https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125988
>From 42eb3826ed79de5aabb7f0197cfda2ad62d9735d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:21:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce cache for scanning
modules
https://github.com/Fznamznon approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arsenm wrote:
Do we really need to generate source for this? It's harder to reason about. It
looks like the sign bit of the input isn't preserved on underflow to 0
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
https://github.com/Nechda updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126897
>From 8baebe758b4f07933294b88bf2390fbb14ddeed0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Nechitaev
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:30:47 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Add AllowFalseEvaluated to clang-tidy
noexcept-move-const
https://github.com/mikaelholmen approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127034
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127034
I had previous attempts for fixing this flaky test. Let's admit I failed so
far, and disable this until we have a permanent fix.
See the discussion at:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126913#issuecom
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
I had previous attempts for fixing this flaky test. Let's admit I failed so
far, and disable this until we have a permanent fix.
See the discussion at:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
Author: Mariya Podchishchaeva
Date: 2025-02-13T10:59:21+01:00
New Revision: 3be48a6f809afccc9bcddc8cf94492812b49e1f7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3be48a6f809afccc9bcddc8cf94492812b49e1f7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3be48a6f809afccc9bcddc8cf94492812b49e1
https://github.com/Fznamznon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hvdijk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Harald van Dijk
Date: 2025-02-13T10:46:42Z
New Revision: 1083ec647f16314bcc9af8c4d6b11f50d288bca6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1083ec647f16314bcc9af8c4d6b11f50d288bca6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1083ec647f16314bcc9af8c4d6b11f50d288bca6.diff
LO
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+! UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
kiranchandramohan wrote:
This test should be in the Driver directory.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+
+
+# `DO CONCURRENT` mapping to OpenMP
+
+```{contents}
+---
+local:
+---
+```
+
+This document seeks to describe the effort to parallelize `do concurrent` loops
+by mapping them to OpenMP worksharing constructs. The goals of this document
+are:
+* Describing h
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+//===- DoConcurrentConversion.cpp -- map `DO CONCURRENT` to OpenMP loops
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+//===- DoConcurrentConversion.cpp -- map `DO CONCURRENT` to OpenMP loops
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+! Mark as xfail for now until we upstream the relevant part. This is just for
+! demo purposes at this point. Upstreaming this is the next step.
+! XFAIL: *
+
+! Tests mapping of a basic `do concurrent` loop to `!$omp parallel do`.
+
+! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-hlfi
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+//===- DoConcurrentConversion.cpp -- map `DO CONCURRENT` to OpenMP loops
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
frasercrmck wrote:
> Do we really need to generate source for this? It's harder to reason about.
> It looks like the sign bit of the input isn't preserved on underflow to 0
Perhaps we could simply check in the generated source? It shouldn't change all
that often. We might want to split it up i
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+! Mark as xfail for now until we upstream the relevant part. This is just for
+! demo purposes at this point. Upstreaming this is the next step.
+! XFAIL: *
+
+! Tests mapping of a basic `do concurrent` loop to `!$omp parallel do`.
+
+! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-hlfi
jhuber6 wrote:
> What about RTTI doesn't work?
Honestly not sure what the original rationale for this was. I'm going to guess
it's either 1) slow or 2) requires libc++-abi.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library -x hlsl -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - %s
| FileCheck %s
+
+// array splat
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void {{.*}}call4
+// CHECK: [[B:%.*]] = alloca [2 x i32], align 4
+// CHE
aaronpuchert wrote:
Something like `READ_ONCE` might be supported differently: suppose there is
actually a read, i.e. an lvalue-to-rvalue cast. We check those here:
```c++
void BuildLockset::VisitCastExpr(const CastExpr *CE) {
if (CE->getCastKind() != CK_LValueToRValue)
return;
checkAcce
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++2c -Wunused %s
+
+namespace GH125810 {
+struct S {
+ int a, b;
+};
+
+void t(S s) {
+ auto &[_, _] = s;
+ auto &[a1, _] = s; // expected-warning {{unused variable '[a1, _]'}}
a-tarasyuk wrote:
malavikasamak wrote:
@dtarditi FYI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125671
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125911
>From 4f86d4f5e2a39414bf0f59e18e2723b9fc0595cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 16:44:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][fatlto] Add FatLTOCleanup pass
When using FatLTO, it is com
https://github.com/zahiraam created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127113
None
>From 1995b54afcc9fab93e7e80d3993d3396f193b31d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:24:32 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] Missing implicit otherwise clause in metad
Michael137 wrote:
FYI on macOS CI this is failing with:
```
FAIL: test_dsym (TestCPPEnumPromotion.TestCPPEnumPromotion)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/as-lldb-cmake/llvm-
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127056
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arsenm wrote:
What about RTTI doesn't work?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66810
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL commented:
Best would be to add that option to script and let user decide whatever use it
or not.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/efriedma-quic requested changes to this pull request.
