@@ -1454,6 +1567,12 @@ static bool
IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
QualType Owner2Type) {
const auto *Owner2 = cast(Field2->getDeclContext());
+ // In C23 mode, check for structural equivalence of attribu
@@ -450,6 +453,116 @@ class StmtComparer {
};
} // namespace
+static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
+ const Attr *Attr1, const Attr *Attr2) {
+ // Two attributes are structurally equivalent if they are
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ struct StructuralEquivalenceContext {
/// key: (from, to, IgnoreTemplateParmDepth)
using NonEquivalentDeclSet = llvm::DenseSet>;
+ /// The language options to use for making a structural equivalence check.
+ const LangOptions &LangOpts;
+
--
vgvassilev wrote:
@ilya-biryukov, would you mind giving this PR a test on your infrastructure and
if it works maybe share some performance results?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133057
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
@@ -3368,7 +3368,8 @@ bool AMDGPUInstructionSelector::selectG_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT(
}
bool AMDGPUInstructionSelector::selectBufferLoadLds(MachineInstr &MI) const {
- assert(!AMDGPU::isGFX12Plus(STI));
+ if (!Subtarget->hasLDSBufferLoad())
Pierre-vh wrote:
Can
@@ -161,3 +161,45 @@ void top() {
clang_analyzer_isTainted(A.data); // expected-warning {{YES}}
}
} // namespace gh114270
+
+
+namespace format_attribute {
+__attribute__((__format__ (__printf__, 1, 2)))
+void log_nonmethod(const char *fmt, ...);
NagyDonat wr
hahnjo wrote:
> While I may not able to look into them in detail recently, it may be helpful
> to split this into seperate patches to review and to land.
I initially considered this, but @vgvassilev said in
https://github.com/root-project/root/pull/17722#issuecomment-2706555950 he
prefers a s
@@ -10104,7 +10104,8 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerINTRINSIC_VOID(SDValue
Op,
case Intrinsic::amdgcn_raw_ptr_buffer_load_lds:
case Intrinsic::amdgcn_struct_buffer_load_lds:
case Intrinsic::amdgcn_struct_ptr_buffer_load_lds: {
-assert(!AMDGPU::isGFX12Plus(*Subtarg
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133062
None
>From 7a6c4284aa576e29e83b50a121ba2df4e8909079 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:49:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Print more info in Bloc
@@ -2997,6 +2997,7 @@ static void RenderFloatingPointOptions(const ToolChain
&TC, const Driver &D,
LangOptions::ComplexRangeKind Range = LangOptions::ComplexRangeKind::CX_None;
std::string ComplexRangeStr = "";
std::string GccRangeComplexOption = "";
+ std::string LastC
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133064
When revisiting a variable, we do that by simply calling visitDecl() for it,
which means it will end up with the same EvalID as the rest of the evaluation -
but this way we end up allowing reads from mutable v
@@ -1067,7 +1067,8 @@ def ProcessorFeatures {
FeatureDotProd, FeatureFPARMv8,
FeatureMatMulInt8,
FeatureSSBS, FeatureCCIDX,
FeatureJS, FeatureLSE, FeatureRAS,
Featur
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
When revisiting a variable, we do that by simply calling visitDecl() for it,
which means it will end up with the same EvalID as the rest of the evaluation -
but this way we end up allowing reads from mutable
https://github.com/changkhothuychung edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-03-26T20:54:08-07:00
New Revision: 64046e9d2628ce421682eea8465e41554b46c96d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64046e9d2628ce421682eea8465e41554b46c96d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64046e9d2628ce421682eea8465e41554b46c96d.diff
L
https://github.com/imdj edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: QuietMisdreavus
Date: 2025-03-26T17:46:21-06:00
New Revision: 3386156b1e8418083e99833d3d22420cf439c039
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3386156b1e8418083e99833d3d22420cf439c039
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3386156b1e8418083e99833d3d22420cf439c039.dif
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Justin Cai (jzc)
Changes
This PR adds support for AOT compilation for Intel CPUs and GPUs in
clang-sycl-linker. When no `-arch` is passed to `clang-sycl-linker`, the output
of the tool will be the resulting linked SPIR-V bytecode. If the
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133201
This patch uses a range constructor to collapse:
llvm::StringSet<> Dest;
for (const auto &S : Src)
Dest.insert(S);
down to:
llvm::StringSet<> Dest(llvm::from_range, Src);
>From 5f536050eb4df
https://github.com/kmpeng edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132288
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
This patch uses a range constructor to collapse:
llvm::StringSet<> Dest;
for (const auto &S : Src)
Dest.insert(S);
down to:
llvm::StringSet<> Dest(llvm::from_range, Src);
---
Full d
https://github.com/imdj edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vls`
running on `linaro-g3-03` while building `clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/143/builds/6485
