https://github.com/ddpagan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126292
Updated status to 'done' for OpenMP 6.0 features:
- OpenMP directives in concurrent loop regions
- atomics constructs on concurrent loop regions
- Lift nesting restriction on concurrent loop
Removed duplic
Author: Helena Kotas
Date: 2025-02-07T11:01:47-08:00
New Revision: 501901e8217a09ce788bedc0eb94cd7d54fa9f6f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/501901e8217a09ce788bedc0eb94cd7d54fa9f6f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/501901e8217a09ce788bedc0eb94cd7d54fa9f6f.diff
@@ -48,94 +48,108 @@ struct TwoFloats {
// CHECK: HLSLResourceClassAttr {{.*}} Implicit CBuffer
// CHECK: HLSLResourceAttr {{.*}} Implicit CBuffer
cbuffer CB {
- // CHECK: VarDecl {{.*}} col:9 used a1 'hlsl_constant float'
+ // CHECK: VarDecl {{.*}} used a1 'hlsl_constant flo
https://github.com/sarnex edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126297
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -9220,13 +9220,24 @@ void LinkerWrapper::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
for (StringRef Arg : LinkerArgs)
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(
"--device-linker=" + TC->getTripleString() + "=" + Arg));
+
+ // Forward the LTO
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126297
>From a19b3263a99c3def8ec4b756d8cf85233ebf9735 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:39:56 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LinkerWrapper] Clean up options after proper forwarding
Summ
https://github.com/sarnex approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126297
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vzakhari wrote:
> I have force pushed this to my branch but github doesn't seem to be picking
> it up on this review?? I don't really know how to fix this.
A rebase to main head and force push helped in another instance of "Processing
updates"
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119718
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
>From 295df258043ef5a87ae603eedd308b863bad7b59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:14:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang] allow restrict qualifier for array types with
poin
https://github.com/Meinersbur closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
fmayer wrote:
> What else even uses the level? __builtin_object_size codegen? Can you add a
> DocBrief to the flag explaining when you'd want to use it?
Let me find out details. We have some code that miscompiles with
`-fstrict-flex-arrays=1`, so something is exploiting the UB.
https://githu
vitalybuka wrote:
Usually our tweak flags looks like -fsanitize--
"bounds" is a group for (array-bounds + local-bounds)
"undefined" is also group, but we already have -fsanitize-undefined-,
but they kind of affect a few sanitizers
so:
`-fsanitize-undefined-strict-flex-arrays`
or
`-fsanitize-a
@@ -444,6 +444,19 @@ class LangOptionsBase {
IncompleteOnly = 3,
};
+ enum class ArrayBoundsStrictFlexArraysLevelKind {
vitalybuka wrote:
To match numerical values, less mental efforts for readers.
```
enum class ArrayBoundsStrictFlexArraysLevelKind
@@ -7,6 +7,16 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64 -fstrict-flex-arrays=2
-fsanitize=array-bounds -x c++ %s -o - | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-STRICT-2,CXX
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64 -fstrict-flex-arrays=3
-fsanitize=array-bounds
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1192,13 +1193,40 @@ llvm::Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitLoadOfCountedByField(
return nullptr;
}
+LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind
+CodeGenFunction::effectiveArrayBoundsFlexArraysLevel() {
+ using StrictFlexArraysLevelKind = LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind;
+
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/22321
Here is
https://github.com/zixuan-wu approved this pull request.
LGTM. But I think commit msg should be refined(this PR is not for upstreaming?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115961
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
zixuan-wu wrote:
LGTM. But I think commit msg should be refined(this PR is not for upstreaming?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115961
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
nikic wrote:
/cherry-pick 26ecddb05d13c101ccd840a6710eb5f8b82de841
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#126201
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/lalaniket8 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
>From 3608d77e3633d853682ffbae16c5b227259ed69c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anikelal
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 12:13:20 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Driver][HIP] Do not pass -dependency-file flag for HIP
Device
https://github.com/rniwa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126203
Implicit value initialization is trivial for our purposes.
