https://github.com/PeterChou1 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96346
>From c267be670adf7aac050484dc1b243aa0eff60b5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:25:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] parse hlsl annotations on struct, add test
---
clang/lib/
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+struct MyBitFields {
+unsigned int field1 : 3; // 3 bits for field1
+unsigned int field2 : 4; // 4 bits for field2
+int field3 : 5;
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+
+// previously, this test would result in an error shown below on the line that
+// declares variable a in struct Eg9:
+// error: use of undeclared identifier
+// 'SV_Dispat
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -ast-dump -o
- %s | FileCheck %s
-// TODO: update once we handle annotations on struct fields
+// tests that
mstorsjo wrote:
> > Indeed, Clang doesn't provide int128_t for 32 bit targets, AFAIK.
>
> It looks like a little bit more complex. I checked with Standalone-i386 and
> AddressSanitizer-i386 targets. They do have int128_t for 32 bit targets as
> soon as clang itself built as 64-bit binary.
Tha
https://github.com/kparzysz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96811
There are chunks of code repeated in a number of functions. This patch moves
some of that code into individual functions.
>From 0eea7de1769025333eaa90bd5022eebafe22996d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof
@@ -1,11 +1,24 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -ast-dump -x hlsl -o
- %s | Filecheck %s
-// expected-no-diagnostics
struct MyBitFields {
-unsigned int field1
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
There are chunks of code repeated in a number of functions. This patch moves
some of that code into individual functions.
---
Patch is 75.04 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https:/
@@ -3010,6 +3010,28 @@ static bool FinishOpenMPLinearClause(OMPLinearClause
&Clause, DeclRefExpr *IV,
Expr *NumIterations, Sema &SemaRef,
Scope *S, DSAStackTy *Stack);
+static bool finishLinearClauses(S
@@ -7994,13 +8016,9 @@ void SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPDeclareVariantDirective(
FD->addAttr(NewAttr);
}
-StmtResult
-SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPParallelDirective(ArrayRef Clauses,
- Stmt *AStmt, SourceLocation StartLoc,
-
https://github.com/TIFitis closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80343
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96811
>From 0eea7de1769025333eaa90bd5022eebafe22996d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:15:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][OpenMP] Place some common code in functions
T
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3010,6 +3010,28 @@ static bool FinishOpenMPLinearClause(OMPLinearClause
&Clause, DeclRefExpr *IV,
Expr *NumIterations, Sema &SemaRef,
Scope *S, DSAStackTy *Stack);
+static bool finishLinearClauses(S
@@ -7994,13 +8016,9 @@ void SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPDeclareVariantDirective(
FD->addAttr(NewAttr);
}
-StmtResult
-SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPParallelDirective(ArrayRef Clauses,
- Stmt *AStmt, SourceLocation StartLoc,
-
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clangd-ubuntu-tsan`
running on `clangd-ubuntu-clang` while building `clang,llvm,mlir` at step 6
"test-build-clangd-clangd-index-server-clangd-indexer-check-clangd".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -ast-dump -o
- %s | FileCheck %s
-// TODO: update once we handle annotations on struct fields
+// tests that
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -ast-dump -o
- %s | FileCheck %s
-// TODO: update once we handle annotations on struct fields
+// tests that
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96779
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian approved this pull request.
Minor nit: Probably don't need to explicitly define a diagnostic group, since
it's only ever used for this diagnostic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96699
___
cfe-commits mailing l
@@ -284,3 +284,48 @@ Example Usage
Base* basePtr = &obj;
basePtr->virtualFunction(); // Allowed since obj is constructed in
device code
}
+
+SPIR-V Support on HIPAMD ToolChain
+==
+
+The HIPAMD ToolChain supports targetting
+`AMDG
@@ -1059,9 +1059,15 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
if (Guard.isValid()) {
// If we have a guard variable, check whether we've already performed
// these initializations. This happens for TLS initialization functions.
