Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-02-12T08:55:02Z
New Revision: 25c055416643f3291dfaa8136cb3a17b00656779
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25c055416643f3291dfaa8136cb3a17b00656779
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25c055416643f3291dfaa8136cb3a17b00656779.diff
LOG
https://github.com/petrhosek created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126876
Using LLVM build itself for PGO training is convenient and a great starting
point but it also has several issues:
* LLVM build implicitly depends on tools other than CMake and C/C++ compiler
and if those too
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126870
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-02-12T10:05:49+01:00
New Revision: 20506a0a15f9c4a7dc1cd0b4fa2dec8449074ab8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20506a0a15f9c4a7dc1cd0b4fa2dec8449074ab8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20506a0a15f9c4a7dc1cd0b4fa2dec8449074ab8.diff
L
https://github.com/schittir converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Petr Hosek (petrhosek)
Changes
Using LLVM build itself for PGO training is convenient and a great starting
point but it also has several issues:
* LLVM build implicitly depends on tools other than CMake and C/C++ compiler
and if those to
petrhosek wrote:
@tstellar We're trying to build a more minimal corpus that would address the
issues I listed with @ilovepi. In the meantime, it'd be helpful to have this
option since the current implementation actually breaks on our builders (which
don't have host toolchain and sysroot instal
https://github.com/schittir closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ class ConstantDataSequential : public ConstantData {
Type *getElementType() const;
/// Return the number of elements in the array or vector.
- unsigned getNumElements() const;
+ uint64_t getNumElements() const;
pzzp wrote:
Should I a
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Donát Nagy
Date: 2025-02-12T11:56:02+01:00
New Revision: edbc1fb228acd7746d91cd72d476c063704504b8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/edbc1fb228acd7746d91cd72d476c063704504b8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/edbc1fb228acd7746d91cd72d476c063704504b8.diff
LO
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119711
From d398fa13c2fa141954c79ca68a59c6ac506b393f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:43:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] A
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ class ConstantDataSequential : public ConstantData {
Type *getElementType() const;
/// Return the number of elements in the array or vector.
- unsigned getNumElements() const;
+ uint64_t getNumElements() const;
pzzp wrote:
ok, I upda
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -786,12 +786,16 @@ NonType
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Message-ID:
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://git
https://github.com/StarOne01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
>From ea6c9ca9cffbf4327fc7bab85e37e2a3c2c0f0cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prashanth
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 07:28:24 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang][Sema] Add diagnostic note for function-like
macros
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126748
From df63943adf054b94249b125078d4dbeafb437641 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:22:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC][analyzer] OOB test consolidation II:
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/StarOne01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
>From ea6c9ca9cffbf4327fc7bab85e37e2a3c2c0f0cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prashanth
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 07:28:24 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang][Sema] Add diagnostic note for function-like
macros
@@ -1112,6 +1112,11 @@ bool AMDGPUToolChain::shouldSkipSanitizeOption(
assert(OptionalGpuArch && "Invalid Target ID");
(void)OptionalGpuArch;
+
+ // Skip checking 'xnack+' feature availability for gfx12 family.
ampandey-1995 wrote:
Sorry, but I didn't u
@@ -2347,6 +2347,27 @@ Sema::BuildDeclRefExpr(ValueDecl *D, QualType Ty,
ExprValueKind VK,
return E;
}
+// Check whether a similar function-like macro exists and suggest it
+static bool isFunctionLikeMacro(const DeclarationName &Name, Sema &SemaRef,
+
https://github.com/ampandey-1995 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126885
>From cfa9342304a03671ed261a4f0b0cbe0297bb050b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amit Pandey
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:47:33 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver][ROCm][ASan] Skip checking ':xnack+' feature for
gf
https://github.com/ampandey-1995 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126885
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -Wno-array-bounds
-analyzer-checker=core,security.ArrayBound,debug.ExprInspection -verify %s
-
-void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -Wno-array-bounds
-analyzer-c
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1,112 +1,163 @@
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
-analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,security.ArrayBound,debug.ExprInspection \
// RUN: -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false -verify %s
-void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
-void cla
https://github.com/ficol updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125522
>From cb26d6a13e196bfc08221b7f6cd43ab45019e7d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Ficek, Jakub"
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:45:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Handle fp options in __builtin_convertvector
This pat
https://github.com/StarOne01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
>From ea6c9ca9cffbf4327fc7bab85e37e2a3c2c0f0cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prashanth
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 07:28:24 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang][Sema] Add diagnostic note for function-like
macros
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,Yutong Zhu
<115899167+yutongz...@users.noreply.github.com>,
Juan Manuel
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121768
From da2bbf99b8430d8b6aa6bf7969c9825b4d94219b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:36:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [
Nechda wrote:
Ask for review @PiotrZSL
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126897
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal requested changes to this pull request.
