https://github.com/irymarchyk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134337
>From df25a8bbfd827085265c51a44bedbf38deebbab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Rymarchyk <>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:54:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-format]: Add `Custom` to `ShortFunctionStyle`;
@@ -3032,6 +2983,162 @@ int UnwindCursor::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_s390x &) {
#endif // defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_LINUX_SIGRETURN) &&
// defined(_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN)
+
+#if defined(B_HAIKU_32_BIT)
+typedef Elf32_Sy
https://github.com/X547 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3032,6 +2983,162 @@ int UnwindCursor::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_s390x &) {
#endif // defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_LINUX_SIGRETURN) &&
// defined(_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN)
+
+#if defined(B_HAIKU_32_BIT)
+typedef Elf32_Sy
irymarchyk wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to push latest changes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134337
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3032,6 +2983,162 @@ int UnwindCursor::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_s390x &) {
#endif // defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_LINUX_SIGRETURN) &&
// defined(_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN)
+
+#if defined(B_HAIKU_32_BIT)
+typedef Elf32_Sy
@@ -3032,6 +2983,162 @@ int UnwindCursor::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_s390x &) {
#endif // defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_LINUX_SIGRETURN) &&
// defined(_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN)
+
+#if defined(B_HAIKU_32_BIT)
+typedef Elf32_Sy
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2025-04-13T12:09:50+08:00
New Revision: 06814834a63139ff27efe3bdbc6dc15d4b39
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/06814834a63139ff27efe3bdbc6dc15d4b39
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/06814834a63139ff27efe3bdbc6dc15d4b39.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134870
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
trungnt2910 wrote:
Yes, tested on `x86_64` and only `x86_64` (though support for other archs can
be added by as easy as defining a few offsets and registers). Requires Haiku
`hrev58811` to fully work with `tests/signal_unwind.pass.cpp`.
This is also the same implementation used in my debugger
@@ -982,8 +982,9 @@ void NVPTXDAGToDAGISel::SelectAddrSpaceCast(SDNode *N) {
case ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED:
Opc = TM.is64Bit() ? NVPTX::cvta_shared_64 : NVPTX::cvta_shared;
break;
-case ADDRESS_SPACE_DSHARED:
- Opc = TM.is64Bit() ? NVPTX::cvta_dshared_64 :
@@ -2038,15 +2038,15 @@ multiclass F_ATOMIC_2_AS,
preds>;
defm _S : F_ATOMIC_2,
preds>;
- defm _DS : F_ATOMIC_2, !listconcat([hasSM<80>], preds)>;
+ defm _S_C : F_ATOMIC_2, !listconcat([hasSM<80>], preds)>;
AlexMaclean wrote:
The PTX doc seems to say this
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc < %s -o - -mcpu=sm_90 -march=nvptx64 -mattr=+ptx80 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: %if ptxas-12.0 %{ llc < %s -mtriple=nvptx64 -mcpu=sm_90 -mattr=+ptx80|
%pt
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ def hasAtomBitwise64 :
Predicate<"Subtarget->hasAtomBitwise64()">;
def hasAtomMinMax64 : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasAtomMinMax64()">;
def hasVote : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasVote()">;
def hasDouble : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasDouble()">;
+def hasClusters : Pred
ilovepi wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Apr 12, 1:52 PM EDT**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/135456).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135456
https://github.com/AlexMaclean edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135444
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc < %s -o - -mcpu=sm_90 -march=nvptx64 -mattr=+ptx80 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: %if ptxas-12.0 %{ llc < %s -mtriple=nvptx64 -mcpu=sm_90 -mattr=+ptx80|
%pt
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc < %s -o - -mcpu=sm_90 -march=nvptx64 -mattr=+ptx80 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: %if ptxas-12.0 %{ llc < %s -mtriple=nvptx64 -mcpu=sm_90 -mattr=+ptx80|
%pt
https://github.com/AlexMaclean commented:
Backend changes look reasonable so far. One concern I have with this change is
that until now we've assumed specific address-spaces are non-overlapping.