- ll
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
>From 7733243a7b9660ce2bcbd43f6219314fcd1e4a73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:20:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-doc] add short circuit in mapper
---
clang-tools-ext
@@ -1,11 +1,24 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -ast-dump -x hlsl -o
- %s | Filecheck %s
-// expected-no-diagnostics
struct MyBitFields {
-unsigned int field1
dpalermo wrote:
The above is an intermittent failure on the tsan buildbot
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/134) and can be ignored. The next
patch processed shows status is green.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80343
___
cfe-comm
@@ -284,3 +284,48 @@ Example Usage
Base* basePtr = &obj;
basePtr->virtualFunction(); // Allowed since obj is constructed in
device code
}
+
+SPIR-V Support on HIPAMD ToolChain
+==
+
+The HIPAMD ToolChain supports targetting
+`AMDG
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96346
>From c267be670adf7aac050484dc1b243aa0eff60b5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:25:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] parse hlsl annotations on struct, add test
---
clang/lib/
https://github.com/jhuber6 commented:
Looks fine in general, I'm not a huge fan of all the `isGPUProfTarget` things
we have around now, but I understand it's required to set up the visibility. I
wonder if we could factor that out into something more common.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
https://github.com/jtb20 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96814
This patch just fixes a few spelling mistakes in the above two files. (I
changed one British spelling to American -- analyse to analyze -- because the
latter spelling is used elsewhere in file, and it's probably be
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Julian Brown (jtb20)
Changes
This patch just fixes a few spelling mistakes in the above two files. (I
changed one British spelling to American -- analyse to analyze -- because the
latter spelling is used elsewhere in file, and it's probab
https://github.com/bob80905 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jtb20 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92731
>From 65db444a6faf8d246e286e04675f2b0a06909723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Brown
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 06:35:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.1 "assume" directive parsing support
This is a mini
PeterChou1 wrote:
> Seems like a tidy test is failing on windows ... can you try updating the
> branch once more?
I think its fixed now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
shiltian wrote:
> > don't you need more code in AST?
>
> Sorry, I don't quite understand the question! Could you elaborate a little
> please?
I was thinking maybe you need changes in AST related files, like
`ASTWriter.cpp`, but that might be not needed as this is adding a new directive.
http
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp -x c++ -std=c++11 -ast-print %s | FileCheck %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+extern int bar(int);
+
+int foo(int arg)
+{
+ #pragma omp assume no_openmp_routines
+ {
+auto fn = [](int x) { return bar(x); };
+// CHECK: auto fn = [
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96358
>From bb407e7c6de15d7ed2f0dd645ca2a469ee1f8a8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:57:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Revert "Revert "[clang-doc] Add --asset option to
clang-doc"
https://github.com/amykhuang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96578
>From 1b436900146e1a91efac95416077485571722517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amy Huang
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:55:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add __hlt intrinsic for Windows ARM.
---
clang/include/clang/
https://github.com/PeterChou1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pcc wrote:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/functions-generated-by-function-createwithdefaultattr-should-respect-target-features/79838
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96721
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2024-06-26T15:44:28-05:00
New Revision: eeb931641ae735faa25283ddb2465318302e864f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eeb931641ae735faa25283ddb2465318302e864f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eeb931641ae735faa25283ddb2465318302e864f.diff
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96811
>From 0eea7de1769025333eaa90bd5022eebafe22996d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:15:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][OpenMP] Place some common code in functions
T
dwblaikie wrote:
@cor3ntin ping on this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -185,10 +185,33 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
return getChar();
// Handle pointers and references.
fhahn wrote:
Added, thank you very much!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76612
@@ -185,10 +185,33 @@ llvm::MDNode *CodeGenTBAA::getTypeInfoHelper(const Type
*Ty) {
return getChar();
// Handle pointers and references.
- // TODO: Implement C++'s type "similarity" and consider dis-"similar"
- // pointers distinct.
- if (Ty->isPointerType() || Ty->
https://github.com/rjmccall commented:
Alright. LGTM, but let's ping @AaronBallman and @efriedma-quic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
cor3ntin wrote:
Please open an issue, I am in a WG21 meeting for the next week. Sorry about
that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-06-26T14:37:06-07:00
New Revision: 2f57df5826a6df8ad5549ed98aede0d60e01e08b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f57df5826a6df8ad5549ed98aede0d60e01e08b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f57df5826a6df8ad5549ed98aede0d60e01e08b.diff
L
https://github.com/hekota created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96823
Implements `export` keyword in HLSL.
There are two ways the `export` keyword can be used:
1. On individual function declarations
```
export void f() {}
```
2. On a group of function declaration:
```
export {
vo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Helena Kotas (hekota)
Changes
Implements `export` keyword in HLSL.
