uecker wrote:
So one usability issue I noticed that we also had in GCC is that the warning
about declaring structs in function prototypes (-Wvisibility) does not make
sense anymore and becomes annoying. We turned it off in C23 for complete (but
not for incomplete) structs) without tag.
http
@@ -8374,20 +8376,212 @@ static void HandlePtrAuthQualifier(ASTContext &Ctx,
QualType &T,
IsInvalid |= !S.checkPointerAuthDiscriminatorArg(
ExtraDiscriminatorArg, Sema::PADAK_ExtraDiscPtrAuth, ExtraDiscriminator);
- if (IsInvalid) {
-Attr.setInvalid();
-retur
https://github.com/kadircet edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -158,6 +158,43 @@ TEST(StdLibTests, EndToEnd) {
UnorderedElementsAre(StdlibSymbol("list"), StdlibSymbol("vector")));
}
+TEST(StdLibTests, StdLibDocComments) {
+ Config Cfg;
+ Cfg.Index.StandardLibrary = true;
+ WithContextValue Enabled(Config::Key, std::move(Cfg));
@@ -158,6 +159,42 @@ TEST(StdLibTests, EndToEnd) {
UnorderedElementsAre(StdlibSymbol("list"), StdlibSymbol("vector")));
}
+TEST(StdLibTests, StdLibDocComments) {
+ Config Cfg;
+ Cfg.Index.StandardLibrary = true;
+ WithContextValue Enabled(Config::Key, std::move(Cfg));
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
thanks, LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tambry created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138459
None
>From 4f4394ff468cb0b398df9e8dab7cf9d18b019c1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raul Tambre
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 18:58:13 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Alias iso9899:2024 to C23, update documentation
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Raul Tambre (tambry)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138459.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/CommandGuide/clang.rst (+9)
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+1)
- (modified) clang/
https://github.com/tambry created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138460
Futureproofs our single Debian-specific special case for roughly the next 6
years.
See: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2025/01/msg4.html
>From 71ed6486e8036682bda9b0f6bd88277c7d927cb2 Mon Se
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Raul Tambre (tambry)
Changes
Futureproofs our single Debian-specific special case for roughly the next 6
years.
See: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2025/01/msg4.html
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
steakhal wrote:
FYI, build bots suggests that this PR has build errors.
BTW, could you run this under perf stats to demonstrate the reduction of the
cache-misses and page-faults? I'd suspect a measurable difference if these
separate allocators really help.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
tambry wrote:
I have commit access but I'll wait for CI so everything's per the book.
:slightly_smiling_face:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hanickadot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138477
This change makes `[[clang::musttail]]` work. Function calls marked with this
attribute won't use system stack, but will loop after nearest function call.
The attribute is already very strick, and checks all
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Hana Dusíková (hanickadot)
Changes
This change makes `[[clang::musttail]]` work. Function calls marked with this
attribute won't use system stack, but will loop after nearest function call.
The attribute is already very strick, and checks
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-clang-x86_64-linux-debian` running on `gribozavr4` while building
`clang` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/6/builds/8904
Here is the relevant piece of t
https://github.com/hanickadot edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hanickadot edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hanickadot edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/melver requested changes to this pull request.
This is also missing flag and IR tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
@@ -1078,22 +1092,44 @@ void
ModuleSanitizerCoverage::InjectCoverageAtBlock(Function &F, BasicBlock &BB,
Store->setNoSanitizeMetadata();
}
if (Options.StackDepth && IsEntryBB && !IsLeafFunc) {
-// Check stack depth. If it's the deepest so far, record it.
Modu
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ class SanitizerArgs {
std::vector CoverageIgnorelistFiles;
std::vector BinaryMetadataIgnorelistFiles;
int CoverageFeatures = 0;
+ int StackDepthCallbackMin = 0;
melver wrote:
`CoverageStackDepthCallbackMin`
https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://github.com/melver edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hanickadot wrote:
```c++
constexpr int deep_test(int remaining) {
if (remaining == 0) {
return 42;
}
MUST_TAIL return deep_test(remaining - 1);
}
constexpr int result = deep_test(200'000);
```
With debug build of clang:
```sh
clang++ -std=c++26 -c deep.cp
MightyFilipns wrote:
> Please also update the release notes.
It should be good now
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137610
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120925
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/halbi2 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137899
>From 238d73776c85ed22386ac494f275261638cd40d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: halbi2
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:07:43 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Warn about deprecated volatile-qualified return types
The old c
halbi2 wrote:
@shafik I have changed the commit message, can you please look again?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137899
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kees updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138323
>From 729d249d3848c2e417174ed935bfefde5c048dc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kees Cook
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 10:51:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [sancov] Introduce optional callback for stack-depth tracking
Normally -
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-05-04T20:36:07-07:00
New Revision: aafbddee808b8c81e2401ddcb6803f582ccb6892
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aafbddee808b8c81e2401ddcb6803f582ccb6892
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aafbddee808b8c81e2401ddcb6803f582ccb6892.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kees updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138323
>From 027ff82e738f6bdf82f958a4774eb05d321b23ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kees Cook
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 10:51:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [sancov] Introduce optional callback for stack-depth tracking
Normally -
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ class SanitizerArgs {
std::vector CoverageIgnorelistFiles;
std::vector BinaryMetadataIgnorelistFiles;
int CoverageFeatures = 0;
+ int StackDepthCallbackMin = 0;
kees wrote:
Fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138323
_
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `openmp-s390x-linux`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/11249
Here is the relevant piece of the build log f
https://github.com/lalaniket8 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137769
>From aa151fcda1cb73edc9564f6e2494699046254350 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anikelal
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:59:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] add alwaysinline attribute to stubs
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGe
@@ -142,99 +125,40 @@ function(compileDeviceRTLLibrary target_name
target_triple)
endif()
set_property(DIRECTORY APPEND PROPERTY ADDITIONAL_MAKE_CLEAN_FILES
${outfile})
-list(APPEND bc_files ${outfile})
+list(APPEND obj_files ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/${out
https://github.com/ojhunt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138482
This adds a number of builtins to query the ptrauth schema of an arbitrary type
in a way that can be fed into other ptrauth qualifiers.
>From e84310f8a57a3f9b75dfc7260137e984d7f55f87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt)
Changes
This adds a number of builtins to query the ptrauth schema of an arbitrary type
in a way that can be fed into other ptrauth qualifiers.
---
Patch is 34.90 KiB, truncated to
ojhunt wrote:
Adding @cor3ntin and @AaronBallman in case they have a better idea for getting
the function key to Sema than having it duplicated in langopts and codegen
options
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138482
___
cfe-commits mailing l
ojhunt wrote:
Also the associated tests do not pass yet as they're blocked on
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136828 and other ptrauth PRs
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138482
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
liushuyu wrote:
Hi there,
It seems like after this pull request, the following C code will crash LLVM if
LLVM assertion is enabled:
Godbolt link: https://godbolt.org/z/91bqnYsb4
```c
#include
#include
#if SIZE_MAX != UINT32_MAX
#error "This reproducer only works on 32-bit targets"
#endif
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
