wzssyqa wrote:
> but that leads to the question of: why is including musl's limits.h a problem?
It cause some warning like
```
./include/bits/xopen_lim.h:84:10: warning: "NL_NMAX" redefined
84 | # define NL_NMAXINT_MAX
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120526
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120526
>From cc30e98287ec0ceca490f1f6a16a0190ff243ed6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:09:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] clang/limits.h: Avoid including limits.h twice
The limits.h of gl
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123059
>From d0decfc63c2fef8ae659bc2133c6aee849ec19ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:33:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] [Modules] Makes sure internal declaration won't be
foun
https://github.com/sr-tream updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121449
>From a678fcdf6b2a5e52799f0aa08f36c3989ab30146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ruihua Dong
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:27:33 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Implement simple folding of preprocessor branches
Extrac
https://github.com/tahonermann updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105738
>From 9dc8727fad50d7a808fc14173189105675cb46c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Honermann
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:44:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Support for MSVC compatible header search path
orde
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123279
Fixes #123179.
>From 04b03d24d661dc8e8503269b7ddf55140e88de20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:45:33 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Correctly annotate braces in macro defi
shiltian wrote:
bump bump
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110381
>From 570aff7459311a43cd9c9139de05dc2ab4cf762c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:36:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] Add an option to control indentation of
`export
@@ -26588,10 +26613,7 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, Cpp20ModulesSupport) {
" int foo;\n"
"};",
Style);
- verifyFormat("export {\n"
- " int foo;\n"
- "};",
- Style);
+ verifyFormat("export { int f
@@ -1522,6 +1523,7 @@ FormatStyle getLLVMStyle(FormatStyle::LanguageKind
Language) {
LLVMStyle.EmptyLineAfterAccessModifier = FormatStyle::ELAAMS_Never;
LLVMStyle.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier = FormatStyle::ELBAMS_LogicalBlock;
LLVMStyle.ExperimentalAutoDetectBinPacking
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
The change looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121314
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1688,13 +1688,21 @@ static bool CheckVectorElementCallArgs(Sema *S,
CallExpr *TheCall) {
auto *VecTyA = ArgTyA->getAs();
SourceLocation BuiltinLoc = TheCall->getBeginLoc();
+ bool AllBArgAreVectors = true;
for (unsigned i = 1; i < TheCall->getNumArgs(); ++i) {
https://github.com/inbelic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123060
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
`Lexer::findNextToken` has an additional check:
`if (!Lexer::isAtEndOfMacroExpansion(Loc, SM, LangOpts, &Loc))`
Does this not change behavior in the case we are replacing? I imagine folks
just copied from `Lexer::findNextToken` and purposely left this out,
@@ -118,47 +118,19 @@ findMembersUsedInInitExpr(const CXXCtorInitializer
*Initializer,
return Results;
}
-/// Returns the next token after `Loc` (including comment tokens).
-static std::optional getTokenAfter(SourceLocation Loc,
shafik wrote:
This looks li
ojhunt wrote:
> > This does mean that if the preferred and explicit types have different
> > storage requirements we may not warn in all possible cases, but that's a
> > scenario for which the warnings are much more complex and confusing
>
> If I understand the patch correctly, we always warn,
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `libunwind-sphinx-docs`
running on `gribozavr3` while building `libunwind` at step 3 "Install pip
dependencies".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/149/builds/34
Here is the relevant piec
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
khyperia wrote:
Looks great, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@khyperia Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build
Author: Ashley Hauck
Date: 2025-01-16T13:57:41-08:00
New Revision: 9be358f82e90317a28754248038f0abd5aef38fd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9be358f82e90317a28754248038f0abd5aef38fd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9be358f82e90317a28754248038f0abd5aef38fd.diff
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
Merged. Thanks for your contribution!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3442,6 +3442,35 @@ uint16_t
ASTContext::getPointerAuthTypeDiscriminator(QualType T) {
encodeTypeForFunctionPointerAuth(*this, Out, T);
} else {
T = T.getUnqualifiedType();
+// Drop exception specification from member function pointer type.
rj
https://github.com/dougsonos updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121525
>From 805b182e1a9ebe5e344943748dce6c86594495eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Wyatt
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:28:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] FunctionEffects: Correctly navigate through array
typ
@@ -173,6 +176,20 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedCXXAttributeName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
+ const LangOptions &Lang = PP.getLangOpts();
+ if (Lang.CPlusPlus &&
+ hasAttrib
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
>From 295df258043ef5a87ae603eedd308b863bad7b59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:14:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] allow restrict qualifier for array types with pointer
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/obiwac created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123252
Previously, when using compiler wrappers (`--override-compiler`, as is default
on macOS with SIP on), CC/CXX were set to just `intercept-cc/c++`, which are
installed to libexec (so a priori not in PATH).
