tbaederr wrote:
> > It looks like this is similar to `__builtin_constant_p` - what is the
> > proposed behavior wrt. side effects in the evaluated expression? gcc and
> > clang disagree about this a lot currently: https://godbolt.org/z/rbneznT9z
>
> It is intended to have no side-effects. I fo
https://github.com/DanielCChen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132363
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kees wrote:
> It looks like this is similar to `__builtin_constant_p` - what is the
> proposed behavior wrt. side effects in the evaluated expression? gcc and
> clang disagree about this a lot currently: https://godbolt.org/z/rbneznT9z
It is intended to have no side-effects. I followed the sam
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130383
>From e8bf3b6f08f0e0030ea36fe8c42fcde166ad27e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Stearn
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:22:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [libclang/python] Add equality comparison operators fo
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132507
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
Hey @YLChenZ. Please join the review of #132427.
Your test case and review comments are more than welcomed!
You probably have debugged the checker thus gained important insights that
would be useful to challenge the existing proposal.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1
steakhal wrote:
@YLChenZ had a slightly different solution. I redirected him here to challenge
your proposal.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Baranov Victor (vbvictor)
Changes
Fix false positives in `bugprone-crtp-constructor-accessibility` check on
deleted constructors that cannot be used to construct objects, even if they
have public or protected access.
Closes h
https://github.com/vbvictor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132543
Fix false positives in `bugprone-crtp-constructor-accessibility` check on
deleted constructors that cannot be used to construct objects, even if they
have public or protected access.
Closes https://github.com
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Baranov Victor (vbvictor)
Changes
Fix false positives in `bugprone-crtp-constructor-accessibility` check on
deleted constructors that cannot be used to construct objects, even if they
have public or protected access.
Closes https://
DeinAlptraum wrote:
As for investigation:
I wrote four tests in `test_file.py` that just assert all files as equal (the
ones named `test_file_eq_failing...`) which is expected to fail, and all four
of these tests fail for me locally. But in the CI, it seems that indeed all
in-memory files seem
zyn0217 wrote:
> @zyn0217
>
>
>
> I am having second thoughts on both this PR and the follow up fix
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/adb0d8ddceb143749c519d14b8b31b481071da77
>
>
>
> We shouldn't be adding information that is required for correct substitution
> into `SubstTem
mizvekov wrote:
I have a patch, I'll post it soon!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109518
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ endif()
# This can be used to detect whether we're in the runtimes build.
set(LLVM_RUNTIMES_BUILD ON)
+if (LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND UNIX AND ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME}
MATCHES "AIX")
+ # Set LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=OFF as AIX doesn't s
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132404
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132072
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -313,8 +314,8 @@ function(add_libclc_builtin_set)
INTERNALIZE
TARGET ${builtins_link_lib_tgt}
INPUTS $
-${ARG_INTERNAL_LINK_DEPENDENCIES}
- DEPENDENCIES ${builtins_link_lib_tmp_tgt}
+$
wenju-he wrote:
thanks, changed t
dtellenbach wrote:
@EthanLuisMcDonough I think your patch effectively introduces a dependency on
libc because `__llvm_write_custom_profile` has `__attribute__((uses))`` but
calls e.g. `atoi` through `setupIOBuffer`.