Please avoid matching the types of the `clang_analyzer_value` dumps, but be
sure to match the whole range sets there, including their curlies. It's still
important to know that
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -339,6 +425,36 @@ void
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::reportBlockInCritSection(
os.str(), ErrNode);
R->addRange(Call.getSourceRange());
R->markInteresting(Call.getReturnValue());
+ // for 'read' call, check whether it
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119711
From d398fa13c2fa141954c79ca68a59c6ac506b393f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:43:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] A
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -339,6 +425,36 @@ void
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::reportBlockInCritSection(
os.str(), ErrNode);
R->addRange(Call.getSourceRange());
R->markInteresting(Call.getReturnValue());
+ // for 'read' call, check whether it
@@ -3636,18 +3644,23 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseRequiresExpression() {
// Start of requirement list
llvm::SmallVector Requirements;
- // C++2a [expr.prim.req]p2
- // Expressions appearing within a requirement-body are unevaluated
operands.
- EnterExpressionEvaluation
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
>From 295df258043ef5a87ae603eedd308b863bad7b59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:14:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Clang] allow restrict qualifier for array types with
po
@@ -339,6 +425,36 @@ void
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::reportBlockInCritSection(
os.str(), ErrNode);
R->addRange(Call.getSourceRange());
R->markInteresting(Call.getReturnValue());
+ // for 'read' call, check whether it
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/StarOne01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
>From ea6c9ca9cffbf4327fc7bab85e37e2a3c2c0f0cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prashanth
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 07:28:24 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang][Sema] Add diagnostic note for function-like
macros
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119711
From d398fa13c2fa141954c79ca68a59c6ac506b393f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:43:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] A
https://github.com/pzzp updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
>From 3feb290783ff44972d5634b505ec3e051f1e2603 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhoupeng12
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 18:13:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm:ir] Add support for constant data exceeding 4GiB
---
clang/lib/
@@ -1,112 +1,163 @@
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
-analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,security.ArrayBound,debug.ExprInspection \
// RUN: -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false -verify %s
-void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
-void clang_analyzer_printState(void);
-
-typedef typeof(siz
https://github.com/gamesh411 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -440,7 +440,6 @@ static SVal castArgToParamTypeIfNeeded(const CallEvent
&Call, unsigned ArgIdx,
return ArgVal;
const FunctionDecl *Definition = CallExprDecl;
- Definition->hasBody(Definition);
schittir wrote:
Yes, that makes sense.
This change is
https://github.com/schittir deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120981
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -440,7 +440,6 @@ static SVal castArgToParamTypeIfNeeded(const CallEvent
&Call, unsigned ArgIdx,
return ArgVal;
const FunctionDecl *Definition = CallExprDecl;
- Definition->hasBody(Definition);
steakhal wrote:
The removal of this would break the `cl
@@ -440,7 +440,6 @@ static SVal castArgToParamTypeIfNeeded(const CallEvent
&Call, unsigned ArgIdx,
return ArgVal;
const FunctionDecl *Definition = CallExprDecl;
- Definition->hasBody(Definition);
steakhal wrote:
These tests can be run using `check-cla
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126874
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -435,27 +435,27 @@ static SVal processArgument(SVal Value, const Expr
*ArgumentExpr,
/// runtime definition don't match in terms of argument and parameter count.
static SVal castArgToParamTypeIfNeeded(const CallEvent &Call, unsigned ArgIdx,
@@ -339,6 +425,36 @@ void
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::reportBlockInCritSection(
os.str(), ErrNode);
R->addRange(Call.getSourceRange());
R->markInteresting(Call.getReturnValue());
+ // for 'read' call, check whether it
@@ -339,6 +425,36 @@ void
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::reportBlockInCritSection(
os.str(), ErrNode);
R->addRange(Call.getSourceRange());
R->markInteresting(Call.getReturnValue());
+ // for 'read' call, check whether it
https://github.com/Xazax-hun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Xazax-hun commented:
Is read the only operation that is non-blocking in this case?