This P
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aymeric Wibo (obiwac)
Changes
Previously, when using compiler wrappers (`--override-compiler`, as is default
on macOS with SIP on), CC/CXX were set to just `intercept-cc/c++`, which are
installed to libexec (so a priori not in PATH).
Thi
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@AaronBallman could you review these changes? thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3307,6 +3307,29 @@ void Sema::CheckShadowInheritedFields(const
SourceLocation &Loc,
}
}
+template
+inline static bool HasAttribute(const QualType &T) {
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@AaronBallman could you take a look at this issue? thanks
https://github.com/llv
https://github.com/obiwac updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123252
>From 11fcbaaba06ebce33f20cc862e8475736c1e046b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aymeric Wibo
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:01:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [scan-build-py] use explicit compiler wrapper paths for
intercept
obiwac wrote:
@rizsotto
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123252
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/leijurv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
>From 1caf823165b16f6701993d586df51d5cdbf0885e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leijurv
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang-format] Add BreakBeforeTemplateClose option
---
clang/d
https://github.com/phoebewang created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123270
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/828965
>From 6e6058e71a13de67e4c5b78258448629b3f8b0ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Wang, Phoebe"
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:06:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [X86
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang)
Changes
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/828965
---
Patch is 35.87 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123270.diff
16 Files Affected:
- (mo
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff a761e26b2364ea457b79b9a4bea6d792e4913d24
6e6058e71a13de67e4c5b78258448629b3f8b0ba --e
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121819
>From 9f952de3cb3e973f17121c057089a28bf4c6e5e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:15:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF-8
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Paul Kirth
Date: 2025-01-16T13:44:55-08:00
New Revision: 92f1f99d2ee9ff0f928741fef4fcb58e994302df
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/92f1f99d2ee9ff0f928741fef4fcb58e994302df
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/92f1f99d2ee9ff0f928741fef4fcb58e994302df.diff
LO
khyperia wrote:
@cachemeifyoucan thank you, done! (feel free to rewrite it as well, if you want
or have any nitpicks)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/khyperia edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121820
>From 2035ab40f01fd10b91f48be9c921039fa12805c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:15:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20ch?=
=?UTF-8
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64-flang-aix` running
on `ppc64-flang-aix-test` while building `clang,flang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/201/builds/1461
Here i
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
I updated the title and PR message. Let me know if that looks ok for you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/thurstond approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Florian Mayer
Date: 2025-01-16T14:00:42-08:00
New Revision: a98df676140c9b3e44f6e094df40d49f53e9a89c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a98df676140c9b3e44f6e094df40d49f53e9a89c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a98df676140c9b3e44f6e094df40d49f53e9a89c.diff
https://github.com/fmayer closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jeremy-rifkin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123166
>From e1ce92c0f54301cacaba316d38d44d20c6d61cb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Rifkin <51220084+jeremy-rif...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:27:03 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Don't
https://github.com/jeremy-rifkin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123166
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -170,16 +170,14 @@ void test_nested_switch() {
}
}
-// Test that if all the values of an enum covered, that the 'default' branch
-// is unreachable.
+// Test that a warning is not emitted if the code is unreachable.
enum Values { A, B, C, D };
void test_all_enums_covere
@@ -170,16 +170,14 @@ void test_nested_switch() {
}
}
-// Test that if all the values of an enum covered, that the 'default' branch
-// is unreachable.
+// Test that a warning is not emitted if the code is unreachable.
enum Values { A, B, C, D };
void test_all_enums_covere
VyacheslavLevytskyy wrote:
> I rebased and the tests are passing locally. but they are still failing in ci.
It's the strange part. The thing is when I created a new
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123191 today, I see all tests passing
in CI before I press Merged. That's why I thought
@@ -1688,13 +1688,21 @@ static bool CheckVectorElementCallArgs(Sema *S,
CallExpr *TheCall) {
auto *VecTyA = ArgTyA->getAs();
SourceLocation BuiltinLoc = TheCall->getBeginLoc();
+ bool AllBArgAreVectors = true;
for (unsigned i = 1; i < TheCall->getNumArgs(); ++i) {
@@ -47,6 +49,10 @@ template void f() {
}(), ...);
}(1, 2);
+ [](Is...) {
+([] { using T = ElementType; }(), ...);
shafik wrote:
Out of curiosity were applying the `getCanonicalType` to `T` and getting `int`
while we really wanted `ElementType`?
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109056
>From eede4b2c2916a3016643fb56f87f7601dfaff69b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:12:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [PAC] Re-sign a pointer to a noexcept member function
whe
khyperia wrote:
@cachemeifyoucan Could you possibly help me get this merged? I'm not sure if
your approval is enough, or if more reviewers are needed - and if so, who. Are
you able to merge this if just your approval is enough?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121231
_
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2025-01-16T22:49:09+02:00
New Revision: 8fa0f0efce5fb81eb422e6d7eec74c66dafef4a3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8fa0f0efce5fb81eb422e6d7eec74c66dafef4a3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8fa0f0efce5fb81eb422e6d7eec74c66dafef4a3.diff
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122095
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Oleksandr T.
