https://github.com/fmayer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112050
>From 78e91cb54bed6ee8deda61a054776bbd3102d79d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Mayer
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:28:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UT
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ void add(sx10x10_t a, sx5x10_t b, sx10x5_t c) {
// expected-error@-1 {{assigning to 'sx10x10_t' (aka 'float
__attribute__((matrix_type(10, 10)))') from incompatible type 'sx5x10_t' (aka
'float __attribute__((matrix_type(5, 10)))')}}
a = b + &c;
- //
Author: Eric Astor
Date: 2024-10-11T17:28:44-04:00
New Revision: 9a97a57d9ee9dbaa4f7ecfdaba565171ea49b7ac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a97a57d9ee9dbaa4f7ecfdaba565171ea49b7ac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a97a57d9ee9dbaa4f7ecfdaba565171ea49b7ac.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Dan Gohman (sunfishcode)
Changes
We were prepared to enable these features [back in February], but they got
pulled for what appear to be unrelated reasons. So let's have another try at
enabling them!
Another motivation here is that it'd
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-webassembly
Author: Dan Gohman (sunfishcode)
Changes
We were prepared to enable these features [back in February], but they got
pulled for what appear to be unrelated reasons. So let's have another try at
enabling them!
Another motivation here
https://github.com/fmayer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112050
It doesn't make a difference currently, but MTE globals are only
supported on Android, so that's the more natural target to use.
>From 78e91cb54bed6ee8deda61a054776bbd3102d79d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flor
Valentin Clement =?utf-8?b?KOODkOODrOODsw=?=,Renato Golin
,Eric Astor
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ericastor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110334
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
It doesn't make a difference currently, but MTE globals are only
supported on Android, so that's the more natural target to use.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112050.diff
1 Files
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ bool RISCVTargetInfo::validateAsmConstraint(
return true;
case 'v':
// A vector register.
-if (Name[1] == 'r' || Name[1] == 'm') {
+if (Name[1] == 'r' || Name[1] == 'd' || Name[1] == 'm') {
topperc wrote:
Nevermind. I gues
https://github.com/pow2clk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111415
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jurahul wrote:
You’re right. Though I am hoping to add a new function with that name and a
different behavior. But I can see how this might be problematic for out of
tree backends as well as that code will compile fine but might fail at
runtime with the new function. I can call the function “find
https://github.com/sunfishcode edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nicovank wrote:
Sounds good, thanks! I will go ahead and rebase and merge this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112017
>From 542112f283387db666c54422c714e901bb898c84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Youngsuk Kim
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:06:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][CGOpenMPRuntime] Avoid Type::getPointerTo() (NFC)
`l
https://github.com/nicovank created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112051
Summary:
Test Plan:
>From 9b2953abd81dab3349a656544c916fe101508ff2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas van Kempen
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:45:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Add new
performance
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Nicolas van Kempen (nicovank)
Changes
Summary:
Test Plan:
---
Patch is 35.21 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112051.diff
10 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-e
https://github.com/nicovank edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112051
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nicovank updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110448
>From 028d68178748806ce2318360260bdc1833b4f2b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas van Kempen
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:44:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy][modernize-use-starts-ends-with] Add support f
https://github.com/nicovank closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112051
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nicovank updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110448
>From 028d68178748806ce2318360260bdc1833b4f2b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas van Kempen
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:44:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy][modernize-use-starts-ends-with] Add support f
nikic wrote:
TBH I am wondering if we should revert this rename. I don't think it's a good
idea to reuse getDeclaration with substantially different semantics, and if
we're not reusing it, then there's not much point to rename...
Instead of having getOrInsertDeclaration + getDeclaration with a
jurahul wrote:
That’s a possibility. I was trying to keep the naming consistent with
similar functions in the Module class. But if folks feel its too much
churn and are ok with the inconsistent naming convention, I am fine with
reverting it and going with the naming scheme proposed above.
