llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-fuzzer` running on `sanitizer-buildbot11` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/8046
Here is the relevant pie
@@ -463,10 +463,11 @@ void HIP::constructGenerateObjFileFromHIPFatBinary(
Objf << ObjBuffer;
- ArgStringList McArgs{"-triple", Args.MakeArgString(HostTriple.normalize()),
+ ArgStringList McArgs{"-target", Args.MakeArgString(HostTriple.normalize()),
@@ -463,10 +463,11 @@ void HIP::constructGenerateObjFileFromHIPFatBinary(
Objf << ObjBuffer;
- ArgStringList McArgs{"-triple", Args.MakeArgString(HostTriple.normalize()),
+ ArgStringList McArgs{"-target", Args.MakeArgString(HostTriple.normalize()),
Moon6688 wrote:
> intrin.h checks for x86_64. But the "x86_64" define is also defined for
> ARM64EC, and we don't support all the intrinsics in ARM64EC mode. Fix the
> preprocessor checks to handle this correctly. (If we actually need some of
> these intrinsics in ARM64EC mode, we can revisit
Author: Matt Arsenault
Date: 2024-10-12T06:42:31+04:00
New Revision: 1ac6ef5af28b72e534496a9833a2b75a2aba66cc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1ac6ef5af28b72e534496a9833a2b75a2aba66cc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1ac6ef5af28b72e534496a9833a2b75a2aba66cc.diff
https://github.com/arsenm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112032
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -372,6 +372,31 @@ void foo(double *d, float f, float *fp, long double *l,
int *i, const char *c) {
// HAS_MAYTRAP: declare float @llvm.experimental.constrained.minnum.f32(
// HAS_MAYTRAP: declare x86_fp80 @llvm.experimental.constrained.minnum.f80(
+ fmaximum_num(*d,*d);
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/06
>From e778fad3eafcd78924efd7aa233ac7ba9f4e6a49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:20:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [flang] Add frontend support for OpenMP extension
@@ -478,3 +478,166 @@ A a{.f1 = {1}};
// CHECK-NEXT: `-DeclRefExpr {{.+}} 'int' NonTypeTemplateParm
{{.+}} 'N' 'int'
} // namespace GH83368
+
+namespace GH60777 {
+
+template constexpr bool True() { return true; }
+
+template
+ requires(sizeof(T) == 4)
+struct A {
+
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112081
Fixes #111854
>From 67c41612085489a2a17eec49f98dbfa0e5bb97cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:27:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] fix range calculation for conditionals w
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oleksandr T. (a-tarasyuk)
Changes
Fixes #111854
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112081.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+1)
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp (+3)
- (
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
>From c08b0a8d34107dc4563c434485ba5f326ab8df93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:28:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Clang: Support minimumnum and maximumnum intrinsics
We just
@@ -1109,12 +1109,50 @@ bool Sema::EnsureTemplateArgumentListConstraints(
return false;
}
-bool Sema::CheckInstantiatedFunctionTemplateConstraints(
+static bool CheckFunctionConstraintsWithoutInstantiation(
+Sema &SemaRef, SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
+Functi
@@ -1109,12 +1109,50 @@ bool Sema::EnsureTemplateArgumentListConstraints(
return false;
}
-bool Sema::CheckInstantiatedFunctionTemplateConstraints(
+static bool CheckFunctionConstraintsWithoutInstantiation(
+Sema &SemaRef, SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
+Functi
Michael137 wrote:
ping
(btw, @labath is the alignment miscalculation still causing issues for you
internally? or did you find a workaround?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97443
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111846
From a9e1790691e01892f7e1b17523cd43421445f3ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 16:28:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] PointerSubChecker sh
NagyDonat wrote:
> > The change LGTM, I think we can merge it.
>
> I guess the testcase pointer-sub.c have to be fixed to work on the windows
> buildbot, also. Right?
Right, thanks for catching my mistake!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111846
__
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111968.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp (+70-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ExprConstShared.h (+8)
- (
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111968
None
>From ad01583c5a32d9d3d19d1a0bb459a503c1bccecc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:34:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Implement __builtin_ass
https://github.com/16bit-ykiko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107982
>From fedea9e4fd57b618fe341e0c30982bff0f098c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ykiko
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] add co_return, co_await, co_yield, consteval,
constinit, conc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
This fixes the error message generated.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111956.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+5)
- (modified) clang/lib/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Daniel Kiss (DanielKristofKiss)
Changes
On Windows there is no platform support for ifunc but we could lower them to
global function pointers.
This also enables FMV for Windows with Clang and Compiler-rt.
