farzonl wrote:
> @farzonl can you please revert the original commit? It seems to break just
> any LLVM build, so I guess the CI testing of all new PRs should be affected.
I don't see it breaking any build in LLVM, just the amd offload ones. Al the
Premerge tests also passed. I suspect the `AM
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Arvind Sudarsanam (asudarsa)
Changes
This PR has the following changes:
Replace llvm-link with calls to linkInModule to link device files Add
-print-linked-module option to dump linked module for testing Added a test to
verify that linki
dschuff wrote:
Thanks for working on this!
This will be the first time I'm not going to oppose an effort to remove Native
Client support 🎉
Although I am going to ask you to wait a couple of months to land it, until we
finally turn it off for good and start deleting the support code from Chromi
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2025-03-31T14:59:41-07:00
New Revision: 6ff33edcdc29be049829934399b2fb2585252439
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ff33edcdc29be049829934399b2fb2585252439
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ff33edcdc29be049829934399b2fb2585252439.diff
@@ -8444,9 +8444,16 @@ let CategoryName = "Lambda Issue" in {
"C++ standards before C++20">, InGroup, DefaultIgnore;
// C++20 class template argument deduction for alias templates.
- def warn_cxx17_compat_ctad_for_alias_templates : Warning<
- "class template argument d
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu
Date: 2025-03-31T20:28:29-04:00
New Revision: 0248d277cabab370b48114cc62aff393b273971b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0248d277cabab370b48114cc62aff393b273971b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0248d277cabab370b48114cc62aff393b273971b.dif
https://github.com/yxsamliu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133590
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev approved this pull request.
Lgtm!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131578
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/petrhosek approved this pull request.
This is definitely an improvement over status quo! Ideally, developers wouldn't
have to list Clang libraries separately from other libraries but that would
require some non-trivial build system refactoring that would be better done in
fo
@@ -10933,27 +11096,100 @@ OverloadCandidateSet::BestViableFunction(Sema &S,
SourceLocation Loc,
// -fgpu-exclude-wrong-side-overloads is off. When
// -fgpu-exclude-wrong-side-overloads is on, all candidates are compared
// uniformly in isBetterOverloadCandidate.
- if (
@@ -1126,7 +1208,8 @@ class Sema;
OperatorRewriteInfo RewriteInfo;
constexpr static unsigned NumInlineBytes =
-24 * sizeof(ImplicitConversionSequence);
+32 * sizeof(ImplicitConversionSequence);
zyn0217 wrote:
Can we add some comments?
@@ -14354,6 +14584,17 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildOverloadedCallExpr(Scope *S,
Expr *Fn,
OverloadingResult OverloadResult =
CandidateSet.BestViableFunction(*this, Fn->getBeginLoc(), Best);
+ // [C++23][over.call.func]
+ // if overload resolution selects a non-static me
anutosh491 wrote:
> I am wondering if we can add such CI for llvm, too... maybe you can discuss
> that at the llvm discord's infrastructure channel...
Absolutely, I shall do that and get back to you on this (I think there are
people at llvm looking into llvm+emscripten use cases and should sup
@@ -4853,9 +4853,16 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::readToken(int LevelDifference)
{
PreviousWasComment = FormatTok->is(tok::comment);
while (!Line->InPPDirective && FormatTok->is(tok::hash) &&
- (!Style.isVerilog() ||
-Keywords.isVerilogPPDirective
efriedma-quic wrote:
> CodeGen/Thumb2/pacbti-m-outliner-1.ll
```
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/pacbti-m-outliner-1.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/pacbti-m-outliner-1.ll
index 23924b2..dc06c26 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/pacbti-m-outliner-1.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/pacb
vzakhari wrote:
> > @farzonl can you please revert the original commit? It seems to break just
> > any LLVM build, so I guess the CI testing of all new PRs should be affected.
>
> I don't see it breaking any build in LLVM, just the amd offload ones. Al the
> Premerge tests also passed. I suspe
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Eccles (tblah)
Changes
Precise OpenMP standards support information is being documented in #132707
Flang now has good support for OpenMP Version 3.1 and earlier.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133745.diff
8
@@ -7558,6 +7558,18 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildExpressionFromDeclTemplateArgument(
} else {
assert(ParamType->isReferenceType() &&
"unexpected type for decl template argument");
+
+if (auto *Method = dyn_cast(VD);
+Method && Method->isExplicitObjectMe
https://github.com/GeorgeKA updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133806
>From dd978982b2ab41d3d2a55abb448e653a80158ecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: George Asante
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:41:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add warning message for C++17 alias template CTAD
---
cla
lyledean1 wrote:
Thanks for the review @AaronBallman , I've updated the PR from your comments
and the CI has passed - is this good to merge now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lld-x86_64-win` running on
`as-worker-93` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/146/builds/2619
Here is the releva
offsetof wrote:
> Will you need me to merge that for you?
