MaskRay wrote:
> It's true that there isn't any compatibility argument for leaving
> `-fprofile-sample/auto` (it was silently ignored afterall), but I think the
> consistency argument is important. From a standpoint of a clang user, it's
> very reasonable to expect that `fprofile-use` and `-fp
https://github.com/cmc-rep updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113614
>From 166a4aec8a8ee813be0ee3045563cd45efd944c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gangc
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:18:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [AMDGPU] Add a type for the named barrier
---
clang/include/clang/
@@ -244,6 +245,17 @@ bool TemplateParameterList::hasAssociatedConstraints()
const {
return HasRequiresClause || HasConstrainedParameters;
}
+ArrayRef TemplateParameterList::getInjectedTemplateArgs() {
+ if (const auto *Context = InjectedArgs.dyn_cast()) {
+TemplateArgu
@@ -2474,19 +2474,46 @@ bool CXXMethodDecl::isUsualDeallocationFunction(
getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Array_Delete)
return false;
+ auto NumParams = getNumParams();
+ bool IsTypeAware = IsTypeAwareOperatorNewOrDelete();
+
// C++ [basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]
@@ -4749,6 +4753,15 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
CXXRecordDecl *getStdBadAlloc() const;
EnumDecl *getStdAlignValT() const;
+ ClassTemplateDecl *getStdTypeIdentity() const;
+ std::optional InstantiateSpecializedTypeIdentity(QualType Subject);
e
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
I cant find my comment, but I see the args structure isn't actually stored
anywhere except as params, so feel free to disregard that comment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113510
___
cfe-commits mai
@@ -2474,19 +2474,46 @@ bool CXXMethodDecl::isUsualDeallocationFunction(
getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Array_Delete)
return false;
+ auto NumParams = getNumParams();
+ bool IsTypeAware = IsTypeAwareOperatorNewOrDelete();
+
// C++ [basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]
@@ -8126,7 +8143,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// The scope in which to find allocation functions.
enum AllocationFunctionScope {
-/// Only look for allocation functions in the global scope.
+/// Only look for allocation functions in the global scope
-
@@ -3358,6 +3358,12 @@ bool FunctionDecl::isReservedGlobalPlacementOperator()
const {
return false;
const auto *proto = getType()->castAs();
+ if (proto->getNumParams() < 2)
+return false;
+ bool IsTypeAwareAllocator =
erichkeane wrote:
is this b
@@ -2474,19 +2474,46 @@ bool CXXMethodDecl::isUsualDeallocationFunction(
getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Array_Delete)
return false;
+ auto NumParams = getNumParams();
+ bool IsTypeAware = IsTypeAwareOperatorNewOrDelete();
+
// C++ [basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]
@@ -2234,6 +2234,17 @@ enum class CXXNewInitializationStyle {
Braces
};
+struct ImplicitAllocationParameters {
+ bool PassTypeIdentity;
erichkeane wrote:
minor preference for all of these being bitfields, or perhaps make this an
`enum` type that we can us
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113510
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2474,19 +2474,46 @@ bool CXXMethodDecl::isUsualDeallocationFunction(
getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Array_Delete)
return false;
+ auto NumParams = getNumParams();
erichkeane wrote:
Don't use auto here, only when the type is on the RHS per coding
@@ -2474,19 +2474,46 @@ bool CXXMethodDecl::isUsualDeallocationFunction(
getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Array_Delete)
return false;
+ auto NumParams = getNumParams();
+ bool IsTypeAware = IsTypeAwareOperatorNewOrDelete();
+
// C++ [basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]
@@ -307,6 +307,10 @@ EXTENSION(datasizeof, LangOpts.CPlusPlus)
FEATURE(cxx_abi_relative_vtable, LangOpts.CPlusPlus &&
LangOpts.RelativeCXXABIVTables)
+// Type aware allocators
+FEATURE(cxx_type_aware_allocators, LangOpts.TypeAwareAllocators)
erichkeane wrote
https://github.com/cmc-rep updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113614
>From 166a4aec8a8ee813be0ee3045563cd45efd944c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gangc
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:18:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [AMDGPU] Add a type for the named barrier
---
clang/include/clang/
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++2c
-fcxx-type-aware-allocators -fexceptions
+
+namespace std {
+ template struct type_identity {};
+ enum class align_val_t : __SIZE_TYPE__ {};
+ struct destroying_delete_t { explicit destroying_delete_t()
@@ -17389,6 +17389,19 @@ Sema::ActOnTag(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind
TUK, SourceLocation KWLoc,
Previous.clear();
}
+ // I think DC check should be DC->isStdNamespace()?
