llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`libc-x86_64-debian-dbg-bootstrap-build` running on `libc-x86_64-debian` while
building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/200/builds/2995
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clangd-ubuntu-tsan`
running on `clangd-ubuntu-clang` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-clangd-clangd-index-server-clangd-indexer".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/134/builds/12872
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 4 "build
stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/11704
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-hip-vega20` running
on `hip-vega20-0` while building `clang` at step 3 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/12987
Here is the relevant piece of the build log fo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/builds/19027
Here is the rele
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/14019
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/15169
Here is the relevant piece
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/17265
Here is the re
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast` running on `as-builder-3` while building `clang`
at step 6 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/2/builds/16328
Here is the relevant piece
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/16198
Here is the rel
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`cross-project-tests-sie-ubuntu` running on `doug-worker-1a` while building
`clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/181/builds/12972
Here is the relevan
Author: Arthur Eubanks
Date: 2025-02-03T22:12:04Z
New Revision: 5dccfd9283cd784758aa3d16fcb6e31f135c080f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dccfd9283cd784758aa3d16fcb6e31f135c080f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dccfd9283cd784758aa3d16fcb6e31f135c080f.diff
LOG
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `openmp-s390x-linux`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/7575
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
bwendling wrote:
Those tests are meant to bail out if the MemberExpr is a pointer. That patch
may be superseded by this patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/12484
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/11529
Here is the relevant piec
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Apologies, if I am missing it but I don't see a test emitting the diagnostic
`err_drv_mix_offload` anywhere.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`cross-project-tests-sie-ubuntu-dwarf5` running on `doug-worker-1b` while
building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/163/builds/12847
Here is the
compnerd wrote:
The other way works with warnings and some performance loss and code bloat
(linking code designed for DLL as static).
So far I've always mandated dynamic linking for BlocksRuntime on Windows within
the Swift toolchain and by the Swift toolchain.
You are correct that the `-stat
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot8` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/10271
Here is the relevant piece of the
jhuber6 wrote:
> Apologies, if I am missing it but I don't see a test emitting the diagnostic
> `err_drv_mix_offload` anywhere.
I'll add a test for it, there's also a few other things I need to tweak.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125556
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 4
"build".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/12182
Here is the relevant piece of th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-libcxx`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-libcxx` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/89/builds/15828
Here is the relev
https://github.com/Icohedron created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125599
This PR relands #122992.
A reland was attempted before (#123853), but it [failed to pass the
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan`
buildbot](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123853#issuecomment
@@ -1654,11 +1654,20 @@ void Sema::EmitDiagnostic(unsigned DiagID, const
DiagnosticBuilder &DB) {
}
case DiagnosticIDs::SFINAE_Suppress:
+ if (DiagnosticsEngine::Level Level = getDiagnostics().getDiagnosticLevel(
+ DiagInfo.getID(), DiagInfo.getLocat
https://github.com/yonghong-song created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125601
Marc Suñé (Isovalent, part of Cisco) reported an issue where an uninitialized
variable caused generated bpf prog binary code not working as expected. The
reproducer is in [1] where the flags “-Wall -Werro
yonghong-song wrote:
cc @anakryiko @jemarch
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1909,7 +1909,19 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// '\#pragma clang attribute push' directives to the given declaration.
void AddPragmaAttributes(Scope *S, Decl *D);
- void PrintPragmaAttributeInstantiationPoint();
+ using DiagFuncRef =
mizve
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (yonghong-song)
Changes
Marc Suñé (Isovalent, part of Cisco) reported an issue where an uninitialized
variable caused generated bpf prog binary code not working as expected. The
reproducer is in [1] where the flags “-Wall -Werror” ar
@@ -1909,7 +1909,19 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// '\#pragma clang attribute push' directives to the given declaration.