In compiler-rt it's not safe to make that assumption because it potentially
b
Author: Paul Kirth
Date: 2025-03-20T14:11:42-07:00
New Revision: 3fbc9b9efc669a236ab21ab06f854bd9ad751af3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3fbc9b9efc669a236ab21ab06f854bd9ad751af3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3fbc9b9efc669a236ab21ab06f854bd9ad751af3.diff
LO
DanielCChen wrote:
I will revert this commit first.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/14962
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132232
>From 5008e3cff11bb019e22148926f0088fbb8fc530f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:00:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Docs] Document freestanding requirements
This adds so
mstorsjo wrote:
> > clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp is over 1MB long (>23k LoC), and can take
> > minutes to recompile (depending on compiler and host system) when modified,
> > and 5 seconds for clangd to update for every edit. Splitting this file was
> > discussed in this thread:
>
> It loo
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Why was this landed w/o any approvals?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132516
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 8
"test-build-unified-tree-check-lld".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/22785
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot12`
while building `clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/8811
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast`
running on `as-builder-4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/33/builds/13572
Here is the relevant piec
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2025-03-21T09:24:11-07:00
New Revision: b858ba0f6597c66e5c276ca9e2564ca27e7e28e7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b858ba0f6597c66e5c276ca9e2564ca27e7e28e7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b858ba0f6597c66e5c276ca9e2564ca27e7e28e7.diff
vbvictor wrote:
Rebase and PR-checks are done, ready to merge
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132281
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#131965
Reverted due to issue reported here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965#issuecomment-2741619498
>From 9d96ab9704ba87c81e71d7b26095b68b2ca8aa80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:0
https://github.com/dtcxzyw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130734
>From b9876822acdca4eaea6496a1d6471e2c0f4ad2e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yingwei Zheng
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:20:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [Clang][CodeGen] Do not set inbounds flag for struct GEP
wi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast`
running on `as-builder-4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/33/builds/13582
Here is th
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
Would it make more sense to use
`_Static_assert(__builtin_is_modifiable_lvalue(...), "")`?
Also, I think it would be valuable to cover more types.
N1570 6.3.2.1/1,
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-22T14:58:32+01:00
New Revision: c51d396f4dec65bac24e00ace3f5ce5582d2c699
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c51d396f4dec65bac24e00ace3f5ce5582d2c699
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c51d396f4dec65bac24e00ace3f5ce5582d2c699.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132544
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-03-22T23:04:46+08:00
New Revision: c5d4dfb291af1f9c099c25b78dd2ea0a6496a45f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c5d4dfb291af1f9c099c25b78dd2ea0a6496a45f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c5d4dfb291af1f9c099c25b78dd2ea0a6496a45f.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132369
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Add PreInc and PreDec ops for this purpose and ignore the overflow if
UnaryOperator::canOverflow() returns false.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132557.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (
https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132372
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132557
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -17,3 +16,134 @@ void k() {
}
} // namespace GH64347
+
+namespace GH123591 {
+
+
+template < typename... _Types >
+struct variant {
+ template
+ variant(_Types...);
+};
+
+template
+using AstNode = variant;
+
+AstNode tree(42, 43, 44);
+
+}
+
+namespace GH123591_2 {
+
+
@@ -17,3 +16,134 @@ void k() {
}
} // namespace GH64347
+
+namespace GH123591 {
+
+
+template < typename... _Types >
+struct variant {
+ template
+ variant(_Types...);
+};
+
+template
+using AstNode = variant;
+
+AstNode tree(42, 43, 44);
+
+}
+
+namespace GH123591_2 {
+
+
https://github.com/jrtc27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for the fix!
Second, that we need a summary explaining the problem and solution.
Is this linked to a bug report, if it is, then we should mention that bug
report as well.
