https://github.com/joaosaffran updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116331
>From 3c792216f88e87b69b3ea7415c2fd74b7f5d7469 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joao Saffran
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:48:41 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] adding comments
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
https://github.com/Artem-B created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117074
We do not have support for the threadsafe statics on the GPU side.
However, we do sometimes end up with empty local static initializers, and those
happen to trigger calls to `__cxa_guard*`, which breaks compila
@@ -53,3 +53,6 @@ LLVM_FIXED_MD_KIND(MD_DIAssignID, "DIAssignID", 38)
LLVM_FIXED_MD_KIND(MD_coro_outside_frame, "coro.outside.frame", 39)
LLVM_FIXED_MD_KIND(MD_mmra, "mmra", 40)
LLVM_FIXED_MD_KIND(MD_noalias_addrspace, "noalias.addrspace", 41)
+// TODO: this will likelly be pla
https://github.com/MatzeB edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
In general, it's hard to avoid recursion: an AST is fundamentally a tree, and
the most natural way to walk a tree is recursive, which is why we have issues
in the first place. This usually isn't an issue because people don't write
deeply nested code
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Only call getThisType() on an instance method.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117090.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Only call getThisType() on an instance method.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117090.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/UncountedLambdaCap
MatzeB wrote:
Note that this has the test changes from #117091 included.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116413
>From 92ccbe72ca95ad2df5a81b76244a8a8d7cedef40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:00:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] update new tests
---
clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExternalSemaSour
@@ -255,4 +255,9 @@ void RuntimeLibcallsInfo::initLibcalls(const Triple &TT) {
}
setLibcallName(RTLIB::MULO_I128, nullptr);
}
+
+ if (TT.isSystemZ()) {
+setLibcallName(RTLIB::FPROUND_F32_F16, "__truncsfhf2");
+setLibcallName(RTLIB::FPEXT_F16_F32, "__extendhfs
https://github.com/jmorse commented:
Behold, I've added a bunch of pedantic comments about the tests.
I think a significant matter is that they all run an LLVM optimisation
pipeline, which I believe means they cover too much of the project to be
"clang" tests, they're more end-to-end or cross
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
LGTM modulo 1 nit.
@mizvekov are you happy with it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
@@ -185,3 +185,46 @@ template struct S {
friend void X::f(T::type);
};
}
+
+namespace GH113324 {
+template struct S1 {
+ friend void f1(S1, int = 0); // expected-error {{friend declaration
specifying a default argument must be a definition}}
+ friend void f2(S1 a, S1 = de
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=%itanium_abi_triple -O1 -emit-llvm
-fextend-lifetimes -o - | FileCheck %s
+// Make sure we don't crash compiling a lambda that is not nested in a
function.
+// We also check that fake uses are properly issued in lambdas.
+
+int glo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Artem Belevich (Artem-B)
Changes
We do not have support for the threadsafe statics on the GPU side.
However, we do sometimes end up with empty local static initializers, and those
happen to trigger calls to `__cxa_guard*`, which breaks co
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Artem Belevich (Artem-B)
Changes
We do not have support for the threadsafe statics on the GPU side.
However, we do sometimes end up with empty local static initializers, and those
happen to trigger calls to `__cxa_guard*`, which br
Artem-B wrote:
@yxsamliu -- should I add it for HIP, too?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117074
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2302,6 +2302,10 @@ def err_init_list_bad_dest_type : Error<
def warn_cxx20_compat_aggregate_init_with_ctors : Warning<
"aggregate initialization of type %0 with user-declared constructors "
"is incompatible with C++20">, DefaultIgnore, InGroup;
+def warn_cxx20_compat_re
@@ -551,3 +551,14 @@ struct full_of_empty empty_test_2(void) {
struct full_of_empty e;
return e; // no-warning
}
+
+struct with_explicit_field {
higher-performance wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040
_
@@ -1419,6 +1419,42 @@ is not specified.
}];
}
+def ExplicitInitDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatField;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``clang::requires_explicit_initialization`` attribute indicates that the
+field of an aggregate must be initialized explicitly by us
@@ -6919,6 +6923,9 @@ ProcessDeclAttribute(Sema &S, Scope *scope, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL,
case ParsedAttr::AT_NoMerge:
handleNoMergeAttr(S, D, AL);
break;
+ case ParsedAttr::AT_ExplicitInit:
+handleExplicitInitAttr(S, D, AL);
higher-perfo
fooishbar wrote:
cc @karolherbst @airlied who are better contacts for CL in Mesa these days
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
https://github.com/arsenm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115558
>From f63263a1aa4873a63918649ea92352eb5cfe66eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 00:41:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] skip warnings for constructors marked with the
[[no
https://github.com/JessehMSFT updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109497
>From 38333491868dfad9c84719d9dd8fd872a2aa7584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Harvey
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:40:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for aligning BlockComments in declarations
--
@@ -1419,6 +1419,42 @@ is not specified.