void AddPragmaAttributes(Scope *S, Decl *D);
- void PrintPragmaAttributeInstantiationPoint();
+ using DiagFuncRef =
+ llvm::function_
https://github.com/honeygoyal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125388
>From f9d8e7f9c0df6beb8b4a63a01ebbc3b3ab93d091 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Honey Goyal
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 14:27:01 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Test Cases for adding -latomic (the access size (8
bytes)
goldsteinn wrote:
@ideasman42 ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ddpagan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125621
>From OpenMP 6.0 features list
- OpenMP directives in concurrent loop regions
- atomics constructs on concurrent loop regions
- Lift nesting restriction on concurrent loop
Testing
- Updated test/OpenMP/for_order
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: David Pagan (ddpagan)
Changes
>From OpenMP 6.0 features list
- OpenMP directives in concurrent loop regions
- atomics constructs on concurrent loop regions
- Lift nesting restriction on concurrent loop
Testing
- Updated test/OpenMP/for_ord
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 13ded6829bf7ca793795c50d47dd2b95482e5cfa
deffda7ca37661781f1bae565ac8ae4a8fbba674 --e
https://github.com/benshi001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125622
None
>From bbd633f6fcd68a14c64281161ba41fda3f4eb047 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:28:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][StaticAnalyzer] Fix a typo in comments [NFC]
---
.../
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125622.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/MemRegion.h
(+1-1)
``di
jhuber6 wrote:
> > Summary: Currently, `-Xarch_` is used to forward argument specially to
> > certain toolchains. Currently, this is only supported by the Darwin
> > toolchain. We want to be able to use this generically, and for offloading
> > too. This patch moves the handling out of the Darw
iajbar wrote:
I opened a SuperOps ticket SUPEROPS-12973 to update the 21.0 release notes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
dwblaikie wrote:
Is my thing about the ctor understanding correct, and it's that the ctor exists
theoretically/abstractly, but not in the AST or in the generated IR/DWARF?
Could it be added/would that be sufficient?
But, yeah, probably fine to just add the attribute, since that's the real
fea
@@ -6601,6 +6573,72 @@ std::string Driver::GetClPchPath(Compilation &C,
StringRef BaseName) const {
return std::string(Output);
}
+const ToolChain &Driver::getOffloadToolChain(
+const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args, const Action::OffloadKind Kind,
+const llvm::Triple &Tar
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang -x cuda %s -Xarch_nvptx64 -O3 -S -nogpulib -nogpuinc -### 2>&1
| FileCheck -check-prefix=O3ONCE %s
+// RUN: %clang -x hip %s -Xarch_amdgcn -O3 -S -nogpulib -nogpuinc -### 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=O3ONCE %s
jhuber6 wrote:
A
@@ -1115,14 +1117,13 @@ def fno_convergent_functions : Flag<["-"],
"fno-convergent-functions">,
// Common offloading options
let Group = offload_Group in {
-def offload_arch_EQ : Joined<["--"], "offload-arch=">, Flags<[NoXarchOption]>,
shiltian wrote:
I thou
https://github.com/andykaylor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125260
>From 4801886dd4c45d32891a7337ad7430a6c5137929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:28:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [CIR] Initial implementation of CIR-to-LLVM IR lowering
https://github.com/andykaylor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125260
>From 4801886dd4c45d32891a7337ad7430a6c5137929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:28:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [CIR] Initial implementation of CIR-to-LLVM IR lowering
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125260
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1115,14 +1117,13 @@ def fno_convergent_functions : Flag<["-"],
"fno-convergent-functions">,
// Common offloading options
let Group = offload_Group in {
-def offload_arch_EQ : Joined<["--"], "offload-arch=">, Flags<[NoXarchOption]>,
Artem-B wrote:
Also, `
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2025-02-03T13:35:43-08:00
New Revision: 622ee03e262469aecbad9d7f2b4b968576e005f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/622ee03e262469aecbad9d7f2b4b968576e005f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/622ee03e262469aecbad9d7f2b4b968576e005f0.diff
L
@@ -1115,14 +1117,13 @@ def fno_convergent_functions : Flag<["-"],
"fno-convergent-functions">,
// Common offloading options
let Group = offload_Group in {
-def offload_arch_EQ : Joined<["--"], "offload-arch=">, Flags<[NoXarchOption]>,
jhuber6 wrote:
I defin
https://github.com/jhuber6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125421
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -146,8 +146,13 @@ let Attributes = [Const, NoThrow,
RequiredVectorWidth<256>], Features = "avx" in
// current formulation is based on what was easiest to recognize from the
// pre-TableGen version.
