@@ -3166,109 +3171,228 @@ bool
SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectFirstBitHigh32(Register ResVReg,
.constrainAllUses(TII, TRI, RBI);
}
-bool SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectFirstBitHigh64(Register ResVReg,
-const SPIRVTyp
@@ -96,15 +96,20 @@ class SPIRVInstructionSelector : public InstructionSelector
{
bool selectFirstBitHigh(Register ResVReg, const SPIRVType *ResType,
MachineInstr &I, bool IsSigned) const;
- bool selectFirstBitHigh16(Register ResVReg, const SPIRVT
@@ -3166,109 +3171,228 @@ bool
SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectFirstBitHigh32(Register ResVReg,
.constrainAllUses(TII, TRI, RBI);
}
-bool SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectFirstBitHigh64(Register ResVReg,
-const SPIRVTyp
@@ -3166,109 +3171,228 @@ bool
SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectFirstBitHigh32(Register ResVReg,
.constrainAllUses(TII, TRI, RBI);
}
-bool SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectFirstBitHigh64(Register ResVReg,
-const SPIRVTyp
https://github.com/spall edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116858
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spall edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116858
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
spall wrote:
I'd also update your description to mention fixing the vector > size 2 bug in
FirstBitHigh as well, by making this code general purpose for both firstbitlow
and firstbithigh.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116858
___
cfe-commi
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119643
>From cbcdcd37ec82e7bbb5fdd1cf83b093778d4fcf9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:02:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] add concepts for raw buffers
---
clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExte
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
`clangd` intentionally suppresses indexing symbols from system headers
as these are likely implementation details the user does not want.
Howver, there are plen
https://github.com/jhuber6 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119735
Summary:
`clangd` intentionally suppresses indexing symbols from system headers
as these are likely implementation details the user does not want.
Howver, there are plenty of system headers that provide extension
@@ -2596,6 +2596,15 @@ template using has_sizeof =
decltype(sizeof(T));
template
constexpr bool is_incomplete_v = !is_detected::value;
+//===--===//
+// Extra additions to
+//===---
@@ -2596,6 +2596,15 @@ template using has_sizeof =
decltype(sizeof(T));
template
constexpr bool is_incomplete_v = !is_detected::value;
+//===--===//
+// Extra additions to
+//===---
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
As suggested by @vitalybuka on #118989
Most of the other sanitizers are now only module level passes. This moves all
functionality into the module pass, and removes the function pass.
>From c19f2f7da960a81e2c8
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Chris Apple (cjappl)
Changes
As suggested by @vitalybuka on #118989
Most of the other sanitizers are now only module level passes. This moves all
functionality into the module pass, and removes the function pass.
---
Full diff:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chris Apple (cjappl)
Changes
As suggested by @vitalybuka on #118989
Most of the other sanitizers are now only module level passes. This moves all
functionality into the module pass, and removes the function pass.
---
Full diff: https://
@@ -2596,6 +2596,15 @@ template using has_sizeof =
decltype(sizeof(T));
template
constexpr bool is_incomplete_v = !is_detected::value;
+//===--===//
+// Extra additions to
+//===---
https://github.com/kuhar requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaronpuchert wrote:
Check out https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/4041:
```
RUN: at line 1:
/opt/llvm-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/clang-solaris11-sparcv9/stage1/bin/clang
-cc1 -internal-isystem
/opt/llvm-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/clang-solaris11-sparcv9/stage1/lib/clan
@@ -2596,6 +2596,15 @@ template using has_sizeof =
decltype(sizeof(T));
template
constexpr bool is_incomplete_v = !is_detected::value;
+//===--===//
+// Extra additions to
+//===---
@@ -2596,6 +2596,15 @@ template using has_sizeof =
decltype(sizeof(T));
template
constexpr bool is_incomplete_v = !is_detected::value;
+//===--===//
+// Extra additions to
+//===---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mingming Liu (mingmingl-llvm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119791.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/LanguageExtens
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119791
None
>From a996d55a1876e53f42978a6ff32fda86c3b062fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mingmingl
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 16:11:30 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [docs]Fix a typo around '#pragma clang section'
---
c
https://github.com/bogner edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-12-12T16:03:20-08:00
New Revision: d01c11df04ae45a3d5b08e69bb683c760bbddd54
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d01c11df04ae45a3d5b08e69bb683c760bbddd54
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d01c11df04ae45a3d5b08e69bb683c760bbddd54.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119724
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/11269
Here is th
https://github.com/snehasish approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bogner wrote:
This should really be talking about concepts for structured buffers, not raw
buffers. At the HLSL language level, there is nothing called a RawBuffer -
there is ByteAddressBuffer and various kinds of StructuredBuffer, which are
represented lower in the stack as a "raw" buffer. Gi
https://github.com/v01dXYZ updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118420
>From b6f013097c0003e37800ad13b420e50e3c84511b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: v01dxyz
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 04:52:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] FunctionDecl::getFunctionTypeLoc: ignore function type
attributes
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
-// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s
-
-// CHECK: @[[CB:.+]] = external constant { float, double }
-cbuffer A : register(b0, spa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Helena Kotas (hekota)
Changes
Introduces translations of `cbuffer` to LLVM target type `target("dx.CBuffer",
...) `. At this point only `cbuffer`s containing scalars and vectors are
supported as we are still work
https://github.com/hekota ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119755
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119755
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 approved this pull request.