Depends on #111961 and
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Daniel Kiss (DanielKristofKiss)
Changes
On Windows there is no platform support for ifunc but we could lower them to
global function pointers.
This also enables FMV for Windows with Clang and Compiler-rt.
Depends on #111961 and #111960
-
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111962
On Windows there is no platform support for ifunc but we could lower them to
global function pointers.
This also enables FMV for Windows with Clang and Compiler-rt.
Depends on #111961 and #111960
>Fr
@@ -141,6 +141,22 @@ enum NodeType : unsigned {
VALL_NONZERO,
VANY_NONZERO,
+ // Floating point approximate reciprocal operation
+ FRECIPE_S,
SixWeining wrote:
They are not the same. The iocsrrd_* instructions have same operand type `GPR`
but frecipe_*
https://github.com/16bit-ykiko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107982
>From fedea9e4fd57b618fe341e0c30982bff0f098c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ykiko
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] add co_return, co_await, co_yield, consteval,
constinit, conc
Author: Dmitry Polukhin
Date: 2024-10-11T08:23:35+01:00
New Revision: 65780f4d8e34461e6bd3baf2ff77496f97874b94
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65780f4d8e34461e6bd3baf2ff77496f97874b94
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65780f4d8e34461e6bd3baf2ff77496f97874b94.dif
https://github.com/dmpolukhin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111662
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-11T09:31:49+02:00
New Revision: ff04bb8f4064274aedcb6e916079132ab6042a10
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff04bb8f4064274aedcb6e916079132ab6042a10
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff04bb8f4064274aedcb6e916079132ab6042a10.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111956
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111959
Seems like passing the quantities directly seems to work fine.
>From b76af9501358a60b7aaa62c5710dab6c65168bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:33:13 +0200
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Seems like passing the quantities directly seems to work fine.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111959.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp (+5-8)
`
https://github.com/lenary approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-10-11T11:17:44+03:00
New Revision: 8bb12ca28f7f195aa483fdb5921681ec373564ab
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8bb12ca28f7f195aa483fdb5921681ec373564ab
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8bb12ca28f7f195aa483fdb5921681ec373564ab.
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111846
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
The change LGTM, I think we can merge it.
My only nitpick was that I tweaked the PR title to make it a bit more accurate.
(Feel free to tweak it further / discuss this if you disagree with my choice.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
@@ -2265,6 +2318,12 @@
AddOrdinaryNameResults(SemaCodeCompletion::ParserCompletionContext CCC,
Results.AddResult(Result("template", CodeCompletionResult::RK_Keyword));
}
+if (SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20 &&
+(CCC == SemaCodeCompletion::PCC_Template
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
karka228 wrote:
> The change LGTM, I think we can merge it.
I guess the testcase pointer-sub.c have to be fixed to work on the windows
buildbot, also. Right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111846
__
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111968
>From 1fa9d5d93ede0cb84d958d166a5cc725e542e7b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:34:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Implement __builtin_assume_al
https://github.com/sebastiankreutzer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sebastian Kreutzer
Date: 2024-10-11T11:23:34+02:00
New Revision: a4402039bffd788b9af82435fd5a2fb311fdc6e8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a4402039bffd788b9af82435fd5a2fb311fdc6e8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a4402039bffd788b9af82435fd5a2fb311fdc6e8.
