincady closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/qinkunbao created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
None
>From 210f005ecccbbd4fed439d3e156d5e0146807bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 19:49:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
jurahul wrote:
> I've landed
> [195e640](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/195e640846765402d1a622006e6a9f9fa3192955)
> to fix the build failure from this PR. Thanks!
Thanks so much!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140289
___
cfe
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Qinkun Bao (qinkunbao)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/test/CodeGen/ubsan-src-ignorelist-category.test (+37)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeG
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
qinkunbao wrote:
Sounds Good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
@@ -44,6 +44,13 @@ bool NoSanitizeList::containsFunction(SanitizerMask Mask,
bool NoSanitizeList::containsFile(SanitizerMask Mask, StringRef FileName,
StringRef Category) const {
+ unsigned NoSanLine = SSCL->inSectionBlame(Mask, "src", FileNa
@@ -1343,6 +1343,11 @@ llvm::Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitLifetimeStart(llvm::TypeSize Size,
if (!ShouldEmitLifetimeMarkers)
return nullptr;
+ // No lifetimes on promise alloca, or middle end passes will assume promise
+ // dead after lifetime.end, leading to mis-optim
thurstond wrote:
This patch should be "[NFC] Precommit test for src:*=sanitize for UBSan" (or
similar), have the test output "passing" for the current build of clang (i.e.,
probably "incorrect" output), reviewed and then merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
@@ -6513,6 +6513,14 @@ static bool canPerformArrayCopy(const InitializedEntity
&Entity) {
static const FieldDecl *getConstField(const RecordDecl *RD) {
assert(!isa(RD) && "Only expect to call this in C mode");
for (const FieldDecl *FD : RD->fields()) {
+// If the field
Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2025-05-19T12:57:54-07:00
New Revision: 72b2219b3e2319e29831e4e9b07c440444f3add6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/72b2219b3e2319e29831e4e9b07c440444f3add6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/72b2219b3e2319e29831e4e9b07c440444f3add6.diff
L
https://github.com/bwendling edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140578
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ziqingluo-90 wrote:
> Can you file an issue so we don't lose track of the bug?
Looks like we have an issue already #140348
@AaronBallman do you think my original example is well-defined according to the
standard? I saw there is a warning
`constexpr constructor that does not initialize all memb
https://github.com/rnk approved this pull request.
Nice, looks good, thanks for implementing this!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138205
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/DaanDeMeyer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140233
>From 57687d8eebc1f8e2b59ed131791895d76f88e30a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daan De Meyer
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 12:08:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-include-cleaner] Make cleanup attr report expr
locat
https://github.com/thurstond requested changes to this pull request.
Per comment above
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sarnex wrote:
Thanks for the guidance and reviews!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138205
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/qinkunbao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7074,6 +7117,86 @@ bool
CXXNameMangler::shouldHaveAbiTags(ItaniumMangleContextImpl &C,
return TrackAbiTags.AbiTagsRoot.getUsedAbiTags().size();
}
+namespace {
+
+class RISCVZicfilpFuncSigLabelMangler : public CXXNameMangler {
+ bool IsTopLevelAndCXXVirtualMethod;
+
+pu
@@ -7074,6 +7117,86 @@ bool
CXXNameMangler::shouldHaveAbiTags(ItaniumMangleContextImpl &C,
return TrackAbiTags.AbiTagsRoot.getUsedAbiTags().size();
}
+namespace {
+
+class RISCVZicfilpFuncSigLabelMangler : public CXXNameMangler {
+ bool IsTopLevelAndCXXVirtualMethod;
+
+pu
https://github.com/sivadeilra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138972
>From 3899bc104788c2c4e01afce2f61b89a0dba5cdff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arlie Davis
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 16:10:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Windows hotpatching support
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Code
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140612
A previous refactoring had reduced the ArgInfo structure to contain a single
member, the argument type. This change eliminates the ArgInfo structure
entirely, instead just storing the argument type directly
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
A previous refactoring had reduced the ArgInfo structure to contain a single
member, the argument type. This change eliminates the ArgInfo structure
entirely, instead just storing the argument type directl
301 - 400 of 587 matches
Mail list logo