+ // Also these guards are questionable - it's possible to get incorrect
+ // codegen w
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++17
-fcxx-type-aware-allocators
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -DNO_TAA -std=c++17
-fno-cxx-type-aware-allocators
+
+namespace std {
+ template struct type_identity {};
+ enum class al
@@ -17389,6 +17389,19 @@ Sema::ActOnTag(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind
TUK, SourceLocation KWLoc,
Previous.clear();
}
+ // I think DC check should be DC->isStdNamespace()?
erichkeane wrote:
Should it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
@@ -0,0 +1,302 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s-std=c++2c
-fcxx-type-aware-allocators -fexceptions
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -DTADD -std=c++2c
-fcxx-type-aware-allocators -fcxx-type-aware-destroying-delete -fexceptions
+
+namespace std {
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113579
>From 95c86a7036e62240ab7704f0b1e47cdc9ac437c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:15:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][AST] Store injected template arguments in
@@ -18661,14 +18661,30 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitHLSLBuiltinExpr(unsigned
BuiltinID,
Value *OpMax = EmitScalarExpr(E->getArg(2));
QualType Ty = E->getArg(0)->getType();
-bool IsUnsigned = false;
if (auto *VecTy = Ty->getAs())
Ty = VecTy->getElemen
@@ -2559,6 +2559,12 @@ bool SPIRVInstructionSelector::selectIntrinsic(Register
ResVReg,
} break;
case Intrinsic::spv_saturate:
return selectSaturate(ResVReg, ResType, I);
+ case Intrinsic::spv_fclamp:
+return selectExtInst(ResVReg, ResType, I, CL::fclamp, GL::FCla
@@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ def int_dx_cast_handle : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty],
[llvm_any_ty]>;
def int_dx_all : DefaultAttrsIntrinsic<[llvm_i1_ty], [llvm_any_ty],
[IntrNoMem]>;
def int_dx_any : DefaultAttrsIntrinsic<[llvm_i1_ty], [llvm_any_ty],
[IntrNoMem]>;
-def int_dx_clamp : Defaul
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs -O0 -mtriple=spirv-unknown-unknown %s -o - |
FileCheck %s
+; RUN: %if spirv-tools %{ llc -O0 -mtriple=spirv-unknown-unknown %s -o -
-filetype=obj | spirv-val %}
adam-yang wrote:
clamp-vec is now gone. The vec
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
@Sirraide 's comments are all relevant, and he's complained about everything I
would have. So when he's happy with this, I am too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@
#include "clang/Basic/CharInfo.h"
#include "clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h"
#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticFrontend.h"
erichkeane wrote:
This is a LOT of include additions. Could we instead create a functi
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Still looks good.
I couldnt find the "no-crash" comments in the tests at the statements where
they crashed but im fine without them too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113570
___
cfe-c
@@ -244,6 +245,17 @@ bool TemplateParameterList::hasAssociatedConstraints()
const {
return HasRequiresClause || HasConstrainedParameters;
}
+ArrayRef TemplateParameterList::getInjectedTemplateArgs() {
+ if (const auto *Context = InjectedArgs.dyn_cast()) {
+TemplateArgu
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -2440,6 +2440,26 @@ class alignas(TypeAlignment) Type : public
ExtQualsTypeCommonBase {
return !isFunctionType();
}
+ /// \returns True if the type is incomplete and it is also a type that
+ /// cannot be completed by a later type definition.
