llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/14368
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/12013
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/11838
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/11613
Here is the relevant piece o
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126464
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126461
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HemangGadhavi converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126484
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pzzp updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
>From 8e18416e111d2acd813efdabf5dd1ad3e34435f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhoupeng12
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 18:13:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm:ir] Add support for constant data exceeding 4GiB
---
clang/lib/
Author: Aniket Lal
Date: 2025-02-10T13:57:52+05:30
New Revision: d9cdf27834de94a7c6f5b66b28c0e6667fec5418
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d9cdf27834de94a7c6f5b66b28c0e6667fec5418
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d9cdf27834de94a7c6f5b66b28c0e6667fec5418.diff
LO
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@lalaniket8 Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a bui
https://github.com/lalaniket8 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/17735
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Aniket Lal (lalaniket8)
Changes
This PR fixes the post merge check fails from PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126488.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified
@@ -256,7 +277,7 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
// similar-types rule.
const auto *RT = Ty->getAs();
if (!RT)
-return AnyPtr;
+return getAnyPtr();
brunodf-snps wrote:
Yes, I agree this shoul
https://github.com/lalaniket8 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126488
This PR fixes the post merge check fails from PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
>From 37565e60b3325324c9396ce236cb005a958f157e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anikelal
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 202
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125880
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/brunodf-snps updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126047
>From f516639a2bfe5cad76ac82684877f46ac6260077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruno De Fraine
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:50:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [TBAA] Refine pointer-tbaa for void pointers by pointe
https://github.com/vikramRH approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pzzp created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
The test file is over 4GiB, which is too big, so I didn’t submit it. 😄
>From 0395fd9680a348c6afc52a165453222c02a3cd48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhoupeng12
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 18:13:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH]
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (pzzp)
Changes
The test file is over 4GiB, which is too big, so I didn’t submit it. 😄
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
jplehr wrote:
This broke our flang-enabled buildbot
https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/105/builds/15554
Looking at it currently
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126297
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/HemangGadhavi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126484
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/lalaniket8 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126471
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
> Merging main into your branch tends to do that.
I’m not sure if this is the case, but my theory is that it’s specifically
creating a new commit on merge that does that. After resolving conflicts, you
have to run `git merge --continue` instead of committing manually. I always
Sirraide wrote:
> Also, i see the typo correction is unpredictable as I addressed above, is
> that a expected behaviour?
Hmm, I don’t know too much about typo correction so I’m probably not the best
person to look into that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
___
brad0 wrote:
It's not missing as in like someone forgot. It is intentional. Same goes for
FreeBSD and OpenBSD's Drivers. The base OS uses libc++ and anything else is not
supported.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126302
___
cfe-commits mail
https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
Hmm, I think what this section is trying to demonstrate is that ‘*According to
the standard*, this is in the path of execution and therefore *supposed* to be
considered unlikely, but we don’t do that’, so maybe it’d be better to
reword/expand the comment
https://github.com/vbvictor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126434
>From 92588a7eb3f87e74887e94f88d3402ec25c6ee53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Baranov
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:34:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] add modernize-use-scoped-lock check
---
.../
DavidTruby wrote:
At a quick glance it looks like we're still trying to link FortranDecimal
somewhere so this might be #121997 instead..
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
DavidTruby wrote:
Sorry, I managed to have a better look at our CI and this seems to be a
downstream build system issue. I assumed because the upstream CI was also
broken that it was an issue in both but that seems to be unrelated.