Hang on... I need to think a little more about the interaction with snan in
strictfp mode.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
efriedma-quic wrote:
How does this interact with strictfp? Do we need a constrained version of
sincospi which raises appropriate exceptions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
efriedma-quic wrote:
Referring to the C standard and implementations, I think modf does in fact
raise an fp exception when the operand is an snan. So to handle this, we need
different lowering in strictfp mode, probably to a "constrained" intrinsic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1
nikic wrote:
Yeah, this is good to go now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121789
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,957 @@
+//===- llvm/unittest/Support/MustacheTest.cpp ===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
ziqingluo-90 wrote:
Thank you @tsepez
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126826
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2804,6 +2804,42 @@ bool SemaHLSL::ContainsBitField(QualType BaseTy) {
return false;
}
+// Can perform an HLSL splat cast if the Dest is an aggregate and the
+// Src is a scalar or a vector of length 1
+// Or if Dest is a vector and Src is a vector of length 1
+bool SemaH
steakhal wrote:
> Worth adding a g++ pre-merge build? Can individual subprojects change their
> pre-merge checks?
I don't have all the context, as I didn't follow this closely, so I wouldn't
raise this.
However, if you think it's worth pursuing and avoiding in the future, feel free
to summari
Author: Piotr Zegar
Date: 2025-02-13T17:51:28+01:00
New Revision: a663e78a6eb6bbd20c0c74b3e6a78e24ee423544
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a663e78a6eb6bbd20c0c74b3e6a78e24ee423544
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a663e78a6eb6bbd20c0c74b3e6a78e24ee423544.diff
L
pinskia wrote:
What is the definition of current target? Is it the current subtarget? Or is it
returning true even when NOT using `#pragma GCC target` (or the target
attribute) even if the builtin is not work for the subtarget?
This is unrelated to offloading but is similar issue.
With respect
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ void MacOSKeychainAPIChecker::checkPreStmt(const CallExpr
*CE,
RegionArgIsBad = true;
}
+ assert(ArgSM);
schittir wrote:
Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127017
___
c
loumalouomega wrote:
> Best would be to add that option to script and let user decide whatever use
> it or not.
Do you want me to do it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
loumalouomega wrote:
Ok, so is not legacy, but the contrary. My version of Clang is old. I can
refactor if you want.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
// Check CUID generated by hash.
// The same CUID is generated for the same file with the same options.
+// RUN: cd %S
+
// RUN: %clang -### -x hip --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--no-offload-new-driver \
// RUN: --offload-arch=gfx906 -c -nogpuinc -no
jansvoboda11 wrote:
This makes sense in principle, but I'm wondering whether
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100681 is the better approach. Seems
like having the client call `finish()` is simpler than doing that
"automatically" in `CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction()` and then trying t
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-02-13T23:08:30Z
New Revision: bcfdae120ea7a03176e41d17e5efe4692d64f807
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bcfdae120ea7a03176e41d17e5efe4692d64f807
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bcfdae120ea7a03176e41d17e5efe4692d64f807.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127056
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ulrich Weigand
Date: 2025-02-14T00:10:37+01:00
New Revision: adacbf68ebeaeaf9d07a5beaff163da9ca0534a9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/adacbf68ebeaeaf9d07a5beaff163da9ca0534a9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/adacbf68ebeaeaf9d07a5beaff163da9ca0534a9.diff
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
One small formatting cleanup in a suggestion. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122981
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+//===--- HLSLRootSignature.def - Tokens and Enum Database ---*- C++
-*-===//
+
+//
llvm-beanz wrote:
nit:
```suggestion
//
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122981
___
cfe-commits ma
@@ -4931,7 +4931,9 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*GetFullTypeForDeclarator(TypeProcessingState &state,
// C99 6.7.5.3p1: The return type may not be a function or array type.