https://github.com/jplehr closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@sebastiankreutzer Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR)
merged into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem wit
ivanradanov wrote:
@jdoerfert Could you have a quick look at the clang-side change if that is
acceptable?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/06
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
@@ -1103,6 +1105,13 @@ bool ConstructDecompositionT::applyClause(
return applyToOutermost(node);
}
+template
+bool ConstructDecompositionT::applyClause(
+const tomp::clause::OmpxBareT &clause,
+const ClauseTy *node) {
+ return applyToAll(node);
iva
hanickadot wrote:
I'm struggling to make sensible API with composition. When I tried that all
`const|static|dynamic|reinterpret|schema_cast` weren't consistent with rest of
std library.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/inbelic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111010
>From 70089645ec5cf62b491a56df96ec46f4328fbc11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Finn Plummer
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:43:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [HLSL] Implement `WaveReadLaneAt` intrinsic
- create a
https://github.com/fsfod updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108276
>From fff6064a63ddf85857ea5036333866317a156ffc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Fransham
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 02:22:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [Clang] Add explicit visibility symbol macros and update
CM
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@ namespace usage_invalid {
namespace usage_ok {
struct IntRef { int *target; };
+ const int *defaultparam(const int &def1 [[clang::lifetimebound]] = 0); //
#def1
int &refparam(int ¶m [[clang::lifetimebound]]);
int &classparam(IntRef param [[clang::l
https://github.com/zygoloid commented:
Thanks, this seems reasonable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112047
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zygoloid edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112047
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -532,6 +533,11 @@ static void
visitLocalsRetainedByReferenceBinding(IndirectLocalPath &Path,
}
} while (Init != Old);
+ if (auto *DAE = dyn_cast(Init)) {
+Path.push_back({IndirectLocalPathEntry::DefaultArg, DAE, DAE->getParam()});
+Init = DAE->getExpr();
+
https://github.com/inbelic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111010
>From 70089645ec5cf62b491a56df96ec46f4328fbc11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Finn Plummer
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:43:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [HLSL] Implement `WaveReadLaneAt` intrinsic
- create a
https://github.com/zygoloid commented:
Please can you also add tests for the case where the default argument is a
pointer, eg:
```c++
using T = int[];
int *f([[clang::lifetimebound]] int *p = T{1, 2, 3});
int *p = f();
```
I expect that won't be caught, and you'll need to make a similar change t
https://github.com/JOE1994 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -15314,6 +15314,32 @@ bool FloatExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr
*E) {
Result = RHS;
wzssyqa wrote:
I guess it was due to that the `APFloat::minnum` claims that it fellow
`IEEE-754 2019 minimumNumber semantics`.
and `fmin` needs to follow t
https://github.com/wzssyqa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110897
>From 9f3cac44dde7d0adcf6cd090c0b91f57cb1c4dca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:18:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Enable `InferAddressSpaces` for SPIR-V.
---
.../amdgpu-kernel-
https://github.com/sunfishcode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112049
>From 92eccc19f25177edf44c2c37f92381bcca7ff661 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Gohman
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:31:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WebAssembly] Enable nontrapping-fptoint and bulk-memory
b
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110897
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx commented:
> Move to separate change, not sure this is necessarily valid for spirv
I think that I'd prefer to keep this around, definitely for AMDGCNSPIRV where
we know it is both correct and empirically beneficial. For vanilla SPIR-V I'll
defer to folks on that si
https://github.com/sunfishcode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035
>From b8f33cd68d11759ad774e16b4d25491a1c9fc3e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Gohman
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:30:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WebAssembly] Define a new "Trail1" CPU
First, define some
Author: Youngsuk Kim
Date: 2024-10-11T20:09:24-04:00
New Revision: 6d4edf2f75f7ec09420f18f7806f480f5b090b40
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6d4edf2f75f7ec09420f18f7806f480f5b090b40
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6d4edf2f75f7ec09420f18f7806f480f5b090b40.diff
Author: Nicolas van Kempen
Date: 2024-10-11T21:00:38-04:00
New Revision: f1367a473d9682a058c7f8c397ed2a787d071826
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f1367a473d9682a058c7f8c397ed2a787d071826
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f1367a473d9682a058c7f8c397ed2a787d071826.
https://github.com/nicovank closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ unsigned char _InterlockedCompareExchange128_rel(__int64
volatile *_Destination,
__int64 *_ComparandResult);
#endif
-#ifdef __x86_64__
+#ifdef __x86_64__ && !defined(__arm64ec__)
FreddyLeaf wr
jurahul wrote:
Btw, the findDeclaration was a temporary state and the plan is to switch to
getDeclaration eventually. The findDeclaration was for staging the rename.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 2:55 PM Rahul Joshi ***@***.***> wrote:
> That’s a possibility. I was trying to keep the naming consisten
https://github.com/higher-performance updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112047
>From 33da8c34977110619fa9ec2e9c9e830c993ce31a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: higher-performance
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:09:13 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Make [[clang::lifetimebound]] work for expressio
@@ -141,6 +141,22 @@ enum NodeType : unsigned {
VALL_NONZERO,
VANY_NONZERO,
+ // Floating point approximate reciprocal operation
+ FRECIPE_S,
tangaac wrote:
The code has been updated.
Only `FRECIPE` and `FRSQRTE` are left.
https://github.com/llvm/llv
@@ -141,6 +141,22 @@ enum NodeType : unsigned {
VALL_NONZERO,
VANY_NONZERO,
+ // Floating point approximate reciprocal operation
+ FRECIPE_S,
wangleiat wrote:
> They are not the same. The iocsrrd_* instructions have same operand type
> `GPR` but frecip
@@ -5800,8 +5800,10 @@ Not all targets support this attribute. ELF target
support depends on both the
linker and runtime linker, and is available in at least lld 4.0 and later,
binutils 2.20.1 and later, glibc v2.11.1 and later, and FreeBSD 9.1 and later.