On Fr
https://github.com/mylai-mtk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mylai-mtk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mylai-mtk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111661
>From 0cc12aa82111ead067485c0e846313563e516e6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming-Yi Lai
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:03:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][RISCV] Emit RISCV function-signature-based CFI label
in
https://github.com/mylai-mtk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
luxufan wrote:
> @luxufan I think we may need changes on the LLVM side before we can make
> progress here -- either to clarify what `unnamed_addr` is intended to mean,
> or perhaps to split it into separate attributes for cloning and merging.
>
> But before we go down that path, this PR doesn'
jplehr wrote:
Would there be any reason to put entries for different offloading languages
into distinctly named “sub entries”?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
Implementation seems fine, but this is still missing a release note (in
`clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`, probably somewhere in the ‘Potentially Breaking
Changes’ section).
CC @AaronBallman @cor3ntin Do we want to make this a warning that defaults to
an err
AaronBallman wrote:
Thanks for the details! I'd say let's hold off on adding these matchers; if you
have a check that needs them, then you could look through clang-tidy to see if
other checks have also added a local matcher for the same thing, and if there's
two or more matchers needing it, th
Author: Mikhail Goncharov
Date: 2024-10-11T14:01:58+02:00
New Revision: 90627a5a190a99ae2991d524580d866484aaba16
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90627a5a190a99ae2991d524580d866484aaba16
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90627a5a190a99ae2991d524580d866484aaba16.d
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -636,6 +636,9 @@ AST Matchers
- Fixed a crash when traverse l
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1737,9 +1737,17 @@ void NamedDecl::printNestedNameSpecifier(raw
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -141,10 +143
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/10
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM with some minor co
vient wrote:
#79 is merged now
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110496
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tarunprabhu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110132
>From 8564770eaa5636abe9a3624619937b0235df0e37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tarun Prabhu
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:32:08 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][flang][mlir] Support -frecord-command-line option
Ad
https://github.com/ichaer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96804
>From 4c6b2fb52dcfe2ca5ace822ecaf6d0e8ac60f0d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Iuri Chaer
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:33:05 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang-format] Introduce "ReflowComments: IndentOnly" to
re-inde
https://github.com/ichaer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96804
>From 4c6b2fb52dcfe2ca5ace822ecaf6d0e8ac60f0d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Iuri Chaer
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:33:05 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang-format] Introduce "ReflowComments: IndentOnly" to
re-inde
https://github.com/whisperity updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
>From 4415aaf903635d11cce7afc232e1768ad32e8592 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Whisperity
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 17:30:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] feat(clang-tidy): Make `P + BS / sizeof(*P)` opt-outable
---
@@ -2186,6 +2197,45 @@
AddOrdinaryNameResults(SemaCodeCompletion::ParserCompletionContext CCC,
} else {
Results.AddResult(Result("template",
CodeCompletionResult::RK_Keyword));
}
+
+ if (SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20 &&
+ SemaRef.getLangO
cor3ntin wrote:
> CC @AaronBallman @cor3ntin Do we want to make this a warning that defaults
> to an error instead? Imo it’s probably fine as-is because I don’t imagine too
> many people would write code that abuses us not diagnosing this...
It looks fine to me as is.
Code that would do some
https://github.com/bricknerb edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5335,6 +5335,217 @@ static void handlePreferredTypeAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL) {
D->addAttr(::new (S.Context) PreferredTypeAttr(S.Context, AL, ParmTSI));
}
+// This function is called only if function call is not inside template body.
+// TODO: Add call
@@ -289,3 +289,13 @@ namespace PR8168 {
static void foo() {} // expected-error{{'static' member function 'foo'
overrides a virtual function}}
};
}
+
+namespace T13 {
+ struct A {
+virtual const int *f() const; // expected-note{{overridden virtual
function is here}}
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovichtec edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang,compiler-rt` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/5059
Here is the
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-11T11:46:33+02:00
New Revision: 80c15c48d1fbb53478c9400e598abcbdcae0d962
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80c15c48d1fbb53478c9400e598abcbdcae0d962
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80c15c48d1fbb53478c9400e598abcbdcae0d962.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111968
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/16bit-ykiko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107982
>From fedea9e4fd57b618fe341e0c30982bff0f098c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ykiko
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] add co_return, co_await, co_yield, consteval,
constinit, conc
wzssyqa wrote:
>
> Yes, but also with an integer please
Clang can convert integer to float, so it won't be a failure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
tbaederr wrote:
Add it as a succcessful test then to check that the `EvaluateFloat` calls don't
fail
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111846
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
; in the special case when those intrinsics are being generated by the
CodeGenPrepare;
-; pass during translations with optimization (note -O3 in llc arguments).
