@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+/*===- amxavx512intrin.h - AMXAVX512
===
+ *
+ * Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+ * See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+/*===- amxavx512intrin.h - AMXAVX512
===
+ *
+ * Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+ * See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+//===-- RemoteJITUtils.cpp - Utilities for remote-JITing *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/yingopq updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112084
>From fa5a4850d80db1258a7dfa77ee46c3902c5dd857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ying Huang
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 03:12:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [MIPS] LLVM data layout give i128 an alignment of 16 for
mips64
F
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/7728
Here is the relevant p
AaronBallman wrote:
I've fixed up a failing test caught by precommit CI and added a release note.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115054
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115054
>From 7570adf7a47d5a863e399aca38984031387e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:01:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [C2y] Add test coverage for WG14 N3370
This paper added
https://github.com/Xazax-hun updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115021
From 81b8faed9e6da8d8a0cc9905d14716f4b2f09665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Horvath
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:37:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Support 'this' position for lifetimebound attribute
Thi
steakhal wrote:
What's the benefit of using `DRAV` over `RAV`? I couldn't find the motivation
in the PR summary in neither of this or the linked PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115144
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
TIFitis wrote:
@jdoerfert @jsjodin Polite request for review :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/7441
Here is the
https://github.com/sdkrystian created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115156
This reverts commit b24650e814e55d90acfc40acf045456c98f32b9c.
>From 026f442bd600bd50921bdcfe550b5ff4c376066e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 08:28:50 -0500
Subject: [
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/7979
Here
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff cfa5ecde415d509b835b2dc5551187f2b7eff773
81b8faed9e6da8d8a0cc9905d14716f4b2f09665 --e
https://github.com/Xazax-hun updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115021
From 80aa4c2c5675e1de12fa4ee05c02355346e88c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Horvath
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:37:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Support 'this' position for lifetimebound attribute
Thi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Gábor Horváth (Xazax-hun)
Changes
This patch makes the position -1 interpreted as the position for 'this'. Adds
some basic infrastructure and support for lifetimebound attribute.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/11
Author: Chris Cotter
Date: 2024-11-06T12:15:11+01:00
New Revision: 2bbb6c067020bef50435c2ba5addcd66d1b9a1dd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bbb6c067020bef50435c2ba5addcd66d1b9a1dd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bbb6c067020bef50435c2ba5addcd66d1b9a1dd.diff
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/7323
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/7048
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/8949
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/8129
Here is the rele
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Malay Sanghi (MalaySanghi)
Changes
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671368
---
Patch is 81.48 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115151.diff
31 Files Affect
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Malay Sanghi (MalaySanghi)
Changes
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671368
---
Patch is 81.48 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115151.d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Malay Sanghi (MalaySanghi)
Changes
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671368
---
Patch is 81.48 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115151.diff
31 Files Affected
AaronBallman wrote:
> My intent with changes made for this issue is to (continue to) treat all
> paths specified by /I as user paths and all paths specified by /external:I,
> /external:env, %INCLUDE%, or %EXTERNAL_INCLUDE% as system paths.
I think this option is the least disruptive.
> Ideall
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: None (Sirraide)
Changes
This pr refactors all recursive AST visitors in `Sema`, `Analyze`, and
`StaticAnalysis` to inherit from DRAV instead. This is over half of the
visitors that inherit from RAV direc
philnik777 wrote:
Maybe a stupid question, but couldn't we make the function simply
`__attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(true, ""))) `?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115099
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/8946
Here is the
@@ -186,6 +186,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to allow specifying
additional functions to match.
+- Improved :doc:`bugprone-throw-keyword-missing
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Should be after `bugprone-sizeof-expression`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
alexfh wrote:
@kadircet is working on a repro for the crash we're seeing. @usx95 is looking
at the compilation errors.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
Author: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: 2024-11-06T11:04:35-05:00
New Revision: f548d39c3c751446d124c08769080214680d53ba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f548d39c3c751446d124c08769080214680d53ba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f548d39c3c751446d124c08769080214680d53ba
https://github.com/sdkrystian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Dmitri Gribenko
Date: 2024-11-06T16:58:10+01:00
New Revision: c10d4b492d981c96fa3269bc0fe0b3ea9b1ca486
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c10d4b492d981c96fa3269bc0fe0b3ea9b1ca486
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c10d4b492d981c96fa3269bc0fe0b3ea9b1ca486.dif
https://github.com/jplehr approved this pull request.
LGTM to temporarily fix the bots.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dmpolukhin wrote:
FYI, in our internal testing we also found a case when this PR fixes issue.
Also we don't see any examples when it may break something so I think we should
merge it ASAP because it fixes known issues and don't have any known
regressions.
@alexfh what is the ETA for release t
@@ -31,10 +31,13 @@
// All MMX instructions will be generated via builtins. Any MMX vector
// types (<1 x i64>, <2 x i32>, etc.) that aren't used by these builtins will
be
// expanded by the back-end.
