@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s\
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection
+
+void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
+
+using size_t = decltype(sizeof(int));
+
+template
+void escape(FirstT first, Rest... args);
+
+namespace CustomClassType {
+struct
BaLiKfromUA wrote:
Could someone merge it?
Or do we need another reviewer?
I don't have merge permissions :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128437
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/17949
Here is
https://github.com/mizvekov requested changes to this pull request.
What problem is this trying to fix here?
At first glance, I think it's a problem that we ast-print instantiations as
explicit specializations. If we fix that, does your problem go away?
Secondly, I agree that if we would print
@@ -12796,6 +12799,7 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr(CXXOperatorCallExpr *E) {
+ llvm::SaveAndRestore cxxOpCallScope(isInCXXOperatorCall, true);
erichkeane wrote:
```suggestion
llvm::SaveAndRestore CxxOpCallScope(isInCXXOpera
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129169
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dpaoliello wrote:
> Any further thoughts on splitting unwind info, as we discussed in #110338?
Unfortunately, this isn't going to work. @pmsjt informs me that we can't have
epilogs in chained unwind tables, since they are only for additional savereg
codes. Using the "assume terminator is 1-byt
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129285
Improve the diagnostics for chained comparisons to report actual expressions
and operators
Fixes #129069
>From 66cd32d7c58976bf050f82c0b6af39bc2b838a74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: F
https://github.com/andykaylor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129167
>From d1fa2629b5786befa8ca8f839cf948df4644d615 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:52:18 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CIR] Upstream func args alloca handling
This change adds
https://github.com/PiJoules updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126785
>From 07c7c069a57ec78e64df711cb17d5c873d3ad8cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leonard Chan
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:31:17 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [CodeGen] Ensure relative vtables use
llvm.type.checked.load.re
@@ -500,7 +500,8 @@ MCSymbol *MCStreamer::emitLineTableLabel() {
MCSymbol *MCStreamer::emitCFILabel() {
// Return a dummy non-null value so that label fields appear filled in when
// generating textual assembly.
- return (MCSymbol *)1;
+ static size_t DummyLabelValue = 0;
uweigand wrote:
In the SystemZ tests, the variables involved have been deliberated marked
`volatile` to prevent this type of optimization (the tests are supposed to
verify the basic operation of the intrinsics). Does this new transformation
respect `volatile`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
@@ -162,3 +162,10 @@ struct A {
};
A<0>::B a;
}
+
+template void shadow() { // expected-note{{template parameter is
declared here}}
erichkeane wrote:
Just a call to this function, so: `shadow()` call. If you change it to
return `int`, you can do: `auto Use
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#129286
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/stellar-aria updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127430
>From ba0eef9808b42b01e356cd5c87745f7477e07c68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Katherine Whitlock
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 22:45:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang-tidy] Add new check
`readability-use-num
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+//===--- UseNumericLimitsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
stellar-aria wrote:
> What is the expected behavior of `+128` `-127`?
I feel like they shouldn't be matched, since with opposite signs they're not
really within the set of limits? It just feels unintuitive to me for `-127` to
be replaced by something like `-std::numeric_limits::max()`. I've ad
Author: Michael Flanders
Date: 2025-02-28T17:42:26+01:00
New Revision: 43eb18e51f5582b73665306a45c640a880976ec1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43eb18e51f5582b73665306a45c640a880976ec1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43eb18e51f5582b73665306a45c640a880976ec1.di
@@ -733,16 +733,17 @@ ENVIRONMENT
.. envvar:: CPATH
- If this environment variable is present, it is treated as a delimited list of
- paths to be added to the default system include path list. The delimiter is
- the platform dependent delimiter, as used in the PATH environ
@@ -733,16 +733,17 @@ ENVIRONMENT
.. envvar:: CPATH
- If this environment variable is present, it is treated as a delimited list of
- paths to be added to the default system include path list. The delimiter is
- the platform dependent delimiter, as used in the PATH environ
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s\
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection
+
+void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
+
+using size_t = decltype(sizeof(int));
+
+template
+void escape(FirstT first, Rest... args);
+
+namespace CustomClassType {
+struct
@@ -376,6 +376,24 @@ let SMETargetGuard = "sme2" in {
// Outer product and accumulate/subtract
//
+multiclass MOP4 checks> {
+ def NAME # "_1x1" : Inst<"svmop4" # name # "_1x1_" # n # "[_{d}_{d}]",
"vidd", t, MergeNone, i # wide # "_1x1", [IsInOutZA, IsStreaming], checks>;
+
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127702
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1986,112 +2360,119 @@ class DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget : public
FixableGadget {
}
};
-/// Scan the function and return a list of gadgets found with provided kits.
