https://github.com/sayhaan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100282
>From 8824746a8fe2390a6cb35075f2595f0a6c9586f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 11:37:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Rebase: [Facebook] Add clang driver options to test debug
info
https://github.com/andykaylor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99723
>From 869385fd8d7738b041149d88d5f427b5039c5921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:07:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Driver] Clean up fp-contract handling in clang driver
This
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
ef8de68faebee0226b4836e66574f225f724e768...cbcf4b3fb0ccad7eea5c1672b90a564e707028f6
cross
chrisnc wrote:
@AaronBallman yes, that would be great! I'm just a contributor, not a
collaborator.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-01` while building
`clang-tools-extra` at step 12 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/898
Here is the relevant
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100204
>From 4cbbf9ee2c5afaa3818c10ab6f2645353da94a8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:55:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [PAC] Define __builtin_ptrauth_type_discriminator
The bui
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple
%itanium_abi_triple -verify %s -DN=1
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple
%itanium_abi_triple -verify %s -DN=2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple
%i
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple
%itanium_abi_triple -verify %s -DN=1
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple
%itanium_abi_triple -verify %s -DN=2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple
%i
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct D3 : B {
#endif
#if __cplusplus >= 202302L
-namespace cwg2561 { // cwg2561: no tentatively ready 2024-03-18
+namespace cwg2561 { // cwg2561: no ready 2024-06-25
MitalAshok wrote:
It doesn't really make sense to put a date for someth
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
>From 0dea95701ca4dfca9b7d0bd889003fc35aa3017e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:39:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [NFC] [Clang] Some core issues have changed status from
t
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
>From 0dea95701ca4dfca9b7d0bd889003fc35aa3017e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:39:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [NFC] [Clang] Some core issues have changed status from
t
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95112
>From e53dfbc9b2c6b7f30c1378731d7de284fa99d568 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 14:26:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang] Implement CWG2813
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -26,24 +27,38 @@ static cl::opt
NoF16Math("nvptx-no-f16-math", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("NVPTX Specific: Disable generation of f16 math ops."),
cl::init(false));
+static cl::opt
+NextSM("nvptx-next-sm", cl::Hidden,
+ cl::desc("NVPTX
https://github.com/yichi170 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yichi170 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/3219
Here
yichi170 wrote:
I don't have write access, so if the PR is ready, please help me land it!
If there is anything that I need to do, please let me know!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/shiltian commented:
I think LLVM generally doesn't follow the convention that `-a x` and `--abc=x`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100270
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
jhuber6 wrote:
> I think LLVM generally doesn't follow the convention that `-a x` and
> `--abc=x`?
`cl::opt` options are arbitrary, but this isn't about convention really, it's
for things like `-Xoffload-linker -Wl,-plugin-opt=blah` not being passed
correctly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// REQUIRES: system-windows
+
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+
+// RUN: %clang_cl /std:c++20 --precompile "%/t/Hello.cppm" "/Fo%/t/Hello.pcm"
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Oh, sorry. It turns to be my bad. We should check
hekota wrote:
Thanks @pow2clk !
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yichi170 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075
>From 60a8a36851bcb0e73228ec4941f1906d0e5b7ba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yichi170
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:15:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] replaced the usage of `asctime` with `std::put_time`
---
cl
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/402
@@ -5813,6 +5813,27 @@ static TypoCorrection TryTypoCorrectionForCall(Sema &S,
Expr *Fn,
return TypoCorrection();
}
+// [C++26][[expr.unary.op]/p4
+// A pointer to member is only formed when an explicit &
+// is used and its operand is a qualified-id not enclosed in parenth
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-07-23T21:57:21-07:00
New Revision: 6461e537815f7fa68cef06842505353cf5600e9c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6461e537815f7fa68cef06842505353cf5600e9c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6461e537815f7fa68cef06842505353cf5600e9c.diff
MaskRay wrote:
> Aren't hashes supposed to be deterministic ?
>
> Can we add a override for builds with asserts turned ON to favor determinism ?
>
> Could have an API to set the determinism flag ?
>
> This also has an effect on Build ID computation ?
Some hashes are supposed to be determinist
owenca wrote:
> Fixes #73584
Seems it's not fixed yet:
```
$ cat test.cpp
{
PyObjectPtr const readinto_method_obj{
PyObject_GetAttrString(input_stream, "readinto")};
}
$ clang-format test.cpp
{
PyObjectPtr const
readinto_method_obj{PyObject_GetAttrString(input_stream, "readi
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93140
>From 09bd1f04730f0accad7ce041b0121f716cc7a18d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gedare Bloom
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 22:21:59 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [clang-format] Improve BlockIndent at ColumnLimit
Fixes #557
https://github.com/vfdff created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100302
Follow PR96025, except expf, more FP math libcalls in libm should also be
supported.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/86635
>From c750234674531788ee26958954a5f9a6b59ea866 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Allen (vfdff)
Changes
Follow PR96025, except expf, more FP math libcalls in libm should also be
supported.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/86635
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/ll
goldsteinn wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yetingk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99849
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-07-24T08:09:06+02:00
New Revision: dbe308c000f3401cbf6bb55f2b8d606fe091dcfe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dbe308c000f3401cbf6bb55f2b8d606fe091dcfe
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dbe308c000f3401cbf6bb55f2b8d606fe091dcfe.diff
L
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100062
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -442,6 +442,46 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
CXXDefaultInitExprResultObjIsWrappedExprResultObj) {
&Env.getResultObjectLocation(*DefaultInit->getExpr()));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, ResultObjectLocationForInheritedCtorInitExpr) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
@@ -442,6 +442,46 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
CXXDefaultInitExprResultObjIsWrappedExprResultObj) {
&Env.getResultObjectLocation(*DefaultInit->getExpr()));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, ResultObjectLocationForInheritedCtorInitExpr) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
https://github.com/martinboehme requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99616
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -442,6 +442,46 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
CXXDefaultInitExprResultObjIsWrappedExprResultObj) {
&Env.getResultObjectLocation(*DefaultInit->getExpr()));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, ResultObjectLocationForInheritedCtorInitExpr) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
@@ -442,6 +442,46 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
CXXDefaultInitExprResultObjIsWrappedExprResultObj) {
&Env.getResultObjectLocation(*DefaultInit->getExpr()));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, ResultObjectLocationForInheritedCtorInitExpr) {
martinboehme wrote
@@ -442,6 +442,46 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
CXXDefaultInitExprResultObjIsWrappedExprResultObj) {
&Env.getResultObjectLocation(*DefaultInit->getExpr()));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, ResultObjectLocationForInheritedCtorInitExpr) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
@@ -442,6 +442,46 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
CXXDefaultInitExprResultObjIsWrappedExprResultObj) {
&Env.getResultObjectLocation(*DefaultInit->getExpr()));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, ResultObjectLocationForInheritedCtorInitExpr) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
cor3ntin wrote:
LGTM too!
Thanks for the fix :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yi-Chi Lee
Date: 2024-07-24T08:56:37+02:00
New Revision: fad17b43dbc09ac7e0a95535459845f72c2b739a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fad17b43dbc09ac7e0a95535459845f72c2b739a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fad17b43dbc09ac7e0a95535459845f72c2b739a.diff
LO
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@yichi170 Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a build
501 - 547 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
