@@ -380,30 +381,114 @@ llvm::SmallVector
getAllRequiredModules(ProjectModules &MDB,
return ModuleNames;
}
+class CachingProjectModules : public ProjectModules {
+public:
+ CachingProjectModules(const GlobalCompilationDatabase &CDB) : CDB(CDB) {}
+
+ std::vector getRequire
https://github.com/kadircet requested changes to this pull request.
thanks, I think the biggest concern is about initial performance of this
approach until cache warms up.
also can we have some tests? it should be possible to unittest by injecting a
custom CDB into modules builder.
https://gi
@@ -380,30 +381,114 @@ llvm::SmallVector
getAllRequiredModules(ProjectModules &MDB,
return ModuleNames;
}
+class CachingProjectModules : public ProjectModules {
+public:
+ CachingProjectModules(const GlobalCompilationDatabase &CDB) : CDB(CDB) {}
+
+ std::vector getRequire
tmatheson-arm wrote:
I think so, but I would rather do it as a separate PR. There are a couple of
other things that could do with tidying up too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126945
___
cfe-commits maili
Author: Mikhail Goncharov
Date: 2025-02-13T13:55:20+01:00
New Revision: 60493ede24a758771a0b34067a30ceb929525b73
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60493ede24a758771a0b34067a30ceb929525b73
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60493ede24a758771a0b34067a30ceb929525b73.d
rj-jesus wrote:
Sounds good, thanks! :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126945
>From e618aba47c0e7244105bf325ab8019a085e1ed99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Matheson
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:31:47 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add missing Neon Types
The AAPCS64 adds a number of
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126945
>From e618aba47c0e7244105bf325ab8019a085e1ed99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Matheson
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:31:47 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add missing Neon Types
The AAPCS64 adds a number of
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127056
This exercises the codepath where we create `DITemplateValueParameter`s whose
`TemplateArgument::ArgKind` is `StructuralValue`, which was added in
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041). Previousl
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
This exercises the codepath where we create `DITemplateValueParameter`s whose
`TemplateArgument::ArgKind` is `StructuralValue`, which was added in
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041). Previo
https://github.com/jeanPerier approved this pull request.
Works with my testing, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
steakhal wrote:
> @steakhal : Sure I can do some tests if you come up with a fix. Right now,
> with an EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build it fails in 30-40% of the runs for me so it
> should be pretty quick to see if a fix works or not. I've never seen it fail
> without EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
I could reproduc
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2025-02-13T10:55:08+01:00
New Revision: b88c5d638a00d723f521c907911e42115717937e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b88c5d638a00d723f521c907911e42115717937e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b88c5d638a00d723f521c907911e42115717937e.diff
steakhal wrote:
Now it says:
```
UNSUPPORTED: Clang :: Analysis/live-stmts.cpp (1 of 1)
Test does not support the following features and/or targets: true, true
steakhal wrote:
```
ValueError: Error in UNSUPPORTED list:
couldn't parse text: '*'
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127034
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
frasercrmck wrote:
> > I'll go add that builtin and come back to this - thanks.
> > What do you think about libclc making use of weak linkage in principle?
>
> Weak should be handled properly by the targets, the one downside is that it
> prevents optimization within a TU because the symbol's in
https://github.com/Michael137 approved this pull request.
Looks great! Thank you for moving all this functionality into Clang
LGTM (just one minor comment left)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
LG, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126986
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Xazax-hun wrote:
Oh, for functions that are documented to not block on invalid `fd`s, I think it
makes sense to skip the warnings when the `fd` is `-1`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
@@ -8476,27 +8476,20 @@ bool TypeSystemClang::CompleteTagDeclarationDefinition(
clang::ASTContext &ast = lldb_ast->getASTContext();
- /// TODO This really needs to be fixed.