Yes please, thank you @cor3ntin
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132284
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
@@ -1098,12 +1098,39 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*getTypeSourceInfoForStdAlignValT(Sema &S,
return S.Context.getTrivialTypeSourceInfo(StdAlignValDecl);
}
+// When searching for custom allocators on the PromiseType we want to
+// warn that we will ignore type aware allocators.
https://github.com/kuhar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133844
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133850
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -710,6 +710,85 @@ class ScalarExprEmitter : public
StmtVisitor {
HANDLEBINOP(Xor)
HANDLEBINOP(Or)
#undef HANDLEBINOP
+
+ mlir::Value emitCmp(const BinaryOperator *e) {
+const mlir::Location loc = cgf.getLoc(e->getExprLoc());
+mlir::Value result;
+QualType l
uecker wrote:
> Curiously, GCC doesn't merge the standard attributes either, it seems to do
> last-one-wins: https://godbolt.org/z/j3W7ej5Kq
I filed a bug for this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119526
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132939
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/6149
Her
@@ -8455,11 +8524,17 @@ void Sema::AddNonMemberOperatorCandidates(
if (FunTmpl) {
AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(FunTmpl, F.getPair(), ExplicitTemplateArgs,
FunctionArgs, CandidateSet);
- if (CandidateSet.getRewriteInfo().shouldAd
@@ -10230,9 +10307,15 @@
Sema::AddArgumentDependentLookupCandidates(DeclarationName Name,
/*AllowExplicit=*/true, ADLCallKind::UsesADL);
if (CandidateSet.getRewriteInfo().shouldAddReversed(
*this, Args, FTD->getTemplatedDecl())) {
+
+// As
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/8943
Here is the r
https://github.com/zygoloid commented:
I think we should do this. Even if WG21 decides that they only want to allow
this and not require it, it seems like a good change that we stand a decent
chance of reaching implementation consensus on.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133426
_
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
There are some system libraries such as sqlite3 which forward declare a struct
then use a pointer to that forward declared type in various APIs. Ignore these
types ForwardDeclChecker like oth
@@ -93,6 +91,9 @@ void test() {
(int *)null_val;// ok
(int *)nullptr; // ok
(nullptr_t)nullptr; // ok
+ (nullptr_t)0; // ok
+ (nullptr_t)(void *)0; // ok
+ (nullptr_t)null_val; // ok
Sirraide wrote:
What about `(nullptr_t)__null`
https
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-latest-gcc`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-latest-gcc` while building `clang` at step 4
"cmake-configure".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/130/builds/11827
Here is the
https://github.com/zeule updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131605
>From 58eb85b45f56142f36686d2a1499deb2e7736eb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugene Shalygin
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:23:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] option to control bin-packing keyworded
paramete
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133815
A previous checkin used a workaround to generate the nsw flag where needed for
unary ops. This change upstreams a subsequent change that was made in the
incubator to generate the flag correctly.
>From a96e0
DanielCChen wrote:
Note that the reason `aio.exp` is not needed is because flang-rt currently
doesn't do asynchronous I/O. Once it is enabled using POSIX `aio_*` system
calls, it will need to export those calls.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131822
https://github.com/jzc edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133194
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133710
>From 81c45d6226d217197ae7b6c35e9ace22027cb7a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Pengcheng
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:12:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV][NFC] Make generated intrinsic records more
human
@@ -1098,12 +1098,39 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*getTypeSourceInfoForStdAlignValT(Sema &S,
return S.Context.getTrivialTypeSourceInfo(StdAlignValDecl);
}
+// When searching for custom allocators on the PromiseType we want to
+// warn that we will ignore type aware allocators.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/133199
The fix to reland was moving `Targets/DirectX.cpp` from
`clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/CMakeLists.txt` back to
`clang/
@@ -35,6 +35,29 @@ namespace std {
template T declval();
} // namespace std
+namespace cwg2611 { // cwg2611: 21
+#if __cpp_fold_expressions >= 201603
Endilll wrote:
```suggestion
#if __cplusplus >= 201703L
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1337
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Union members get the same address, so we can't just use
`Pointer::getByteOffset()`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133852.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteC
vzakhari wrote:
@farzonl can you please revert the original commit? It seems to break just any
LLVM build, so I guess the CI testing of all new PRs should be affected.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133776
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
@@ -3115,11 +3115,24 @@ void CastOperation::CheckCStyleCast() {
Self.CurFPFeatureOverrides());
}
}
- if (DestType->isNullPtrType() && !SrcType->isNullPtrType()) {
-Self.Diag(SrcExpr.get()->getExprLoc(), diag::err_nullptr_cast)
https://github.com/mustartt edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Iñaki?= Amatria Barral
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -817,8 +817,13 @@ void Flang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
// 'flang -E' always produces output that is suitable for use as fixed form
// Fortran. However it is only valid free form sourc
https://github.com/mustartt edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asudarsa commented:
I tried to build it locally and I got a series of 'undefined reference' errors.