>From 717eca92439705bd9f152631a0602fdb7df9413a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:29:41 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [WebKit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Implicit value initialization is trivial for our purposes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126203.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/PtrType
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125830
>From 45aa8d52ef8391fd15d81fb55a39c34f5aec233b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sjoerd Meijer
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:00:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Add an option to control loop-interchange
T
MaskRay wrote:
It seems that Debian/Ubuntu special cases are used in very few cases like
`--hash-style=` `-z relro` defaults and default lib path `/usr/lib/cuda`.
To make it easier to maintain, we should not add every new codename to
clang::driver::Distro... @sylvestre
I hope that Debian/Ub
https://github.com/nikic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125880
>From 2f698e27ae61b91019544cc707c134e0aec9ecd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:08:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [CaptureTracking][FunctionAttrs] Add support for
CaptureInfo
https://github.com/nikic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125880
>From 2f698e27ae61b91019544cc707c134e0aec9ecd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:08:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [CaptureTracking][FunctionAttrs] Add support for
CaptureInfo
@@ -94,31 +96,53 @@ namespace llvm {
/// U->getUser() is always an Instruction.
virtual bool shouldExplore(const Use *U);
-/// captured - Information about the pointer was captured by the user of
-/// use U. Return true to stop the traversal or false to continu
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126206
When substituting for rewrite purposes, as in rebuilding constraints for a
synthesized deduction guide, it assumed that packs were in `PackExpansion*`
form, such that the instantiator could extract a pattern. F
@@ -438,18 +448,21 @@ void llvm::PointerMayBeCaptured(const Value *V,
CaptureTracker *Tracker,
};
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
const Use *U = Worklist.pop_back_val();
-switch (DetermineUseCaptureKind(*U, IsDereferenceableOrNull)) {
-case UseCaptureKind::NO_CAPTU
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "function-attrs"
STATISTIC(NumMemoryAttr, "Number of functions with improved memory attribute");
-STATISTIC(NumNoCapture, "Number of arguments marked nocapture");
+STATISTIC(NumCapturesNone, "Number of arguments marked
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 083686daf9feb5b5acadaef22e60b10a8b781f8a
030e486cbd0cff569ea17028ab22dbd42edf8e5a --e
https://github.com/ampandey-1995 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126186
>From 030e486cbd0cff569ea17028ab22dbd42edf8e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amit Pandey
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:11:23 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver][ROCm][OpenMP] Fix default ockl linking for OpenMP.
Author: Malavika Samak
Date: 2025-02-07T13:34:01+05:30
New Revision: ac640a2d626e65cd4c35a4442f40a23da4d8cbfd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac640a2d626e65cd4c35a4442f40a23da4d8cbfd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac640a2d626e65cd4c35a4442f40a23da4d8cbfd.diff
https://github.com/malavikasamak closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2025-02-07T09:18:18+01:00
New Revision: 26ecddb05d13c101ccd840a6710eb5f8b82de841
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26ecddb05d13c101ccd840a6710eb5f8b82de841
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26ecddb05d13c101ccd840a6710eb5f8b82de841.diff
https://github.com/petrhosek updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120323
>From 025652fd24c1dd13a3d628bd1a56c26e715badaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Hosek
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:23:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Fuchsia] Support PGO
Enable 2-stage builds with PGO.
---
.../ca
https://github.com/zyn0217 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126045
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -94,31 +96,53 @@ namespace llvm {
/// U->getUser() is always an Instruction.
virtual bool shouldExplore(const Use *U);
-/// captured - Information about the pointer was captured by the user of
-/// use U. Return true to stop the traversal or false to continu
Michael137 wrote:
The one test failure unrelated:
```
FAIL: Clang :: Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp (20542 of 21851)
TEST 'Clang :: Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp'
FAILED
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 4: mk
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
When substituting for rewrite purposes, as in rebuilding constraints for a
synthesized deduction guide, it assumed that packs were in `PackExpansion*`
form, such that the instantiator could extract a pattern
@@ -1281,17 +1321,15 @@ static void addArgumentAttrs(const SCCNodeSet &SCCNodes,
if (ArgumentSCC[0]->Uses.size() == 1 &&
ArgumentSCC[0]->Uses[0] == ArgumentSCC[0]) {
Argument *A = ArgumentSCC[0]->Definition;
-A->addAttr(Attribute::getWithCaptureI
https://github.com/petrhosek ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Petr Hosek (petrhosek)
Changes
Enable 2-stage builds with PGO.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120323.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-stage2-instrumented.cmake (+44)
- (modified) cla
https://github.com/zmodem approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
> Have you checked if anywhere in the docs or comments we still have "V2"
> somewhere?