-static void findGadgets(const Stmt *S, ASTContext &Ctx,
-const UnsafeBufferU
@@ -1986,112 +2360,119 @@ class DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget : public
FixableGadget {
}
};
-/// Scan the function and return a list of gadgets found with provided kits.
-static void findGadgets(const Stmt *S, ASTContext &Ctx,
-const UnsafeBufferU
https://github.com/zmodem updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129255
>From c1fe663ceacd31064b2758e43de1afc3f51d3f2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Wennborg
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:55:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Coroutines] Replace coro.outside.frame metadata with an
int
@@ -1986,112 +2360,119 @@ class DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget : public
FixableGadget {
}
};
-/// Scan the function and return a list of gadgets found with provided kits.
-static void findGadgets(const Stmt *S, ASTContext &Ctx,
-const UnsafeBufferU
@@ -2672,7 +3053,7 @@ static inline std::optional
createDataFixit(const ASTContext &Ctx,
// `DRE.data()`
std::optional
UPCStandalonePointerGadget::getFixits(const FixitStrategy &S) const {
- const auto VD = cast(Node->getDecl());
ilya-biryukov wrote:
NIT: we
@@ -1948,31 +2294,59 @@ class DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget : public
FixableGadget {
const IntegerLiteral *Offset = nullptr;
public:
- DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result)
+ DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget(const MatchResult &Result)
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov commented:
@ivanaivanovska I only have NITs so far, could you address them?
I will make sure to finish the few other functions I have left "note to self"
for, but I don't actually expect much to pop up there.
As soon as the comments are addressed, I think we are
@@ -1948,31 +2294,59 @@ class DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget : public
FixableGadget {
const IntegerLiteral *Offset = nullptr;
public:
- DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result)
+ DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget(const MatchResult &Result)
https://github.com/zmodem closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/20721
Here is the r
zmodem wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion on the previous PR:
- I think that discussion ended with the conclusion that we need an explicit
mechanism for marking out-of-frame allocas.
- We agree it should not be metadata
- I think an intrinsic may be better than a flag directly on the
zmodem wrote:
(sorry, wrong button)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zmodem reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125492
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -254,6 +254,224 @@ void foo() {
}
} // namespace CXX17_aggregate_construction
+namespace newexpr_init_list_initialization {
Flandini wrote:
They currently take different code paths and have different results in CSA. I
think ideally they would use the same
https://github.com/jvoung approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128437
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
LGTM once the 'auto' problems are fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alex Voicu (AlexVlx)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#128360 pending resolution of odd test break.
---
Patch is 183.19 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129280.diff
3 Files Affe
@@ -234,6 +273,29 @@ cir::FuncOp CIRGenFunction::generateCode(clang::GlobalDecl
gd, cir::FuncOp fn,
return fn;
}
+clang::QualType CIRGenFunction::buildFunctionArgList(clang::GlobalDecl gd,
+ FunctionArgList &args) {
+ con
@@ -149,16 +153,49 @@ mlir::LogicalResult CIRGenFunction::declare(Address addr,
const Decl *var,
void CIRGenFunction::startFunction(GlobalDecl gd, QualType returnType,
cir::FuncOp fn, cir::FuncType funcType,
-
@@ -500,7 +500,8 @@ MCSymbol *MCStreamer::emitLineTableLabel() {
MCSymbol *MCStreamer::emitCFILabel() {
// Return a dummy non-null value so that label fields appear filled in when
// generating textual assembly.
- return (MCSymbol *)1;
+ static size_t DummyLabelValue = 0;
https://github.com/jvoung closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128437
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/virginia-cangelosi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129259
Fix error in fp8-init-list.c introduced by PR #126726
>From 2198ad34793db8a11c88dc69deaf7bc4038b0de8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Virginia Cangelosi
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:07:54 +
Subject: [
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Virginia Cangelosi (virginia-cangelosi)
Changes
Fix error in fp8-init-list.c introduced by PR #126726
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129259.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/AArch64/fp8-ini
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Hans Wennborg (zmodem)
Changes
Metadata should not be "load bearing", i.e. required for correctness, since
optimizations are not required to preserve it. Therefore, turn this into an
intrinsic instead.