+ unsigned NumNegativeBits = 0;
Michael137 wrote:
Can we move this block back in
frasercrmck wrote:
Oh, also for context, there was
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124709 a few weeks ago. So it appears
that there are other people interested in moving libclc to the runtimes
infrastructure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126078
_
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2025-02-13T12:15:24+01:00
New Revision: b963d3768c0e88d2cac043d4754ce90a19a7e1ec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b963d3768c0e88d2cac043d4754ce90a19a7e1ec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b963d3768c0e88d2cac043d4754ce90a19a7e1ec.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (Lukacma)
Changes
Currently arm_neon.h emits C-style casts to do vector type casts. This relies
on implicit conversion between vector types to be enabled, which is currently
deprecated behaviour and soon will disappear. To
Lukacma wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (Lukacma)
Changes
Currently arm_neon.h emits C-style casts to do vector type casts. This relies
on implicit conversion between vector types to be enabled, which is currently
deprecated behaviour and soon will disappear. To en
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: undef deprecator found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git diff -U0 --pickaxe-regex -S
'([^a-zA-Z0-9#_-]undef[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]|UndefValue::get)'
242aa8c743fe4344844753d8faf59744235319df
https://github.com/hokein closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126532
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ergawy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
>From 207fc495f95a852f2689b0fb1d369ac1cc0dea17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ergawy
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent`
mapping
This
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+//===- DoConcurrentConversion.cpp -- map `DO CONCURRENT` to OpenMP loops
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+//===- DoConcurrentConversion.cpp -- map `DO CONCURRENT` to OpenMP loops
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/AlexVlx commented:
> We can't keep waiting for this to get in the release
I'll merge later today once CI passes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
> I think the correct place is the clang resource directory
Tough to say, the compiler resource directory is for things the compiler emits
as a part of the language, yet we don't store `libomp` there. I'd say it makes
sense, if you had `lib/clang/21/lib/amdgcn-amd-amdhsa/libcl
https://github.com/egorzhdan approved this pull request.
I'm not an expert in the area, but this change LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126683
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arsenm wrote:
> Yeah, amdgcn-amd-amdhsa should be roughly equivalent to amdgcn--
These are not equivalent
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
mikaelholmen wrote:
Hi,
Heads up that I see a miscompile with this patch where a needed store is
removed. I'll try to extract some kind of reproducer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125880
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llv
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127056
>From b84ebf9c696ffc3867a52ed1540d59d18d2e5ece Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:00:28 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][DebugInfo][test] Add tests for C++20 non-type
tem
jhuber6 wrote:
> > Yeah, amdgcn-amd-amdhsa should be roughly equivalent to amdgcn--
>
> These are not equivalent
That's something I've been meaning to ask, the difference I know of right now
is that `amdgcn--` will not create a ROCm toolchain so we don't do any of that.
However, I don't know
@@ -21962,6 +21962,35 @@ SDValue tryLowerPartialReductionToWideAdd(SDNode *N,
return DAG.getNode(TopOpcode, DL, AccVT, BottomNode, ExtOp);
}
+static SDValue foldRevInvolution(SDNode *N) {
MacDue wrote:
Please add a doc comment that explains what this does
@@ -21962,6 +21962,35 @@ SDValue tryLowerPartialReductionToWideAdd(SDNode *N,
return DAG.getNode(TopOpcode, DL, AccVT, BottomNode, ExtOp);
}
+static SDValue foldRevInvolution(SDNode *N) {
+ SDValue InnerRev = N->getOperand(1);
+ if (!InnerRev.hasOneUse())
+return SDVal
@@ -21962,6 +21962,35 @@ SDValue tryLowerPartialReductionToWideAdd(SDNode *N,
return DAG.getNode(TopOpcode, DL, AccVT, BottomNode, ExtOp);
}
+static SDValue foldRevInvolution(SDNode *N) {
+ SDValue InnerRev = N->getOperand(1);
+ if (!InnerRev.hasOneUse())
+return SDVal
@@ -21962,6 +21962,35 @@ SDValue tryLowerPartialReductionToWideAdd(SDNode *N,
return DAG.getNode(TopOpcode, DL, AccVT, BottomNode, ExtOp);
}
+static SDValue foldRevInvolution(SDNode *N) {
+ SDValue InnerRev = N->getOperand(1);
+ if (!InnerRev.hasOneUse())
+return SDVal
AaronBallman wrote:
> > > That's what the initial proposal / patch was, but that got reverted
> > > because it broke some CUDA on Arm sources. See #121839.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, but I'm suggesting that seems like a bug with CUDA on Arm sources.
> > (But it also depends on how GCC behaves with off
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2025-02-13T07:59:08-06:00
New Revision: f6e3d33c009cada0437c11d3fd1beace74c5dcfa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f6e3d33c009cada0437c11d3fd1beace74c5dcfa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f6e3d33c009cada0437c11d3fd1beace74c5dcfa.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126567
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MacDue edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116422
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2025-02-13T14:56:12+01:00
New Revision: 1e64ea9914d3cc839b52e50d2d497600e03c8b6e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1e64ea9914d3cc839b52e50d2d497600e03c8b6e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1e64ea9914d3cc839b52e50d2d497600e03c8b6e.diff
Author: Jan Voung
Date: 2025-02-13T08:57:54-05:00
New Revision: 27e78e68a6788a08ea591250b6600284b360cff2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27e78e68a6788a08ea591250b6600284b360cff2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27e78e68a6788a08ea591250b6600284b360cff2.diff
LOG
https://github.com/jvoung closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ritter-x2a edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125826
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1592,6 +1592,11 @@ class CGObjCNonFragileABIMac : public CGObjCCommonMac {
bool isClassLayoutKnownStatically(const ObjCInterfaceDecl *ID) {
// Test a class by checking its superclasses up to
// its base class if it has one.