No need to revert, sorry for the noise!
https://github.com/ll
@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
davidtrevelyan wrote:
@@ -247,45 +240,134 @@ void StackAddrEscapeChecker::checkPreCall(const
CallEvent &Call,
}
}
-void StackAddrEscapeChecker::checkPreStmt(const ReturnStmt *RS,
- CheckerContext &C) const {
- if (!ChecksEnabled[CK_StackAddrEscapeChecker
@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
devnexen wrote:
oh y
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-02-10T10:19:22Z
New Revision: 4dec3909e93c23ef1545c934f9715f9be2d7c49b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4dec3909e93c23ef1545c934f9715f9be2d7c49b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4dec3909e93c23ef1545c934f9715f9be2d7c49b.diff
LOG
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124779
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aniket Lal
Date: 2025-02-10T10:24:13Z
New Revision: cab893ab8ebdcf63cfc63666009122d9c0e31bdf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cab893ab8ebdcf63cfc63666009122d9c0e31bdf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cab893ab8ebdcf63cfc63666009122d9c0e31bdf.diff
LOG: [C
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-01` while building `clang`
at step 12 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/4907
Here is the relevant piece of
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
For `new A[N]{1,2,3}`, we need to allocate N elements of type A, and initialize
the first three with the given InitListExpr elements. However, if N is larger
than 3, we need to initialize the remaining eleme
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126494
For `new A[N]{1,2,3}`, we need to allocate N elements of type A, and initialize
the first three with the given InitListExpr elements. However, if N is larger
than 3, we need to initialize the remaining element
xgupta wrote:
Probably need a fresh start.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95715
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xgupta closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95715
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jplehr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126495
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#126297
Broken buildbots
https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/105/builds/15554
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/15490
Error is
```
# .---command stderr
#
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jan Patrick Lehr (jplehr)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#126297
Broken buildbots
https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/105/builds/15554
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/15490
Error is
```
# .---command stderr---
kadircet wrote:
FWIW, i bisected a performance regression (and possibly an infinite loop) in
clangd to this PR. trying to get a reproducer now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/12953
Here is the r
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
Just looking at this on Linaro's bots, thanks for the fix!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
https://github.com/saiislam approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jan Patrick Lehr
Date: 2025-02-10T10:58:56+01:00
New Revision: 6fd99de31864a5ef84ae8613b3a9034e05293461
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd99de31864a5ef84ae8613b3a9034e05293461
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd99de31864a5ef84ae8613b3a9034e05293461.di
https://github.com/jplehr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
I also looked at this but got into a rabbit hole finding out whether you could
have channel specific invites. I think you can, but I don't think it actually
helps us. As the other problem we have had is invites expiring, so the fewer
unique invite links the better.
https:
DavidTruby wrote:
This has broken Windows builds but I'm not fully sure why and I can't
investigate as I'm on holiday. Can we revert until we can work out why Windows
builds are broken?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122341
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/Xazax-hun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
Thanks a lot for the change and persisting. Sorry for the stupid questions :)
Looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
@@ -247,45 +240,128 @@ void StackAddrEscapeChecker::checkPreCall(const
CallEvent &Call,
}
}
-void StackAddrEscapeChecker::checkPreStmt(const ReturnStmt *RS,
- CheckerContext &C) const {
- if (!ChecksEnabled[CK_StackAddrEscapeChecker
zahiraam wrote:
@alexey-bataev I haven't gotten any response from @Meinersbur , can I merge
this in? Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119891
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
jyn514 wrote:
The conversation there seems stalled. What can I do to move this forward?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123683
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jeanPerier wrote:
> A rebase to main head and force push helped in another instance of
> "Processing updates"
I had that twice on my PRs last week. The "Processing updates" was still stuck
after a day. A rebase and force push also "solved" the issue. I do not recall
facing that before, maybe
rorth wrote:
This patch still breaks the [Solaris/sparcv9
buildbot](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/5233).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are a
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-02-10T14:28:40+01:00
New Revision: 199c791a1dbf417fdb08fbbb054d51ed398f285a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/199c791a1dbf417fdb08fbbb054d51ed398f285a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/199c791a1dbf417fdb08fbbb054d51ed398f285a.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126186
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126511
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
@necto
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
chomosuke wrote:
Ping~~~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chomosuke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118568
>From b43a2602025bdacea06ced5171904fb5d765de9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: chomosuke
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 07:10:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] fixed removeFunctionArgs don't remove comma
---
.../clang-tid
https://github.com/hokein closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.cpp - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/nikic commented:
Looks reasonable to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125911
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.cpp - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+
+; RUN: opt -passes="fatlto-cleanup" -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-fuchsia < %s -S |
FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Use UTC please. Also, is the triple here really needed?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125911
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.h - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -1,21 +1,24 @@
// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && split-file %s %t
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-fuchsia -O2 -flto -ffat-lto-objects \
-// RUN: -fsanitize=cfi-icall -fsanitize-trap=cfi-icall
-fvisibility=hidden -emit-llvm -o - %s
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.h - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.cpp - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125911
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.cpp - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===- FatLtoCleanup.cpp - clean up IR for the FatLTO pipeline --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/nico created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126524
…r like gcc
We now process all 6 options left-to-right and pick whatever is active at the
end.