+ ///
+ /// E.g. For
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-10-25T18:11:28+01:00
New Revision: f24c1dd08ea71fa7334a85fd2772c2f728de0c56
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f24c1dd08ea71fa7334a85fd2772c2f728de0c56
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f24c1dd08ea71fa7334a85fd2772c2f728de0c56.diff
Cydox wrote:
But for now, I think we should merge #112786 into 19.1.3 so that the we can
have that be the cutoff in the kernel.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
ozbenh wrote:
So what should we (Amazon Linux) do to help with this ? I'm not the most
familiar with autotools and cmake, I know we did some tweaking of triples in
the version of llvm/clang we ship as part of the distro and it's very possible
that we did something wrong. I would love to help m
https://github.com/chouzz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113669
>From 02124e4cfd7dbc395d4974c7561d5f110980aaa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: chouzz
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:42:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Support symbolTags for document symbol
---
clang-tools-extra/
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -152,6 +115,44 @@ bool SemaAMDGPU::CheckAMDGCNBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID,
return false;
}
+bool SemaAMDGPU::CheckMovDPPFunctionCall(CallExpr *TheCall, unsigned NumArgs,
arsenm wrote:
Start with lowercase
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
apple-fcloutier wrote:
Failing test seems to be failing on main.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/8941
Here is the relevan
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112081
>From 67c41612085489a2a17eec49f98dbfa0e5bb97cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:27:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] fix range calculation for conditionals with throw
@@ -54,19 +54,18 @@ class FlattenedSpelling {
const Record &OriginalSpelling;
public:
- FlattenedSpelling(const std::string &Variety, const std::string &Name,
+ FlattenedSpelling(const std::string &Variety, StringRef Name,
const std::string &Namespace,
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113640
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
brunodf-snps wrote:
> Do we want nocapture markings on memory operands?
I had a chance to discuss this with @nikic and he brought up the LEA
instruction. The following would capture the address the `b` field:
```
asm("lea %0, %1" : "=r" (r) : "m" (p[i].b));
```
I could not find back if you ar
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112727
>From 37a1728dde2cad21b9f851268c1625b7ef2dc338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:20:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [rtsan][NFC] Documentation of suppression flag
---
clang/docs
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113575
>From 67a48d3861b44bd5c37fc9740ee2c54ddd1a8d1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:21:39 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] enhance handling of [[deprecated]] attribute
diagnosti
Author: Endre Fülöp
Date: 2024-10-24T17:37:04+02:00
New Revision: 61a76f58ebf161c739fb196d56c1899735c7cea8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61a76f58ebf161c739fb196d56c1899735c7cea8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61a76f58ebf161c739fb196d56c1899735c7cea8.diff
L
https://github.com/inbelic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113623
- create a clang built-in in Builtins.td
- link dot4add_i8packed in hlsl_intrinsics.h
- add lowering to spirv backend through expansion of operation as OPSDot is
missing up to SPIRV 1.6 in SPIRVInstr
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 70334081f75d67900c6ffa193c60c4d6f4767354
1423c03b1cc31749027b84f9ec063e0b5ba02c3a --e
https://github.com/cjappl closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79899
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Cydox wrote:
@bwendling What do you think about that?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+# Script to parse many JUnit XML result files and send a report to the
buildkite
+# agent as an annotation.
+#
+# To run the unittests:
+# python3 -m unittest discover -p generate_test_report.py
+
+import argparse
+import unittest
+from io import StringIO
+from
whisperity wrote:
> I'm happy to document future changes beyond this check, but would like to
> keep this PR's scope limited to just porting the original CSA based check to
> a tidy check as much as possible.
@vabridgers I believe it is perfectly fine to add a "Limitations" section to
the doc
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=hlsl2021 -finclude-default-header -triple \
+// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-compute %s -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o
- | \
+// RUN: FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-DXIL
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=hlsl2021 -finclude-defaul
https://github.com/ar-visions created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
Enable format info for C function declarations in Clang Index API, so we may
have this context
clang_Cursor_getFormatAttr
Get FormatAttr at Function Declaration
clang_FormatAttr_getType
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: AR Visions (ar-visions)
Changes
Enable format info for C function declarations in Clang Index API, so we may
have this context
clang_Cursor_getFormatAttr
Get FormatAttr at Function Declaration
clang_FormatAttr_getType
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ar-visions edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/7171
Here is the relevant p
@@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ def BPF_END : BPFArithOp<0xd>;
def BPF_XCHG: BPFArithOp<0xe>;
def BPF_CMPXCHG : BPFArithOp<0xf>;
+class BPFAtomicLoadStoreOp val> {
+ bits<4> Value = val;
+}
+
+def BPF_LOAD_ACQ : BPFAtomicLoadStoreOp<0x1>;
+def BPF_STORE_REL : BPFAtomicLoadStoreOp<0xb
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 commented:
Two minor comments. Script otherwise seems reasonable enough to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
@@ -194,12 +198,43 @@ Some issues with flags can be debugged using the
``verbosity=$NUM`` flag:
misspelled_flag
...