You've addressed some of the places where this assumption is encoded but I
think there are others y
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From 32f60cd27c9234fd945443e801f1788930b1cd57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc didn'
Author: Paul Kirth
Date: 2025-04-12T10:54:27-07:00
New Revision: b71123f1272ee081b18b8ced1925d6e9300e7310
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b71123f1272ee081b18b8ced1925d6e9300e7310
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b71123f1272ee081b18b8ced1925d6e9300e7310.diff
LO
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135456
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
>From ca795c3f27e37ad8a8f165a3b10e9415cbfd66a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:32:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Improved the -Wtautological-overlap-compare diagnostics to
warn
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From 32f60cd27c9234fd945443e801f1788930b1cd57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc didn'
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc didn'
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,h --
clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/BitcodeReader.cpp
clan
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
>From ca795c3f27e37ad8a8f165a3b10e9415cbfd66a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:32:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Improved the -Wtautological-overlap-compare diagnostics to
warn
@@ -92,3 +92,162 @@ const char name[] = "Some string";
void takeCharArray(const char name[]);
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:26: warning: do not declare C-style arrays,
use 'std::array' or 'std::vector' instead [modernize-avoid-c-arrays]
+
+namespace std {
+ template
+ str
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc didn'
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions c,cpp --
clang/lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisB
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
>From ca795c3f27e37ad8a8f165a3b10e9415cbfd66a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:32:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Improved the -Wtautological-overlap-compare diagnostics
to
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
>From ca795c3f27e37ad8a8f165a3b10e9415cbfd66a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:32:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Improved the -Wtautological-overlap-compare diagnostics
to
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2025-04-12T15:04:29-07:00
New Revision: 09c8cfe219481a8fc20c6711dc5c87451f5a5ef1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09c8cfe219481a8fc20c6711dc5c87451f5a5ef1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09c8cfe219481a8fc20c6711dc5c87451f5a5ef1.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2025-04-12T15:06:21-07:00
New Revision: 5f744cc6301abb3be5a500b2fcbc944fe2bd3241
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f744cc6301abb3be5a500b2fcbc944fe2bd3241
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f744cc6301abb3be5a500b2fcbc944fe2bd3241.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hulxv created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135505
While reading the code, I found some dead variables that are not used anymore
but it still declared without removing them. I think it should be removed.
CC @ilovepi @petrhosek
>From 5c2d71ade401ad29335d1518ff48
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Mohamed Emad (hulxv)
Changes
While reading the code, I found some dead variables that are not used anymore
but it still declared without removing them. I think it should be removed.
CC @ilovepi @petrhosek
---
Full diff: http
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc didn'
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc did
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc did
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/9317
Here is the r
https://github.com/hulxv edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135505
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc did
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc did
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// Check that if we are compiling with fgpu-rdc amdgpu-enable-hipstdpar is not
+// passed to CC1, to avoid eager, per TU, removal of potentially accessible
+// functions.
+
+// RUN: %clang -### --hipstdpar --offload-arch=gfx906 %s -nogpulib -nogpuinc \
+// RUN:
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// Test that the accelerator code selection pass only gets invoked after
linking
+
+// Ensure Pass HipStdParAcceleratorCodeSelectionPass is not invoked in PreLink.
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -mllvm -amdgpu-enable-hipstdpar
-flto -emit-llvm-bc
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// Test that the accelerator code selection pass only gets invoked after
linking
+
+// Ensure Pass HipStdParAcceleratorCodeSelectionPass is not invoked in PreLink.
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -mllvm -amdgpu-enable-hipstdpar
-flto -emit-llvm-bc
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// Test that the accelerator code selection pass only gets invoked after
linking
+
+// Ensure Pass HipStdParAcceleratorCodeSelectionPass is not invoked in PreLink.
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -mllvm -amdgpu-enable-hipstdpar
-flto -emit-llvm-bc
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
THANKS!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Jérôme?= Duval ,
=?utf-8?q?Jérôme?= Duval
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
trungnt2910 wrote:
This code has **not** been tested against `tests/signal_unwind.pass.cpp`, and
this exact test has failed when tested against `libunwind` in LLVM 20 on Haiku.
See #135367 for an alternative impleme
brad0 wrote:
cc @korli @X547
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaronpuchert wrote:
> (It should be noted that the standard doesn't always base this on the
> immediate context being well-formed: for `std::common_type` it's based on
> whether some expression "denotes a valid type." But I assume that's an
> editorial issue and means the same thing.)
Filed c
https://github.com/aaronpuchert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135390
>From 20219354f6a5a59cb36554fb26c5864b5d9be74e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Puchert
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:47:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Suppress errors from well-formed-testing type traits in
SF
https://github.com/aaronpuchert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135390
>From ef1b40c0247205f8147fe6050c1303628833c247 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Puchert
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:47:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Suppress errors from well-formed-testing type traits in
SF
@@ -0,0 +1,748 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,748 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,748 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/rmarker approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while building
`clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/10386
Here is the relevant piece
https://github.com/brad0 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/trungnt2910 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135367
>From bc84623d87b606ff2af239170bd19c14cb4e2876 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trung Nguyen
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:53:14 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] [libunwind][Haiku] Fix signal frame unwinding
The current un
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135493
This change adds an ArraySubscriptExpr from the function parameter with base
type as Pointer
Issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/130197
>From 650a2402bef4ef83abaaa2b5ae78a7bcdfb4b79f Mon Sep
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper)
Changes
This change adds an ArraySubscriptExpr from the function parameter with base
type as Pointer
Issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/130197
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135456
>From 07c9c8756b564198c2761e353b1b2b2031c9a4ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:11:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and
functions
korli wrote:
> Yes, tested on `x86_64` and only `x86_64` (though support for other archs can
> be added by as easy as defining a few offsets and registers). Requires Haiku
> `hrev58811` to fully work with `tests/signal_unwind.pass.cpp`.