I did a quick scan and I couldn't find stale references.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1
yumeyao wrote:
I agree with the point _we should not add every new codename to
clang::driver::Distro..._, and actually only ancient ubuntu releases `Lucid`
`Jaunty` and `Karmic` uses `--hash-style=both` which is the special case here,
in other/common cases, we just need to know it it debian/ub
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126094
From 7440c102ba71485c2982aa160c961c163a3da5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:26:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer][NFC] Remove "V2" from ArrayBoundC
https://github.com/kito-cheng approved this pull request.
LGTM :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
brad0 wrote:
cc @MaskRay
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
> Have you checked if anywhere in the docs or comments we still have "V2"
> somewhere?
I searched for `CheckerV2` and `BoundV2` and the only findings are:
- A annoying testcase called `test_demangle_pass` that contains references to
many obsolete code fragments (in strings, as
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-02-07T09:28:10Z
New Revision: e00fc80c194b3742cd387b7cc74a5fd7ab775bf0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e00fc80c194b3742cd387b7cc74a5fd7ab775bf0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e00fc80c194b3742cd387b7cc74a5fd7ab775bf0.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/lalaniket8 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
>From 3608d77e3633d853682ffbae16c5b227259ed69c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anikelal
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 12:13:20 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Driver][HIP] Do not pass -dependency-file flag for HIP
Device
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-02-07T11:10:09Z
New Revision: c269182b13abddc459820e57a4d2065f364b23dc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c269182b13abddc459820e57a4d2065f364b23dc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c269182b13abddc459820e57a4d2065f364b23dc.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang,lldb` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/14274
Here
@@ -186,106 +212,212 @@ class MatchDescendantVisitor : public
DynamicRecursiveASTVisitor {
return DynamicRecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseStmt(Node);
}
+ void setASTContext(ASTContext &Context) { ActiveASTContext = &Context; }
+
+ void setHandler(const UnsafeBufferUsageHa
@@ -787,9 +933,9 @@ AST_MATCHER(FunctionDecl, isNormalPrintfFunc) {
// Then if the format string is a string literal, this matcher matches when at
// least one string argument is unsafe. If the format is not a string literal,
// this matcher matches when at least one pointer ty
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov commented:
I am still working on going through the commit very thoroughly.
It all looks great, just a few minor comments, and I've also left a few notes
to not forget where I stopped
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125492
__
@@ -186,106 +212,212 @@ class MatchDescendantVisitor : public
DynamicRecursiveASTVisitor {
return DynamicRecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseStmt(Node);
}
+ void setASTContext(ASTContext &Context) { ActiveASTContext = &Context; }
+
+ void setHandler(const UnsafeBufferUsageHa
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125492
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1189,29 +1353,40 @@ class PointerArithmeticGadget : public WarningGadget {
const Expr *Ptr; // the pointer expression in `PA`
public:
- PointerArithmeticGadget(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result)
+ PointerArithmeticGadget(const MatchResult &Result)
---
@@ -1139,26 +1299,30 @@ class ArraySubscriptGadget : public WarningGadget {
const ArraySubscriptExpr *ASE;
public:
- ArraySubscriptGadget(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result)
+ ArraySubscriptGadget(const MatchResult &Result)
: WarningGadget(Kind::ArraySubscript),
@@ -839,17 +988,22 @@ AST_MATCHER_P(CallExpr, hasUnsafePrintfStringArg,
// second is an integer, it is a snprintf:
const Expr *UnsafeArg;
- if (hasUnsafeFormatOrSArg(&Node, UnsafeArg, 2, Ctx, false))
-return UnsafeStringArgMatcher.matches(*UnsafeArg, F
@@ -1060,19 +1210,24 @@ class IncrementGadget : public WarningGadget {
const UnaryOperator *Op;
public:
- IncrementGadget(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result)
+ IncrementGadget(const MatchResult &Result)
: WarningGadget(Kind::Increment),
-Op(Result.Nodes.