+; pass during
@@ -2186,6 +2197,45 @@
AddOrdinaryNameResults(SemaCodeCompletion::ParserCompletionContext CCC,
} else {
Results.AddResult(Result("template",
CodeCompletionResult::RK_Keyword));
}
+
+ if (SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20 &&
+ SemaRef.getLangO
jmorse wrote:
Undid the format-changes in this PR. For context: I've been building profiles
of all DenseMap allocations across a build of the CTMark suite to find
DenseMaps that a) are frequently used and b) usually have a small number of
elements, making them good candidates for initial stack
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang,compiler-rt` at step
5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/2416
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-s390x-linux-multistage` running on `systemz-1` while building
`clang-tools-extra` at step 11 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/98/builds/486
Here is the relevant
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
; in the special case when those intrinsics are being generated by the
CodeGenPrepare;
-; pass during translations with optimization (note -O3 in llc arguments).
+; pass during
pitrou wrote:
Judging by the list of notifications at the bottom of this PR, this does seem
to have hit a number of projects (including [our
own](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/44372)).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67766
___
cfe-
JonPsson1 wrote:
Patch updated to pass an extension attribute for each retval/parameter, per
your suggestion.
There may possibly be cases of NoExt (struct-in-reg) that also need to be
handled, but I will wait with that until I have a test case.
Does this seem ok (for now at least), or would y
https://github.com/jmorse updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111836
>From d2b935e3a537e065b00f543a1792d1979ba413d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Morse
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:17:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [NFC] Replace more DenseMaps with SmallDenseMaps
These DenseM
AaronBallman wrote:
> > LGTM, please keep an eye out for fallout in the wild though. It may be
> > interesting to see how many instances of `-Wno-deprecated-literal-operator`
> > exist now and do a search again before release to see how many new
> > instances show up.
>
> Thats a good idea! I
AaronBallman wrote:
Pre-commit CI failures appear to be unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -15314,6 +15314,32 @@ bool FloatExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr
*E) {
Result = RHS;
return true;
}
+
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_fmaximum_num:
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_fmaximum_numf:
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_fmaximum_numl:
+ case Builtin::B
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-10-11T07:21:16-07:00
New Revision: 2d133aaaeb97df62a92de80dae48f6bd8859a9e3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d133aaaeb97df62a92de80dae48f6bd8859a9e3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d133aaaeb97df62a92de80dae48f6bd8859a9e3.diff
LO
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
>From c08b0a8d34107dc4563c434485ba5f326ab8df93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:28:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Clang: Support minimumnum and maximumnum intrinsics
We just in
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-10-11T07:21:17-07:00
New Revision: bae17a2682c8fcc58c1b7248427b153dba7cb39b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bae17a2682c8fcc58c1b7248427b153dba7cb39b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bae17a2682c8fcc58c1b7248427b153dba7cb39b.diff
LO
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > I've checked #111992 and it does fix the problem, so let's land it?
>
> Yes, I would like to create a test case to don't regress this feature in
> future. I need to reduce libc++ `functional` header to something smaller.
Right, definitely +1 to adding a test case. I de
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/06
>From 4326796699c6c28859c9445965443fdac4626864 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:20:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [flang] Add frontend support for OpenMP extension
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/06
>From e778fad3eafcd78924efd7aa233ac7ba9f4e6a49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:20:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [flang] Add frontend support for OpenMP extension
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/06
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/06
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jthackray deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/serge-sans-paille updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111434
>From df4552469da6186141520b68da65c894ff8966a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: serge-sans-paille
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:30:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Warn about memset/memcpy to NonTriviall
wzssyqa wrote:
> Can you add a test that passes a non-float value and checks that it's
> rejected?