}];
}
+def ExplicitInitDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatField;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``clang::requires_explicit_initialization`` attribute indicates that the
+field of an aggregate must be initialized explicitly by us
https://github.com/rjmccall requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1419,6 +1419,42 @@ is not specified.
}];
}
+def ExplicitInitDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatField;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``clang::requires_explicit_initialization`` attribute indicates that the
+field of an aggregate must be initialized explicitly by us
@@ -,6 +1116,10 @@ void CXXRecordDecl::addedMember(Decl *D) {
} else if (!T.isCXX98PODType(Context))
data().PlainOldData = false;
+if (Field->hasAttr() && !Field->hasInClassInitializer())
{
+ setHasUninitializedExplicitInitFields(true);
+}
-
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116847
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/t-rasmud updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114606
>From cc19550fdbaca4b77e90de57c472a31a8c3f8293 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rashmi Mudduluru
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:10:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Webkit Checkers] Introduce a Webkit checker for memory
https://github.com/t-rasmud created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117021
Add `ObjCInterfaceDecl` to the list of types supported by the `hasType` and
`hasDeclaration` matchers, `ObjCObjectPointerType` to the list of types
supported by `pointee`.
>From 87ba2a10ca7435fdf6b5c47d2c1c97
Author: Alex Voicu
Date: 2024-11-20T23:57:55Z
New Revision: 53a6a11e0d51229d341b8906252645cd8a5de796
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53a6a11e0d51229d341b8906252645cd8a5de796
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53a6a11e0d51229d341b8906252645cd8a5de796.diff
LOG: [L
https://github.com/AlexVlx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ideasman42 wrote:
> I don't disagree these are all potential pitfalls (and there are certainly
> more), I just don't see how having the diff code in a separate project
> ameliorates any of them. And as stated earlier, I think it in fact
> complicates them.
>From a user perspective it likely j
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zygoloid closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114865
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -17,12 +17,10 @@ double test_int_builtin(double p0) {
double2 test_int_builtin_2(double2 p0) {
return __builtin_hlsl_elementwise_firstbithigh(p0);
- // expected-error@-1 {{1st argument must be a vector of integers
- // (was 'double2' (aka 'vector'))}}
+ // expected-err
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2024-11-20T08:33:05-05:00
New Revision: f710e4c0219c97d4726742b294446b833e604819
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f710e4c0219c97d4726742b294446b833e604819
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f710e4c0219c97d4726742b294446b833e604819.diff
@@ -322,22 +322,26 @@ foreach( t ${LIBCLC_TARGETS_TO_BUILD} )
if ( ARCH STREQUAL spirv OR ARCH STREQUAL spirv64 )
set( build_flags -O0 -finline-hint-functions -DCLC_SPIRV )
- set( opt_flags )
+ set( clc_opt_flags )
+ # Inline CLC functions into OpenCL
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8714,6 +8714,21 @@ void Sema::CheckVariableDeclarationType(VarDecl *NewVD) {
}
}
+ // zero sized static arrays are not allowed in HIP device functions
+ if (LangOpts.CUDAIsDevice && LangOpts.HIP) {
+if (FunctionDecl *FD = getCurFunctionDecl();
+FD &&
+
https://github.com/arsenm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116847
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+#define CLC_SIGN(TYPE, F)
\
+ _CLC_DEF _CLC_OVERLOAD TYPE __clc_sign(TYPE x) {
\
+if (__clc_isnan(x)) {
@@ -555,6 +555,8 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
getS(); // Now diagnoses "Reason 2", previously diagnoses "Reason 1"
}
+- Clang now omits warnings for constructors marked with the ``[[noreturn]]``
attribute (#GH63009).
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@Si
@@ -49,3 +49,15 @@ void check() {
test_type(g);
test_type(h); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
}
+
+namespace GH63009 {
+struct S {
+ [[noreturn]] S() { throw int {}; }
+};
+
+int test_no_return_constructor() { S(); } // ok
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@AaronBallm
@@ -206,12 +206,14 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
if (!CodeGenOpts.PointerTBAA)
return AnyPtr;
// Compute the depth of the pointer and generate a tag of the form
"p
-// ".
+// ". Look through pointer and array types to
@@ -230,6 +232,11 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
->getString();
TyName = Name;
} else {
+ // Be conservative if the type a MemberPointerType. Those would require
+ // stripping const-qualifiers inside the typ
@@ -206,12 +206,14 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
if (!CodeGenOpts.PointerTBAA)
return AnyPtr;
// Compute the depth of the pointer and generate a tag of the form
"p
-// ".