This is a follow-up to #127653.
--
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128979
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yxsamliu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Hans Wennborg (zmodem)
Changes
Metadata should not be "load bearing", i.e. required for correctness, since
optimizations are not required to preserve it. Therefore, turn this into an
intrinsic instead.
This is a follow-up to #127
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128437
>From 319ad0b803b8c6c6c5405178335bd1f2258be4b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentyn Yukhymenko
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 12:08:02 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] first implementation and basic tests
---
.../Mod
https://github.com/hokein edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
SpencerAbson wrote:
I think this just needed a rebase after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125097 was landed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu
Date: 2025-02-28T09:58:19-05:00
New Revision: 0f0665db067f9680f0a90ad07c2f42842acc693f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f0665db067f9680f0a90ad07c2f42842acc693f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f0665db067f9680f0a90ad07c2f42842acc693f.dif
Author: Virginia Cangelosi
Date: 2025-02-28T15:17:33Z
New Revision: 4a477eeefa5be85f51e146aca8f76e2421a63971
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4a477eeefa5be85f51e146aca8f76e2421a63971
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4a477eeefa5be85f51e146aca8f76e2421a63971.diff
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
extern "C" {
#endif
+#if !defined(__CUDA_ARCH__)
+
sarnex wrote:
@compnerd @Bigcheese Do you mind taking a look at Artem's questions above? Thx
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128222
___
@@ -507,6 +559,9 @@ let SMETargetGuard = "sme-f16f16" in {
}
let SMETargetGuard = "sme-b16b16" in {
+ defm SVBMOP4A_H : MOP4<"a", "za16", "bf", "aarch64_sme_mop4a", "",
[ImmCheck<0, ImmCheck0_1>]>;
Lukacma wrote:
```suggestion
defm SVBMOP4A_H : MOP4<"a",
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129116
>From ed0cf3f026e439288f8334f27555ad26825fd56a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:49:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][diagnostics] Fix structured binding shadows
tem
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From 09b809d803ca319f194eba6b6d8a78fa6dbbf9f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges for
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From cb684ab2c1bf2f1388fbdee063eaa95753d70a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges for
@@ -162,3 +162,10 @@ struct A {
};
A<0>::B a;
}
+
+template void shadow() { // expected-note{{template parameter is
declared here}}
erichkeane wrote:
Please instantiate this template as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129116
___
https://github.com/Marcondiro updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129209
>From c1bb0f84852e223a83638384188e4858877ec89e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcondiro <46560192+marcond...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:34:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Contr
@@ -162,3 +162,10 @@ struct A {
};
A<0>::B a;
}
+
+template void shadow() { // expected-note{{template parameter is
declared here}}
+ using arr = int[1]; // expected-warning@+1 {{decomposition declarations are
a C++17 extension}}
erichkeane wrote:
```sugg
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From f8874335dfcef03fd75eff9a8ba5ff91b3596877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges for
@@ -52,6 +52,14 @@ class Address {
elementType);
}
+ Address(mlir::Value pointer, clang::CharUnits alignment)
+ : Address(pointer,
+mlir::cast(pointer.getType()).getPointee(),
andykaylor wrote:
The thing that's being cast is
@@ -1986,112 +2360,119 @@ class DerefSimplePtrArithFixableGadget : public
FixableGadget {
}
};
-/// Scan the function and return a list of gadgets found with provided kits.