Sorry, I will need to revert my approval.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133776
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
Author: Finn Plummer
Date: 2025-03-31T13:38:09-07:00
New Revision: 5e2860a8d375ded2d2912894e380fefc8cb1f23a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5e2860a8d375ded2d2912894e380fefc8cb1f23a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5e2860a8d375ded2d2912894e380fefc8cb1f23a.diff
https://github.com/inbelic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133790
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12,22 +16,307 @@ void b0(int a, int b) {
x = x | b;
}
-// CHECK: %{{.+}} = cir.binop(mul, %{{.+}}, %{{.+}}) nsw : !s32i
-// CHECK: %{{.+}} = cir.binop(div, %{{.+}}, %{{.+}}) : !s32i
-// CHECK: %{{.+}} = cir.binop(rem, %{{.+}}, %{{.+}}) : !s32i
-// CHECK: %{{.+}} = cir.bi
https://github.com/mariusdr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1138,8 +1138,9 @@ mlir::Value ScalarExprEmitter::emitShl(const BinOpInfo
&ops) {
mlir::isa(ops.lhs.getType()))
cgf.cgm.errorNYI("sanitizers");
- cgf.cgm.errorNYI("shift ops");
- return {};
+ return builder.create(cgf.getLoc(ops.loc),
and
https://github.com/tarunprabhu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -759,6 +762,46 @@ LogicalResult cir::BinOp::verify() {
return mlir::success();
}
+//===--===//
+// ShiftOp
+//===--===//
+LogicalResult
https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
Seems reasonable to me, but I’d still like @erichkeane to take a look at this
as the attributes code owner
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133107
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -8444,9 +8444,16 @@ let CategoryName = "Lambda Issue" in {
"C++ standards before C++20">, InGroup, DefaultIgnore;
// C++20 class template argument deduction for alias templates.
- def warn_cxx17_compat_ctad_for_alias_templates : Warning<
- "class template argument d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
A previous checkin used a workaround to generate the nsw flag where needed for
unary ops. This change upstreams a subsequent change that was made in the
incubator to generate the flag correctly.
---
Ful
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (offsetof)
Changes
Require `std::initializer_list` to be a class template with a template-head
equivalent to `template` and no default arguments.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133822.diff
3 Files A
Author: Florian Hahn
Date: 2025-03-31T22:27:59+01:00
New Revision: 32f24029c72dae175c9e2cc81f931f065a2ba347
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32f24029c72dae175c9e2cc81f931f065a2ba347
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32f24029c72dae175c9e2cc81f931f065a2ba347.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
We can safely switch to insert_range here because
SyntheticStmtSourceMap starts out empty in the constructor. Also
TheCFG->synthetic_stmts() comes from DenseMap, so we know that the
keys are
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133844
We can safely switch to insert_range here because
SyntheticStmtSourceMap starts out empty in the constructor. Also
TheCFG->synthetic_stmts() comes from DenseMap, so we know that the
keys are unique. That
asudarsa wrote:
Please remove redundant 'support' from PR topic
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133194
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3249,166 +3249,204 @@ void SemaHLSL::processExplicitBindingsOnDecl(VarDecl
*VD) {
}
}
}
-
-static bool CastInitializer(Sema &S, ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *E,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &List,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &Des
@@ -12071,6 +12071,37 @@ NamespaceDecl *Sema::getOrCreateStdNamespace() {
return getStdNamespace();
}
+/// Check that the template-head of this class template is acceptable for
+/// a declaration of 'std::initializer_list', and optionally diagnose if
+/// it is not.