Is the cleanup just running `black`? Would be better committed separately in my
opinion. Either way, LGTM for both the cleanup and the test change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119666
MaskRay wrote:
> This is no longer the case after
> [N3322](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3322.pdf).
>
> (Incidentally, I wrote a blog post about this yesterday:
> [developers.redhat.com/articles/2024/12/11/making-memcpynull-null-0-well-defined](https://developers.redhat.co
https://github.com/hokein closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114044
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-12-12T20:57:39+01:00
New Revision: 33b910cde3b305a49c98c6de88dbc22ced9dea61
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33b910cde3b305a49c98c6de88dbc22ced9dea61
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33b910cde3b305a49c98c6de88dbc22ced9dea61.diff
LO
https://github.com/zahiraam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119741
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -169,4 +173,42 @@ bool isConstOwnerPtrMemberExpr(const clang::Expr *E) {
return isOwnerPtrType(T) && T.isConstQualified();
}
+class EnsureFunctionVisitor
+: public ConstStmtVisitor {
+public:
+ bool VisitStmt(const Stmt *S) {
+for (const Stmt *Child : S->children
@@ -20,9 +21,13 @@ elif clang_bolt_mode == "perf":
else:
assert 0, "Unsupported CLANG_BOLT_MODE variable"
-config.clang = perf_wrapper + os.path.realpath(
+clang_nowrapper = os.path.realpath(
lit.util.which(clang_binary, config.clang_tools_dir)
).replace("\\", "/")
+
Author: Mingming Liu
Date: 2024-12-12T19:43:25-08:00
New Revision: 02bcaca5995de283c85acfcca61a39baac315794
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02bcaca5995de283c85acfcca61a39baac315794
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02bcaca5995de283c85acfcca61a39baac315794.diff
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cjappl wrote:
> > Remove functional pass
>
>
>
> function pass?
Thanks, fixed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119755
Introduces translations of `cbuffer` to LLVM target type `target("dx.CBuffer",
...) `. At this point only `cbuffer`s containing scalars and vectors are
supported as we are still working on the target type design
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-12-12T12:16:20-08:00
New Revision: afcb7d4a2eab51977497e43ce6539d2b0ca01071
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/afcb7d4a2eab51977497e43ce6539d2b0ca01071
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/afcb7d4a2eab51977497e43ce6539d2b0ca01071.diff
LO
@@ -164,18 +164,18 @@ Decl *SemaHLSL::ActOnStartBuffer(Scope *BufferScope, bool
CBuffer,
return Result;
}
-// Calculate the size of a legacy cbuffer type based on
+// Calculate the size of a legacy cbuffer type in bytes based on
hekota wrote:
Cbuffer & pac
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119681
>From 0982f5ca3f9d1ea713b1e34b6e6b9d08ff65e6f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:31:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [WebKit checkers] Recognize ensureFoo functions
In WebKit, we
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119719
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119719
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -486,10 +486,10 @@ enum class TemplateSubstitutionKind : char {
const Decl *D = I->first;
llvm::PointerUnion &Stored =
newScope->LocalDecls[D];
-if (I->second.is()) {
- Stored = I->second.get();
+if (isa(I->second)) {
+
@@ -800,7 +800,9 @@ static ABIArgInfo classifyExpandedType(SwiftAggLowering
&lowering,
if (lowering.empty()) {
return ABIArgInfo::getIgnore();
} else if (lowering.shouldPassIndirectly(forReturn)) {
-return ABIArgInfo::getIndirect(alignmentForIndirect, /*byval*/ fal
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// REQUIRES: asserts
arsenm wrote:
The test should not crash under any build. It does not matter what the symptoms
are today
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119246
___
cfe-commits mailing l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (macurtis-amd)
Changes
If 'GeneratedArgsStorage' ever grows, contained strings may get copied and data
pointers stored in 'GeneratedArgs' may become invalid, pointing to deallocated
memory.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://github.com/macurtis-amd created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119798
If 'GeneratedArgsStorage' ever grows, contained strings may get copied and data
pointers stored in 'GeneratedArgs' may become invalid, pointing to deallocated
memory.