-static void findGadgets(const Stmt *S, ASTContext &Ctx,
-const UnsafeBufferU
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125492
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pzzp updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
>From ad5d0ba6d6fdacf89c9fd132bfb4a8d733781f03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pzzp
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm:ir] Add support for constant data exceeding 4GiB
---
clang/lib/CodeGe
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/24243
Here is
https://github.com/zhaohuiw42 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129198
>From 54c65ab88fe949bce2b1717f97132c06ec1405ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhaohui
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:12:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Check for uninitialized use in lambda within
CXXOperatorCa
@@ -12597,6 +12597,12 @@ namespace {
bool isRecordType;
bool isPODType;
bool isReferenceType;
+// Tracks whether the current expression is being visited within a
+// CXXOperatorCallExpr. This flag is set to true when entering a
+// CXXOperatorCallExpr an
@@ -12796,6 +12803,7 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr(CXXOperatorCallExpr *E) {
+ isInCXXOperatorCall = true;
zhaohuiw42 wrote:
Fixed, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129198
___
@@ -12804,6 +12812,20 @@ namespace {
Visit(Callee);
for (auto Arg: E->arguments())
HandleValue(Arg->IgnoreParenImpCasts());
+ isInCXXOperatorCall = false;
+}
+
+void VisitLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr *E) {
+ if (isInCXXOperatorCall) {
https://github.com/Flandini updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127702
>From 12791f2c89f7e42bd261ac573c2497857c42b6f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Flanders
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:56:13 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] [analyzer] Do list initialization for CXXNewExpr with
https://github.com/pzzp updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
>From 82cb46625825e6aca4544b964e4885ba535c96b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pzzp
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm:ir] Add support for constant data exceeding 4GiB
---
clang/lib/CodeGe
@@ -12806,6 +12810,19 @@ namespace {
HandleValue(Arg->IgnoreParenImpCasts());
}
+void VisitLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr *E) {
+ if (!isInCXXOperatorCall) {
+Inherited::VisitLambdaExpr(E);
+return;
+ }
+
+ for (const auto &init : E->captu
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime-2` running on `rocm-worker-hw-02` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/10/builds/433
Here is the rel
https://github.com/PeddleSpam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128938
>From f1c09277af268256fce71df9a858959b69385ef1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leon Clark
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:59:02 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [AggressiveInstCombine] Shrink loads used in
shufflevector
https://github.com/mizvekov commented:
We could use a scope guard here to avoid the duplication, and this includes the
pre-existing EOF handling. This would make this sort of bug more unlikely to
happen in the future.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129212
___
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From 09b809d803ca319f194eba6b6d8a78fa6dbbf9f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges for
nico wrote:
This seems to break tests: http://45.33.8.238/linux/161683/step_6.txt
Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/yxsamliu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128926
>From 30bde986afda876d877d63212d8e4a34d2927aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yaxun (Sam) Liu"
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:43:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [CUDA][HIP] fix virtual dtor host/device attr
Currently if
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From 09b809d803ca319f194eba6b6d8a78fa6dbbf9f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges for
AlexVlx wrote:
> This seems to break tests: http://45.33.8.238/linux/161683/step_6.txt
>
> Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
Should be fixed within the next 30 mins or so, if not I'll revert, apologies
for the inconvenience.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
https://github.com/yxsamliu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128926
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
LGTM, thank you for the quick fix!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129169
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void f(int x, int y, int z) {
if ((ayy y < z' don't
have their mathematical meaning}}
erichkeane wrote:
Hmm @AaronBallman will probably have to comment here, but I'm not sure this
is better? The point of `comparisons like` here was to
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ziqing Luo
Date: 2025-02-28T10:33:32-08:00
New Revision: 7446601c6a9b71945fdc9d7434d8347789708858
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7446601c6a9b71945fdc9d7434d8347789708858
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7446601c6a9b71945fdc9d7434d8347789708858.diff
LO
vbvictor wrote:
> I‘m sorry for requesting approval again. But I'm really confused that should
> I make sure my branch is alwasy up-to-date?
Rebase from `main` periodically, at least before merge.
It's just to make sure that there are no merge conflicts.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void f(int x, int y, int z) {
if ((ayy y < z' don't
have their mathematical meaning}}
AmrDeveloper wrote:
Yes i think the word `like` should be removed here, but I am thinking should we
prefer the previous diagnostics or the one with actual
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void f(int x, int y, int z) {
if ((ayy y < z' don't
have their mathematical meaning}}
erichkeane wrote:
I don't like the one with the actual expression in it, as that is going to get
arbitrarily large. That said, I DO wonder if there is va
Author: pvanhout
Date: 2025-02-28T10:29:42+01:00
New Revision: f09e245b35f291ab48f6efeb4986e7f9818b7cb7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f09e245b35f291ab48f6efeb4986e7f9818b7cb7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f09e245b35f291ab48f6efeb4986e7f9818b7cb7.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Pierre-vh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128509
>From e580bbe66a5d65e90051cb0906b87478341696e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pvanhout
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:21:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][AMDGPU] Enable module splitting by default
The default
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129207
>From 917e3b80ae7962a4f0bd5735cdc88163fcdbdcc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:09:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Clang: Add minnum/maxnum builtin functions support
With https
201 - 300 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