-Disabling
--
+Disabling and suppressing
+-
-In some circumstances, you may want to suppress error reporting in a specif
https://github.com/vvd170501 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612
>From 96662cb7f681e7158c05a0190894de70eee03d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vadim Dudkin
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:18:52 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update std symbol mapping to v20230810; Move assertion to
https://github.com/ostannard closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ostannard wrote:
Merged:
376d7b27fa3d [ARM] Optimise byval arguments in tail-calls
914a3990d1a0 [ARM] Avoid clobbering byval arguments when passing to tail-calls
a96c14eeb8fc [Clang] Always forward sret parameters to musttail calls
78ec2e2ed5e3 [ARM] Allow tail calls with byval args
82e64721974b
https://github.com/usx95 approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asb wrote:
> LGTM. (And it's time to mark RV[A|B|M]23 as non-experimental now?)
RVA23 and RVB23 yes. RVM23 isn't ratified yet. I've got a couple of other
patches like this to lay the groundwork before flipping the switch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113619
___
T-Gruber wrote:
> LGTM
Hi @steakhal, should we then merge it? Or do you have any comments?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: T-Gruber
Date: 2024-10-25T11:59:16+02:00
New Revision: 86d65ae7949e0322f10e1856c5c33caa34ebfe2f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/86d65ae7949e0322f10e1856c5c33caa34ebfe2f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/86d65ae7949e0322f10e1856c5c33caa34ebfe2f.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113439
>From 467c478cbc2400e1337e6dcc344a96e4a697341a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:59:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[clang][NFC]=20Add=20test=20for=20CWG1898?=
@@ -640,3 +640,48 @@ namespace H {
struct S s;
}
}
+
+namespace cwg1898 { // cwg1898: 2.7
+void e(int) {} // #cwg1898-e-int
+void e(int) {}
+// expected-error@-1 {{redefinition of 'e'}}
+// expected-note@#cwg1898-e-int {{previous definition is here}}
+void e(long) {}
+
+voi
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113660
>From 37886ec83bf246fb366ba2e1f14fa011891073df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:39:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [ci] New script to generate test reports as Buildkite
https://github.com/jayfoad edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113614
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -15,7 +15,15 @@
AMDGPU_TYPE(Name, Id, SingletonId, Width, Align)
#endif
+#ifndef AMDGPU_NAMED_BARRIER_TYPE
+#define AMDGPU_NAMED_BARRIER_TYPE(Name, Id, SingletonId, Width, Align, Scope) \
+ AMDGPU_TYPE(Name, Id, SingletonId, Width, Align)
+#endif
+
AMDGPU_OPAQUE_PTR_TYP
https://github.com/asb closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -16534,7 +16534,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildVAArgExpr(SourceLocation
BuiltinLoc,
PromoteType = QualType();
}
}
-if (TInfo->getType()->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::Float))
+if (TInfo->getType()->isFloat16Type() || TInfo->getType()->isFloat32T
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113660
>From 37886ec83bf246fb366ba2e1f14fa011891073df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:39:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [ci] New script to generate test reports as Buildkite
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112747
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Benjamin Kramer
Date: 2024-10-25T14:48:38+02:00
New Revision: 32baf2917357b4e5a566ff43c6e0156e5ad10cb8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32baf2917357b4e5a566ff43c6e0156e5ad10cb8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32baf2917357b4e5a566ff43c6e0156e5ad10cb8.dif
https://github.com/t-rasmud approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110222
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -477,6 +485,100 @@ void DiagnosticsEngine::setSeverityForAll(diag::Flavor
Flavor,
setSeverity(Diag, Map, Loc);
}
+namespace {
+class WarningsSpecialCaseList : public llvm::SpecialCaseList {
bricknerb wrote:
Do we need to use inheritance here?
Could
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot12`
while building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/3071
Her
@@ -477,6 +485,100 @@ void DiagnosticsEngine::setSeverityForAll(diag::Flavor
Flavor,
setSeverity(Diag, Map, Loc);
}
+namespace {
+class WarningsSpecialCaseList : public llvm::SpecialCaseList {
+public:
+ static std::unique_ptr
+ create(const llvm::MemoryBuffer &MB, st
DavidSpickett wrote:
Example failing build:
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/113045#_
Another example:
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/113055#_
The second example should not be failing but this modulemap test is for
whatever reason,
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/8311
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-s390x-linux` running
on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/42/builds/1620
Here is the relevant piece of the build log f
201 - 300 of 565 matches
Mail list logo
