@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++17 -expect-clang-tidy-error %s
performance-noexcept-move-constructor %t
carlosgalvezp wrote:
Does this need to be a separate file? Can't we just have it in an existing
test, inside `namespace PRX`?
https
carlosgalvezp wrote:
LGTM, had a small comment. Not sure it's worth mentioning this in the releases
notes, it's just a crash fix. But it doesn't hurt I guess.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66810
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lis
JonasToth wrote:
@PiotrZSL I did assign you as reviewer because I noticed you do many reviews.
Please remove yourself if that was not appropriate.
I did not contribute to clang-tidy for a longer period and not sure who to
assign (if any!) for the PR. It was not meant offensively or so :)
https
https://github.com/EugeneZelenko unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117901
>From d1d0722e833a9b66206c008a4cd3f6c5b4548b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:08:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [ast-matcher] add `exportDecl` matcher
---
clang/docs/R
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117901
>From d1d0722e833a9b66206c008a4cd3f6c5b4548b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:08:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ast-matcher] add `exportDecl` matcher
---
clang/docs/R
pawosm-arm wrote:
> @pawosm-arm See also
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/As-needed#Importance_of_linking_order.
> It is common for distributions to enable `-Wl,--as-needed` via patches to
> the compiler or configuration files.
Indeed, the distributions couldn't avoid
thesamesam wrote:
I thought I recognised your name from somewhere ;)
Apparently I completely forgot about
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67209 too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117573
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
@@ -27,6 +27,29 @@ This check will flag:
- All applications of binary operators with a narrowing conversions.
For example: ``int i; i+= 0.1;``.
+Note that arithmetic with integer types may perform implicit conversions if
the used integer types are smaller than ``int``.
+T
@@ -27,6 +27,29 @@ This check will flag:
- All applications of binary operators with a narrowing conversions.
For example: ``int i; i+= 0.1;``.
+Note that arithmetic with integer types may perform implicit conversions if
the used integer types are smaller than ``int``.
+T
@@ -27,6 +27,29 @@ This check will flag:
- All applications of binary operators with a narrowing conversions.
For example: ``int i; i+= 0.1;``.
+Note that arithmetic with integer types may perform implicit conversions if
the used integer types are smaller than ``int``.
--
@@ -27,6 +27,29 @@ This check will flag:
- All applications of binary operators with a narrowing conversions.
For example: ``int i; i+= 0.1;``.
+Note that arithmetic with integer types may perform implicit conversions if
the used integer types are smaller than ``int``.
--
https://github.com/PiotrZSL requested changes to this pull request.
- Formatting
- Please think about simplifying this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SherAndrei updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117658
>From 5eea9669c455e2b0dacbb4dca34be7dc100711cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SherAndrei
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:30:46 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][transformer] Allow usage of applyFirst with
rewriteDesc
SherAndrei wrote:
@ymand, could you please take a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117658
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SherAndrei edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117658
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117428
>From 3e25d7ef2e223942298078dace8979905956d05c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:53:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add an off-by-default warning to complain about MSVC
bitfield
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117428
>From 3e25d7ef2e223942298078dace8979905956d05c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:53:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add an off-by-default warning to complain about MSVC
bitfield
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/9413
Here is the re
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-12-02T08:20:41+01:00
New Revision: dd0d9561b8945d4128814bd7eda1bc470a1552f7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dd0d9561b8945d4128814bd7eda1bc470a1552f7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dd0d9561b8945d4128814bd7eda1bc470a1552f7.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein commented:
The change looks good to me (please wait for @erichkeane review before
landing). I’d suggest adding a brief rationale in the commit message instead of
just including links, to make it more self-contained.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118165
__
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