+//
// FIXME: _mm_prefetch must be a built-in because it takes a compile-ti
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115048
>From 9359df8624a75b7c0c361fdfcd9fc9102824dc68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:48:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Darwin] Introduce `SubFrameworks` as a SDK
defaul
@@ -2801,6 +2801,67 @@ class OpenMPIRBuilder {
using GenMapInfoCallbackTy =
function_ref;
+private:
+ /// Emit the array initialization or deletion portion for user-defined mapper
+ /// code generation. First, it evaluates whether an array section is mapped
+ /// an
https://github.com/TIFitis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jyknight wrote:
So, this is interesting, because the decls _already_ don't conflict, normally.
They only conflict if the x86intrin.h is included within a `extern "C++" {}`
block, _and_ is included after windows.h.
It comes down to, effectively this. Note, run the examples with
`-fms-extension
ldionne wrote:
> I do care. I sometimes like to compare benchmarks from different iterations.
> Currently when I build a benchmark I get a message where the executable is
> stored. The new approach makes harder to find the location of the executable.
> I wonder whether we can show a message wh
vbe-sc wrote:
@Endilll, please, could you take a look?
Also, do you have any ideas why the Win pipeline fails with checkout failure?
How can I fix it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+//===-- RemoteJITUtils.cpp - Utilities for remote-JITing *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -8236,11 +8236,14 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
DeclContext *NewDC = D->getDeclContext();
if (FieldDecl *FD = dyn_cast(ShadowedDecl)) {
-// Fields are not shadowed by variables in C++ static methods.
-if (CXXMethodDecl *MD = d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Paul Osmialowski (pawosm-arm)
Changes
The `-frtlib-add-rpath` is very convenient when linking against various
runtimes (OpenMP, Fortran, sanitizers), so much so we could argue that this
should be a defaul
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Paul Osmialowski (pawosm-arm)
Changes
The `-frtlib-add-rpath` is very convenient when linking against various
runtimes (OpenMP, Fortran, sanitizers), so much so we could argue that this
should be a default behavior.
This patch add
@@ -47,6 +76,59 @@ static llvm::cl::opt
OptHostSupportsJit("host-supports-jit",
static llvm::cl::list OptInputs(llvm::cl::Positional,
llvm::cl::desc("[code to run]"));
+static llvm::Error sanitizeOopArguments(const char *ArgV0) {
+
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113777
>From 78019b9d9dc138f38bb5b32576b621351ae6427c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 01:07:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] prevent assertion failure from an invalid
template
sdkrystian wrote:
@alexfh @wlei-llvm Please send a repro when you can!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SahilPatidar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110418
>From a3bdb2c9e5f9f5c75dfb35647cf3513c6c631412 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SahilPatidar
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:30:08 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Clang-Repl] Implement out-of-process execution
interf
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
Thanks for handling this issue!
My quick first impression is that I'm satisfied with your changes. However, I'm
a bit confused because as far as I see, the empty struct is _unable to_
transfer any attacker-controlled data, and therefore I don't know what does it
mean that it'
Sirraide wrote:
CI on Windows seems to be broken trying to check out the branch:
```console
> git fetch -v --prune -- origin 0dd745286a124f7142d827810be5185abdc196cf
POST git-upload-pack (112 bytes)
>From https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
* branch 0dd745286a124f7142d82781
Endilll wrote:
> Also, do you have any ideas why the Win pipeline fails with checkout failure?
> How can I fix it?
It seems to be unrelated to you. Might be fixed when you'll push a new commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll, please, could you take a look?
My knowledge of wording about templates is not deep enough, unfortunately.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang,llvm,mlir` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/8943
H
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/10286
Here is
https://github.com/pawosm-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115163
The `-frtlib-add-rpath` is very convenient when linking against various
runtimes (OpenMP, Fortran, sanitizers), so much so we could argue that this
should be a default behavior.
This patch adds the ability
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114481
>From 3ba88ce598aaab269169f0a5db5981c9a9ac8603 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 22:38:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Add pass to handle AMDGCN pseudo-intrinsics (abstract
placehol
Author: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: 2024-11-06T08:43:37-05:00
New Revision: 2904f809cd1bf2651d6eceb2ad86553f407bf530
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2904f809cd1bf2651d6eceb2ad86553f407bf530
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2904f809cd1bf2651d6eceb2ad86553f407bf530
https://github.com/Xazax-hun ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115021
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113777
>From 78019b9d9dc138f38bb5b32576b621351ae6427c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 01:07:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] prevent assertion failure from an invalid
template
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/6348
Here is the relevant pie
alexfh wrote:
We've also found a clang crash and a few new compilation errors after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114569. We definitely need to revert
it as well as this commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111852
___
cfe-com
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/10961
Author: Sarah Spall
Date: 2024-11-06T07:31:39-08:00
New Revision: fb90733e196039b0a77f43af98c42c9267a31e07
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb90733e196039b0a77f43af98c42c9267a31e07
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb90733e196039b0a77f43af98c42c9267a31e07.diff
L
https://github.com/Xazax-hun updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115021
From 3ef43fcbb6540b50ed0b41c68d6b26bb31cb1a68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Horvath
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:37:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Support 'this' position for lifetimebound attribute
Thi
@@ -8236,11 +8236,14 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
DeclContext *NewDC = D->getDeclContext();
if (FieldDecl *FD = dyn_cast(ShadowedDecl)) {
-// Fields are not shadowed by variables in C++ static methods.