+
+// Cannot check a null class
+
https://github.com/AaronBallman milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
> CC @jdoerfert (we don't have a CUDA maintainer, so I'm not certain who else
> to tag)
Closest is @Artem-B, there's also a few NVIDIA people floating around like
@gonzalobg.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126324
___
cfe-co
AaronBallman wrote:
This seems like a reasonable one to backport, so I'm adding it to the 20.x
milestone.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
@@ -194,3 +194,34 @@ char test_comparison_with_extent_symbol(struct incomplete
*p) {
return ((char *)p)[-1]; // no-warning
}
+int table[256], small_table[128];
+int test_cast_to_unsigned(signed char x) {
+ unsigned char y = x;
+ if (x >= 0)
+return x;
+ // FIXME: Her
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Makes sense.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
Thanks for the report! I've reverted the change for now.
```llvm
declare ptr @passthrough(ptr)
define i16 @test() {
%a = alloca i16, align 1
store i16 1, ptr %a, align 1
%call = call ptr @passthrough(ptr readnone captures(ret: address, provenance)
%a)
%v = load i16, ptr %
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
From c3dc63db8914d759b6c58611b7448d4e83c66752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:35:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer][NFC] Add ArrayBound tests to doc
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Looks great. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
@@ -194,3 +194,34 @@ char test_comparison_with_extent_symbol(struct incomplete
*p) {
return ((char *)p)[-1]; // no-warning
}
+int table[256], small_table[128];
+int test_cast_to_unsigned(signed char x) {
+ unsigned char y = x;
+ if (x >= 0)
+return x;
+ // FIXME: Her
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/builds/19921
Here is the rele
https://github.com/AZero13 deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85465
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Flandini wrote:
@steakhal, looks like the premerge checks built with clang 20
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/145477#0194f106-3262-4d2b-922c-b3810220acd1/6-4595.
I build locally with clang 18.
This type of error is caught by g++, not clang++:
https://godbolt.or
https://github.com/asb updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126352
>From 446b59bd47eb5356454665eeb82e75a77862350a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Bradbury
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 06:27:26 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [doc] Add Discord invite link alongside channel links
By far the
HerrCai0907 wrote:
> Remove legacy argument `-ignore-insert-conflict` flag from `run-clang-tidy.py`
Could you explain more about `legacy` argument `-ignore-insert-conflict`. It
still in `clang-apply-replacements` tool.
```
USAGE: clang-apply-replacements [options]
OPTIONS:
Formatting Option
https://github.com/asb closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Alex Bradbury
Date: 2025-02-13T15:00:21Z
New Revision: db2953d80148870ee22b0ffaed883a02174485c4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db2953d80148870ee22b0ffaed883a02174485c4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db2953d80148870ee22b0ffaed883a02174485c4.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Flandini wrote:
Worth adding a g++ pre-merge build? Can individual subprojects change their
pre-merge checks?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125826
>From bdee20130567c0a2f4d492f2b573f1681c5afbdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 04:19:00 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU] Replace gfx940 and gfx941 with gfx942 in offload and
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
loumalouomega wrote:
> > Remove legacy argument `-ignore-insert-conflict` flag from
> > `run-clang-tidy.py`
>
> Could you explain more about `legacy` argument `-ignore-insert-conflict`. It
> still in `clang-apply-replacements` tool.
>
> ```
> USAGE: clang-apply-replacements [options]
>
> OP
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
From c3dc63db8914d759b6c58611b7448d4e83c66752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:35:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer][NFC] Add ArrayBound tests to doc
Author: Donát Nagy
Date: 2025-02-13T16:09:09+01:00
New Revision: d2240cd314102ed99d35b84d43006e324f344163
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d2240cd314102ed99d35b84d43006e324f344163
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d2240cd314102ed99d35b84d43006e324f344163.diff
LO
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2624,9 +2624,8 @@ void CGOpenMPRuntime::emitDistributeStaticInit(
emitUpdateLocation(CGF, Loc, OMP_IDENT_WORK_DISTRIBUTE);
llvm::Value *ThreadId = getThreadID(CGF, Loc);
llvm::FunctionCallee StaticInitFunction;
- bool isGPUDistribute =
- CGM.getLangOpts().Op
@@ -1109,6 +1109,11 @@ class Triple {
Env == llvm::Triple::EABIHF;
}
+ /// Tests if the target represents a GPU which can be offloaded to.
