@@ -1704,6 +1704,20 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
return true;
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_cross: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
+ return true;
+if (CheckVectorElementCallA
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,6 +23,67 @@ namespace llvm {
class LLVMContext;
class raw_ostream;
class DILocation;
+ class Function;
+
+#if ENABLE_DEBUGLOC_COVERAGE_TRACKING
+ // Used to represent different "kinds" of DebugLoc, expressing that a
DebugLoc
+ // is either ordinary, containing
VyacheslavLevytskyy wrote:
@asudarsa Can you please have a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109415
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -487,14 +490,15 @@ def Main():
if bugs_metadata == "DILocation":
try:
+origin = bug["origin"]
action = bug["action"]
bb_name = bug["bb-name"]
@@ -115,6 +138,23 @@ namespace llvm {
DebugLocKind getKind() const { return Loc.Kind; }
#endif
+#if ENABLE_DEBUGLOC_ORIGIN_TRACKING
+#if !ENABLE_DEBUGLOC_COVERAGE_TRACKING
+#error Cannot enable DebugLoc origin-tracking without coverage-tracking!
+#endif
SL
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs < %s | \
+; RUN: FileCheck %s
+
+target triple = "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+define dso_local void @foo(i64 %t) local_unnamed
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
//
// FIXME: Path handling should work on all platforms.
// REQUIRES: system-linux
+// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.*}}-zos{{.*}}
abhina-sree wrote:
Would this work instead? I think this testcase won't work for all non-linux
targets
// REQUIRES:
jrtc27 wrote:
Same comments as -global
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108942
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64-unknown-elf -verify-machineinstrs < %s \
jrtc27 wrote:
This was previously linux-gnu not elf. If it works fine with
@@ -23,3 +26,9 @@ void bar(int x) {
// AARCH64: [[ATTR1]] = !{i32 1, !"stack-protector-guard", !"sysreg"}
// AARCH64: [[ATTR2]] = !{i32 1, !"stack-protector-guard-reg", !"sp_el0"}
// AARCH64: [[ATTR3]] = !{i32 1, !"stack-protector-guard-offset", i32 1024}
+
+// RISCV: !llvm.mod
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64-unknown-elf -verify-machineinstrs < %s \
keith-packard wrote:
I kinda wondered -- the existing tests are all over t
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64-unknown-elf -verify-machineinstrs < %s \
+; RUN: | FileCheck %s
+
+define void @foo(i64 %t) sspstrong {
keith-pa
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64-unknown-elf -verify-machineinstrs < %s \
+; RUN: | FileCheck %s
+
+define void @foo(i64 %t) sspstrong {
jrtc27 w
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++20 %s
+
+namespace GH49093 {
+ class B {
+ public:
+static int a() { return 0; } // expected-note {{member is declared here}}
+decltype(a< 0 >(0)) test;// expected-error {{member 'a' used before
its
Sirraide wrote:
I can’t help w/ AST matchers either unfortunately.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109147
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,1572 @@
+//=== SemaFunctionEffects.cpp - Sema handling of function effects
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: A
@@ -253,6 +253,122 @@ static bool printSymbolizedStackTrace(StringRef Argv0,
void **StackTrace,
return true;
}
+#if ENABLE_DEBUGLOC_ORIGIN_TRACKING
+void sys::symbolizeAddresses(AddressSet &Addresses,
+ SymbolizedAddressMap &SymbolizedAddresses)
zygoloid wrote:
@fsfod Can you update the first comment to describe the overall purpose of this
change? That seems pretty central to understanding whether we want this, and if
so, whether this looks like the right set of annotations.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109702
___
https://github.com/RamaMalladiAWS approved this pull request.
Looks good @peterwaller-arm .
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109263
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
https://github.com/ddpagan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109726
OpenMP features table: updated scope directive status from 'worked on' to
'done' in section OpenMP 5.1 Implementation Details.