-let Features = "mmx", Attributes = [NoThrow, Const] in {
- def _mm_prefet
@@ -5439,3 +5441,21 @@ OpenACCAsteriskSizeExpr *
OpenACCAsteriskSizeExpr::CreateEmpty(const ASTContext &C) {
return new (C) OpenACCAsteriskSizeExpr({}, C.IntTy);
}
+
+ConvertVectorExpr *ConvertVectorExpr::CreateEmpty(const ASTContext &C,
+
lukel97 wrote:
Just a heads up I've been using this locally for a bit now and it's been great,
thanks for working on this. Haven't run into any issues so far.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@li
https://github.com/zwuis updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124793
>From 16596add29b63ee0282e026dec7b1d5946863113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yanzuo Liu
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:38:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Fix wrong initialization kind
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe (ssahasra)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125627.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp (+4-21)
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe (ssahasra)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125627.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp (+4-21)
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h (+4)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe (ssahasra)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125627.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp (+4-21)
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h (+4)
-
https://github.com/ssahasra created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125627
None
>From 5d6d4fbbfabf5e33ec366ea113a0e6c93ba46bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:36:20 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm] Create() functions for ConvergenceControlIns
Author: Michael Park
Date: 2025-02-03T11:22:02-08:00
New Revision: a9e249f64e800fbb20a3b26c0cfb68c1a1aee5e1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a9e249f64e800fbb20a3b26c0cfb68c1a1aee5e1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a9e249f64e800fbb20a3b26c0cfb68c1a1aee5e1.diff
https://github.com/mpark closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5404,6 +5404,115 @@ third argument, can only occur at file scope.
a = b[i] * c[i] + e;
}
+Extensions for controlling atomic code generation
+=
+
+The ``[[clang::atomic]]`` statement attribute enables users to control ho
@@ -5404,6 +5404,115 @@ third argument, can only occur at file scope.
a = b[i] * c[i] + e;
}
+Extensions for controlling atomic code generation
+=
+
+The ``[[clang::atomic]]`` statement attribute enables users to control ho
firewave wrote:
I ran it on the Cppcheck codebase and there were several cases I would consider
false positives as well as some which are really awkward to fix (in some cases
leading to potentially unnecessary lookups). I will provide some examples in
the next few days.
https://github.com/llv
@@ -1697,19 +1721,17 @@ llvm::opt::DerivedArgList
*ToolChain::TranslateXarchArgs(
} else if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_Xarch_host)) {
NeedTrans = !IsDevice;
Skip = IsDevice;
-} else if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_Xarch__) && IsDevice) {
-
Author: Devon Loehr
Date: 2025-02-03T21:20:47+01:00
New Revision: dfc28736d445196ae97c323c086936e07a7c5b49
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dfc28736d445196ae97c323c086936e07a7c5b49
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dfc28736d445196ae97c323c086936e07a7c5b49.diff
L
https://github.com/abhina-sree created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125570
This patch continues the work that was started here
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426 to correctly open text files in text mode.
>From 7ac3589c34f4cb48bbf9b0fea74adfc9fccaecdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: A
https://github.com/bwendling created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125571
An LValueToRValue cast shouldn't be ignored, so bail out of the visitor if we
encounter one.