Alternatively, instead of using a BugReporterVisitor, we could maintain a set
of file handles that are OK to use.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
_
https://github.com/YutongZhuu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126846
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126748
From df63943adf054b94249b125078d4dbeafb437641 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:22:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [NFC][analyzer] OOB test consolidation II:
steakhal wrote:
I want to review this PR before anyone would approve and merge this, as I was
the one who plotted a potential solution in the linked issue. I hope I can get
to this on the weekend.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752
___
NagyDonat wrote:
> Please avoid matching the types of the `clang_analyzer_value` dumps, but be
> sure to match the whole range sets there, including their curlies. It's still
> important to know that it would have a single range associated.
Yes, that's what I was planning. Pushed a commit that
@@ -786,12 +786,16 @@ NonTypeTemplateParmDecl *NonTypeTemplateParmDecl::Create(
QualType T, bool ParameterPack, TypeSourceInfo *TInfo) {
AutoType *AT =
C.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20 ? T->getContainedAutoType() : nullptr;
- return new (C, DC,
- additional
zahiraam wrote:
> @zahiraam I've reverted your PR. I'm happy to test your revised version
> though my build environment is no secret -- `-DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=On` along
> with clang as the host compiler.
Sorry about that! I will fix the error and merge it back.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
@@ -145,6 +145,92 @@ using MutexDescriptor =
std::variant;
+class NonBlockOpenVisitor : public BugReporterVisitor {
+private:
+ const VarRegion *VR;
+ const CallExpr *OpenCallExpr;
+ int O_NONBLOCKV;
whisperity wrote:
My suggestion is to call this `int`
@@ -1648,8 +1648,11 @@ SourceLocation CallExpr::getBeginLoc() const {
if (const auto *Method =
dyn_cast_if_present(getCalleeDecl());
Method && Method->isExplicitObjectMemberFunction()) {
-assert(getNumArgs() > 0 && getArg(0));
-return getArg(0)->getBeg
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119711
From d398fa13c2fa141954c79ca68a59c6ac506b393f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:43:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] A
@@ -145,6 +145,92 @@ using MutexDescriptor =
std::variant;
+class NonBlockOpenVisitor : public BugReporterVisitor {
+private:
+ const VarRegion *VR;
+ const CallExpr *OpenCallExpr;
+ int O_NONBLOCKV;
flovent wrote:
i understand now, thank you for explai
@@ -15919,10 +15919,17 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnStmtExprResult(ExprResult ER) {
if (Cast && Cast->getCastKind() == CK_ARCConsumeObject)
return Cast->getSubExpr();
+ auto Ty = E->getType().getUnqualifiedType();
alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource wrote:
> Bef
https://github.com/alexey-bataev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
flovent wrote:
i have implemented the way using set successfully in my local development
environment as @Xazax-hun suggested.
the implementation detail is:
1. when we encounter `open` call, if open flag contains O_NONBLOCK, store
call's return Symbol to set,
2. when we encounter `read` call, ch
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
>From 295df258043ef5a87ae603eedd308b863bad7b59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:14:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Clang] allow restrict qualifier for array types with
po
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126905
While working on moving the conversion builtins to the CLC library in 25c05541
it was discovered that many weren't passing the OpenCL-CTS tests.
As it happens, the clspv-specific code for conversion impleme
AaronBallman wrote:
> > /cc @SharonXSharon
>
> thanks for submitting the fix! A noob question, I wonder in general why does
> clang choose to warn on the invalid formatter instead of erroring out given
> it'll be undefined behavior for invalid formatter?
Functionally, some kinds of UB are wor
frasercrmck wrote:
CC @rjodinchr. I remember you saying you're OOO so no pressure, but perhaps you
could verify this commit with clspv?