Mach-O targets suppor
https://github.com/16bit-ykiko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107982
>From fedea9e4fd57b618fe341e0c30982bff0f098c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ykiko
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] add co_return, co_await, co_yield, consteval,
constinit, conc
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mdtoguchi wrote:
Hello - any additional feedback on this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107493
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zygoloid wrote:
> I expect that won't be caught, and you'll need to make a similar change to
> `visitLocalsRetainedByInitializer` to handle it.
Actually, maybe the best thing would be to change `visitFunctionCallArguments`
to step over `CXXDefaultArgExpr` in `Args`. That should cover both case
https://github.com/tahonermann updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111389
>From 3c4a2b8a52d3f1c730df88a308dece21a67834ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Honermann
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:10:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [SYCL] The sycl_kernel_entry_point attribute.
The `sycl_
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111798
>From 259282836aa24e59b94dba0572faa2180520028d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:31:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver][AVR] Reject c/c++ compilation for avr1 devices
avr-gcc als
benshi001 wrote:
> Thanks for getting to this I had forgotten I raised that issue.
>
> You should move your commit's message into the PR description, as the PR
> description is what's used for the final commit when we merge this.
Thanks. I have update my PR description according to my commit m
@@ -400,6 +400,14 @@ void AVRToolChain::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs(const ArgList
&DriverArgs,
void AVRToolChain::addClangTargetOptions(
const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs, llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args,
Action::OffloadKind DeviceOffloadKind) const {
+ // Reject C
@@ -400,6 +400,14 @@ void AVRToolChain::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs(const ArgList
&DriverArgs,
void AVRToolChain::addClangTargetOptions(
const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs, llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args,
Action::OffloadKind DeviceOffloadKind) const {
+ // Reject C
@@ -400,6 +400,14 @@ void AVRToolChain::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs(const ArgList
&DriverArgs,
void AVRToolChain::addClangTargetOptions(
const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs, llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args,
Action::OffloadKind DeviceOffloadKind) const {
+ // Reject C
@@ -400,6 +400,14 @@ void AVRToolChain::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs(const ArgList
&DriverArgs,
void AVRToolChain::addClangTargetOptions(
const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs, llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args,
Action::OffloadKind DeviceOffloadKind) const {
+ // Reject C
https://github.com/benshi001 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111798
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111798
>From c50c44044546fd9d67dab56b1f88b2e83557656f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:31:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Driver][AVR] Reject c/c++ compilation for avr1
devices
avr
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64-aix` running
on `aix-ppc64` while building `clang,llvm` at step 3 "clean-build-dir".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/64/builds/1190
Here is the relevant piece of the build
benshi001 wrote:
> ```
> �_bk;t=1728546187607�Failed Tests (1):
> �_bk;t=1728546187607� Clang :: Driver/hip-partial-link.hip
> ```
>
> And the CI test failure is this, the reporting is not great because we run
> check- targets one after another. This test was already failing on main.
>
> If i
MaxEW707 wrote:
I put a PR with a fix, https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112066.
This should probably go into 19.1.2 but I am familiar with that process.
If someone with more experience in the project can give guidance there that
would be appreciated :).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaxEW707 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112066
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87717.
>From 52e2175eb672fa9a97f9c1480a3cfb727b7c3dce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: MaxEW707
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:01:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix extra to
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Max Winkler (MaxEW707)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87717.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112066.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Headers
Author: Iuri Chaer
Date: 2024-10-11T19:14:09-07:00
New Revision: 0fba8381d2a71ff440fdf0ae30d59a0bf07fea75
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0fba8381d2a71ff440fdf0ae30d59a0bf07fea75
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0fba8381d2a71ff440fdf0ae30d59a0bf07fea75.diff
LO
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@ichaer Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build,
https://github.com/hanickadot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861
From e1c8d5e689fe8d3d0338eb64220aaf6371aed48a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Hana=20Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:05:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang & libcxx] constexpr point
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/11565
Here is th
wzssyqa wrote:
I cannot reproduce the fail of `Driver/hip-partial-link.hip`. Any idea about it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/8563
Here
tbaederr wrote:
> > Can you add a test that passes a non-float value and checks that it's
> > rejected?
>
> Do you mean something like this?
>
> ```
> $ cat xx.c
> #include
>
> float f(char *a, char *b) {
> return fminimum_num(a, b);
> }
> $ ./bin/clang -std=c23 -O2 -S -emit-llvm xx
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64le-clang-test-suite` while
building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/4912
1 - 100 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