Fixes #124868.
>From 5050dbd75fc7446985f4bebe5c7c0ab13e3ccbbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Weber
Date: Mon, 1
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
Looks wonderful! Added some nits inline.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
@@ -45,3 +48,91 @@ Note: Both Chrome-tracing and speedscope tools might
struggle with time traces a
Luckily, in most cases the default max-steps boundary of 225 000 produces the
traces of approximately that size
for a single entry point.
You can use ``-analyze-function=get_gl
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126524
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124920
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -45,3 +48,91 @@ Note: Both Chrome-tracing and speedscope tools might
struggle with time traces a
Luckily, in most cases the default max-steps boundary of 225 000 produces the
traces of approximately that size
for a single entry point.
You can use ``-analyze-function=get_gl
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126532
Fixes #125821
The assertion was too strict, as Clang can reach this code path when
recursively generating deduction guides for alias templates. See the detailed
explanation
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
@@ -45,3 +48,91 @@ Note: Both Chrome-tracing and speedscope tools might
struggle with time traces a
Luckily, in most cases the default max-steps boundary of 225 000 produces the
traces of approximately that size
for a single entry point.
You can use ``-analyze-function=get_gl
sarnex wrote:
@jhuber6 Ping on this one when you have time, thx :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125920
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -45,3 +48,91 @@ Note: Both Chrome-tracing and speedscope tools might
struggle with time traces a
Luckily, in most cases the default max-steps boundary of 225 000 produces the
traces of approximately that size
for a single entry point.
You can use ``-analyze-function=get_gl
Meinersbur wrote:
@clementval You agreed to a new folder structure in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-names-for-flang-rt-libraries/84321/4. Could
you please review this PR again?
The "Check code formatting" stage does not pass by design. For moved/renamed
files it requires a complete reforma
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+//===--- NlohmannJsonExplicitConversionsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
alexfh wrote:
It looks like this commit introduces an undesired false-positive:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/rEjzK63he
```
struct P {
int a [[clang::require_explicit_initialization]];
};
struct S {
P p;
S(P p) : p(p) {}
};
```
```
:7:12: warning: field in 'P' requires explicit initializati
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-02-10T07:48:57-08:00
New Revision: 280d2a3035ad362cb9dab9f59aa9bdbb88723e9e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/280d2a3035ad362cb9dab9f59aa9bdbb88723e9e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/280d2a3035ad362cb9dab9f59aa9bdbb88723e9e.diff
L
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-02-10T07:49:17-08:00
New Revision: eaedfc0e5299d43dda28346eb2a5b068a8bee58d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eaedfc0e5299d43dda28346eb2a5b068a8bee58d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eaedfc0e5299d43dda28346eb2a5b068a8bee58d.diff
L
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-02-10T07:49:42-08:00
New Revision: ba9810e803744974157e85a80854e163818db608
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ba9810e803744974157e85a80854e163818db608
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ba9810e803744974157e85a80854e163818db608.diff
L
1 - 100 of 556 matches
Mail list logo