>
> This is also the same implementation used in my debug
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2025-04-12T14:26:30-03:00
New Revision: 761787d42576751afbaaba5107233ee849f81b6f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/761787d42576751afbaaba5107233ee849f81b6f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/761787d42576751afbaaba5107233ee849f81b6f.dif
https://github.com/ojhunt edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot8` while
building `clang-tools-extra` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/7295
Here i
korli wrote:
Tested on x86_64?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while building
`clang-tools-extra,clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/10397
Here is t
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
>From ca795c3f27e37ad8a8f165a3b10e9415cbfd66a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:32:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Improved the -Wtautological-overlap-compare diagnostics to
warn
ricejasonf wrote:
Sorry, I haven't had time to revisit this, but in that test we are only
checking the validity of the decomposition declarations so I think the addition
of `constexpr` to that variable should not affect the checks on the other
declarations. There is plenty of coverage on decom
hahnjo wrote:
> When I have time, I will need to see that I turn the reduced example into
> actual valid code to understand what is going on...
I spent some time turning it into valid code, but then noticed that the `error:
use of overloaded operator '=' is ambiguous` is gone. Going back, the
mgorny wrote:
I find this change quite confusing. It seems that `-static-libflangrt` now
expects entirely different install location than `-shared-libflangrt`.
Furthermore, the location used seems inconsistent with clang, i.e.:
/usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/../../../../lib/clang/21/lib/x86_64-pc-l
mgorny wrote:
> I find this change quite confusing. It seems that `-static-libflangrt` now
> expects entirely different install location than `-shared-libflangrt`.
Ah, sorry, now I see that
`-L/usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/../../../../lib/clang/21/lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu` is
also added, so the "resour
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-asan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot2` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/7523
Here is the relevan
@@ -1334,6 +1334,11 @@ unsigned ContinuationIndenter::getNewLineColumn(const
LineState &State) {
Style.IndentWidth;
}
+ if (Style.BraceWrapping.BeforeLambdaBody &&
+ Style.BraceWrapping.IndentBraces && Current.is(TT_LambdaLBrace)) {
+return CurrentState
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135479
>From f041f9c3eac94b8f1322ebaa9dfd60d4287840d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:36:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Wrap and indent lambda braces in GNU style
Fix #13
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135133
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
>From bf1294a2be9da63717087f8940a7bad5b3c522f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 23:21:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Avoid diagnosing std::array initializations
fo
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
>From bf1294a2be9da63717087f8940a7bad5b3c522f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 23:21:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Avoid diagnosing std::array initializations
fo
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134188
>From 56fc987f62fcc0ad74924bea0351efaebee23547 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 21:02:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Improve integer comparison by matching valid
expre
RiverDave wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134188
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/petrhosek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135505
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
trungnt2910 wrote:
> Does it build on r1beta5?
Theoretically yes, since I did not require any new Haiku nightly feature for
tge implementation.
The unwinding might not fully work due to missing CFE information in `libroot`,
in this case for `_kern_send_signal`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135133
>From 6876f4a602b44d587eb62163acd3e769b212b40b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:52:36 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] implement printing of canonical expressions
This pat
@@ -119,13 +119,18 @@
UseDesignatedInitializersCheck::UseDesignatedInitializersCheck(
void UseDesignatedInitializersCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
const auto HasBaseWithFields =
hasAnyBase(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(has(fieldDecl();
+
+ // see #133715
+
RiverDave wrote:
> Ok, I see, let's disable for ::std::array then, generalize in the future if
> we come across a similar use case.
Thanks, your feedback has been addressed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457
>From ca38d210bd3058575752ff9d21232e87a550a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions
clang-doc did
mizvekov wrote:
I've added a few test cases showing the effects on diagnostics.
Which is likely to be short lived, as the underlying issue looks easy to solve.
I have updated the patch to cover printing of dependent decltype as well.
I have looked into also covering DependentSizedArrays, but th
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135133
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129370
>From cae6e099a40086bba0790783f4088058f5aead20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 02:09:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] detect arithmetic operations within member list
in
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
>From ee7ba0b76586c73aa83f156982953482345f9b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 23:21:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Avoid diagnosing std::array initializations
fo
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