Date: 2025-01-16T13:00:41-08:00
New Revision: d49a2d2bc9c65c787bfa04ac8ece614da48a8cd5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d49a2d2bc9c65c787bfa04ac8ece614da48a8cd5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d49a2d2bc9c65c787bfa04ac8ece614da48a8cd5.diff
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122621
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121419
>From 3f6b1d68978857035a972f49b1cfd9d9d0151be9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 01:47:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] emit -Wignored-qualifiers diagnostic for
cv-qualifi
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106036
>From ef0f3551dbb3ce61c57a5ad044d86b504c7742e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 02:35:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] restrict use of attribute names reserved by the
C+
https://github.com/Prabhuk approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123258
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dougsonos updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121525
>From 805b182e1a9ebe5e344943748dce6c86594495eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Wyatt
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:28:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] FunctionEffects: Correctly navigate through array
typ
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122820
>From 71ddb5a2b4cc8a9609410b436e896484401f5e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:03:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [HLSL] cbuffer: Create host layout struct and add
resource ha
farzonl wrote:
> > > > I see also some problems in test cases
> > >
> > >
> > > @VyacheslavLevytskyy the SPIRV test case failures are not related to my
> > > change. They are also failing on main.
> >
> >
> > I will check now. For one the reason is clear, #123191
>
> I can't reproduce two o
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116785
>From 5f260726253e78a00d2dff02c22837ce02b49075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:55:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] Consider preferred_type in bitfield warnings
(#116760)
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117428
>From 3e25d7ef2e223942298078dace8979905956d05c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:53:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Add an off-by-default warning to complain about MSVC
bitfield
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123098
>From 05bb2f8554e7dab1e084738155348389284bcc36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:03:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Improve the documentation for the init_priority
attr
alanzhao1 wrote:
FYI this change messes up formatting of angle brackets for member function
template parameters.
See #123144
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100980
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
@@ -121,11 +121,12 @@ def InitPriorityDocs : Documentation {
In C++, the order in which global variables are initialized across translation
units is unspecified, unlike the ordering within a single translation unit. The
``init_priority`` attribute allows you to specify a relati
brad0 wrote:
@emaste @brooksdavis
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109056
>From eede4b2c2916a3016643fb56f87f7601dfaff69b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:12:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [PAC] Re-sign a pointer to a noexcept member function
whe
kpneal wrote:
A recap of the history of the strictfp attribute.
Originally we needed a way to prevent the Inliner from inlining a non-strictfp
function into a strictfp function. We added the `strictfp` attribute to the
function definition for this. Then we found that basic blocks were being
o
https://github.com/fmayer ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
This slightly simplifies the code.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123228.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp (+6-9
Flandini wrote:
> I like the direction of this PR but at the same time it makes memspaces a bit
> more error prone to use. Do you think we could find a way to prevent using
> `isa` on memspaces?
Do you mean moving away from a class hierarchy definition for memspaces and
towards something else
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
@khyperia Sure, I can help you merge. Code change looks good as I don't see any
open review feedback and no objection from adding the option.
Can you please update the PR message to be a better formatted commit message?
The squash commit will use that as commit message,
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -x c++-header -emit-pch -fmodule-format=obj \
+// RUN: -o %t.pch %s \
+// RUN: -mllvm -debug-only=pchcontainer &>%t-pch.ll
+// RUN: cat %t-pch.ll | FileCheck %s
+
adrian-prantl wrote:
Don't forget the REQUIRE: a
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
That looks very correct :-)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123253
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/ilovepi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123258
None
>From 28bf9373f5296f848f614b665bf494267a1bf40f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:48:24 +
Subject: [PATCH] [fuchsia][cmake] Add runtimes for cortex-m4 for the Fuchsia
ilovepi wrote:
* **#123258** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/123258?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/1232
https://github.com/ilovepi ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123258
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
> While it isn't technically 'unreachable', it IS by intent of the code. Is
> there perhaps some sort of annotation on the struct we have that we could
> skip this assumption on instead? Something that says "this enum might have
> values not in the enumerator list"?
Hmm, I can
@@ -170,16 +170,14 @@ void test_nested_switch() {
}
}
-// Test that if all the values of an enum covered, that the 'default' branch
-// is unreachable.
+// Test that a warning is not emitted if the code is unreachable.
enum Values { A, B, C, D };
void test_all_enums_covere
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Paul Kirth (ilovepi)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123258.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-stage2.cmake (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-s
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123253
>From 33b128cc2fd83894506f27ad730c3ac145c49f6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:02:10 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][PCH] Don't try to create standalone debug-info
fo
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@ldionne could you take a look at the latest changes? thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121419
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+//===-- MemSpaces.cpp -*- C++
-*--//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
301 - 400 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