+/// \re
@@ -12071,6 +12071,37 @@ NamespaceDecl *Sema::getOrCreateStdNamespace() {
return getStdNamespace();
}
+/// Check that the template-head of this class template is acceptable for
+/// a declaration of 'std::initializer_list', and optionally diagnose if
+/// it is not.
+/// \re
shiltian wrote:
> @shiltian Could you update MLIR infrastructure for the new default as well?
> `mlir/lib/Target/LLVM/ROCDL/Target.cpp` and
> `mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/ROCDLDialect.cpp`, which both keep an ear on the
> ABI version, partly for linking in device libraries
https://github.com/l
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ def GNUImaginaryConstant :
DiagGroup<"gnu-imaginary-constant">;
def IgnoredGCH : DiagGroup<"ignored-gch">;
def IgnoredReferenceQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-reference-qualifiers">;
def IgnoredQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-qualifiers",
[IgnoredReference
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++11 -Wignored-qualifiers -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++11 -Wignored-base-class-qualifiers -verify
lyledean1 wrote:
I've updated those tests - so will let the CI run now and confirm everything
passes
https:
https://github.com/mariusdr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133574
>From dd54aa59eabe9c3b7b110f46d82ff5c4d0b88c57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marius doerner
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:21:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Clear `NeedsCleaning` flag after
`ExpandBuiltinMa
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// Fixes #59819. The underlying problem was fixed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142560, but this patch adds a proper regression test.
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --format=md --doxygen --output=%t --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileChec
@@ -3249,166 +3249,204 @@ void SemaHLSL::processExplicitBindingsOnDecl(VarDecl
*VD) {
}
}
}
-
-static bool CastInitializer(Sema &S, ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *E,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &List,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &Des
@@ -3249,166 +3249,204 @@ void SemaHLSL::processExplicitBindingsOnDecl(VarDecl
*VD) {
}
}
}
-
-static bool CastInitializer(Sema &S, ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *E,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &List,
-llvm::SmallVectorImpl &Des
@@ -3249,33 +3249,42 @@ void SemaHLSL::processExplicitBindingsOnDecl(VarDecl
*VD) {
}
}
}
+namespace {
+class InitListTransformer {
+ Sema &S;
+ ASTContext &Ctx;
+ QualType InitTy;
+ QualType *DstIt = nullptr;
+ Expr **ArgIt = nullptr;
+ bool Wrap;
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vls`
running on `linaro-g3-03` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/143/builds/6581
Here is the relevant piece of th
asudarsa wrote:
> Shouldn't we be able to just use LTO after the SPIR-V backend left
> experimental?
Hi @jhuber6
Thanks for the ping back. That is the eventual path for us. However, we would
like to do it in stages. Replacing llvm-link tool with linkInModule call helps
us to achieve one of
jyknight wrote:
- In C89: it's impossible to get the address of a temporary struct, so the
lifetime is irrelevant.
- In C99: you now can get the address (from an array subobject), but the
lifetime was defined as "until the next sequence point". This made it
technically illegal to access even n
asudarsa wrote:
@jhuber6
Can you please take a look? This is one of the many changes we are making to
upstream SYCL.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133797
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
tahonermann wrote:
@Fznamznon, @frasercrmck, any further review feedback? @erichkeane, would you
like to weigh in on this change before it lands?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133030
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -Wno-dangling -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=C99
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c11 -Wno-dangling -emit-llvm -o - %s |
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64le-clang-multistage-test`
while building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/76/builds/8327
Here i
@@ -1646,7 +1646,6 @@ void Preprocessor::ExpandBuiltinMacro(Token &Tok) {
// Set up the return result.
Tok.setIdentifierInfo(nullptr);
- Tok.clearFlag(Token::NeedsCleaning);
mariusdr wrote:
True, my bad. If the flag is removed we can get asserts on __DAT
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133472
>From f9268b3a331fd8caf2440d742a1f084c0f9648ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:01:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [C11] Implement WG14 N1285 (temporary lifetimes)
This
krzysz00 wrote:
@shiltian Could you update MLIR infrastructure for the new default as well?
`mlir/lib/Target/LLVM/ROCDL/Target.cpp` and
`mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/ROCDLDialect.cpp`, which both keep an ear on the
ABI version, partly for linking in device libraries
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133804
>From f5d2ab90f34cf2d7323e9c3c2e37680c35f411d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:38:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [alpha.webkit.ForwardDeclChecker] Ignore forward declared
stru
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the quick review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133755
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dtcxzyw edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
301 - 390 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