+ bool isOffloadingTargetGPU() const {
sarnex wrote:
sure, thats good point. i think doing that will reso
https://github.com/sarnex updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126956
>From 967dec47f3d369effa0defdc0d39547a173aca67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Sarnie, Nick"
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:03:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LLVM][Triple][NFCI] Add function to test for GPU
offloadin
https://github.com/sarnex updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126956
>From 967dec47f3d369effa0defdc0d39547a173aca67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Sarnie, Nick"
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:03:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [LLVM][Triple][NFCI] Add function to test for GPU
offloadin
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
LG but wait for a review from @steakhal
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
https://github.com/Xazax-hun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -306,6 +314,25 @@ void BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::handleUnlock(
C.addTransition(State);
}
+void BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::handleOpen(const CallEvent &Call,
+ CheckerContext &C) const {
+ const auto *Flag = Call.getAr
@@ -315,16 +342,54 @@ bool
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::isBlockingInCritSection(
void BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call,
CheckerContext &C) const {
if (isBlockingInCritSection(Call, C)) {
+
https://github.com/kuilpd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005
>From dd65babbf4c73a0b2fc2e4aa47a9a346bd5a9adf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilia Kuklin
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:33:45 +0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [lldb] Analyze enum promotion type during parsing
---
clang/
@@ -21962,6 +21962,35 @@ SDValue tryLowerPartialReductionToWideAdd(SDNode *N,
return DAG.getNode(TopOpcode, DL, AccVT, BottomNode, ExtOp);
}
+static SDValue foldRevInvolution(SDNode *N) {
+ SDValue InnerRev = N->getOperand(1);
+ if (!InnerRev.hasOneUse())
+return SDVal
@@ -21962,6 +21962,35 @@ SDValue tryLowerPartialReductionToWideAdd(SDNode *N,
return DAG.getNode(TopOpcode, DL, AccVT, BottomNode, ExtOp);
}
+static SDValue foldRevInvolution(SDNode *N) {
+ SDValue InnerRev = N->getOperand(1);
+ if (!InnerRev.hasOneUse())
+return SDVal
@@ -22270,6 +22299,15 @@ static SDValue performIntrinsicCombine(SDNode *N,
return tryConvertSVEWideCompare(N, ISD::SETULT, DCI, DAG);
case Intrinsic::aarch64_sve_cmpls_wide:
return tryConvertSVEWideCompare(N, ISD::SETULE, DCI, DAG);
+ case Intrinsic::aarch64_sve_rev:
kuilpd wrote:
@Michael137
Thank you for seeing this through!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+
+
+# `DO CONCURRENT` mapping to OpenMP
+
+```{contents}
+---
+local:
+---
+```
+
+This document seeks to describe the effort to parallelize `do concurrent` loops
+by mapping them to OpenMP worksharing constructs. The goals of this document
+are:
+* Describing h
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+
+
+# `DO CONCURRENT` mapping to OpenMP
+
+```{contents}
+---
+local:
+---
+```
+
+This document seeks to describe the effort to parallelize `do concurrent` loops
+by mapping them to OpenMP worksharing constructs. The goals of this document
+are:
+* Describing h
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM! Please wait a bit before landing in case @efriedma-quic has any
additional comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
https://github.com/serge-sans-paille updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127020
>From c2d1352aba4872957e34633b92d87c39d0eb7e45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: serge-sans-paille
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:20:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][cmake] Sanitize CLANG_BOLT values
Thi
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ void MacOSKeychainAPIChecker::checkPreStmt(const CallExpr
*CE,
RegionArgIsBad = true;
}
+ assert(ArgSM);
steakhal wrote:
I'm okay with this assert.
It shouldn't change much though because the very next lookup would fail if this
wa
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127034
>From 518e232d68b73c884bc6c9a56b0d7c7e217e3d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:36:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Disable a flaky test while triaging why its
fla
https://github.com/jmorse approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > * Now the ScanningProjectModules are owned by different calls to
> > `ModulesBuilder::buildPrerequisiteModulesFor`. So we don't need to care
> > about thread safety in ScanningProjectModules. And if we make it the
> > underlying ProjectModules, we need to care about the t
101 - 200 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