// For conversion functions, we'll diagnose this particular error later.
- if (!D.isInvali
@@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ QualType Sema::BuildMatrixType(QualType ElementTy, Expr
*NumRows, Expr *NumCols,
}
bool Sema::CheckFunctionReturnType(QualType T, SourceLocation Loc) {
- if (T->isArrayType() || T->isFunctionType()) {
+ if ((!getLangOpts().HLSL && T->isArrayType()) ||
@@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ QualType Sema::BuildMatrixType(QualType ElementTy, Expr
*NumRows, Expr *NumCols,
}
bool Sema::CheckFunctionReturnType(QualType T, SourceLocation Loc) {
- if (T->isArrayType() || T->isFunctionType()) {
+ if ((!getLangOpts().HLSL && T->isArrayType()) ||
https://github.com/llvm-beanz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122981
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/charan-003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117953
>From b886394f3aca3ea53f2c97d85a8e963d192c122f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: charan-003 <85248228+charan-...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:43:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/24] Update SemaL
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118992
>From e994824f3630ee8b224afceb6c14d980c9013112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:14:17 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] splat cast wip
---
clang/include/clang/AST/OperationKinds.def
https://github.com/Icohedron created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127137
Fixes #99205.
- Implements the HLSL intrinsic `AddUint64` used to perform unsigned 64-bit
integer addition by using pairs of unsigned 32-bit integers instead of native
64-bit types
- The LLVM intrinsic `ua
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Deric Cheung (Icohedron)
Changes
Fixes #99205.
- Implements the HLSL intrinsic `AddUint64` used to perform unsigned 64-bit
integer addition by using pairs of unsigned 32-bit integers instead of native
64
dtellenbach wrote:
Hi @EthanLuisMcDonough, this unfortunately breaks
-
[Profile-x86_64.Profile-x86_64.instrprof-darwin-dead-strip.c](https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/job/clang-stage1-RA/3529/testReport/junit/Profile-x86_64/Profile-x86_64/instrprof_darwin_dead_strip_c/),
and
-
[Profile-
Author: Ben Langmuir
Date: 2025-02-13T14:06:17-08:00
New Revision: e3cab30ab96e1d22bbedff005673ae0c1431c3af
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e3cab30ab96e1d22bbedff005673ae0c1431c3af
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e3cab30ab96e1d22bbedff005673ae0c1431c3af.diff
https://github.com/benlangmuir closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127110
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tgross35 wrote:
What is needed to move this forward?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zixu-w created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127136
…ete decl chains until the end of `finishPendingActions`. (#121245)"
This reverts commit a9e249f64e800fbb20a3b26c0cfb68c1a1aee5e1.
Reverting this change because of issue #126973.
>From 63db52efccafa7716cb6b6f07
justincady wrote:
I just want to double check my understanding. :)
If I were to convert [this
example](https://gist.github.com/MaskRay/24f4e2eed208b9d8b0a3752575a665d4#distributed-thinlto)
to its functional equivalent in DTLTO, would it be:
```
clang -fuse-ld=lld -O2 -flto=thin -fthinlto-dist
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Zixu Wang (zixu-w)
Changes
…ete decl chains until the end of `finishPendingActions`. (#121245)"
This reverts commit a9e249f64e800fbb20a3b26c0cfb68c1a1aee5e1.
Reverting this change because of issue #126973.