-if (CXXMethodDecl *MD = d
https://github.com/MalaySanghi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115151
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671368
>From 3b6510da8fb3b9709839ea0c102355879b11aa6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Malay Sanghi
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:37:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [X
https://github.com/PankajDwivedi-25 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111650
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8236,11 +8236,14 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
DeclContext *NewDC = D->getDeclContext();
if (FieldDecl *FD = dyn_cast(ShadowedDecl)) {
-// Fields are not shadowed by variables in C++ static methods.
-if (CXXMethodDecl *MD = d
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/12011
Here is the r
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
None
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFun
PankajDwivedi-25 wrote:
Great, looks it is part of another bug propagated.
Including fix path resolved the issue.
Closing this PR now.
Thank you for your feedback.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111650
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-comm
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/1614
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/JOE1994 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113331
>From 01755acec5beb6884d7c3dbcc7e250952feaac15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Youngsuk Kim
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:40:23 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [llvm] Deprecate Type::getPointerTo()
Replace remaining uses
https://github.com/paulwalker-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112548
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctionD
Author: yingopq
Date: 2024-11-06T16:14:30+01:00
New Revision: 86e4beb702fde407a35938a1c37279a61c0291e7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/86e4beb702fde407a35938a1c37279a61c0291e7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/86e4beb702fde407a35938a1c37279a61c0291e7.diff
LOG:
mikolaj-pirog wrote:
> > I would like to benchmark `lld` after this change, since I have added a
> > loop that goes through every section of every object file. Could someone
> > point in the direction of a good benchmark for that? I was thinking I can
> > benchmark on the linking of `clang` or
https://github.com/DavidTruby edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115163
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+! REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
DavidTruby wrote:
This test doesn't actually need x86-registered-target. The driver is able to
construct command lines for targets that aren't registered as LLVM backends,
and since we're using -### all we nee
https://github.com/DavidTruby approved this pull request.
LGTM, and seems useful especially for flang.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115163
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/9043
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for th
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114813
>From 91ff2b4226110ea35c78f0f1b6ff89b4bec2c788 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:38:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] eliminate shadowing warnings for parameters using
d
https://github.com/JonPsson1 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-11-06T15:19:00Z
New Revision: f61a8bc305d60f1ab04225e2b210d8b3d9c97eb8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f61a8bc305d60f1ab04225e2b210d8b3d9c97eb8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f61a8bc305d60f1ab04225e2b210d8b3d9c97eb8.diff
LOG:
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-11-06T15:19:00Z
New Revision: 7585e2fd3caee30d5332c93995b7a6f51ab06660
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7585e2fd3caee30d5332c93995b7a6f51ab06660
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7585e2fd3caee30d5332c93995b7a6f51ab06660.diff
LOG:
JonPsson1 wrote:
I will abandon this now since @efriedma-quic's patch (#113506) is the better
approach and approved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
@@ -730,7 +731,9 @@ class YAMLConverter {
}
}
- void convertParams(const ParamsSeq &Params, FunctionInfo &OutInfo) {
+ std::optional convertParams(const ParamsSeq &Params,
+ FunctionInfo &OutInfo) {
Xazax-hun wro
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112084
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5d8be4c036aa5ce4a94f1f37a9155d5c877e23db
97ace17c59193fe29e9bdce4c6f53be398f15d01 --e
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 0e907c17214aa3b1a60b66867fea3cc0f0dcbaa0
2074e8a732fbe04365d82ec8fcbff5635228be2d --e
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 05b6c2e4b933e7a3606899c72067c92b6077287b
548298c8e2d1030b5d4edb8b548609b55aeba7f0 --e
MalaySanghi wrote:
@phoebewang
please review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115151
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` running on `ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` while
building `clang` at step 7 "test-build-stage1-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/bu
https://github.com/sdkrystian created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115172
After #111852 was reverted in #115159, two tests now fail because they
partially depend on its changes. This patch temporarily fixes the failing cases
by updating the expected output to match the actual outp
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/11565
Here is the rel
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian)
Changes
After #111852 was reverted in #115159, two tests now fail
because they partially depend on its changes. This patch temporarily fixes the
failing cases by updating the expected output to match the a
101 - 200 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