>From 1827e1189aaaf2dc3945a744e249ea77b4acc6c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: David Pagan (ddpagan)
Changes
OpenMP features table: updated scope directive status from 'worked on' to
'done' in section OpenMP 5.1 Implementation Details.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109726.diff
1 Files Af
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library -emit-llvm
-disable-llvm-passes -o - %s | FileCheck %s --enable-var-scope
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void {{.*}}arr_assign1
+// CHECK: [[Arr:%.*]] = alloca [2 x i32], align 4
+// CHECK: [[Arr2:%.*]] = allo
https://github.com/mdtoguchi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107493
>From 411203429a789330f044d6d7b2c0216cf21d816b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael D Toguchi
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:39:42 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Driver][SYCL] Add initial SYCL offload compilation
s
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
Also, add to Release notes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
@@ -152,22 +152,93 @@ static bool hasLiveDefs(const MachineInstr &MI, const
TargetRegisterInfo *TRI) {
return false;
}
-void BPFMIPreEmitChecking::processAtomicInsts() {
+bool BPFMIPreEmitChecking::processAtomicInsts() {
+ if (!MF->getSubtarget().getHasJmp32()) {
+// O
@@ -35,6 +35,15 @@ static const char *BTFKindStr[] = {
#include "llvm/DebugInfo/BTF/BTF.def"
};
+static const DIType *tryRemoveAtomicType(const DIType *Ty) {
yonghong-song wrote:
Yes. It is necessary. completeType intends to find the *next* type id. For
exa
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+if(EXISTS ${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen AND CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
+ add_subdirectory(${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen llvm/lib/CodeGen)
+endif()
RossComputerGuy wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what you're meaning.
https://git
compnerd wrote:
> @compnerd @etcwilde WDYT about conditionalizing the new dependency with an
> `if (TARGET vt_gen)` instead of doing the `add_subdirectory()` dance?
Ugh, I misread the change as `include_directories`. The `add_subdirectory` is
definitely odd and I'm not sure if that is a proper
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: David Pagan (ddpagan)
Changes
Release notes: added 'omp scope' directive to "OpenMP Support" section of
"What's New in Clang"
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109752.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/doc
https://github.com/ddpagan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109752
Release notes: added 'omp scope' directive to "OpenMP Support" section of
"What's New in Clang"
>From 6ded6531f20d4f2a8eee5e0263d2ff87da17e8d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Pagan
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 2
RossComputerGuy wrote:
> The `add_subdirectory` is definitely odd and I'm not sure if that is a proper
> solution.
I'm not familiar with how LLVM CodeGen works and I am a bit new to LLVM but I
looked at
[`clang/CMakeLists.txt`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d61b2590f8e360695a52983
Author: David Pagan
Date: 2024-09-23T19:59:28-07:00
New Revision: 9b5a3036adbd9eed0f377cdf06aa622b917a1699
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9b5a3036adbd9eed0f377cdf06aa622b917a1699
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9b5a3036adbd9eed0f377cdf06aa622b917a1699.diff
L
ddpagan wrote:
Thanks, Alexey. I'll do that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ddpagan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -766,8 +766,19 @@ static void EmitAtomicOp(CodeGenFunction &CGF, AtomicExpr
*Expr, Address Dest,
// LLVM atomic instructions always have synch scope. If clang atomic
// expression has no scope operand, use default LLVM synch scope.
if (!ScopeModel) {
+llvm::SyncSc
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+; RUN: opt -S -dxil-intrinsic-expansion < %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=CHECK
farzonl wrote:
My point still stands why do you need two runs?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109180
___
https://github.com/torshepherd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95712
>From 2c9e7c16524b7ce3bf818e451279722dc45d3efc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tor Shepherd
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 23:12:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] just defaults
---
clang-tools-extra/clangd/Config.h
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+if(EXISTS ${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen AND CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
+ add_subdirectory(${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen llvm/lib/CodeGen)
+endif()
compnerd wrote:
The issue is that the `vt_gen` target is undefined. This is _
https://github.com/compnerd edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -152,22 +152,93 @@ static bool hasLiveDefs(const MachineInstr &MI, const
TargetRegisterInfo *TRI) {
return false;
}
-void BPFMIPreEmitChecking::processAtomicInsts() {
+bool BPFMIPreEmitChecking::processAtomicInsts() {
+ if (!MF->getSubtarget().getHasJmp32()) {
+// O
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+; RUN: llc -march=bpfel -mcpu=v3 -filetype=asm -o - %s | FileCheck
-check-prefixes=CHECK %s
+; RUN: llc -march=bpfeb -mcpu=v3 -filetype=asm -o - %s | FileCheck
-check-prefixes=CHECK %s
+;
+; Source:
+; #include
+; struct gstruct_t {
+; _Atomic int a;
yonghong-song wrote:
> @yonghong-song, note: if all three commits remain a part of a single pull
> request, the are required to be squashed
> ([link](https://llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html)). If you want all three to be
> separate, each has to have it's separate pull request (one branch forked from
alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource wrote:
> Also, it needs a release note I think for the matcher change.