+// ". Look through pointer and array types to
@@ -206,12 +206,14 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
if (!CodeGenOpts.PointerTBAA)
return AnyPtr;
// Compute the depth of the pointer and generate a tag of the form
"p
-// ".
+// ". Look through pointer and array types to
https://github.com/hiraditya updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116892
>From 2974c9d52c45145de1735f79ccaa11b037269083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AdityaK
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:54:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add a testcase for riscv64-linux-android triple
---
clang/test/Dri
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Dan Gohman (sunfishcode)
Changes
This adds WebAssembly support for the new [Lime1 CPU].
First, this defines some new target features. These are subsets of existing
features that reflect implementation concerns:
- "call-indirect-overlong" -
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Dan Gohman (sunfishcode)
Changes
This adds WebAssembly support for the new [Lime1 CPU].
First, this defines some new target features. These are subsets of existing
features that reflect implementation concerns:
- "call-indirect-overlong"
https://github.com/sunfishcode ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-wasm
Author: Dan Gohman (sunfishcode)
Changes
This adds WebAssembly support for the new [Lime1 CPU].
First, this defines some new target features. These are subsets of existing
features that reflect implementation concerns:
- "call-indirect-overlo
@@ -854,9 +854,15 @@ and `-mbulk-memory` flags, which correspond to the [Bulk
Memory Operations]
and [Non-trapping float-to-int Conversions] language features, which are
[widely implemented in engines].
+A new Lime1 target CPU is added, -mcpu=lime1. This CPU follows the defin
https://github.com/cjappl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117086
These functions recently were helpful for a user, so I decided to add them to
the official docs.
Any feedback on wording or content appreciated as always
>From 056fa6a787efb0721b30fee6e0bdea9843e303d4 Mon Sep
Author: Daniel Paoliello
Date: 2024-11-20T16:48:30-08:00
New Revision: c86899d2d218e19f5a69d9f97f6ff43abc6c897c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c86899d2d218e19f5a69d9f97f6ff43abc6c897c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c86899d2d218e19f5a69d9f97f6ff43abc6c897c.di
https://github.com/dpaoliello closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116847
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -322,22 +322,26 @@ foreach( t ${LIBCLC_TARGETS_TO_BUILD} )
if ( ARCH STREQUAL spirv OR ARCH STREQUAL spirv64 )
set( build_flags -O0 -finline-hint-functions -DCLC_SPIRV )
- set( opt_flags )
+ set( clc_opt_flags )
+ # Inline CLC functions into OpenCL
https://github.com/JessehMSFT updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109497
>From 38333491868dfad9c84719d9dd8fd872a2aa7584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Harvey
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:40:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add support for aligning BlockComments in declarations
--
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chris Apple (cjappl)
Changes
These functions recently were helpful for a user, so I decided to add them to
the official docs.
Any feedback on wording or content appreciated as always
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
https://github.com/rniwa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117090
Only call getThisType() on an instance method.
>From 31481cda425206408eb3aeef844503b110dfaa4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:23:18 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [webkit.UncountedLa
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: python %t/gen.py %t/switch-overflow.c %t/tmp.c && %clang_cc1
-emit-llvm %t/tmp.c -o - | FileCheck %t/tmp.c
+
+//--- gen.py
efriedma-quic wrote:
I guess 32000 is small enough that a test won't be that expensive,
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115395
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MatzeB created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117092
- Rework attr-target-x86 test
- Allow prefer-256-bit for __attribute__((target))
>From 3bab9f901045426321d687fc36e4ba3034cc0f30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Braun
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:23:56 -080
https://github.com/MatzeB created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117091
Rework the attr-target-x86 test so the CHECK lines for the attributes
are next to their corresponding `__attribute__`.
>From 3bab9f901045426321d687fc36e4ba3034cc0f30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Braun
sunfishcode wrote:
The short answer is that's what the [Lime1 CPU calls
it](https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/blob/main/Lime.md#lime1)
:smile: .
> Can you explain why you want call-indirect-overlong in lime1? Is it because
> you want to be able to link files compiles with multi-
https://github.com/MatzeB ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117091
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joaosaffran updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116331
>From 3c792216f88e87b69b3ea7415c2fd74b7f5d7469 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joao Saffran
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:48:41 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] adding comments
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matthias Braun (MatzeB)
Changes
Rework the attr-target-x86 test so the CHECK lines for the attributes
are next to their corresponding `__attribute__`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117091.diff
1 Files Affected
sbc100 wrote:
> The short answer is that's what the [Lime1 CPU calls
> it](https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/blob/main/Lime.md#lime1)
> 😄 .
