https://github.com/jroelofs approved this pull request.
The patch itself LGTM though, despite my gripes on the current prioritization
rule.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118544
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118124
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature +sve
-target-feature +bf16 -verify -emit-llvm %s
CarolineConcatto wrote:
I think @SpencerAbson asked on the previous PR, but just in c
Author: Aidan Goldfarb
Date: 2024-12-03T13:39:17-05:00
New Revision: 9791f258079a4334c61c64cb62d9746a3db2c25c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9791f258079a4334c61c64cb62d9746a3db2c25c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9791f258079a4334c61c64cb62d9746a3db2c25c.diff
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117671
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/frobtech updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118416
>From 5a039fa6003a7612ddc6603192a121d92d3903cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roland McGrath
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:33:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver][Fuchsia] Avoid "argument unused" warnings
There shoul
https://github.com/zahiraam ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118528
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Zahira Ammarguellat (zahiraam)
Changes
If the range for `llvm::any_of` is empty, `Idx` will be `0` and an underflow
might occur when computing `Idx-1`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118528.diff
1 Files Af
efriedma-quic wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the intended meaning here. Is noescape on a struct
argument supposed to recursively apply to every pointer field of the struct?
If that's the intended meaning, should we restrict this to structs that have
pointer fields?
https://github.com/llvm
fhahn wrote:
> > ping :) @AaronBallman WDYT re making this clear in the release notes (also
> > that there's an easy way to disable) + the ongoing work in parallel for the
> > type sanitizer?
>
> I think it's a reasonable experiment to try.
>
> I would call it a potentially breaking change be
https://github.com/t-rasmud closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117021
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ class ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder {
void setSize(CharUnits NewSize) { Size = Context.toBits(NewSize); }
void setSize(uint64_t NewSize) { Size = NewSize; }
- CharUnits getAligment() const { return Alignment; }
+ CharUnits getAlignment() const { return A
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118050
>From 92b8a28eb7664b3cac6a8039834b099b010af3ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:19:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Don't add top-level const qualifiers to captured
fun
rcvalle wrote:
I'm still trying to understand why a collision with a function of different
arity is riskier than a collision with a function of the same arity, as there
are so many factors that can account for it, such as:
* What registers that attacker has control of.
* How the registers that
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ class Checker {
unsigned ErrCount = 0;
Checker(llvm::StringRef File, const ClangdLSPServer::Options &Opts)
- : File(File), Opts(Opts) {}
+ : File(File), Opts(Opts), Index(/*SupportContainedRefs=*/false) {}
HighCommander4 wrote
HighCommander4 wrote:
Updated to remove the default arguments.
Thanks for the reviews!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117673
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118593
None
>From 04e220ec2c16c65a3c785a586653ea4bc47337f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 23:31:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [analysis] support mutation analysis for pointee wip
--
501 - 517 of 517 matches
Mail list logo