---
Full diff: https://
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Zixu Wang (zixu-w)
Changes
…ete decl chains until the end of `finishPendingActions`. (#121245)"
This reverts commit a9e249f64e800fbb20a3b26c0cfb68c1a1aee5e1.
Reverting this change because of issue #126973.
---
Full diff: https://github.c
https://github.com/V-FEXrt approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Deric Cheung (Icohedron)
Changes
Fixes #99205.
- Implements the HLSL intrinsic `AddUint64` used to perform unsigned 64-bit
integer addition by using pairs of unsigned 32-bit integers instead of native
64-bit types
- The LLVM intrinsic
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+//===--- ParseHLSLRootSignature.h ---*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/inbelic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122981
>From 98deff6a407b912852e70b2bdc3618aaec8a1931 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Finn Plummer
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:23:39 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] [HLSL][RootSignature] Initial Lexer Definition with
puncua
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127110
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126143
>From 43bb8a63bf008bf08bae03e4e64cf76e32e77ea5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] Remove 'libomptarget.devicertl.a' fatbinary and use
stat
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126143
>From 923b58bec55e1956b1ef9379cb1053e060bcb2e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] Remove 'libomptarget.devicertl.a' fatbinary and use
stat
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+//===--- ParseHLSLRootSignature.h ---*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/llvm-beanz commented:
My last real question here is whether this belongs in clang/Parse or if it
should be in clang/Lex. Since it is now strictly Lexing it shouldn't have any
dependencies on the parse or AST libraries right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122981
_
https://github.com/llvm-beanz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122981
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kuilpd closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-02-13T09:10:38-08:00
New Revision: d096f45322660d59de5267555f121986629bab30
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d096f45322660d59de5267555f121986629bab30
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d096f45322660d59de5267555f121986629bab30.diff
L
https://github.com/sarnex edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126956
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127023
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
PiotrZSL wrote:
> In version 14.0 looks like is not anymore:
Because, it were added in Clang 15.
Even now on main branch it's still utilized.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
@@ -2804,6 +2804,42 @@ bool SemaHLSL::ContainsBitField(QualType BaseTy) {
return false;
}
+// Can perform an HLSL splat cast if the Dest is an aggregate and the
+// Src is a scalar or a vector of length 1
+// Or if Dest is a vector and Src is a vector of length 1
+bool SemaH
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 72f4e656b8feb3665bd074fadf1db1e72b385030
b5b9b158e7e379f2d430584e3ccf519677bf27a3 --e
https://github.com/NagyDonat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127117
Currently there are many casts that are not modeled (i.e. ignored) by the
analyzer, which can cause paradox states (e.g. negative value stored in
`unsigned` variable) and false positive reports from various c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)
Changes
Currently there are many casts that are not modeled (i.e. ignored) by the
analyzer, which can cause paradox states (e.g. negative value stored in
`unsigned` variable) and false positive rep
https://github.com/zahiraam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127113
>From 1995b54afcc9fab93e7e80d3993d3396f193b31d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:24:32 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [OpenMP] Missing implicit otherwise clause in
metadi
@@ -188,29 +189,50 @@ int test_cast_to_unsigned(signed char x) {
if (x >= 0)
return x;
// FIXME: Here the analyzer ignores the signed -> unsigned cast, and manages
to
- // load a negative value from an unsigned variable. This causes an underflow
- // report, which is
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)
Changes
Currently there are many casts that are not modeled (i.e. ignored) by the
analyzer, which can cause paradox states (e.g. negative value stored in
`unsigned` variable) and false positive reports from various
https://github.com/tarunprabhu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tarunprabhu commented:
Just some small nits
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DKLoehr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126952
>From 748451908cc46416dab8ec427e8df656e61d7d94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Devon Loehr
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:17:05 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Remove xbegin and _xend
---
clang/lib/Headers/intrin.h | 2 -
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/22778
Here is the relevant p
Fznamznon wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bzEq closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bzEq wrote:
I am not going to pursue this PR, close it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Michael137 wrote:
let me know if you need me to merge this for you
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
201 - 300 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