>From 52bc1d826b7df0c9fbeb7d991e89990
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119643
>From cbcdcd37ec82e7bbb5fdd1cf83b093778d4fcf9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:02:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] add concepts for raw buffers
---
clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExte
arsenm wrote:
> I mean, why do we have to watch for type mismatches and fix them instead of
> creating the correct type in the first place? There is
> `getPointerType(RetQT)` just above, shouldn't it be something like
> `getPointerType(RetQT, )`? Or RetQT should have had
> the correct address
https://github.com/ronlieb approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119798
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/broxigarchen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
>From 605578fbee47034a01869f42220dbd63631a5c87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: guochen2
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:33:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] True16 for v_alignbyte_b32 in MC
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuilt
fmayer wrote:
> Remove functional pass
function pass?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/broxigarchen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/broxigarchen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
>From c0feab212b954a47ad7541a5eceb149c478b3341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: guochen2
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:33:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] True16 for v_alignbyte_b32 in MC
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuilt
@@ -3876,8 +3876,17 @@ bool
FunctionDecl::doesDeclarationForceExternallyVisibleDefinition() const {
FunctionTypeLoc FunctionDecl::getFunctionTypeLoc() const {
const TypeSourceInfo *TSI = getTypeSourceInfo();
- return TSI ? TSI->getTypeLoc().IgnoreParens().getAs()
-
https://github.com/broxigarchen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
>From bddf957c544de2095ada423134eb8dc9fdfe2702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: guochen2
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:33:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] True16 for v_alignbyte_b32 in MC
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuilt
SLTozer wrote:
I've updated this patch, and made it dependent on a [previous
PR](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/11) - the logic for enabling
the flag is coupled with code from the earlier PR, and also we now slightly
extend the test added in that PR instead of creating a new one
MaskRay wrote:
In general, functional changes need tests. When the initial
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145227 landed, I did not have a chance to look, and
the tests may have gap. When adding new functionality, ensure that the test
coverage gets improved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-12-12T09:37:04-08:00
New Revision: f7e868fe432da733f30379c01076f5f4c9792501
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7e868fe432da733f30379c01076f5f4c9792501
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7e868fe432da733f30379c01076f5f4c9792501.diff
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119681
>From 0982f5ca3f9d1ea713b1e34b6e6b9d08ff65e6f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:31:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WebKit checkers] Recognize ensureFoo functions
In WebKit, we
@@ -54,69 +54,110 @@ void addDxilValVersion(StringRef ValVersionStr,
llvm::Module &M) {
auto *DXILValMD = M.getOrInsertNamedMetadata(DXILValKey);
DXILValMD->addOperand(Val);
}
+
void addDisableOptimizations(llvm::Module &M) {
hekota wrote:
Intentional wh
https://github.com/pcc edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pcc closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/thurstond created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119797
parseSanitizeTrapArgs follows the general pattern of "compute the sanitizer
mask based on the default plus opt-in (if supported) minus opt-out". This patch
refactors the functionality into a generalized funct
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Thurston Dang (thurstond)
Changes
parseSanitizeTrapArgs follows the general pattern of "compute the sanitizer
mask based on the default plus opt-in (if supported) minus opt-out". This patch
refactors the functionality into a genera
Author: Paul Kirth
Date: 2024-12-12T09:47:10-08:00
New Revision: 357d00d7c7c81768047e9e9668c6f507c6c24cb3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/357d00d7c7c81768047e9e9668c6f507c6c24cb3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/357d00d7c7c81768047e9e9668c6f507c6c24cb3.diff
LO
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119633
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/carlocab updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119670