Do you mean something like this?
```
$ cat xx.c
#include
float f(char *a, char *b) {
return fminimum_num(a, b);
}
$ ./bin/clang -std=c23 -O2 -S -emit-llvm xx.c
xx.c:4:22: error: passin
tbaederr wrote:
It's not your fault
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
labath wrote:
> (btw, @labath is the alignment miscalculation still causing issues for you
> internally? or did you find a workaround?)
The fire has been extinguished by #110648, but it's not ideal that any
structure with a [[no_unique_address]] is treated as packed. It's not causing
any issu
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang,compiler-rt` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/6657
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-runtime-cuda-clang`
running on `as-builder-7` while building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 7
"build-clang-default".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/7/builds/5643
Here is the relev
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building
`clang,compiler-rt` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/6456
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-fuzzer` running on `sanitizer-buildbot12` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/7979
Here is the relevant pie
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-11T11:36:55+02:00
New Revision: 42ec740d0347a89b656c9be5ac4a7e4d8bcd30d5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/42ec740d0347a89b656c9be5ac4a7e4d8bcd30d5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/42ec740d0347a89b656c9be5ac4a7e4d8bcd30d5.diff
L
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-10-11T11:58:14+02:00
New Revision: f74f568b29885c3fa63c44e33f91f3bb7281138e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f74f568b29885c3fa63c44e33f91f3bb7281138e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f74f568b29885c3fa63c44e33f91f3bb7281138e.diff
L
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111975
Use explicit target and stop restricting hosts it can run on.
>From d3ec46ab6c4d4d5d740336a9c81c24ed8dc70680 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:38:02 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
Use explicit target and stop restricting hosts it can run on.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111975.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/Driver/hipstdpar.c (+6-1
arsenm wrote:
* **#111976** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/111976?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/>
* **#111975** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111975
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MarkMurrayARM wrote:
Hi - is this being worked on? We are still seeing build failures that look like
```
-- ABI list file not generated for configuration
aarch64-none-elf.libcxxabi.v2.unstable.exceptions.nonew, `check-cxx-abilist`
will not be available.
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
CM
@@ -2829,6 +2829,56 @@ void
CodeGenModule::CreateFunctionTypeMetadataForIcall(const FunctionDecl *FD,
F->addTypeMetadata(0, llvm::ConstantAsMetadata::get(CrossDsoTypeId));
}
+uint32_t
+CodeGenModule::calcRISCVZicfilpFuncSigLabel(const FunctionType &FT,
+
AlexVlx wrote:
> > InstCombine's primary function is a canonicalization pass. You shouldn't be
> > modifying it for specifically SPIRV optimizations (with the exception of
> > SPIRV intrinsic support). SPIRV specific transforms belong in later backend
> > IR passes
>
> Does it mean, that the
mylai-mtk wrote:
Update:
* Rebase to `main`
* Address comments: Expand the scope of this PR to allow testing
* Address other comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License
wzssyqa wrote:
> Add it as a succcessful test then to check that the `EvaluateFloat` calls
> don't fail
done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
arsenm wrote:
> Does it mean, that the reasoning behind this very PR is not legit?
No. This is providing the generic property in the datalayout used by
InstCombine and others as a hint of what to do without directly knowing what
the target is
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110695
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
>From c08b0a8d34107dc4563c434485ba5f326ab8df93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:28:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Clang: Support minimumnum and maximumnum intrinsics
We just in
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
; in the special case when those intrinsics are being generated by the
CodeGenPrepare;
-; pass during translations with optimization (note -O3 in llc arguments).
+; pass during
https://github.com/abhina-sree updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111723
>From c1676e48a587e10ba54c28e99192fd5e6a36f72e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhina Sreeskantharajan
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 13:23:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SystemZ][z/OS] Add new openFileForReadBinary f
201 - 300 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