>
> > Can you explain why you want call-indirect-overlong in lime1? Is it because
> > you want to be able to link files compiles with multi
https://github.com/MatzeB edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MatzeB ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matthias Braun (MatzeB)
Changes
It would be useful for us to have `__attribue__((target("prefer-256-bit")))` /
`__attribue__((target("no-prefer-256-bit")))` to create variants of a functions
to generate AVX code with 256/512 bit vector si
https://github.com/MatzeB edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116976
>From 4d13a8267dd5d0e99063bb088a85406af5266c80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:07:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] constexpr reduce or/xor
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -732,6 +732,10 @@ at the end to the next power of 2.
These reductions support both fixed-sized and scalable vector types.
+The reduction intrinsics, including ``__builtin_reduce_add``,
c8ef wrote:
Added.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116976
_
@@ -320,6 +320,11 @@ bool isQualificationConvertiblePointer(QualType From,
QualType To,
} // namespace
static bool canThrow(const FunctionDecl *Func) {
+ // consteval specifies every call to the function must produce a compile-time
+ // constant. compile-time constant canno
Author: Axel Lundberg
Date: 2024-11-20T14:57:23-08:00
New Revision: 668f2c7fab288db90d474a7f6f72b11e5a120328
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/668f2c7fab288db90d474a7f6f72b11e5a120328
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/668f2c7fab288db90d474a7f6f72b11e5a120328.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116359
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smithp35 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111334
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
Oh, right, we have isInlineViable(), but attributes aren't part of it for...
reasons. (I haven't tried to dig into
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-avoid-inlining-alwaysinline-functions-when-they-cannot-be-inlined
; I'll believe you
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114684
>From d95d0fdb22ae2ad162f89cb211f313cea6c6474a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:54:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] enhance error recovery with RecoveryExpr for
traili
@@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ void test_invalid_call(int s) {
int var = some_func(undef1);
}
+int some_func2(int a, int b);
+void test_invalid_call_2() {
+ // CHECK: `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors
+ // CHECK-NEXT: |-UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} ''
lvalue (ADL) = 'some_
david-salinas wrote:
> Is there an issue with simply using the `HostTC` for everything? I feel like
> that's the solution to this mess, since the `HostTC` would always know
> whether or not the target is Windows without us needing to forward a bunch of
> stuff.
Yes, that would work too. But
https://github.com/sunfishcode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035
>From 22c34e6c92a6fe384e409a083584c00954521861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Gohman
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:30:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [WebAssembly] Support the new "Lime1" CPU
This adds WebAssembl
https://github.com/sunfishcode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035
>From 329d30a551639f6aeccdb805358c1b661d73d97c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Gohman
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:30:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [WebAssembly] Support the new "Lime1" CPU
This adds WebAssembl
@@ -311,3 +311,19 @@
// CHECK-X86_64-GCC: Found candidate GCC installation:
{{.*}}i686-linux-android{{[/\\]}}4.9
// CHECK-X86_64-GCC-NEXT: Found candidate GCC installation:
{{.*}}x86_64-linux-android{{[/\\]}}4.9
// CHECK-X86_64-GCC-NEXT: Selected GCC installation:
{{.*}}x86_
https://github.com/hiraditya edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/androm3da created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117057
When linking programs with qcld, we get a link error like below:
Error:
/inst/clang+llvm-19.1.0-cross-hexagon-unknown-linux-musl/x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/../target/hexagon-unknown-linux-musl//usr/lib/libc.a(s
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 approved this pull request.
Neat!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117021
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ void test_invalid_call(int s) {
int var = some_func(undef1);
}
+int some_func2(int a, int b);
+void test_invalid_call_2() {
+ // CHECK: `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors
+ // CHECK-NEXT: |-UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} ''
lvalue (ADL) = 'some_
efriedma-quic wrote:
We could maybe look at setting hadError less aggressively in InitListChecker,
for cases where the error is unlikely to impact the overall parse. If a member
has a RecoveryExpr as its initializer, it's probably reasonable to continue
producing error messages.
That said, I
sbc100 wrote:
Can you explain why you want `call-indirect-overlong` in lime1? Is it because
you want to be able to link files compiles with multi-table? i.e. do you
want/expect type relocations at every call_indirect site? If so then perhaps
a better name might be `call-indirect-relocatabl
@@ -20,6 +20,17 @@ class SpaceShipDefaultCompare {
int operator<=>(const SpaceShipDefaultCompare &) const = default;
};
+class UnusedConstPrivateField {
+ public:
+ UnusedConstPrivateField() : unused_(0) {}
+ private:
+ const int unused_; // expected-warning{{private field
@@ -8714,6 +8714,21 @@ void Sema::CheckVariableDeclarationType(VarDecl *NewVD) {
}
}
+ // zero sized static arrays are not allowed in HIP device functions
+ if (LangOpts.CUDAIsDevice && LangOpts.HIP) {
+if (FunctionDecl *FD = getCurFunctionDecl();
+FD &&
+
1 - 100 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