I would also like to see a test showing a case where we successfully print
arichardson wrote:
Would be good to get a review from e.g. amdgpu folks since the non-zero globals
AS would result in a functional change (assuming this intrinsic is supported
there).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132489
___
cfe-commits m
@@ -490,15 +490,17 @@ genReferencesBlock(const std::vector
&References,
}
return Out;
}
-
static std::unique_ptr
-writeFileDefinition(const Location &L,
-std::optional RepositoryUrl = std::nullopt) {
- if (!L.IsFileInRootDir && !RepositoryUrl)
+writeF
@@ -749,13 +752,8 @@ genHTML(const EnumInfo &I, const ClangDocContext &CDCtx) {
Out.emplace_back(std::move(Table));
- if (I.DefLoc) {
-if (!CDCtx.RepositoryUrl)
- Out.emplace_back(writeFileDefinition(*I.DefLoc));
-else
- Out.emplace_back(
- write
@@ -57,11 +58,13 @@ static void writeFileDefinition(const ClangDocContext
&CDCtx, const Location &L,
OS << "*Defined at " << L.Filename << "#" << std::to_string(L.LineNumber)
<< "*";
} else {
-OS << "*Defined at [" << L.Filename << "#" << std::to_string(L.Line
@@ -12985,6 +12985,16 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBuiltinCallExpr(const
CallExpr *E,
assert(Src.isInt());
return Success((Src.getInt() & (Alignment - 1)) == 0 ? 1 : 0, E);
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_is_modifiable_lvalue: {
+const Expr *Arg = E->getArg(0);
@@ -490,15 +490,17 @@ genReferencesBlock(const std::vector
&References,
}
return Out;
}
-
static std::unique_ptr
-writeFileDefinition(const Location &L,
-std::optional RepositoryUrl = std::nullopt) {
- if (!L.IsFileInRootDir && !RepositoryUrl)
+writeF
@@ -57,11 +58,13 @@ static void writeFileDefinition(const ClangDocContext
&CDCtx, const Location &L,
OS << "*Defined at " << L.Filename << "#" << std::to_string(L.LineNumber)
<< "*";
} else {
-OS << "*Defined at [" << L.Filename << "#" << std::to_string(L.Line
@@ -749,13 +752,8 @@ genHTML(const EnumInfo &I, const ClangDocContext &CDCtx) {
Out.emplace_back(std::move(Table));
- if (I.DefLoc) {
-if (!CDCtx.RepositoryUrl)
- Out.emplace_back(writeFileDefinition(*I.DefLoc));
-else
- Out.emplace_back(
- write
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132285
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
Fix overall looks fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132285
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -23,3 +22,67 @@ void test(A &a, B &b) {
const A &&ar10 = static_cast(xvalue());
const A &&ar11 = static_cast(xvalue());
}
+
+struct C : private A { // expected-note 4 {{declared private here}}
+C&& that();
+
+void f() {
+(void)static_cast(*this);
+
https://github.com/hulxv edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131280
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -276,6 +286,62 @@
// HTML-CIRCLE: return
// HTML-CIRCLE: double The perimeter of the circle.
+// HTML-SHAPE-PREFIX: class Shape
+// HTML-SHAPE-PREFIX-NEXT:
+// HTML-SHAPE-PREFIX-NEXT: Defined at line
+// HTML-SHAPE-PREFIX-NEXT: https://repository.com/./incl
@@ -383,4 +449,4 @@
// MD-ALL-FILES: ## [GlobalNamespace](GlobalNamespace{{[\/]}}index.md)
// MD-INDEX: # C/C++ Reference
-// MD-INDEX: * Namespace: [GlobalNamespace](GlobalNamespace)
+// MD-INDEX: * Namespace: [GlobalNamespace](GlobalNamespace)
ilovepi wrote
https://github.com/arichardson approved this pull request.
'Thraed' typo in the commit message but otherwise LGTM. But someone else should
also approve this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lis
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve2-vla`
running on `linaro-g4-02` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/198/builds/3067
Here is the relevant piece of t
ZhongUncle wrote:
@ilovepi I am not familiar with PR, so accidentally closed the previous PR.
This is a new one. Sorry for that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132510
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
tbaederr wrote:
> > It looks like this is similar to `__builtin_constant_p` - what is the
> > proposed behavior wrt. side effects in the evaluated expression? gcc and
> > clang disagree about this a lot currently: https://godbolt.org/z/rbneznT9z
>
> IIUC this intrinsic shouldn't be similar to
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130383
>From e8bf3b6f08f0e0030ea36fe8c42fcde166ad27e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Stearn
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:22:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [libclang/python] Add equality comparison operators fo
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff a27da0a20cbfb9f0c600d53bf2520f068b222f59
262f6602c76de472ddcacfe1d13069f777aaec73 --e
https://github.com/sumitsays updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131237
>From 6d5c4053c90975d64e378e52779dab9c3ffb64cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Agarwal
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:02:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] dot2add working for dxil without sema check
---
clang/in
zyn0217 wrote:
I'll merge without a release note, instead I plan to backport it to the 20
release along with a changelog.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132507
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
Nice cleanup, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132369
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/13778
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132557
Add PreInc and PreDec ops for this purpose and ignore the overflow if
UnaryOperator::canOverflow() returns false.