>From f5086e8af7b370aae43bee98493ded9c9f7aa9b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025
https://github.com/zmodem closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125526
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
@efriedma-quic Created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125571
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Abhina Sree (abhina-sree)
Changes
This patch continues the work that was started here
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426 to correctly open text files in text mode.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125570.d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
An LValueToRValue cast shouldn't be ignored, so bail out of the visitor if we
encounter one.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125571.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/li
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
An LValueToRValue cast shouldn't be ignored, so bail out of the visitor if we
encounter one.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125571.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
bwendling wrote:
This change didn't affect the tests, which is either good or bad, depending on
your point of view. I assume that it's okay because we're looking for a
`MemberExpr`, and they don't appear to have the LValueToRValue cast, at least
for the instances we care about. I'm actively wo
zmodem wrote:
creduce'd reproducer:
```
$ cat /tmp/a.cc
class Location {
public:
static Location Current(int = __builtin_LINE());
};
class DOMMatrix;
class BasicMember {
public:
BasicMember(DOMMatrix *);
};
template using Member = BasicMember;
class ExceptionState {
public:
ExceptionState
@@ -1984,6 +1984,15 @@ llvm::Constant
*ConstantEmitter::emitForMemory(CodeGenModule &CGM,
return Res;
}
+ // In HLSL bool vectors are stored in memory as a vector of i32
+ if (destType->isExtVectorBoolType() && CGM.getContext().getLangOpts().HLSL) {
+llvm::Type *b
vitalybuka wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
Do you anticipate the clang driver ever adding the libclosure runtime to the
link line automatically? If we do, would this flag control the behavior of
that?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125384
___
cfe-commits maili
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
compnerd wrote:
I can see that as being useful certainly. `-fblocks` could add
`-lBlocksRuntime`. However, I think that the behaviour change with
`-static-libclosure` would then impact both code generation (on Windows) and
the linking, which would give the correct desired behaviour. Where as,
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/10269
Here is the relevant piece of the
@@ -248,4 +248,16 @@ __attribute__((optnone)) T func_22(T x, T y) {
float func_23(float x, float y) {
return func_22(x, y);
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: FunctionDecl {{.*}} func_24 'vector2float (vector2double)'
+// CHECK: CompoundStmt {{.*}}
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Can we also add a summary, explaining your implementation e.g. "added
TrailingObjects to `ConvertVectorExpr` containing "
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
jhuber6 wrote:
Here's something fun, `-O0` and `-O3` are accepted by `-Xarch` but `-O1` and
`-O2` are rejected.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125421
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
Author: Ikhlas Ajbar
Date: 2025-02-03T16:43:27-06:00
New Revision: 1abe7e8debc44d9a7e460c2be0b85b7cf137585b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1abe7e8debc44d9a7e460c2be0b85b7cf137585b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1abe7e8debc44d9a7e460c2be0b85b7cf137585b.diff
https://github.com/androm3da approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125584
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/iajbar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125584
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/honeygoyal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125388
>From f9d8e7f9c0df6beb8b4a63a01ebbc3b3ab93d091 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Honey Goyal
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 14:27:01 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Test Cases for adding -latomic (the access size (8 bytes)
e
@@ -338,6 +338,10 @@ void aix::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
CmdArgs.push_back("-lpthread");
}
const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(ToolChain.GetLinkerPath());
+
+ if (Sanitize.hasAnySanitizer() && IsArch32Bit) {
honeygo
@@ -1120,3 +1120,21 @@
// RUN:-c \
// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK-K-UNUSED %s
// CHECK-K-UNUSED: clang: warning: -K: 'linker' input unused
[-Wunused-command-line-argument]
+
+// Check No Sanitizer on 32-bit AIX
+// RUN: %if target={{.*aix.*}} %{ \
+// RUN
MattPD wrote:
@alexey-bataev Would you be able to take a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123867
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rnk edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rnk approved this pull request.
Thanks for optimizing the builtins! I feel like builtins have grown
significantly since adding RISC-V and ARM MVE intrinsics, and few people until
now have stopped to re-evaluate how we represent these things.
While I was watching these clearl
@@ -482,17 +488,42 @@ void clang::EmitClangBuiltins(const RecordKeeper
&Records, raw_ostream &OS) {
for (const auto *BuiltinRecord :
Records.getAllDerivedDefinitions("AtomicBuiltin"))
collectBuiltins(BuiltinRecord, Builtins);
-
unsigned NumAtomicBuiltins = Buil
@@ -1,64 +1,40 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -verify=expected,aarch64 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -verify=expected,unsupported -fsyntax-only
%s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple loongarch64 -verify=expected,loongarch64
-fsyntax-only %s
-// RUN: %clang
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/21790
Here is the relevant p
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/17817
Here is the relevant piece of t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/18711
Here is the relevant piece of t
@@ -1334,6 +1334,16 @@ class X86_64ABIInfo : public ABIInfo {
return T.isOSLinux() || T.isOSNetBSD();
}
+ bool returnCXXRecordGreaterThan128InMem() const {
+// Clang <= 20.0 did not do this.
+if (getContext().getLangOpts().getClangABICompat() <=
+LangOpt
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125111
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/antangelo approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
101 - 200 of 472 matches
Mail list logo