For clarity, the remaining failures I see are, e.g.,
```
Error for vector size 1 found at 0x0001: *-0x0p+0 vs 0x0p+0
Input value: -0x1.02p-25 (conve
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126908
The libclc headers are an implementation detail and are not intended to be used
by others as OpenCL headers. The only artifacts of libclc we want to publish
are the LLVM bytecode libraries.
As the headers
AaronBallman wrote:
> The public libclang interface needs to be stable, yes... but in this context,
> that's just the interfaces declared in clang/include/clang-c/CXString.h. We
> can do whatever we want with the internal interface in
> clang/tools/libclang/CXString.h.
Oh, good catch! Agreed.
frasercrmck wrote:
CC @KarolHerbst.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126908
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matt
Date: 2025-02-12T08:53:47-05:00
New Revision: a1826b4d2603a2018ca348d430159ec59e0b72bd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a1826b4d2603a2018ca348d430159ec59e0b72bd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a1826b4d2603a2018ca348d430159ec59e0b72bd.diff
LOG: [Op
@@ -96,6 +100,47 @@ the header file to conditionally make a
function constexpr whenever
the constant evaluation of the corresponding builtin (for example,
``std::fmax`` calls ``__builtin_fmax``) is supported in Clang.
+``__has_target_builtin``
+
+
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-out-of-tree`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-out-of-tree` while building `clang` at step 7
"build-flang-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/53/builds/12221
H
https://github.com/sarnex edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sarnex edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Nick Sarnie (sarnex)
Changes
We should be able to use `spirv64` as a device variant match and it should be
considered a GPU.
Also add the triple to an RTTI check.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126801.di
@@ -1112,6 +1112,11 @@ bool AMDGPUToolChain::shouldSkipSanitizeOption(
assert(OptionalGpuArch && "Invalid Target ID");
(void)OptionalGpuArch;
+
+ // Skip checking 'xnack+' feature availability for gfx12 family.
jhuber6 wrote:
The fact that target-id's pu
StarOne01 wrote:
Done! (Sorry for force pushes 😅, git suddenly decided to act weird).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kadircet wrote:
> * Now the ScanningProjectModules are owned by different calls to
> `ModulesBuilder::buildPrerequisiteModulesFor`. So we don't need to care about
> thread safety in ScanningProjectModules. And if we make it the underlying
> ProjectModules, we need to care about the thead safet
@@ -1104,9 +1104,13 @@ void Sema::ActOnStartOfTranslationUnit() {
}
void Sema::ActOnEndOfTranslationUnitFragment(TUFragmentKind Kind) {
- // No explicit actions are required at the end of the global module fragment.
- if (Kind == TUFragmentKind::Global)
+ if (Kind == TUFrag
ficol wrote:
Hi @shafik, can you please review this PR after changes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cf
jtb20 wrote:
The failures with this patch and not mine are just:
PASS->FAIL: tests/5.1/dispatch/test_dispatch_is_device_ptr.c run
PASS->FAIL: tests/5.1/dispatch/test_dispatch_nowait.c run
that's actually probably neither here nor there, the clauses in question aren't
implemented in my patch ye
Author: Farzon Lotfi
Date: 2025-02-12T09:21:39-05:00
New Revision: 767b15f9d57cf31fd6ba2aed8c17a8c30d5b5e6e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/767b15f9d57cf31fd6ba2aed8c17a8c30d5b5e6e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/767b15f9d57cf31fd6ba2aed8c17a8c30d5b5e6e.diff
https://github.com/farzonl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/OCHyams commented:
> @OCHyams I believe you did the C API changes, are there any additional
> concerns in this area?
SGTM, just one inline question
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
https://github.com/OCHyams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Lambdaris updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94137
>From 17075214ce351cc39db7e2da8d0bfcb196861c7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lambdaris
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 21:31:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [coverage] Count false counters when calculating max
counter i
@@ -227,14 +228,14 @@ class NVVMDialectLLVMIRTranslationInterface
} else if (attribute.getName() ==
grypp wrote:
Sure sounds great
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125908
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
Lambdaris wrote:
> What's the current status?
I think it's done and ready for review.
> I think marking extended semantics (to Regions) will still be the issue.
> Could we enhance "Gap"?
Could you clarify the issue and how we enhance "gap" a bit more? Now the major
work of this patch is in
1 - 100 of 565 matches
Mail list logo