@@ -294,63 +426,81 @@ isInUnspecifiedPointerContext(internal::Matcher
InnerMatcher) {
// 4. the operand of a pointer subtraction operation
//(i.e., computing the distance between two pointers); or ...
- // clang-format off
- auto CallArgMatcher = callExpr(
+ if (au
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126094
From 7440c102ba71485c2982aa160c961c163a3da5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:26:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer][NFC] Remove "V2" from ArrayBoundC
Meinersbur wrote:
This PR still needs a review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
The unittest failure seems to be random nonsense, apparently the Python package
`psutil` is not available on that windows machine:
> llvm-lit.py: C:\a\lld-x86_64-win\build\utils\lit\tests\lit.cfg:111: warning:
> Setting a timeout per test not supported. Requires the Python psut
sjoerdmeijer wrote:
> This is a bit off topic, but do you have any opinion on adding a pragma for
> interchange like other loop optimizations do? I think it can sometimes be
> useful if we can enable/disable the interchange for each loop, but I think
> there are a few things to consider if we
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
This addresses the MSAN failure reported
in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791#issuecomment-2639183154:
```
==5633==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 in
clang::ASTNodeI
Michael137 wrote:
Put up https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
Should address the failure @hokein observed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/22185
Here is the relev
ivanaivanovska wrote:
> @ivanaivanovska @ilya-biryukov One PR is fine. I will look at it.
@ziqingluo-90 Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125492
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Meinersbur wrote:
I second @shiltian's concern. Host-side and device-side libraries should have
different names[^1] if there differences between them. We have host-offloading
as well.
[^1]: Unless they would be interchangeable, i.e. contains host-side libomp,
libomptarget AND device device-si
Author: Michael Kruse
Date: 2025-02-07T11:43:31+01:00
New Revision: 98e118ca435d280ff1c3540eb5e9b4140b44a1b4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/98e118ca435d280ff1c3540eb5e9b4140b44a1b4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/98e118ca435d280ff1c3540eb5e9b4140b44a1b4.diff
https://github.com/Meinersbur closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121997
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126206
>From 2ce86d8842b7b37141d4a415830880b9d1d30260 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:15:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Remove the PackExpansion restrictions for rewrite
substit
Meinersbur wrote:
The OpenMP pragma conceptually applies interchange in the frontend, with
syntactical requirements for the loops it applies to.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125830
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126223
This doesn't seem to do any good and breaks a few libc++ tests. Remove the
special case.
>From af446487c0a09760bda3a8bb646b19015b736971 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Fri,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
This doesn't seem to do any good and breaks a few libc++ tests. Remove the
special case.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126223.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/B
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
This addresses the MSAN failure reported
in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791#issuecomment-2639183154:
```
==5633==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-val
https://github.com/jeanPerier approved this pull request.
I do not know much the target-abi LLVM module flag, but this looks reasonable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126188
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125830
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sjoerd Meijer
Date: 2025-02-07T10:31:24Z
New Revision: 612df14c0058572c876f59d41ec56c89710cee15
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/612df14c0058572c876f59d41ec56c89710cee15
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/612df14c0058572c876f59d41ec56c89710cee15.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/zyn0217 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 83ba3740bf51347307494d013099e392c310e32b
04636bea1b873805af02dea865637d7125cee1e5 --e
https://github.com/lalaniket8 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
>From 3608d77e3633d853682ffbae16c5b227259ed69c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anikelal
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 12:13:20 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Driver][HIP] Do not pass -dependency-file flag for HIP
Device
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mariya Podchishchaeva (Fznamznon)
Changes
Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects via
pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC supports an
extension allowing to do it.
Aside from array
301 - 400 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