Added.
> I have no problem with the code here, but don't know enough about ASTMatchers
> to be able to review this for 'well justified'. Do we have someone besides
> Aaron who does?
FWIW this
https://github.com/mylai-mtk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109080
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109753
>From 99a3e850f943393f18405d98601a08a91065d710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:37:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Allow placement-new in std fu
mylai-mtk wrote:
@MaskRay Sure, I also agree that `!cfi_type` is a too general name and covers
too little possibility for its name. I picked this approach instead of adding
RISC-V-specific metadata nodes just to avoid adding RISC-V specifics to the
conceptually backend-neutral LLVM IR. However
@@ -724,6 +724,9 @@ enum ASTRecordTypes {
/// Record code for vtables to emit.
VTABLES_TO_EMIT = 70,
+
+ /// Record code for the FunctionDecl to lambdas mapping.
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Let's add some simple comments here to explain why we want to do this.
ht
@@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ class ASTWriter : public ASTDeserializationListener,
/// instead of comparing the result of `getDeclID()` or `GetDeclRef()`.
llvm::SmallPtrSet PredefinedDecls;
+ /// Map that provides the ID of function to the vector of lambdas inside it.
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM with nits
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -532,6 +532,10 @@ class ASTReader
/// namespace as if it is not delayed.
DelayedNamespaceOffsetMapTy DelayedNamespaceOffsetMap;
+ /// Mapping from FunctionDecl IDs to the corresponding lambda IDs.
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Same here. Let's explain our intenti
https://github.com/torshepherd edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95712
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4351,6 +4351,15 @@ void
ASTReader::loadDeclUpdateRecords(PendingUpdateRecord &Record) {
reader::ASTDeclContextNameLookupTrait(*this, *Update.Mod));
DC->setHasExternalVisibleStorage(true);
}
+
+ // Load any pending lambdas for the function.
+ if (auto *FD
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-09-23T19:47:41-07:00
New Revision: 64e7cb266e54e689791ad499965ddb0f8a1a2262
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64e7cb266e54e689791ad499965ddb0f8a1a2262
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64e7cb266e54e689791ad499965ddb0f8a1a2262.diff
L
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+if(EXISTS ${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen AND CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
+ add_subdirectory(${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen llvm/lib/CodeGen)
+endif()
RossComputerGuy wrote:
Ok, so the solution is to set `-DLLVM_DIR` which is do
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
I think we'll need to watch out for performance regressions... in most cases,
we can probably zero-pad cheaply, but there might be cases where it isn't
cheap, or cases where it should be cheap but the LLVM backend can't figure i
tbaederr wrote:
Endianness is very well possible indeed, but it's a little weird this starts
failing now, since the shifts done aren't vector specific.
Are you testing this on a solaris host?
When you say stage2-build, you mean you're building clang main with your system
compiler (this is stag
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+if(EXISTS ${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen AND CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
+ add_subdirectory(${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen llvm/lib/CodeGen)
+endif()
compnerd wrote:
No, `LLVM_DIR` is passed to the CMake configure step to locat
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+if(EXISTS ${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen AND CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
+ add_subdirectory(${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen llvm/lib/CodeGen)
+endif()
RossComputerGuy wrote:
Looks like CMake accepted that change, let's see if it
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109147
From d369d26aad940299eb98ff0c322614043144c558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:56:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+if(EXISTS ${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen AND CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
+ add_subdirectory(${LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR}/include/llvm/CodeGen llvm/lib/CodeGen)
+endif()
compnerd wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/cmake/mod
https://github.com/compnerd edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
401 - 463 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