There are two ways the `export` keyword can be used:
1. On individual function declarations
```
export void f() {}
```
2. On a group of function declaration:
```
export {
@@ -1425,16 +1430,27 @@ MDNode *getPGOFuncNameMetadata(const Function &F) {
return F.getMetadata(getPGOFuncNameMetadataName());
}
-void createPGOFuncNameMetadata(Function &F, StringRef PGOFuncName) {
- // Only for internal linkage functions.
- if (PGOFuncName == F.getName(
@@ -103,27 +112,226 @@ static cl::opt
ICPDUMPAFTER("icp-dumpafter", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Dump IR after transformation happens"));
+// Indirect call promotion pass will fall back to function-based comparison if
+// vtable-count / function-
@@ -322,14 +796,133 @@ bool
IndirectCallPromoter::processFunction(ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI) {
if (!NumCandidates ||
(PSI && PSI->hasProfileSummary() && !PSI->isHotCount(TotalCount)))
continue;
+
auto PromotionCandidates = getPromotionCandidatesForCallSite
@@ -103,27 +112,226 @@ static cl::opt
ICPDUMPAFTER("icp-dumpafter", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Dump IR after transformation happens"));
+// Indirect call promotion pass will fall back to function-based comparison if
+// vtable-count / function-
@@ -103,27 +112,226 @@ static cl::opt
ICPDUMPAFTER("icp-dumpafter", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Dump IR after transformation happens"));
+// Indirect call promotion pass will fall back to function-based comparison if
+// vtable-count / function-
@@ -140,14 +348,56 @@ class IndirectCallPromoter {
// indirect callee with functions. Returns true if there are IR
// transformations and false otherwise.
bool tryToPromoteWithFuncCmp(
- CallBase &CB, const std::vector &Candidates,
- uint64_t TotalCount, ArrayRe
@@ -322,14 +796,133 @@ bool
IndirectCallPromoter::processFunction(ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI) {
if (!NumCandidates ||
(PSI && PSI->hasProfileSummary() && !PSI->isHotCount(TotalCount)))
continue;
+
auto PromotionCandidates = getPromotionCandidatesForCallSite
@@ -277,35 +626,160 @@ CallBase &llvm::pgo::promoteIndirectCall(CallBase &CB,
Function *DirectCallee,
// Promote indirect-call to conditional direct-call for one callsite.
bool IndirectCallPromoter::tryToPromoteWithFuncCmp(
-CallBase &CB, const std::vector &Candidates,
-
@@ -103,27 +112,226 @@ static cl::opt
ICPDUMPAFTER("icp-dumpafter", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Dump IR after transformation happens"));
+// Indirect call promotion pass will fall back to function-based comparison if
+// vtable-count / function-
@@ -1425,16 +1430,27 @@ MDNode *getPGOFuncNameMetadata(const Function &F) {
return F.getMetadata(getPGOFuncNameMetadataName());
}
-void createPGOFuncNameMetadata(Function &F, StringRef PGOFuncName) {
- // Only for internal linkage functions.
- if (PGOFuncName == F.getName(
@@ -103,27 +112,226 @@ static cl::opt
ICPDUMPAFTER("icp-dumpafter", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Dump IR after transformation happens"));
+// Indirect call promotion pass will fall back to function-based comparison if
+// vtable-count / function-
@@ -322,14 +796,133 @@ bool
IndirectCallPromoter::processFunction(ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI) {
if (!NumCandidates ||
(PSI && PSI->hasProfileSummary() && !PSI->isHotCount(TotalCount)))
continue;
+
auto PromotionCandidates = getPromotionCandidatesForCallSite
@@ -322,14 +796,133 @@ bool
IndirectCallPromoter::processFunction(ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI) {
if (!NumCandidates ||
(PSI && PSI->hasProfileSummary() && !PSI->isHotCount(TotalCount)))
continue;
+
auto PromotionCandidates = getPromotionCandidatesForCallSite
@@ -277,35 +626,160 @@ CallBase &llvm::pgo::promoteIndirectCall(CallBase &CB,
Function *DirectCallee,
// Promote indirect-call to conditional direct-call for one callsite.