>From 9db768ec1be84d6bf647b85f052776720822f64f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carlo Cabrera
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 01:45:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][Driver][Darwin] Optionally use xcselect to find
ma
https://github.com/joaosaffran updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116331
>From ae719102cdafe101b3d718a144ed2f3488ecd44f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joao Saffran
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:48:41 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] adding comments
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-12-12T12:54:02-08:00
New Revision: 5048808859eece3aaa680aaecb4a89dfabe9627b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5048808859eece3aaa680aaecb4a89dfabe9627b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5048808859eece3aaa680aaecb4a89dfabe9627b.diff
LO
https://github.com/tstellar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Tom Stellard
Date: 2024-12-12T15:50:33-08:00
New Revision: ea6e13586ce22291e9e7a4e382f6b2409b406da9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea6e13586ce22291e9e7a4e382f6b2409b406da9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea6e13586ce22291e9e7a4e382f6b2409b406da9.diff
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119643
>From cbcdcd37ec82e7bbb5fdd1cf83b093778d4fcf9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:02:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] add concepts for raw buffers
---
clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExte
https://github.com/bob80905 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119643
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/11277
Here is th
5chmidti wrote:
> whether `bugprone-no-escape` would want to see these changes or not.
The `bugprone-no-escape` check seems to be a bit limited because it only works
with `dispatch_async` and `dispatch_after` (from Apple, it seems). It could
probably be expanded to include some more async cons
thurstond wrote:
> Would be possible to switch DiagnosedAlwaysRecoverableKinds to this function?
That's a bit more complicated because it has Unrecoverable and
AlwaysRecoverable error cases (vs. the current function only has one error
case: ~Supported). I'll refactor RecoverableKinds in a foll
Author: Thurston Dang
Date: 2024-12-12T18:31:01-08:00
New Revision: 7077896a548a22d6a15c59d4b3edbc19d8e44fce
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7077896a548a22d6a15c59d4b3edbc19d8e44fce
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7077896a548a22d6a15c59d4b3edbc19d8e44fce.diff
https://github.com/thurstond closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119797
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
This PR reintroduces VisitLambdaExpr in LocalVisitor so that lambdas used to
constrcut WTF::Function, for example, would get checked for its lambda captures.
We explicitly ignore lambda used in initializing a
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119191
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SixWeining closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119191
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: hitmoon
Date: 2024-12-13T10:34:53+08:00
New Revision: 3b10e31d3a4a1c660c82287d3b9f6515f37a32ca
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b10e31d3a4a1c660c82287d3b9f6515f37a32ca
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b10e31d3a4a1c660c82287d3b9f6515f37a32ca.diff
LOG:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@hitmoon Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
This PR reintroduces VisitLambdaExpr in LocalVisitor so that lambdas used to
constrcut WTF::Function, for example, would get checked for its lambda captures.
We explicitly ignore lambda used
https://github.com/rniwa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119800
This PR reintroduces VisitLambdaExpr in LocalVisitor so that lambdas used to
constrcut WTF::Function, for example, would get checked for its lambda captures.
We explicitly ignore lambda used in initializing a Var
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY FreeBSDTargetInfo : public
OSTargetInfo {
case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
case llvm::Triple::riscv64:
break;
+case llvm::Triple::loongarch32:
hitmoon wrote:
@brooksdavis Thanks!
after have readin
https://github.com/Bigcheese created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119740
This separates out parsing of modulemaps from updating the `clang::ModuleMap`
information.
Currently this has no effect other than slightly changing diagnostics. Upcoming
changes will use this to allow searc
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-12-12T10:55:27-08:00
New Revision: f0f8434afac2d30ac143250377fb6433c68fc0a8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f0f8434afac2d30ac143250377fb6433c68fc0a8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f0f8434afac2d30ac143250377fb6433c68fc0a8.diff
LO
201 - 300 of 370 matches
Mail list logo