>From 06a6ab84ce28373731bd3750b876f951f849b129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ Changes in existing checks
- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-default-member-init
` check by matching
- ``constexpr`` and ``static``` values on member initialization and by
detecting
- explicit casting of built-in types within member list initialization.
+
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-22T18:03:50+01:00
New Revision: db7475a770c360a42560aa01859d5dcbb808ade8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db7475a770c360a42560aa01859d5dcbb808ade8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db7475a770c360a42560aa01859d5dcbb808ade8.diff
L
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto commented:
Hi Marian,
I am seeing some errors by the CI, but it goes away If I re-run
update_cc_tests it fixes it.
But like the other files it also adds some extra check lines.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127043
_
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
Sirraide wrote:
> Edit: Perhaps it's wanted to make this intrinsic accept VLA (and report
> `false`) and variably-modified types without evaluating the non-constant
> array size.
That sho
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm < %s| FileCheck %s
+
+void report(int value);
Sirraide wrote:
Yeah, all of these should just be sema tests using `static_assert`; maybe 1 or
2 codegen tests just to make sure we can emit
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132550
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ Changes in existing checks
- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-default-member-init
` check by matching
- ``constexpr`` and ``static``` values on member initialization and by
detecting
- explicit casting of built-in types within member list initialization.
+
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/14750
Here is the relevant piece of the
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132555
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132555
See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132061?notification_referrer_id=NT_kwDOBv04MLUxNTM5NjQwOTM5MToxMTcyNTgyODg#issuecomment-2745313527
>From e74045c3cb0264d434411b7a9046637e1d9984ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:0
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-03-22T23:58:15+08:00
New Revision: 868c89ff0e0ef09ac504873cb9bab8197f5fca2d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/868c89ff0e0ef09ac504873cb9bab8197f5fca2d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/868c89ff0e0ef09ac504873cb9bab8197f5fca2d.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132555
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132061?notification_referrer_id=NT_kwDOBv04MLUxNTM5NjQwOTM5MToxMTcyNTgyODg#issuecomment-2745313527
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13255
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131374
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ConcreteCactus updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130421
>From 41c7e3093e9943383d25d7c8d0c31b5ab2edd18b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=81ron=20H=C3=A1rn=C3=A1si?=
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:43:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Added Conflictin
mizvekov wrote:
I posted an alternative fix for this here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132559
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131649
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
jrtc27 wrote:
As far as I know GPUs don't do TLS...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129370
>From c81ff04def9d2198c84b96fb5cfa1de90ca57a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 02:09:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] detect arithmetic operations within member list
in
https://github.com/RiverDave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129370
>From 4e5e44c721e1867b9263d0a0ea4669d0bd3bdd4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivera
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 02:09:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] detect arithmetic operations within member list
in
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ Changes in existing checks
- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-default-member-init
` check by matching
- ``constexpr`` and ``static``` values on member initialization and by
detecting
- explicit casting of built-in types within member list initialization.
+
RiverDave wrote:
@HerrCai0907 could we merge this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132559
>From 27cf231f8497cc483c44d5e5ada05af9ae48e6ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 14:39:10 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] ASTContex: fix getCommonSugaredType for array types
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This corrects the behaviour for getCommonSugaredType with regards to array top
level qualifiers: remove differing top level qualifiers, as they must be
redundant with element qualifiers.
Fixes https://g
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132559
This corrects the behaviour for getCommonSugaredType with regards to array top
level qualifiers: remove differing top level qualifiers, as they must be
redundant with element qualifiers.
Fixes https://github.
@@ -749,13 +752,8 @@ genHTML(const EnumInfo &I, const ClangDocContext &CDCtx) {
Out.emplace_back(std::move(Table));
- if (I.DefLoc) {
-if (!CDCtx.RepositoryUrl)
- Out.emplace_back(writeFileDefinition(*I.DefLoc));
-else
- Out.emplace_back(
- write
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