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2025-03-26T21:20:04-07:00
New Revision: 16d1942c069a7572efceba884452f08a157cb684
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16d1942c069a7572efceba884452f08a157cb684
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16d1942c069a7572efceba884452f08a157cb684.diff
olologin wrote:
> It would feel safer if the custom check was passed via command-line instead,
> similar to --config
But then you will not be able to properly disable such checks for subfolders
(modules) of some huge project, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131804
https://github.com/jzc created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133194
This PR adds support for AOT compilation for Intel CPUs and GPUs in
clang-sycl-linker. When no `-arch` is passed to `clang-sycl-linker`, the output
of the tool will be the resulting linked SPIR-V bytecode. If the `-
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133212
The instantiation of a VarDecl's initializer might be deferred until the
variable is actually used. However, we were still building the DeclRefExpr with
a type that could later be changed by the initializer's i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
The instantiation of a VarDecl's initializer might be deferred until the
variable is actually used. However, we were still building the DeclRefExpr with
a type that could later be changed by the initializer'
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ void ConstCorrectnessCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder
*Finder) {
const auto ConstReference = hasType(references(isConstQualified()));
HerrCai0907 wrote:
I think the comment means check the constness of pointer and array instead of
const
https://github.com/sumitsays updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131237
>From 6d5c4053c90975d64e378e52779dab9c3ffb64cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Agarwal
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:02:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] dot2add working for dxil without sema check
---
clang/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
This patch uses a range constructor to collapse:
llvm::StringSet<> Dest;
for (const auto &S : Src)
Dest.insert(S);
down to:
llvm::StringSet<> Dest(llvm::from_range, Src);
---
Full diff: ht
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132542
>From 9a8d9b7d5d3f07685579c3d1336e146755bb7efa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Wang, Phoebe"
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 19:15:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [X86][AVX10] Re-target mavx10.1 and emit warning for
ma
https://github.com/andykaylor approved this pull request.
Looks good. Thanks for the updates!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133205
This patch removes the old range constructors of SmallSet and
StringSet that do not take the llvm::from_range tag. Since there are
so few uses, this patch directly removes them without going through
the d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
This patch removes the old range constructors of SmallSet and
StringSet that do not take the llvm::from_range tag. Since there are
so few uses, this patch directly removes them without going through
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
This patch removes the old range constructors of SmallSet and
StringSet that do not take the llvm::from_range tag. Since there are
so few uses, this patch directly removes them without going through
the
@@ -44,23 +44,19 @@ MDNode *LoopInfo::createPipeliningMetadata(const
LoopAttributes &Attrs,
else if (Attrs.PipelineInitiationInterval != 0)
Enabled = true;
+ SmallVector Args;
+ Args.append(LoopProperties.begin(), LoopProperties.end());
+
if (Enabled != true) {
-
@@ -44,23 +44,19 @@ MDNode *LoopInfo::createPipeliningMetadata(const
LoopAttributes &Attrs,
else if (Attrs.PipelineInitiationInterval != 0)
Enabled = true;
+ SmallVector Args;
+ Args.append(LoopProperties.begin(), LoopProperties.end());
+
if (Enabled != true) {
-
https://github.com/kasuga-fj commented:
Thanks for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131985
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-02` while building `clang`
at step 12 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/5888
Here is the relevant piece of
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Ariel-Burton)
Changes
Commit 20b7f5982622f includes a case that checks diagnostics for for loops
using thread locals.
This fails on platforms which do not support TLS.
This change adds guards to run this part of the test iff the feat
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2025-03-27T14:04:41+08:00
New Revision: 80f216db530eda98a444bc1994c7d69a7107c3c6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80f216db530eda98a444bc1994c7d69a7107c3c6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80f216db530eda98a444bc1994c7d69a7107c3c6.diff
LO
501 - 542 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