bool IndirectCallPromoter::tryToPromoteWithFuncCmp(
-CallBase &CB, const std::vector &Candidates,
-
https://github.com/minglotus-6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81442
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/minglotus-6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81442
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s
-verify
+
+// previously, this test would result in an error shown below on the line that
+// declares variable a in struct Eg9:
+// error: use of undeclared identifier
+// 'SV_Dispat
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96823
>From b67ecd20cc2c11f4f99c2d90c95fdbd988659947 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:31:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [HLSL] Implement `export` keyword
Fixes #92812
---
.../clang/
https://github.com/h-vetinari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93429
>From 8c1b899aa174b107fece1edbf99eaf261bdea516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:45:22 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [runtimes] [CMake] Use CMAKE_REQUIRED_
Author: antangelo
Date: 2024-06-26T18:54:41-04:00
New Revision: 5dcf3d5335a8bd936c89a4cdf1da909e6b995b6f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dcf3d5335a8bd936c89a4cdf1da909e6b995b6f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dcf3d5335a8bd936c89a4cdf1da909e6b995b6f.diff
LOG
https://github.com/antangelo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96803
>From 66b82f970e8914a920259dd12decd65fbb325356 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:58:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [libc] Remove atomic alignment diagnostics globally
Summary:
Thes
https://github.com/petrhosek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-06-26T18:12:46-05:00
New Revision: f23a5f08f4b8d7734cf11342b2c1a405823e899e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f23a5f08f4b8d7734cf11342b2c1a405823e899e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f23a5f08f4b8d7734cf11342b2c1a405823e899e.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/preames edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2002,6 +2003,76 @@ bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
return true;
}
+#elif defined(__linux__) && defined(__riscv)
+// struct riscv_hwprobe
+struct RISCVHwProbe {
+ int64_t Key;
+ uint64_t Value;
+};
+bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
@@ -2002,6 +2003,76 @@ bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
return true;
}
+#elif defined(__linux__) && defined(__riscv)
+// struct riscv_hwprobe
+struct RISCVHwProbe {
+ int64_t Key;
+ uint64_t Value;
+};
+bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
@@ -2002,6 +2003,76 @@ bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
return true;
}
+#elif defined(__linux__) && defined(__riscv)
+// struct riscv_hwprobe
+struct RISCVHwProbe {
+ int64_t Key;
+ uint64_t Value;
+};
+bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
@@ -83,8 +83,14 @@ void riscv::getRISCVTargetFeatures(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &Triple,
// and other features (ex. mirco architecture feature) from mcpu
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ)) {
StringRef CPU = A->getValue();
-if (CPU == "nat
https://github.com/preames approved this pull request.
LGTM w/minor comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2024-06-27T07:26:37+08:00
New Revision: 8f2d74affd8f4f182a2e9f05e86b494aad1b707c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f2d74affd8f4f182a2e9f05e86b494aad1b707c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f2d74affd8f4f182a2e9f05e86b494aad1b707c.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96779
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang,libc` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/756
Here is
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2024-06-27T07:27:58+08:00
New Revision: 4558e45e7e33d1cfc1a54af761085e358dbab64b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4558e45e7e33d1cfc1a54af761085e358dbab64b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4558e45e7e33d1cfc1a54af761085e358dbab64b.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96122
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MagentaTreehouse created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96831
Use range-based for loops. In addition, extracted a loop from
`CXXRecordDecl::completeDefinition` to eliminate the `Done` flag, and only
construct `MyFinalOverriders` when `FinalOverriders` is null.
>F
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (MagentaTreehouse)
Changes
Use range-based for loops. In addition, extracted a loop from
`CXXRecordDecl::completeDefinition` to eliminate the `Done` flag, and only
construct `MyFinalOverriders` when `FinalOverriders` is null.
---
Fu
https://github.com/EthanLuisMcDonough updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76587
>From 530eb982b9770190377bb0bd09c5cb715f34d484 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ethan Luis McDonough
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:38:38 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/23] Add profiling functions to libomptarget
https://github.com/weiweichen created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96832
We noticed that `TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo` is giving up back empty
`opt->featureMap` for AArch64, which is probably related to [this
change](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a03d06a736fd8921c8f
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: weiwei chen (weiweichen)
Changes
We noticed that `TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo` is giving up back empty
`opt->featureMap` for AArch64, which is probably related to [this
change](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a03d06
https://github.com/weiweichen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96832
>From 37e0ff835b7ade8def6e141ae7a55d55380f887e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Weiwei Chen
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:28:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Bring initFeatureMap back to AArch64TargetInfo.
---
clang/
https://github.com/weiweichen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96832
>From 37e0ff835b7ade8def6e141ae7a55d55380f887e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Weiwei Chen
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:28:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Bring initFeatureMap back to AArch64TargetInfo.
---
clang/
weiweichen wrote:
@willghatch 👀
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96832
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
201 - 300 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
